New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Frankly, if I were you I'd give him a full refund - and then terminate his account, and never again accepted him as a customer.
Yes, it's obvious that he is trying to put you under pressure, and normally one should never give in to such despicable attempts, but (a) this is LET and if you want a good image here you refund even if you did nothing wrong, and (b) he's actually doing you a favour in disguise, because troublemaker cost effort ~ money and if they are asking to leave you should be happy, refund them, and never let them in again.
Whatever we tell you, you take it in a bad direction and we are seriously confused about what to do now, while there is no victimisation I have caused you, we still direct different criticisms here, we do what no company has done, we answer you all one by one, be sure that if there is a situation as you have stated, we will not help anyone before and in the current period, we will not answer all questions one by one as in the previous period, I ask you to approach a little logically.
Just @ me next time
What happens if my VPS is down for 72 hours and you do not respond
should I contact credit card customer service
I see you everywhere giving moral lessons.
It's not emotional at all.
I lost $30 and I think we can estimate that at least 40% of people won't get their money back.
Out of 930 orders, that's several thousand dollars.
Nothing emotional, just theft.
But it's good that you at least expressed your personal interest. At least we know where the bias comes from.
Mine was clear from the start.
You can contact us directly, if it is a problem caused by us, your refund will be provided, why should we cause you such a problem, this is direct victimisation, but I have not yet understood why you are saying this, no customer deserves to have such a problem.
You do not need to enter the process, your direct refund is provided, in such a situation, if we are giving you this problem, this is a big loss for the customer.
REFUND IS REQUESTED
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1666
The issue is, I do NOT trust you.
I don't quite understand what you mean, is there a victimisation or a problem we have caused you, you have such an approach, we offer a return guarantee when you have a problem, as we offer to every customer.
You (feel to) see this or that. Irrelevant for me.
Evidence?
Based on what?
So far you failed to show (with evidence) that a single customer was ripped off.
Interesting. Care to tell us how you know the number of orders?
Evidence?
BS! Not blindly following a private war != being biased.
It was indeed.
You see, if you showed tangible and credible evidence that @awmbilisim actually and really scammed people I'd be on your side - but you didn't.
I think I can present the evidence for him. You and @repuc shared an IP. So he’s at least close enough to have your WiFi password.
I did not tell you to get service or I did not give you the right service by getting to know you, we gave the service we gave to all our customers and you were satisfied and left good comments, why would there be such a bad situation out of the blue, we are a company that has been serving since 2018.
REFUND IS REQUESTED
I DO NOT TRUST YOU
I fear that you will close the shop in 4-6 months
FYI: That means absolutely nothing in Turkey, or generally outside us-american territory/jurisdiction.
@awmbilisim
The issue has been escalated
I used US based credit card, so it is covered
Just check with PAYTR
@awmbilisim
It seems evident to me that some LowEndTalk members do not really care about scammers or associates and accomplices of scammers as long as their servers are cheap and operational. And it's no wonder why scammers and other pump and dump hosts have no issues paying the fees as recouping is likely to be quick.
Thank you for your service. Your troubles have been doubled.
You're definitely the most annoying guy I've seen here. For sure.
You won, you're right I was wrong about everything. My apologies, sir.
I'm not a cop, I didn't conduct my investigation properly. I should have kept my mouth shut.
Now that's something tangible. Normally I'd ask for evidence but I trust you enough to just take your word.
That said, that does not necessarily mean a whole lot. It would e.g. not be uncommon for a company to run an open inhouse "courtesy" wifi network.
Who did you go to Dubai with on 13th of March, how long have you known Fatihhan Durukan for and is he a friend of yours?
He has a point.. if you accuse someone, people have a right to expect some evidence.
It’s a bit more of a deduction. He’s admin and has IP logs, and was interested in when they might have met up. That just seems like a perfect setup for an IP match.
It looks like you may have become offended by my comment. I assure you I meant to cause you no victimisation.
No one can provide evidence that we have done anything bad because we have not done anything bad here, even 1 $ of 1 person did not stay with us, and it does not stay, the customer uses what he received, you are constantly pulling the issues to different places and we have provided the right service, only one wrong person has received service from us and worked with us in the past, but we can express it like this, unfortunately we cannot see future events, if we could see it, we would take the right people and work with the same people until the end of the company, but unfortunately we cannot see it.
Not in a kangaroo court such as LET.
lmao
community need to find out when @awmbilisim and/or @repuc lied and then they will explain the lie.
@repuc you never refunded me like its written in your return policy. My bank has done the chargeback for me.
i still would like to see the evidence, not that i dont trust @jar but its like a finisher move in mortal kombat
I have no legally valid proof of this. I said so in my first message.
I have evidence that many lies were told by this provider. Evidence that cannot be posted here because it contains personal data.
Which were transferred to the moderators, who probably played a part in the removal of the tag.
In short, I think I've spent enough time explaining myself.
I've understood that you don't think I'm legitimate. And that's OK after all
I feel I've given enough of myself so that other people don't get ripped off.
It may not be enough, but we all have our limits.
If you don't agree, then you can fight to get the provider's tag back.
I agree to disagree