New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
@joelgm
This is a direct quote from dacentec. "You can request a block of ipv6 from support once you have your server, there is no charge for ipv6."
Depending on what server you got you could have gotten a free /29.
Thought you get a block /29 for free if you provide justification.
@joelgm I gave
RIPEARIN justification and they swapped my /30 out for a new /29.It's not immediately obvious from the initial order form. Even I had assumed 4 addresses would be usable in /30.
What is a good justification for ARIN ? They don't accept VPS hosting has justification. I would need the /29 for this kind of stuff and I have no other reason... Is there an other way ?
Nice speeds @sin . I'm not seeing speeds anywhere like that. My best speed as of right now was about 20 MB/s . I think i've seen it hit 30MB/s bu tnothing near 90-100MB/s
Yes, now from China Telecom to you is Level 3.
Only seeing 1.7MB/s to Australia, on 23.92.x.x
Avg Ping from Sydney, Aus is 400ms
Syd to LA is ~180ms,
Will do a traceroute this afternoon and see what path its taking
I was about to ask you for this! Thank you!
Seems to be MUCH better from sydney equinix DC
from China Unicom , seems switched to Telia today, the GTT has bad ping performance in the last 7 days
The addition of Level 3 is good for China Mobile. In the past, it is CM-L3-GTT. Now goes L3 directly.
In my memory... I remember that CU's connection quality to L3 is not good, may get higher latency than GTT.
Great offer @dacentec, I could not be happier.
@FredQc - Is a 3107.7 unixbench about right for a dual L5420?
The single x3440 seems to do a little better??
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: ****************** OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab108.2 -- #1 SMP Tue May 12 18:07:50 MSK 2015 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5067.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 08:32:24 up 4 days, 3:29, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.09; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue May 19 2015 08:32:24 - 09:00:57 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28570327.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3500.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3029.4 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 682952.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 186064.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1670375.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1465061.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 85990.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12422.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5739.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2708.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1876478.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28570327.9 2448.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3500.4 636.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 3029.4 704.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 682952.8 1724.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 186064.9 1124.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1670375.7 2880.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1465061.6 1177.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 85990.1 215.0 Process Creation 126.0 12422.1 985.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5739.6 1353.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2708.1 4513.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1876478.7 1251.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1227.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue May 19 2015 09:00:57 - 09:29:44 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 117829661.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 21283.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 22322.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 627729.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 164395.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1917644.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5751768.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 939052.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 55074.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 25607.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3428.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 8188676.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 117829661.6 10096.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 21283.5 3869.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 22322.6 5191.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 627729.6 1585.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 164395.3 993.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1917644.1 3306.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5751768.8 4623.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 939052.3 2347.6 Process Creation 126.0 55074.4 4371.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 25607.8 6039.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3428.5 5714.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 8188676.4 5459.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3812.8Yes.
Edit. I have done the same test without the crappy HDDs copy test and got 4756.3 Dual L5520 gave me 9468.2 :P
Maybe you should add to the wiki that the kvm wont recognize a password like â÷ï1Àëæ[¤lú¡ÔäjÇúûa\é=»<Èð*m¾Êç÷. I realized this too late.
Serverbear benchmark for the Dual L5420 with CentOS 7 RAID1: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2015/05/27/whEPNr9yXQ12FCbH
Serverbear benchmark for the Opteron 1385 with CentOS 6 single disk: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2015/05/27/XnHTkKpMgiJWP8GV
I know they aren't 100% comparable due to the RAID difference but still gives a general picture. Too bad that X3440 doesn't come with 16GB of RAM.
Edit: Same Dual L5420 with CentOS 7 but RAID0: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2015/05/27/93GWMUtWxH8qglu9
I think it's better to use common characters as password in any case...
The site is down. Can't reply my ticket though.
LowEndDDoS™
Dacentec webpage has been up again for the last couple of hours. But it certainly is something they can have a look at (@dacentec): a way of communicating in these cases to their customers (Facebook, twitter, ...) ?
They probably don't want to let the attacker(s) know the details of what they're doing if you get what I mean.
Pretty sure the status page will disappear when they do get one, considering it only affects their website and not the clients.
@Dacentec
Can you look at the speed issues to Australia? Look at the network benchmarks to Sydney, 54k/s!
Maybe its taking a bad route or peering wrong?
we can look at the routes to AU.
We are working on a better long term for the website, that will probably require the DDoS filtering we are scrambling to get online.
no better way to test it than posting offers here.
I think MammothVPS should be taken out of the speed test, even within AU I rarely get more than 2MB/s to them and it's painfully slow from everywhere outside of AU. I've asked the guy at ServerBear to remove MammothVPS from the test script.
I don't think that's the issue here. @bohdans and I tested it a bit to different locations with different providers and there is some performance issue moving data to many Aussie networks from Dacentec right now.
Seems better than it was 2 days ago,
Some Traceroutes:
Sydney 1 - Network Presence
Sydney 2 - RansomIT
Optus Cable
Speedtests
Sydney 1 - Network Presence
2015-05-28 18:56:08 (1.31 MB/s) - 100mb saved [104857600/104857600]Sydney 2 - RansomIT
2015-05-28 18:57:48 (1.56 MB/s) - 100mb saved [104857600/104857600]Optus Cable
2015-05-28 18:59:32 (0.92 MB/s) - 100mb saved [104857600/104857600]@dacentec, Logged ticket #587661 with the above info.
Any ideas when more stock of the cheaper servers is here?