Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


WHMCS Pricing Changes - Page 6
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

WHMCS Pricing Changes

12346

Comments

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    No one likes a price increase and although I understand why people are complaining, it really has little to do with WHMCS being greedy or not.

    Ultimately, $40 /month for a license that does as much as it does is really not much. Anyone struggling to pay $40 /month probably shouldn't be in business at all.

    There are a few possible outcomes that I see happening:

    1.) WHMCS uses the money to improve their product, support, or both. This is a good thing and probably worth the extra $$$.

    2.) WHMCS does not improve at all, and this will spur on Blesta, ClientExec and other competitors to develop alternatives at a lower price. Competition is GOOD! It will encourage WHMCS to be 1 step ahead to make the premium worth paying for.

    3.) Worse case scenario is that WHMCS does not improve, they pocket all the profits, and Blesta/ClientExec still don't improve or become competitive and people STILL buy WHMCS. This is a possibility, but if there are no alternatives to WHMCS for the same or less money, then that probably means WHMCS is currently undervalued.

    Yes they may still be greedy, but every business wants to get paid as much as clients are willing to pay. In the absence of competition and viable alternatives, that number could be quite large. There are probably thousands of hosts that would pay hundreds of dollars for a WHMCS license since the only better alternatives cost much much more!

    I bought about 6 owned licenses and before they hiked up the prices for the updates, I bought another 5 years or so of updates so the price hikes have not really affected my company. Though I'm not happy about the price rise, it's not a crazy hike and it's not unaffordable and with the prospect of improvements and more competition, I am hopeful that there ill be some good to come out of it,.

    Thanked by 1mgilang
  • SnickertasticSnickertastic Member
    edited October 2016

    @jarland said:

    @Snickertastic said:
    If your new provider and on a budget it would dig a hole in your pocket pretty fast. If your smart I'd skip even looking at WHMCS there are better billing systems out there that are more affordable. They still haven't updated there backup system makes you wonder if they even use it?

    A provider on a budget under $40 is not a provider. It's like a kid playing house. Why is WHMCS responsible for your backups?

    I do think you misinterpreted what I had said earlier so I'm going to break this down for you.

    • I didn't mean that WHMCS is responsible for backups in any way.
    • I meant that they should have a better backup system with in the billing system itself it would be handy many other low cost solutions already give you that type of solution and it's secure unlike whmcs will they still offer up to email you mysql backup.
    • Granted if you have experience you can use third parties and such but I think about the new people that don't know how to code or do manual backups or create bash scripts do to such.

    Just because someone uses an affordable billing system doesn't always mean it's a kid some people out right want to focus most of their money towards the quality of the servers and less on the billing system. I know few big providers who don't use whmcs they actually use lower cost billing system and neither of them are owned by kids.

    Thanked by 1jar
  • I just did the switch from whmcs to Ubersmith. I find it much better and it'll be easier to scale :)

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    No idea if ubersmith is any good by $250 /month for 75 clients seems like a lot.

    $1,500 for 300 clients = $5 per client. Is it worth it? Doesnt seem at all competitive.

  • randvegeta said: No idea if ubersmith is any good by $250 /month for 75 clients seems like a lot.

    $1,500 for 300 clients = $5 per client. Is it worth it? Doesnt seem at all competitive.

    You need to compare what features you get more than whmcs as well. The company I work for won't even be able to use that because we have around 1000 active customers :L

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep

    Foul said: switch from whmcs to Ubersmith

    I know of several providers that are going the other way (from Ubersmith to WHMCS). Ubersmith gets really expensive when you start getting up there in size.

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    jarland said: A provider on a budget under $40 is not a provider

    I agree with this, but I would say that someone just starting out when comparing available products not fully understanding the in's and out's in detail because they have not used either of them is now more likely to chose the cheaper product more often than not.

    The net effect will be more revenue for people like blesta over the coming years which may result in them catching up to WHMCS given enough time, this in turn will create a more viable competitor which will drive both products forward faster.

    Its a good thing for the industry but I still don't really think it was necessary for WHMCS to do this, I dont think it will do them any favors in the long run.

    I think the fact that they keep referring to hosts with 1000 clients as large is a bit of a joke, I would have understood it more if they said under 1000 your price is going up to $25 p/month across the board, between 1000 and 3000 the price is going up to $50, 3000 to 5000 $75 p/month and 5000+ our price is going up to $150 p/month

  • This sector really needs good competition. I also do agree that $40/mo is not much money for a business. However this should not mean that a product can raise prices whenever it wants.

    This is a chance for Blesta and ClientExec. I suppose Hostbill is already way too expensive than all these.

  • However this should not mean that a product can raise prices whenever it wants.

    Why not? WHMCS can easily price themselves out of the market, no one is forced to use them.

  • @randvegeta said:
    No one likes a price increase and although I understand why people are complaining, it really has little to do with WHMCS being greedy or not.

    Ultimately, $40 /month for a license that does as much as it does is really not much. Anyone struggling to pay $40 /month probably shouldn't be in business at all.

    There are a few possible outcomes that I see happening:

    1.) WHMCS uses the money to improve their product, support, or both. This is a good thing and probably worth the extra $$$.

    2.) WHMCS does not improve at all, and this will spur on Blesta, ClientExec and other competitors to develop alternatives at a lower price. Competition is GOOD! It will encourage WHMCS to be 1 step ahead to make the premium worth paying for.

    3.) Worse case scenario is that WHMCS does not improve, they pocket all the profits, and Blesta/ClientExec still don't improve or become competitive and people STILL buy WHMCS. This is a possibility, but if there are no alternatives to WHMCS for the same or less money, then that probably means WHMCS is currently undervalued.

    Yes they may still be greedy, but every business wants to get paid as much as clients are willing to pay. In the absence of competition and viable alternatives, that number could be quite large. There are probably thousands of hosts that would pay hundreds of dollars for a WHMCS license since the only better alternatives cost much much more!

    I bought about 6 owned licenses and before they hiked up the prices for the updates, I bought another 5 years or so of updates so the price hikes have not really affected my company. Though I'm not happy about the price rise, it's not a crazy hike and it's not unaffordable and with the prospect of improvements and more competition, I am hopeful that there ill be some good to come out of it,.

    You are right,

    But it's not the whmcs business if you have +200 clients or +10000 clients !

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    x3host said: But it's not the whmcs business if you have +200 clients or +10000 clients !

    WHMCS do not agree, sadly.

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    @x3host said:

    @randvegeta said:
    No one likes a price increase and although I understand why people are complaining, it really has little to do with WHMCS being greedy or not.

    Ultimately, $40 /month for a license that does as much as it does is really not much. Anyone struggling to pay $40 /month probably shouldn't be in business at all.

    There are a few possible outcomes that I see happening:

    1.) WHMCS uses the money to improve their product, support, or both. This is a good thing and probably worth the extra $$$.

    2.) WHMCS does not improve at all, and this will spur on Blesta, ClientExec and other competitors to develop alternatives at a lower price. Competition is GOOD! It will encourage WHMCS to be 1 step ahead to make the premium worth paying for.

    3.) Worse case scenario is that WHMCS does not improve, they pocket all the profits, and Blesta/ClientExec still don't improve or become competitive and people STILL buy WHMCS. This is a possibility, but if there are no alternatives to WHMCS for the same or less money, then that probably means WHMCS is currently undervalued.

    Yes they may still be greedy, but every business wants to get paid as much as clients are willing to pay. In the absence of competition and viable alternatives, that number could be quite large. There are probably thousands of hosts that would pay hundreds of dollars for a WHMCS license since the only better alternatives cost much much more!

    I bought about 6 owned licenses and before they hiked up the prices for the updates, I bought another 5 years or so of updates so the price hikes have not really affected my company. Though I'm not happy about the price rise, it's not a crazy hike and it's not unaffordable and with the prospect of improvements and more competition, I am hopeful that there ill be some good to come out of it,.

    You are right,

    But it's not the whmcs business if you have +200 clients or +10000 clients !

    It actually is since they are selling a license and it is up to them how they charge and what limitations they impose.

    If you dont like it you dont have to use them. You are free to use an alternative like Blesta. Other software companies even make it easy to migrate.

    Are you also going to say that hosts dont have a right to increase their prices? Or change the limits / allowances for given package?

  • moonmartinmoonmartin Member
    edited October 2016

    @randvegeta said:

    Ultimately, $40 /month for a license that does as much as it does is really not much. Anyone struggling to pay $40 /month probably shouldn't be in business at all.

    That is a dumb argument. People with that many customers pay thousands of dollars a month consisting almost entirely of little fees like this. So yes they do make a cumulative difference because...math.

  • classy said: $1,500 for 300 clients = $5 per client.

    That pricing is incorrect, they're much cheaper than that.

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    @moonmartin said:

    @randvegeta said:

    Ultimately, $40 /month for a license that does as much as it does is really not much. Anyone struggling to pay $40 /month probably shouldn't be in business at all.

    That is a dumb argument. People with that many customers pay thousands of dollars a month consisting almost entirely of little fees like this. So yes they do make a cumulative difference because...math.

    Huh? Yes WHMCS will make alot more money if people are paying the higher fees. So?

    Is the fact that a 'company' that cannot afford $40 an argument FOR the price hike? No. But the fact that a company has the right to set their own prices IS, and is probably the only relevant reason.

    Company is selling a license and they have the right to charge whatever they want, in the same way you may choose whichever billing software you like. Does it make the price hike right? Maybe not, but is $40 /month alot? No. Depending on who you are, the license can be see as both cheap and expensive.

    Bugs aside, the software itself is worth much more than $40 /month. It is a bargain actually! The productivity benefits is far greater than CPanel for example, and yet no-one complains about the per server licensing model.

    For larger business, WHMCS is cheap. After all, it's barely more than $1 /day, and hardly worth an hours labour for most IT people. It's hard to see who would struggle to afford this. And the smallest companies are likely unaffected anyway.

    Their model makes sense from a business perspective. Keep the price for new-comers and small players low, which will encourage them to use the software in the first place. Then charge a proper rate for proper hosts, for those who can easily afford it.

    From a marketing perspective, it would probably look better for them to say.. monthly fee $40! 55% discount for small and startup companies with fewer than 250 clients. Something like that. Looks better than a tiered pricing structure.

  • WHTWHT Member

    Do you know whats next? There will be no more reseller licenses. Everyone should buy from whmcs.com. Am sure in some months it will come.

    Thanked by 1x3host
  • How is client number determined? And by whom?

    Thanked by 1Hxxx
  • That's above your pay grade.

    @allnetstore said:
    How is client number determined? And by whom?

  • @randvegeta said:

    @x3host said:

    @randvegeta said:
    No one likes a price increase and although I understand why people are complaining, it really has little to do with WHMCS being greedy or not.

    Ultimately, $40 /month for a license that does as much as it does is really not much. Anyone struggling to pay $40 /month probably shouldn't be in business at all.

    There are a few possible outcomes that I see happening:

    1.) WHMCS uses the money to improve their product, support, or both. This is a good thing and probably worth the extra $$$.

    2.) WHMCS does not improve at all, and this will spur on Blesta, ClientExec and other competitors to develop alternatives at a lower price. Competition is GOOD! It will encourage WHMCS to be 1 step ahead to make the premium worth paying for.

    3.) Worse case scenario is that WHMCS does not improve, they pocket all the profits, and Blesta/ClientExec still don't improve or become competitive and people STILL buy WHMCS. This is a possibility, but if there are no alternatives to WHMCS for the same or less money, then that probably means WHMCS is currently undervalued.

    Yes they may still be greedy, but every business wants to get paid as much as clients are willing to pay. In the absence of competition and viable alternatives, that number could be quite large. There are probably thousands of hosts that would pay hundreds of dollars for a WHMCS license since the only better alternatives cost much much more!

    I bought about 6 owned licenses and before they hiked up the prices for the updates, I bought another 5 years or so of updates so the price hikes have not really affected my company. Though I'm not happy about the price rise, it's not a crazy hike and it's not unaffordable and with the prospect of improvements and more competition, I am hopeful that there ill be some good to come out of it,.

    You are right,

    But it's not the whmcs business if you have +200 clients or +10000 clients !

    It actually is since they are selling a license and it is up to them how they charge and what limitations they impose.

    If you dont like it you dont have to use them. You are free to use an alternative like Blesta. Other software companies even make it easy to migrate.

    Are you also going to say that hosts dont have a right to increase their prices? Or change the limits / allowances for given package?

    Before whmcs there was a company called " moderbill " they did the same and after a while a new baby appeared called " whmcs " : )

  • @WHT said:
    Do you know whats next? There will be no more reseller licenses. Everyone should buy from whmcs.com. Am sure in some months it will come.

    Umm, what's wrong with that? They're removing summerhosts for us, we should be thanking them

    Thanked by 1leapswitch
  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    x3host said: Before whmcs there was a company called " moderbill " they did the same and after a while a new baby appeared called " whmcs " : )

    I had a Modernbill license. It was way more expensive than WHMCS and it was awful in my opinion. Their own price hikes turned out to be good for hosts since it gave rise to WHMCS and other billing systems.

    My hope is that the WHMCS price hike will spur on development and competition, and hence I am happy with what is happening!

    Thanked by 1x3host
  • I wonder if they're still offering the owned license or are they doing away with it.

  • ricardo said: Why not? WHMCS can easily price themselves out of the market, no one is forced to use them.

    This is not a proper market and I know it is not WHMCS's fault. I hope in the long term other products can respond to this price hike with decent moves and we see a better competition.

  • moonmartinmoonmartin Member
    edited October 2016

    @allnetstore said:
    How is client number determined? And by whom?

    From what I have read, it's any client with active products. People will probably have a lot of dormant client accounts with no active products. As far as I can tell, those don't count.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    Looks like the 'reseller' program got bumped some too but it doesn't look like they're tiering it... yet.

    Francisco

  • I'd like to support the colleagues from WHMCS. I'm sure that the saved resources will be invested in project development and eventually it will allow to increase clients' satisfaction. So it will be a win-win situation.

    Not merely attempting to drop a link to my billing software here, but I see some people in this thread interested in trying alternatives but no real mention BILLmanager. I would love to hear more feedback on the product from LET members as to whether or not this is something that could meet your needs here. I would also love to answer any questions about it’s features.

    GUI might look a trifle old school but I can also say that we have a professional UX team in our office who work hard on releasing a new high-end interface till the end of the year. It's a fact.

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider
    edited October 2016

    @beatpavel said:
    I'd like to support the colleagues from WHMCS. I'm sure that the saved resources will be invested in project development and eventually it will allow to increase clients' satisfaction. So it will be a win-win situation.

    Not merely attempting to drop a link to my billing software here, but I see some people in this thread interested in trying alternatives but no real mention BILLmanager. I would love to hear more feedback on the product from LET members as to whether or not this is something that could meet your needs here. I would also love to answer any questions about it’s features.

    GUI might look a trifle old school but I can also say that we have a professional UX team in our office who work hard on releasing a new high-end interface till the end of the year. It's a fact.

    Whmcs importer ,cpanel and solusvm modules?

    Edit, oh nvm it's ispsystems, so no external server or panel support I assume, yawn.

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    beatpavel said: GUI might look a trifle old school but I can also say that we have a professional UX team in our office who work hard on releasing a new high-end interface till the end of the year. It's a fact.

    Do people really demand beautiful UI? Simplicity is all I am after and if it an be customized to my own style/design easily then the default UI can be minimal.

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    beatpavel said: Not merely attempting to drop a link to my billing software here, but I see some people in this thread interested in trying alternatives but no real mention BILLmanager. I would love to hear more feedback on the product from LET members as to whether or not this is something that could meet your needs here. I would also love to answer any questions about it’s features.

    GUI might look a trifle old school but I can also say that we have a professional UX team in our office who work hard on releasing a new high-end interface till the end of the year. It's a fact.

    Hire my company and we'll re-design the whole GUI in a month or two...
    Holy damn can't get it why you guys take so long to release something that should already been done. I mean, you got a chance here.

  • @moonmartin said:

    @allnetstore said:
    How is client number determined? And by whom?

    From what I have read, it's any client with active products. People will probably have a lot of dormant client accounts with no active products. As far as I can tell, those don't count.

    So one must be careful about handing out free/promo stuff through WHMCS in future

Sign In or Register to comment.