Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › New Scalaway C2 Intel Avoton based dedicated server - Page 5
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

New Scalaway C2 Intel Avoton based dedicated server

12357

Comments

  • nfnnfn Veteran
    edited March 2016

    Just tested the php bench from this site http://www.php-benchmark-script.com/ and the results are these:

    scaleway c2s

    --------------------------------------
|        PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT        |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2016-03-09 22:32:25
Server : @
PHP version : 7.0.4-1~dotdeb+8.1
Platform : Linux
--------------------------------------
test_math                 : 0.828 sec.
test_stringmanipulation   : 1.221 sec.
test_loops                : 0.651 sec.
test_ifelse               : 0.493 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time:               : 3.193 sec.

    ovh ssd vps 2

    --------------------------------------
|        PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT        |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2016-03-09 22:32:08
Server : @
PHP version : 7.0.4
Platform : Linux
--------------------------------------
test_math                 : 0.351 sec.
test_stringmanipulation   : 0.513 sec.
test_loops                : 0.288 sec.
test_ifelse               : 0.184 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time:               : 1.336 sec.

    Can this have a visual impact in the daily performance o php website?

  • telephonetelephone Member

    @nfn said:

    >

    Can this have a visual impact in the daily performance o php website?

    It shouldn't. As long as you follow best practises and cache, the majority of bottlenecks won't be PHP related (unless the coding is atrocious).

    Thanked by 1yomero
  • globalRegistersglobalRegisters Member

    Are the C2 systems capable of virtualization.

    Can someone run this:
    grep 'vmx\|svm' /proc/cpuinfo

  • jvnadrjvnadr Member

    globalRegisters said: Are the C2 systems capable of virtualization.

    Yes, they are VT-x capable.

    Thanked by 2globalRegisters netomx
  • yomeroyomero Member
    edited March 2016

    jvnadr said: Yes, they are VT-x capable.

    Including the VPS ones? (2.99) (Thinking about nesting =P)

  • dragon1993dragon1993 Member

    @nfn said:
    Just tested the php bench from this site http://www.php-benchmark-script.com/ and the results are these:

    scaleway c2s

    --------------------------------------
|        PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT        |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2016-03-09 22:32:25
Server : @
PHP version : 7.0.4-1~dotdeb+8.1
Platform : Linux
--------------------------------------
test_math                 : 0.828 sec.
test_stringmanipulation   : 1.221 sec.
test_loops                : 0.651 sec.
test_ifelse               : 0.493 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time:               : 3.193 sec.

    ovh ssd vps 2

    --------------------------------------
|        PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT        |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2016-03-09 22:32:08
Server : @
PHP version : 7.0.4
Platform : Linux
--------------------------------------
test_math                 : 0.351 sec.
test_stringmanipulation   : 0.513 sec.
test_loops                : 0.288 sec.
test_ifelse               : 0.184 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time:               : 1.336 sec.

    Can this have a visual impact in the daily performance o php website?

    PHP benchmark single thread.
    Real world have more visitor (more thread)

    My question: storage local sata ssd or shitty ethernet network storage?

  • ValdVald Member

    @nfn said:
    Just tested the php bench from this site http://www.php-benchmark-script.com/ and the results are these:

    scaleway c2s

    --------------------------------------
|        PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT        |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2016-03-09 22:32:25
Server : @
PHP version : 7.0.4-1~dotdeb+8.1
Platform : Linux
--------------------------------------
test_math                 : 0.828 sec.
test_stringmanipulation   : 1.221 sec.
test_loops                : 0.651 sec.
test_ifelse               : 0.493 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time:               : 3.193 sec.

    ovh ssd vps 2

    --------------------------------------
|        PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT        |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2016-03-09 22:32:08
Server : @
PHP version : 7.0.4
Platform : Linux
--------------------------------------
test_math                 : 0.351 sec.
test_stringmanipulation   : 0.513 sec.
test_loops                : 0.288 sec.
test_ifelse               : 0.184 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time:               : 1.336 sec.

    Can this have a visual impact in the daily performance o php website?

    PHP is not multithreaded so you are just using one cpu core

  • deadbeefdeadbeef Member
    edited March 2016

    @Vald said:
    PHP is not multithreaded so you are just using one cpu core

    Both php-fpm and apache run multiple PHP processes, so you are definitely not using just a single core overall.

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    AlbaHost said: I have had problem with debian wheezy only that the ssh key was not working, otherwise in debian jessie or ubuntu etc was working fine.

    Hello,

    Dev tem fixed the issue today.

    I invite you to check in few hours.

    Regards,
    Scaleway Technician

    Thanked by 1netomx
  • nfnnfn Veteran

    @linuxthefish any ETA for Centos 6.5 and 7?

    Thanks

  • ZweiTigerZweiTiger Member
    edited March 2016

    @nfn said:
    linuxthefish any ETA for Centos 6.5 and 7?

    Thanks

    No ETA. They are working on centos more then 1 year. But seems they added many commit within the days to centos ISO as i see in github.

    And i think centos 7 will be there no 6.

    Also theese new avoton cpu-s support centos very well like the dedicated server line...

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    @nfn said:
    linuxthefish any ETA for Centos 6.5 and 7?

    Thanks

    No clue, try opening a ticket!

    On both the 32gb one and the 2GB VPS I can upload 832/484mbit via iperf to UK O.o

    Thanked by 2Backendbox netomx
  • ManofServerManofServer Member

    Wait, so Proxmox fails on the C2? But Qemu works?

  • allXunderallXunder Member

    Shame on me :( But I would definitely appreciate an invite. Thanks in advance!

  • ValdVald Member
    edited March 2016

    deadbeef said: Both php-fpm and apache run multiple PHP processes, so you are definitely not using just a single core overall.

    the benchmark does not use php-fpm nor apache

  • nfnnfn Veteran
    edited March 2016

    @Vald said: the benchmark does not use php-fpm nor apache

    Yes I used cli, but the results using nginx+fpm are the same.

  • dragon1993dragon1993 Member

    storage local sata ssd or shitty ethernet network storage?

  • AmitzAmitz Member

    LowEndReadingService, my name is Amitz. I have read the Scaleway website for you. It's local SSD. Please send me USD 7 as agreed via Paypal. Thank you.

    Thanked by 7gleert cassa iwaswrongonce jvnadr XIAOSpider97 MikePT netomx
  • ValdVald Member
    edited March 2016

    nfn said: Yes I used cli, but the results using nginx+fpm are the same.

    Hi nfn, i think you need to configure php-fpm and nginx for that, its not enabled by default, or you could just try pthreads (http://pthreads.org/)

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited March 2016

    Amitz said: local SSD

    Nope, not as simple as that. Only the 24 EUR dedi has a locally-attached 250GB SATA SSD, the rest are...

    https://www.scaleway.com/faq/server/volumes/

    The total bandwidth of your volumes is limited to 120MB/s by the network link.

    In case of the x86 based servers the limit is likely to be not 120 MB/sec, but about 300 MB/sec, since their network cards are 2500BaseX. However it's still network-based storage with all its downsides (such as higher CPU use and latencies compared to SATA).

    Thanked by 2Amitz vladka24
  • dragon2611dragon2611 Member

    The C2's have a faster link to the "Network" and I presume the SSD's than the C1's

  • ebonyebony Member

    i manged to get proxmox to work with containers but kvm is still being a pain, i used the donker boot

  • ZweiTigerZweiTiger Member
    edited March 2016

    Is there anybody who know how to get the 250GB Direct SSD on the C2L server?

    I type df -h , and i only see the 50gb disk.

    Where is the 250GB?

    Thanks!

    GOT IT...

  • gleertgleert Member, Host Rep

    @ZweiTiger where is the 250GB SSD and how do you make it the main drive?

  • info_hashinfo_hash Member

    dragon2611 said: The C2's have a faster link to the "Network" and I presume the SSD's than the C1's

    Is this sure? Is the network better in the C2's? Seems so from the speedtest I've seen, but could be because they are on a switch that's less busy? Or will it be like that long term?

  • ZweiTigerZweiTiger Member

    @gleert said:
    ZweiTiger where is the 250GB SSD and how do you make it the main drive?

    https://www.scaleway.com/docs/attach-and-detach-a-volume-to-an-existing-server/

    mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sda

    then

    mount /dev/sda /home

    then you could see:
    df -h

    Now if you copy something in the home directory it will be on the 250gb ssd.

    Thanked by 1gleert
  • DetruireDetruire Member

    rm_ said: The total bandwidth of your volumes is limited to 120MB/s by the network link.

    Is storage over a separate port, or would pushing 500Mb/s to the internet limit writes to <60MB/s?

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    Detruire said: Is storage over a separate port, or would pushing 500Mb/s to the internet limit writes to <60MB/s?

    It is not on a separate port on the C1 ARM, and on the new ones the NIC is 2500 Mbit so it won't bottleneck the Internet bandwidth at the same time with storage access.

  • ZweiTigerZweiTiger Member

    @rm_ said:
    In case of the x86 based servers the limit is likely to be not 120 MB/sec, but about 300 MB/sec, since their network cards are 2500BaseX. However it's still network-based storage with all its downsides (such as higher CPU use and latencies compared to SATA).

    lol. So if the hardware fail your data fail too. Am i understand correctly? Then.. your LSSD always could fail. And use software raid and etc.. very strange for me.

    Always make a daily backup.

  • boerndboernd Member

    It seems the C2L is not hard capped to 800mbit/s...

    Thanked by 2deadbeef Mathias
Sign In or Register to comment.