Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Highest Available Storage and RAM and the Cheapest Price! - Page 8
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Highest Available Storage and RAM and the Cheapest Price!

1234568»

Comments

  • @notgod said:
    look my Signature

    Your storage website doesn't work.

  • HbrHbr Member

    Yep! It does not. I've got an error here as well. :)

  • tommy said: WRITE: io=99568KB, aggrb=1659KB/s, minb=1659KB/s, maxb=1659KB/s, mint=60005msec, maxt=60005msec

    Do you have the IOPs line. Also which service is this?

  • zeitgeistzeitgeist Member
    edited October 2015

    @Nekki said:
    Doesn't sound that weird, unless you choose a Debian minimal template you usually get Apache, Bind, Samba and a bunch of other stuff you usually won't use.

    Well, yes, if there were minimal templates to choose from. I suppose that's one area where they could improve their services (less bloat is also good for them - fewer attack vectors, fewer resources).

  • @zeitgeist said:
    Well, yes, if there were minimal templates to choose from. I suppose that's one area where they could improve their services (less bloat is also good for them - fewer attack vectors, fewer resources).

    Or you could just follow their knowledgebase article: Make minimal OS

  • NekkiNekki Veteran
    edited October 2015

    @zeitgeist said:
    Well, yes, if there were minimal templates to choose from. I suppose that's one area where they could improve their services (less bloat is also good for them - fewer attack vectors, fewer resources).

    Every provider has a mix of minimal and regular templates, it's perfectly normal with OVZ. It's offered as a convenience to those that want them, so whilst removing them would 'improve' service for you, it would make it worse for others. Next time just pick the minimal template and be happy.

  • MarkTurner said: Do you have the IOPs line. Also which service is this?

    400 IOPS

    test: (g=0): rw=write, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
    ...
    test: (g=0): rw=write, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
    2.0.8
    Starting 15 processes
    test: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 102400MB)
    Jobs: 15 (f=15): [WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW] [100.0% done] [0K/1596K /s] [0 /399  iops] [eta 00m:00s]
    test: (groupid=0, jobs=15): err= 0: pid=1175
      write: io=97384KB, bw=1622.1KB/s, iops=405 , runt= 60005msec
        clat (usec): min=44 , max=122818 , avg=36962.45, stdev=12884.04
         lat (usec): min=44 , max=122818 , avg=36962.91, stdev=12884.19
        clat percentiles (usec):
         |  1.00th=[  668],  5.00th=[ 5728], 10.00th=[ 6048], 20.00th=[36096],
         | 30.00th=[38144], 40.00th=[39168], 50.00th=[39168], 60.00th=[40192],
         | 70.00th=[42240], 80.00th=[42752], 90.00th=[45312], 95.00th=[47872],
         | 99.00th=[67072], 99.50th=[78336], 99.90th=[89600], 99.95th=[95744],
         | 99.99th=[111104]
        bw (KB/s)  : min=   45, max=  378, per=6.65%, avg=107.83, stdev=24.91
        lat (usec) : 50=0.06%, 100=0.22%, 250=0.20%, 500=0.12%, 750=0.58%
        lat (usec) : 1000=0.40%
        lat (msec) : 2=0.23%, 4=2.53%, 10=6.94%, 20=0.04%, 50=84.67%
        lat (msec) : 100=3.96%, 250=0.05%
      cpu          : usr=0.02%, sys=0.10%, ctx=90458, majf=0, minf=372
      IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=0/w=24346/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
      WRITE: io=97384KB, aggrb=1622KB/s, minb=1622KB/s, maxb=1622KB/s, mint=60005msec, maxt=60005msec
    

    their lowest plan
    Storage Server - 0.5 TB (LEB edition)

  • zeitgeistzeitgeist Member
    edited October 2015

    telephone said: Or you could just follow their knowledgebase article: Make minimal OS

    Nekki said: Every provider has a mix of minimal and regular templates,

    Every provider? They don't. As @telephone posted above, they have an entry in their knowledge base with how to uninstall the bloat, afterwards. That's fine, but it would be just as efficient if not more to provide a minimal template.

    Like I said - I only briefly reviewed them and I liked them overall. Adding minimal templates is my suggestion to them for improving their services.

  • HbrHbr Member
    edited October 2015

    What speed are you usually getting uploading to @Time4vps?

    Here it is mostly 10MB/s to 15MB/s uploading from an OVH dedicate 500 Mbps connection.

    Sometimes I get 20MB/s, but it is not usual.

  • @zeitgeist My bad, didn't realise they were missing the minimal templates. You have my apologies, Sir.

  • @Hbr said:
    What speed are you usually getting uploading to Time4vps?

    I regularly get 15MB+ from OVH to time4vps and have had 40MB a few times since they upped the port speed.

    Thanked by 2vimalware Hbr
  • HbrHbr Member
    edited October 2015

    Right now it is doing only 2MB/s to no more than 4MB/s constantly.

  • Hbr said: Right now it is doing only 2MB/s to no more than 4MB/s constantly.

    Traceroute to/from the StorageVPS to your server

  • HbrHbr Member
    edited October 2015

    @MarkTurner said:
    Traceroute to/from the StorageVPS to your server

    1 xxx.xxx.8.xxx) 0.032 ms 0.013 ms 0.011 ms

    2 213.197.128.177 (213.197.128.177) 0.252 ms 0.231 ms 0.219 ms

    3 80.232.193.242 (80.232.193.242) 5.180 ms 5.169 ms 5.160 ms

    4 xe-0-2-0-300.stk30.ip4.gtt.net (77.67.82.85) 46.446 ms 46.369 ms 46.353 ms

    5 xe-10-2-0.par22.ip4.gtt.net (141.136.108.74) 50.649 ms 50.668 ms 50.659 ms

    6 online-gw.ip4.gtt.net (46.33.93.90) 45.590 ms 45.725 ms 45.882 ms

    7 195.154.1.252 (195.154.1.252) 46.279 ms 46.852 ms 46.906 ms

    8 195.154.1.131 (195.154.1.131) 45.409 ms 45.309 ms 45.232 ms

    9 xxx.20.xxx.xxx) 44.960 ms 44.952 ms 44.941 ms

    Right now it is doing 10MB/s. I believe it may vary from 5MB/s to 15MB/s mostly. OVH to Time4VPS.

  • Hbr said: Right now it is doing 10MB/s. I believe it may vary from 5MB/s to 15MB/s mostly. OVH to Time4VPS.

    Is that uploading or downloading from Time4VPS?

  • HbrHbr Member

    Uploading from OVH to Time4VPS. I didn't test download speed yet.

  • Hbr said: Here it is mostly 10MB/s to 15MB/s uploading from an OVH dedicate 500 Mbps connection.

    uploading to my time4vps :

    online.net 1-2 MB/s
    Linode (SG/4GB) : 3 MB/s
    dediserve (SG) : 3.5 MB/s

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Host Rep, Veteran

    My VPS at Time4VPS gets good Speed BTW. 25MB/s+ Always from Hetzner (DE).

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • hawkjohn7hawkjohn7 Member
    edited October 2015

    Anyone use ethernetserver ?
    I can't find reinstall OS feature on their storage over (vrtz.net)

  • TrafficTraffic Member
    edited October 2015

    @hawkjohn7 said:
    Anyone use ethernetserver ?
    I can't find reinstall OS feature on their storage over (vrtz.net)

    You have SolusVM access so yes, you can reinstall OS.

  • @Traffic said:
    You have SolusVM access so yes, you can reinstall OS.

    I don't receive any email about solusVM :/
    Could you give me link to solusvm?

  • @hawkjohn7 said:

    PMing you.

Sign In or Register to comment.