Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Cheap Dacentec offers (dedicated) - Page 12
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Cheap Dacentec offers (dedicated)

1…910121415…27

Comments

  • sinsin Member

    Well I would leave some network benches of my server but none of them finish and ssh is slow as hell today - I will try later.

  • UmairUmair Member

    @dacentec said:
    It looks like GTT fixed a problem with 216.126.192.0/21 being filtered this morning, that network should work normally now.

    Can you take a look at 216.126.195.X as well ?? I am getting awfully slow speed :(

    CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz Number of cores : 8 CPU frequency : 1200.000 MHz Total amount of ram : 7863 MB Total amount of swap : 7999 MB System uptime : 3:47, Download speed from CacheFly: 19.4MB/s Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 9.52MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 12.1MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.62MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.82MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 27.8KB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 6.04MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.05MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 8.62MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 6.1MB/s

  • UmairUmair Member

    Somethings is seriously wrong with path to NL.

    wget http://mirror.leaseweb.com/speedtest/100mb.bin
--2015-05-18 11:36:32--  http://mirror.leaseweb.com/speedtest/100mb.bin
Resolving mirror.leaseweb.com... 108.59.10.97, 2604:9a00:2010:a001:1:face:bad:c0de
Connecting to mirror.leaseweb.com|108.59.10.97|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.bin.1”

45% [=========================================>         ] 45,113,626  42.7K/s  eta 38m 43s
  • hotsnowhotsnow Veteran
    edited May 2015

    @Umair said:
    Somethings is seriously wrong with path to NL.

    it seems many US providers to mirror.leaseweb.com are all abnormal now, try again later :p

  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member

    From my Kimsufi server in Canada: no problem...

  • D3vilD3vil Member

    :o

  • RizRiz Member
    edited May 2015

    @D3vil seeing the same thing.

    root@mail:~# wget http://ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat
--2015-05-18 12:50:23--  http://ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat
Resolving ovh.net (ovh.net)... 213.186.33.6
Connecting to ovh.net (ovh.net)|213.186.33.6|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100Mio.dat.1'

 0% [                                       ] 226,988     1.21K/s  eta 3h 40m

    --2015-05-18 12:51:35--  http://speed.hetzner.de/100MB.bin
Resolving speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)... 88.198.222.222, 2a01:4f8:0:a140::2
Connecting to speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)|88.198.222.222|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100MB.iso.1'

 0% [                                       ] 213,578     30.4K/s  eta 54m 52s
  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member
    edited May 2015

    Connection to my server is also very slow, eg: SSH but I guess they are looking into it ...

  • evilghaleonevilghaleon Member

    Same speed problem here, and I'm on the 199.x.x.x block.

  • RizRiz Member
    edited May 2015

    The congestion seems to be with certain carrier(s). Here's a test to Ramnode ATL/NYC. Maybe all these new orders are using more traffic than expected?

    root@mail:~# wget http://lg.atl.ramnode.com/static/100MB.test
--2015-05-18 12:55:56--  http://lg.atl.ramnode.com/static/100MB.test
Resolving lg.atl.ramnode.com (lg.atl.ramnode.com)... 107.191.101.180
Connecting to lg.atl.ramnode.com (lg.atl.ramnode.com)|107.191.101.180|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100MB.test'

100%[======================================>] 100,000,000 63.6M/s   in 1.5s

2015-05-18 12:55:58 (63.6 MB/s) - `100MB.test' saved [100000000/100000000]

root@mail:~# wget http://lg.nyc.ramnode.com/static/100MB.test
--2015-05-18 12:56:09--  http://lg.nyc.ramnode.com/static/100MB.test
Resolving lg.nyc.ramnode.com (lg.nyc.ramnode.com)... 107.191.96.26
Connecting to lg.nyc.ramnode.com (lg.nyc.ramnode.com)|107.191.96.26|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100MB.test.1'

100%[======================================>] 100,000,000 23.8M/s   in 7.3s

2015-05-18 12:56:17 (13.1 MB/s) - `100MB.test.1' saved [100000000/100000000]

    and as you can see speed is still slow to OVH CA.

    root@mail:~# wget http://proof.ovh.ca/files/100Mio.dat
--2015-05-18 12:57:48--  http://proof.ovh.ca/files/100Mio.dat
Resolving proof.ovh.ca (proof.ovh.ca)... 192.99.19.165, 2607:5300:60:273a::1
Connecting to proof.ovh.ca (proof.ovh.ca)|192.99.19.165|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig]
Saving to: `100Mio.dat.4'

 0% [                                       ] 63,385      22.1K/s
  • sinsin Member

    Glad to see I'm not the only one with slow SSH and network speeds today

  • yomeroyomero Member
    edited May 2015

    sin said: Glad to see I'm not the only one with slow SSH and network speeds today

    Same here. I am downloading from an OVH ip at 1KB/s or sth like that. Probably everything to europe is congested?

    Edit: Trying from another provider at Dacentec on other IP range (192.*), and it's the same

  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member
    edited May 2015

    @yomero: indeed it seems European locations are affected ...

  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member
    edited May 2015

    It seems it's getting a little bit better: ovh.net is fast, mirror.leaseweb.com still slow but not as slow as before (100-200 KB/s).

    SSH connection is faster as well.

  • wychwych Member

    Ping to UK is up slightly but nothing uncommon for peak nighttime over to US.

  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member
    edited May 2015

    Connection to Europe seems to be fully restored ...

    @dacentec: would it be possible to have some kind of network status page for this kind of information ?

  • dacentecdacentec Member, Host Rep

    We had some Telia issues.

    http://stats.dacentec.com/

  • aFriendaFriend Member

    Folks - I checked right now and see the connectivity to Hetzner in DE has improved from under 400 KB/s to approx 4 MB/s. So is this considered normal or is it supposed to be faster?

  • WilliamWilliam Member

    4MB/s is fairly solid for EU<>US.

  • fireglowfireglow Member

    Can't wait for some new 20 USD server offers! :-)

  • evilghaleonevilghaleon Member

    EU speeds are back to normal. Loving this box, it's such a great value.

    Question for @dacentec- I ordered it with the 100mbps unmetered option. Speeds are obviously faster, is it a configuration issue, or am I just limited to ~33TB/mo? Not that I'm complaining. :P

    CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz
Number of cores : 8
CPU frequency : 1200.000 MHz
Total amount of ram : 7863 MB
Total amount of swap : 7999 MB
System uptime : 1:07,
Download speed from CacheFly: 47.7MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 15.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 42.3MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 8.44MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 7.76MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 21.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.14MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 18.6MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 15.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 12.1MB/s
I/O speed : 84.1 MB/s
  • dacentecdacentec Member, Host Rep

    @evilghaleon caps are only for repeat offenders, you can see your bandwidth usage inside your portal. If you start some popular software mirror and every month go crazy you will probably get the cap.

    Thanked by 1evilghaleon
  • evilghaleonevilghaleon Member

    dacentec said: @evilghaleon caps are only for repeat offenders, you can see your bandwidth usage inside your portal. If you start some popular software mirror and every month go crazy you will probably get the cap.

    I don't plan on getting close any time soon, but it's good to know. You guys rock!

  • UmairUmair Member

    @TheKiller said:
    But you have got pretty good IO.

    Well looks like I was not using RAID1 before. (I didn't even knew that).
    With RAID1, IO is definitely slow.

    I/O speed : 88.6 MB/s

    Good thing is, network speed is getting better. :)

    PS, anyone using these boxes in Soft RAID1 ?? resync speed is kinda slow. It's been few hours and it's still only near 50%. Not that I am complaining much, just asking how many out there are using the disk as RAID1.

  • sinsin Member
    edited May 2015

    @Umair said:

    You can change the speed:

    echo 80000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min

    I set mine at 95000 and it finished within a few hours on 2TB - just make sure to change it back to the default or something reasonable after the first resync.

    Thanked by 1Umair
  • UmairUmair Member
    edited May 2015

    @sin said:
    I set mine at 95000 and it finished within a few hours on 2TB - just make sure to change it back to the default or something reasonable after the first resync.

    I am actually using that already.
    echo 60000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min

    But I didn't see much difference after that. Hopefully things will get better after the initial sync. Current situation.

    finish=339.3min speed=54785K/sec

  • princeshokoprinceshoko Member

    Pretty surprised the Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 1381 is 800mhz. I had looked it up and had not found that info. What I found said 2500mhz. Explains alot on why all my tests were so slow once I actually checked the cpuinfo.

    Really not sure i'll keep it at 800mhz, considering my phone is faster. Also my I/O is only 45 MB/s at best. Not sure how others are getting up in the 90's.

  • dacentecdacentec Member, Host Rep

    Here are the clock speeds. We have a couple boxes out on the bench. We are checking if there is some BIOS option or if possibly the clock scales under load or something.
    http://products.amd.com/en-gb/OpteronCPUResult.aspx?f1=Quad-Core+AMD+Opteron™

  • wychwych Member

    Check your linux governor and the BIOS for powersaving, I had it on a few of my recent deployments.

    Or leave it on if your a environmentalist, it speeds up under load anyhow.

  • WilliamWilliam Member

    princeshoko said: Really not sure i'll keep it at 800mhz, considering my phone is faster.

    It is not. You cannot compare x86-64 and ARM one by one.

Sign In or Register to comment.