Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Enough is enough - C1vhosting - Page 9
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Enough is enough - C1vhosting

1679111217

Comments

  • @Maounique said:

    @kevinds said: Figure out which OS you want, set grub to launch the installer on reboot.

    Or I could use the qemu hack, but that is not how it is supposed to work. I am installing fairly often as I use such things for tests.

    grml-rescueboot iso loading, but yeah. so much effort for working around. ain't nobody got time for that

  • @Andreix said:

    Well, I have worked with italians long enough to conclude that when there's something they don't like or properly understand, they'll just scream, blame you, blame the weather/sun/zodiac sign, but won't even consider they may actually be wrong.

    Generalization is always wrong

    Thanked by 1Maounique
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep
    edited February 23

    @Carlin0 said:

    @Andreix said:

    Well, I have worked with italians long enough to conclude that when there's something they don't like or properly understand, they'll just scream, blame you, blame the weather/sun/zodiac sign, but won't even consider they may actually be wrong.

    Generalization is always wrong

    No, it's not.
    This is: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/absolutization

    When saying "bears are dangerous", it's true that based on generalization, bears are generally dangerous and can hurt people. However, this leaves room for exception... in all worldly bears, there may be 1 bear that's friendly and would make an awesome pet companion.

    Saying "absolutely all bears are dangerous" puts that 1 friendly bear in the same category as the other bad bears. So there's absolutely no room for exception.

    Generalization is good, people just need to learn vocabulary and word interpretation.
    And, if possible, to stop victimizing over all small/unimportant details. In general, not related to you in particular.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • @Andreix I could say to you: if many people have told you that you are the one who is wrong maybe they are right :D

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @Carlin0 said:
    @Andreix I could say to you: if many people have told you that you are the one who is wrong maybe they are right :D

    I would say that most of the time, people embrace the idea that gives them the best comfort at the time.

    I will give you another example and will stop engaging on this anymore as I don't really like to waste time on "what if(s)?!".

    Few years back, there was a time when poor Romanians would migrate to countries that offered them the (apparent) chance to earn more for their work. Generally those countries would be Spain, Italy, Germany and Norway (ofc others may be, but those were kinda the most liked back then).
    When this "migration" was taking place, there were 2-3 incidents in IT and ES, when some Romanian guys murdered, stole and/or beaten up some local people.
    Following those incidents, Romanians were considered by ES, IT and more as "criminal gypsies".

    Should I be offended by the general idea those people have about Romanian as a nation and Romanians in general?
    Many people went out and spoke, presenting the situation as it was: an exception.

    Who was right? ES, IT that had a general idea of Romanian being bad or RO that had a general idea that ES, IT overreacted discriminating a whole country for a couple of people out of 19 million?

    Again, I stand by what I said. That's my understanding on how things are. You are, of course, free to understand the world in your own personalized way, because every individual's experience is personalized to his interactions with the world.

    Wish you a wonderful weekend! :)

  • @Andreix said:
    That's my understanding on how things are.

    Very limited vision...

  • @Carlin0 said:

    @Andreix said:
    That's my understanding on how things are.

    Very limited vision...

    more understandable with $200 paid.

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @cybertech said:

    @Carlin0 said:

    @Andreix said:
    That's my understanding on how things are.

    Very limited vision...

    more understandable with $200 paid.

    I don't really get that. Paid by/to who?

  • LeviLevi Member

    @Andreix said:

    @cybertech said:

    @Carlin0 said:

    @Andreix said:
    That's my understanding on how things are.

    Very limited vision...

    more understandable with $200 paid.

    I don't really get that. Paid by/to who?

    Just pay 200$ to your barber and you will understand something. If not, you will have one happy barber.

  • @Andreix said: Who was right? ES, IT that had a general idea of Romanian being bad or RO that had a general idea that ES, IT overreacted discriminating a whole country for a couple of people out of 19 million?

    Who was right?

    Extreme alt right wing nazi's

    Yeah that's enough X/TV for a while...

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @emg88 said: I'm still confused at why a lot of you are still a customer of c1vhosting ...

    Well, it is my first product from them, I pay 82 cents a month for a lot of resources. I am ready to take 80% steal, unstable service, no support etc. But I expected to be able to mount the ISOs available in the panel, I expected more than 2 images and the bugs to be fixed in a timely manner.

    That being said, I am disappointed, but I think it is still worth it, can still use it as a proxy.

  • @Maounique said:

    @emg88 said: I'm still confused at why a lot of you are still a customer of c1vhosting ...

    Well, it is my first product from them, I pay 82 cents a month for a lot of resources. I am ready to take 80% steal, unstable service, no support etc. But I expected to be able to mount the ISOs available in the panel, I expected more than 2 images and the bugs to be fixed in a timely manner.

    That being said, I am disappointed, but I think it is still worth it, can still use it as a proxy.

    Multiple idea of product usage from c1vhosting:
    1. idle
    2. proxy
    3. idle offline
    4. proxy offline

    Thanked by 1Maounique
  • @cybertech said:
    @c1vhosting its been like this for months are you gonna correct it?

    > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    > #                     v2024-01-01                    #
    > # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > 
    > Tue Feb 20 02:30:22 UTC 2024
    > 
    > Basic System Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Uptime     : 2 days, 9 hours, 49 minutes
    > Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    > CPU cores  : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz
    > AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    > VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    > RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    > Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    > Disk       : 59.0 GiB
    > Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    > Kernel     : 6.1.0-13-amd64
    > VM Type    : KVM
    > IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    > 
    > IPv6 Network Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > ISP        : Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
    > ASN        : AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
    > Host       : C1V Hosting
    > Location   : Milan, Lombardy (25)
    > Country    : Italy
    > 
    > fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
    >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > Read       | 8.41 MB/s     (2.1k) | 82.70 MB/s    (1.2k)
    > Write      | 8.45 MB/s     (2.1k) | 83.13 MB/s    (1.2k)
    > Total      | 16.86 MB/s    (4.2k) | 165.84 MB/s   (2.5k)
    >            |                      |
    > Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
    >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > Read       | 156.57 MB/s    (305) | 175.11 MB/s    (171)
    > Write      | 164.89 MB/s    (322) | 186.77 MB/s    (182)
    > Total      | 321.47 MB/s    (627) | 361.88 MB/s    (353)
    > 
    > Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Test            | Value
    >                 |
    > Single Core     | 207
    > Multi Core      | 196
    > Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4988908
    > 
    > YABS completed in 48 min 56 sec
    > 

    YABS completed in 48 min 56 sec

    @c1vhosting I'm not alone in this, another kind reminder i know you're busy and all dont neglect us here.

  • nvmenvme Member

    @cybertech said:

    @cybertech said:
    @c1vhosting its been like this for months are you gonna correct it?

    > > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > > #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    > > #                     v2024-01-01                    #
    > > # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    > > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > > 
    > > Tue Feb 20 02:30:22 UTC 2024
    > > 
    > > Basic System Information:
    > > ---------------------------------
    > > Uptime     : 2 days, 9 hours, 49 minutes
    > > Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    > > CPU cores  : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz
    > > AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    > > VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    > > RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    > > Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    > > Disk       : 59.0 GiB
    > > Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    > > Kernel     : 6.1.0-13-amd64
    > > VM Type    : KVM
    > > IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    > > 
    > > IPv6 Network Information:
    > > ---------------------------------
    > > ISP        : Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
    > > ASN        : AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
    > > Host       : C1V Hosting
    > > Location   : Milan, Lombardy (25)
    > > Country    : Italy
    > > 
    > > fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    > > ---------------------------------
    > > Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
    > >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > > Read       | 8.41 MB/s     (2.1k) | 82.70 MB/s    (1.2k)
    > > Write      | 8.45 MB/s     (2.1k) | 83.13 MB/s    (1.2k)
    > > Total      | 16.86 MB/s    (4.2k) | 165.84 MB/s   (2.5k)
    > >            |                      |
    > > Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
    > >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > > Read       | 156.57 MB/s    (305) | 175.11 MB/s    (171)
    > > Write      | 164.89 MB/s    (322) | 186.77 MB/s    (182)
    > > Total      | 321.47 MB/s    (627) | 361.88 MB/s    (353)
    > > 
    > > Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    > > ---------------------------------
    > > Test            | Value
    > >                 |
    > > Single Core     | 207
    > > Multi Core      | 196
    > > Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4988908
    > > 
    > > YABS completed in 48 min 56 sec
    > > 

    YABS completed in 48 min 56 sec

    @c1vhosting I'm not alone in this, another kind reminder i know you're busy and all dont neglect us here.

    Woah, that CPU is freaking slower than Raspberry Pi

  • loayloay Member

    @Arkas said:
    @c1vhosting - Provider tag removed by decision of admins/mods

    Thanked by 4Levi sh97 xvps shruub
  • The only reason that makes sense to me is using it as a VPN or seedbox for public torrenting

  • LeviLevi Member

    @emg88 said:
    The only reason that makes sense to me is using it as a VPN or seedbox for public torrenting

    That requires somewhat stable connection. And not on 40Mbps 4G.

  • @loay said:

    @Arkas said:
    @c1vhosting - Provider tag removed by decision of admins/mods

    Who is the next?

  • @alciregi said:

    @loay said:

    @Arkas said:
    @c1vhosting - Provider tag removed by decision of admins/mods

    Who is the next?

    Web hosters who run their servers without proper licences?

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    Re "ISO"

    No need to try diverse tricks. Just asking @c1vhosting politely does the trick (well, at least a couple of months ago it did for me).

  • time for chargeback wooooohoooo

  • davidedavide Member
    edited February 25

    That's entrepreneurship: punch in the face all of your customers, and when they dare to complain, punch harder. Good things will come out of it. A shiny Darwin award 🏆

    Thanked by 1Svensken
  • @c1vhosting having your provider tag removed does not absolve you from all the above responsibilities!!!

    Thanked by 2Carlin0 Svensken
  • LeviLevi Member

    @cybertech said:

    @c1vhosting having your provider tag removed does not absolve you from all the above responsibilities!!!

    You are wrong. Now he has nothing to loose to not openly scam everyone in this forum. He is toasted.

    Thanked by 1totally_not_banned
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited February 25

    @jsg said:
    Re "ISO"

    No need to try diverse tricks. Just asking @c1vhosting politely does the trick (well, at least a couple of months ago it did for me).

    I know, the problem with that is that I use these boxes to experiment various things and I am reinstalling often. Leaving the ISO on in an unstable server can lead to disaster as I know from the other side of the fence when the ISO gets updated or the connection with the storage is lost.

    In the end I did manage to set it up as I intended, the steal is far lower than at the beginning, so, for now, it works as intended. Fixing the ISO loading though is still on my wish list, in the meantime I would do my experiments elsewhere.

    Overall, a bit worse than I have expected but still usable for my purposes at a good price.

  • xvpsxvps Member
    edited February 25

    @Levi said:

    @cybertech said:

    @c1vhosting having your provider tag removed does not absolve you from all the above responsibilities!!!

    You are wrong. Now he has nothing to loose to not openly scam everyone in this forum. He is toasted.

    Many of us also use lowendspirit.com, where he also advertises his services.
    In other words, there are more provider tags to lose.

  • @c1vhosting where you at mate there's work to be done!

  • LowHostingLowHosting Member, Host Rep

    @cybertech said:
    @c1vhosting where you at mate there's work to be done!

    I'm getting a lot of attacks (for over 24 hours straight) from a specific C1V subnet, it could also be spoofed traffic so I don't blame C1V, but who would want to spoof a single subnet? I'm a little bit confused.

    It seems similar to what happened to this guy https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3865159#Comment_3865159

    @DanSummer said:
    I've started seeing your IP more and more attacking my clients sites. A very good way to > trash your entire network.

  • @LowHosting said:

    @cybertech said:
    @c1vhosting where you at mate there's work to be done!

    I'm getting a lot of attacks (for over 24 hours straight) from a specific C1V subnet, it could also be spoofed traffic so I don't blame C1V, but who would want to spoof a single subnet? I'm a little bit confused.

    It seems similar to what happened to this guy https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3865159#Comment_3865159

    @DanSummer said:
    I've started seeing your IP more and more attacking my clients sites. A very good way to > trash your entire network.

    i know this is totally unrelated but if it helps in anyway:

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3865185/#Comment_3865185

    Thanked by 1LowHosting
  • edited February 27

    @LowHosting said:

    @cybertech said:
    @c1vhosting where you at mate there's work to be done!

    I'm getting a lot of attacks (for over 24 hours straight) from a specific C1V subnet, it could also be spoofed traffic so I don't blame C1V, but who would want to spoof a single subnet? I'm a little bit confused.

    Strange dump. If it were SYN-ACKs i'd say it's backscatter from someone SYN flooding said subnet with source set to your IP and port 443 but it's actually PSH-ACK. Unless your dump is somehow filtered i don't know what to make of this. Should be easy to filter though as traffic hitting services with source ports < 1024 (aka privileged ports) is practically never legitimate.

    Edit: A quick search hints towards the possibility of a misconfiguration maybe causing PSH-ACK instead of SYN-ACK.

Sign In or Register to comment.