New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
thanks
I had a long discussion with @MarkTurner the other week and he seemed like a knowledgeable / good guy. Am admittedly tempted to buy one of those dual core Xeons, but have no immediate use for it so I've held off.
I emailed Steve a sales question the other week and he replied right away, but after I responded to him I never heard back. I don't really care because I'm not in the market to buy a new server immediately (and he's probably a busy guy etc.), but just sayin.
Tulix runs the small datacenter suite accross the hall from Yomura which occupies GNAX's old space on 17th floor at 55 Marietta.
Yomura uses Tulix's network.
Tulix also operates another suite down the hall on the 17th floor. They do hosting/colo/streaming services. Tulix and Tulip are the same company.
@ckm_2 its definitely not our end - try Cachefly and you'll see about 1Gbps performance
wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
@hotsnow - should be double digits for disk hours 00-99 somewhere in that range. We replaced all the disks before this offer went out as previously these systems we running 72GB SAS drives as boot disks. ILO you can install your own ISOs
@netomx - open a ticket
@digitalduke - for standard OS like Centos use the installer in the client panel. Its a whole lot faster
@RyanD - not correct - we lease two /24's from Tulix and have a gigabit between our suites to bring in that traffic. But Tulix is not one of transit providers per se. I dont even thing they announce our ARIN provided space.
@hostnun - can you pm me your email, I want to follow this up with Steve
@MiguelQ AS7363 is Yomura, not Tulix. Tulix is AS36820 and they have another one for their other datacentre down the road.
-- Your answer makes me laugh, since you are the one responsible for the networking.
@ckm_2 Did I misunderstand your question? I thought you were trying ascertain whether your server was able to burst beyond 100Mbps.
That's true, the automated installer is very quick, I just like the flexibility of configuring partitioning and file systems at install time.
@digitalduke - if you need an ISO mounted onto the server, just open a ticket then it will be mounted locally to your server. It will make it a lot faster.
Yes, maybe you did misunderstand.
Downloading from various locations, the transfer speed is much higher. The problem is only when I download from Datashack, where I'm usually able to get speeds beyond 100Mbps. This is the first time I've had a connection max out and stay at 11.1MB/s between two specific servers, both connected at 1Gbps.
hello sir,five hours ago I had buy delimitervps's dedi server,could you tell me deliver my server need how times?one day?or more.
thanks
@ourvps - delivery is 1-3 working days after the order has been reviewed and accepted.
ckm_2 - it was too early in the morning and not caffeinated enough yet when I read your email.
On a server with 10GE uplink straight into a router - we're seeing a flat 11.1MB/s - ie 88.8Mbps. Thats identical to what you were seeing so I'd say there is some traffic shaping going on somewhere.
If you visit 204.152.38.88 in a browser it goes to Ndevix.com.
I have tested that URL http://www.datashack.net/speedtest/1gb.bin from other locations including non Yomura sites - 11.1MB/s straight
If you run 2 in parallel each gets 11.1MB/s, sounds like the server is set to traffic shape.
I did last night, it was just to inform you my mistake
XD
@MarkTurner
Interesting about the Ndevix.com, but that is just their web designer and customer.
If I run 2 in parallel, I still get 11.1MB/s in total.
>
11.1MB/s is 88Mbps so you are basically maxing out that 100Mbps port.
It is 1Gbps ports at the datacenters, not 100Mbps.
That's what makes it so strange.
@ckm_2 I've tried from our network and three third party networks where we have some servers. All are 11.1MB/s but because the level is so stable - never goes about 11.1MB/s its got to be shaped.
If you ping datashack.net and ping ndevix.com - its the same IP. If you access the IP you'll get ndevix.com.
So its either the same company, share the same server where ndevix is the default site. But seems stupid to rate limit your test file to 88.8Mbps.
@MarkTurner
On a traceroute to datashack.net (204.152.38.84), the hop before is 204.152.38.88 (ndevix.com). They don't have the same ip, it looks like a node and container.
A ping to ndevix.com goes to 204.152.38.69 (s101.ndevix.com).
The test file(s) I've been using, are not limited. They download at up to 800Mbps when going to other locations.
Huhh???
However, I do get crappy speeds from my Ramnode.
When you just use HE / Cogent your network isn't going to be good.
@ckm_2 from OVH Canada, Rackspace, Amazon AWS, Softlayer and Yomura they are all a flat 11.1MB/s
@mcmyhost: See this:
The IP address used for the download is 204.152.38.88, its redirected.
Now enter 204.152.38.88 in your browser - Ndevix.com
@mcmyhost - what is the IP address of the server you were able to get 29.0 MB/s from. PM if you prefer. I want to see the path between them
@mcmyhost - From London:
/dev/null 0% of 1024 MB 223 kBps 01h18m
From BT -> Hurricane Electric (so it doesn't surprise me) into s105.ndevix.com
PM'd the IP.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: http://204.152.38.88/1gb.bin [following]
--2013-12-19 10:01:39-- http://204.152.38.88/1gb.bin
Huh... I didn't notice the 302. That's interesting.
@MarkTurner
Hmm... that's also interesting.
(I was just finishing this post up, before you posted your reply above)
@mcmyhost - Thanks for posting your speed tests.
I was also getting poor results with Ramnode. I know it's been much better before.
@MarkTurner Thanks for ALL YOUR HELP, internetz, kudos, cookies, bacon, and cats for you!