Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


It's Easter, show me what you've got! Providers, Give us the crazy deals! Mega-request thread! - Page 14
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

It's Easter, show me what you've got! Providers, Give us the crazy deals! Mega-request thread!

11214161718

Comments

  • lemonlemon Member
    edited April 2018

    @Cdoe said:
    How do Netcup make any profit with dedicated cores and this pricing?

    They're not really dedicated. If you use 100% for 24/7 for example you'll get less power.

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @beagle said:
    Does anyone know how these Root-Server Eierkanone perform compared to the 8vCore/8GB/320GB SAS vServers from BF?

    I am still holding on to one of the latter. I doubt the 2 dedicated cores are better than 8 shared ones, overall performance should be good anyway. of course depends on the intended use anyway...
    keep in mind that mining is forbidden by their newer ToS - and they apply that at least to those who agree to it by ordering new services ;-)

    maybe @angstrom can post the cpu flags, at least you might get AES instructions with the rootserver which you definitely won't get on the vserver.

    @EHRA said:

    @pullangcubo said:
    Just a head's up to all intrested, Root-Server Eierkanone is back at
    https://www.netcup.de/vserver/uebersicht_vserver_angebote.php

    I did not find Easter egg. But NetCup has interesting prices.

    it's still there for the moment, but you need to browse the german pages. also not working from mobile...

    Thanked by 1beagle
  • CdoeCdoe Member
    edited April 2018

    @lemon said:

    @Cdoe said:
    How do Netcup make any profit with dedicated cores and this pricing?

    They're not really dedicated. If you use 100% for 24/7 for example you'll get less power.

    Ok, so same marketing catch as unlimited bandwidth, but we will throttle after 80 mbits for 15 minutes :-P

  • pullangcubopullangcubo Member
    edited April 2018

    @angstrom can you do a GeekBench? Just curious as I'm pretty sure it's the same CPU setup as this one https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/701565 which is from an old netcup deal...don't remember who posted this though (perhaps it's you @Falzo?)

    @Cdoe said:
    Ok, so same marketing catch as unlimited bandwidth, but we will throttle after 80 mbits for 15 minutes :-P

    I vaguely remember @Falzo doing some tests before regarding that policy of netcup and I believe he concluded that unless you actually abuse it, it's actually leniently enforced...

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Falzo said: maybe @angstrom can post the cpu flags, at least you might get AES instructions with the rootserver which you definitely won't get on the vserver.

    Voilà (cat /proc/cpuinfo):

    processor   : 0
    vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
    cpu family  : 6
    model       : 63
    model name  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    stepping    : 2
    microcode   : 0x1
    cpu MHz     : 2297.338
    cache size  : 16384 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings    : 1
    core id     : 0
    cpu cores   : 1
    apicid      : 0
    initial apicid  : 0
    fpu     : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level : 13
    wp      : yes
    flags       : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl xtopology eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm arat xsaveopt invpcid_single fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
    bogomips    : 4594.67
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    
    processor   : 1
    vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
    cpu family  : 6
    model       : 63
    model name  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    stepping    : 2
    microcode   : 0x1
    cpu MHz     : 2297.338
    cache size  : 16384 KB
    physical id : 1
    siblings    : 1
    core id     : 0
    cpu cores   : 1
    apicid      : 1
    initial apicid  : 1
    fpu     : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level : 13
    wp      : yes
    flags       : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl xtopology eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm arat xsaveopt invpcid_single fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
    bogomips    : 4594.67
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    
    Thanked by 2Falzo pullangcubo
  • jojoomjojoom Member
    edited April 2018

    .

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Basically, 1 of these E5 cores, is as powerful as an Intel Atom server, its more or less 2 Atom servers virtualized, with 8GB

  • @Clouvider said:
    !! Easter Dedicated Servers MEGA SALE !!

    E3 Dedicated Servers from as little as £20 / MO!

    All prices presented on this page are exclusive of VAT.
    Month to month contract. Minimum 14 days cancellation notice. Stock on offer is very limited. Order yours now to avoid disappointment.

    Offer open to both new and existing Clients. Promotional servers cannot replace an existing server either now nor in the future.

    Order link: Dedicated Servers UK

    Servers located at one of the following datacentres, allocated from first available location:

    • VIRTUS LON1
    • Telehouse North 2

    Both datacentres run on our AS62240, with geographically dispersed routing sites across Equinix LD8, Telehouse North 2 and Virtus LON1. All sites connected with MPLS-TE with diverse routing and sub 5-ms switchover on top our Dark Fibre and our own DWDMs.

    Following upstreams are included in the mix:

    • Level3
    • NTT
    • GTT
    • Telia
    • Cogent

    We also peer, with open peering policy, at:

    • LINX LON1
    • LINX LON2
    • LONAP

    We peer with all major UK eyeballs.

    We have a dedicated 10G private peering with Liberty Global (Virgin Media, UPC, Ziggo, and other networks owned by LG)

    Order yours now to avoid disappointment!

    UK Dedicated Servers

    More about us: Clouvider, About us - Network

    Use code '5I086NUUCYCE' for 40% off (recurring) of the configurable servers: Supermicro MC E3v6 SSD and Supermicro MC E3v6 NVMe!! (starting from just £47.40 / mo after discount!). This code is valid until 7th April 2018, strictly limited to the first 20 orders.

    @Clouvider

    can i get one this sir ?

  • angstromangstrom Moderator
    edited April 2018

    @Neoon said:
    Basically, 1 of these E5 cores, is as powerful as an Intel Atom server, its more or less 2 Atom servers virtualized, with 8GB

    Am still running unixbench.sh, but am pleased so far with the Root-Server Eierkanone, it's a great deal for the money. Personally, I didn't see much point in getting an Atom, though I almost did yesterday, but I stopped myself at the last minute. :-D

  • feezioxiiifeezioxiii Member, Host Rep

    @Noobskid said:

    @Clouvider said:
    !! Easter Dedicated Servers MEGA SALE !!

    E3 Dedicated Servers from as little as £20 / MO!

    All prices presented on this page are exclusive of VAT.
    Month to month contract. Minimum 14 days cancellation notice. Stock on offer is very limited. Order yours now to avoid disappointment.

    Offer open to both new and existing Clients. Promotional servers cannot replace an existing server either now nor in the future.

    Order link: Dedicated Servers UK

    Servers located at one of the following datacentres, allocated from first available location:

    • VIRTUS LON1
    • Telehouse North 2

    Both datacentres run on our AS62240, with geographically dispersed routing sites across Equinix LD8, Telehouse North 2 and Virtus LON1. All sites connected with MPLS-TE with diverse routing and sub 5-ms switchover on top our Dark Fibre and our own DWDMs.

    Following upstreams are included in the mix:

    • Level3
    • NTT
    • GTT
    • Telia
    • Cogent

    We also peer, with open peering policy, at:

    • LINX LON1
    • LINX LON2
    • LONAP

    We peer with all major UK eyeballs.

    We have a dedicated 10G private peering with Liberty Global (Virgin Media, UPC, Ziggo, and other networks owned by LG)

    Order yours now to avoid disappointment!

    UK Dedicated Servers

    More about us: Clouvider, About us - Network

    Use code '5I086NUUCYCE' for 40% off (recurring) of the configurable servers: Supermicro MC E3v6 SSD and Supermicro MC E3v6 NVMe!! (starting from just £47.40 / mo after discount!). This code is valid until 7th April 2018, strictly limited to the first 20 orders.

    @Clouvider

    can i get one this sir ?

    It's gone within 15 mins after that offer came up

  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited April 2018

    @pullangcubo said:
    @angstrom can you do a GeekBench? Just curious as I'm pretty sure it's the same CPU setup as this one https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/701565 which is from an old netcup deal...don't remember who posted this though (perhaps it's you @Falzo?)

    @Cdoe said:
    Ok, so same marketing catch as unlimited bandwidth, but we will throttle after 80 mbits for 15 minutes :-P

    I vaguely remember @Falzo doing some tests before regarding that policy of netcup and I believe he concluded that unless you actually abuse it, it's actually leniently enforced...

    can't tell if that's my doing with the geekbench, but looks quite like a 2core netcup. as it's not qemu it also should be a rootserver then.

    here's a fresh one from the old BF vServer: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7772886

    also nench.sh:

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2018-04-02 14:24:57 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores:    8
    Frequency:    2297.336 MHz
    RAM:          7,8G
    Swap:         
    Kernel:       Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    320G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        3,834 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        7,327 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        4,258 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 133.2 us / 240.1 us / 19.8 ms / 313.3 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 8.89 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.17 GiB, 1.78 k iops, 444.5 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    340.46 MiB/s
        2nd run:    547.41 MiB/s
        3rd run:    637.05 MiB/s
        average:    508.31 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        Cachefly CDN:         81.98 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        80.19 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   2.02 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      35.67 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         9.18 MiB/s
    

    from the looks of @angstrom benches the disk speed seems to be better on the new rootservers, but that might change once the nodes are in full use. don't know how netcup spreads their products across their nodes anyway...

    TL;DR; obviously both are good value for the money, but I wouldn't change from the vserver to the RS ;-)

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    angstrom said: I'm running a third benchmark (unixbench.sh) at the moment; will post when completed.

    This is for the Root-Server Eierkanone:

       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    2 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: v22018044357164016: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.16.0-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3+deb8u1 (2018-01-08)
       Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz (4594.7 bogomips)
              x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz (4594.7 bogomips)
              x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       15:20:01 up  1:10,  1 user,  load average: 0.35, 0.18, 0.11; runlevel 5
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 02 2018 15:20:01 - 15:48:09
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       29073078.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     3762.9 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               3908.2 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        639557.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          173035.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1635380.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1020467.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 141840.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               7837.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   7853.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1698.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         877888.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   29073078.0   2491.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3762.9    684.2
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3908.2    908.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     639557.4   1615.0
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     173035.7   1045.5
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1635380.4   2819.6
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1020467.9    820.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     141840.6    354.6
    Process Creation                                126.0       7837.8    622.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7853.6   1852.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1698.8   2831.3
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     877888.2    585.3
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1124.7
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 02 2018 15:48:09 - 16:16:16
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       57494274.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     7472.2 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               7056.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        752026.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          251167.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2391450.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             2031677.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 285110.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              16848.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  12794.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1754.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        1616582.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   57494274.2   4926.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7472.2   1358.6
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7056.5   1641.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     752026.9   1899.1
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     251167.5   1517.6
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2391450.5   4123.2
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2031677.0   1633.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     285110.9    712.8
    Process Creation                                126.0      16848.7   1337.2
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      12794.4   3017.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1754.5   2924.2
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1616582.7   1077.7
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1878.6
    
    Thanked by 1pullangcubo
  • @Falzo said:
    TL;DR; obviously both are good value for the money, but I wouldn't change from the vserver to the RS ;-)

    How much was that deal?

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Falzo said: also nench.sh:

    For comparison, nench.sh on the Root-Server Eierkanone:

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2018-04-02 14:52:00 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores:    2
    Frequency:    2297.338 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         -
    Kernel:       Linux 3.16.0-5-amd64 x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    400G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        3.553 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.612 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        1.940 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 101.0 us / 152.7 us / 20.2 ms / 194.4 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 11.7 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.85 GiB, 2.33 k iops, 583.3 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    467.30 MiB/s
        2nd run:    953.67 MiB/s
        3rd run:    899.31 MiB/s
        average:    773.43 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        Cachefly CDN:         89.35 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        83.54 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   3.43 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      44.48 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         11.76 MiB/s
    
    Thanked by 2Falzo pullangcubo
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Falzo said: TL;DR; obviously both are good value for the money, but I wouldn't change from the vserver to the RS ;-)

    I forget now, how much was that BF server? :-) Looks good. :-)

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @pullangcubo said:

    @Falzo said:
    TL;DR; obviously both are good value for the money, but I wouldn't change from the vserver to the RS ;-)

    How much was that deal?

    the same. aka 6,99€ including vat, 3 month term/payment :-)

    Thanked by 2pullangcubo angstrom
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Falzo said:

    @pullangcubo said:

    @Falzo said:
    TL;DR; obviously both are good value for the money, but I wouldn't change from the vserver to the RS ;-)

    How much was that deal?

    the same. aka 6,99€ including vat, 3 month term/payment :-)

    That was also a great deal!

  • Got the time4vps storage 4TB for 50% off. That's $2.4/TB not bad

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    At the end I ended up getting nothing, not sure if that is a good sign

    Thanked by 2Mxl proxima
  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited April 2018

    @FR_Michael said:

    @imok said:
    @FR_Michael or you could do a couple of slots for 70% off :P

    People will become crazy.

    Fuck it, next 10 orders get's 60% discount (so 8,06EUR / month excluding VAT) with coupon: AM7J-KR4S-32NL-P4KJ ;)

    I only jumped on that one. 4core/4GB, also much value for the money... https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7773892

     nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2018-04-02 15:36:46 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores:    4
    Frequency:    2599.998 MHz
    RAM:          3.9G
    Swap:         
    Kernel:       Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 x86_64
    
    Disks:
    vda    300G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        3.906 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        5.842 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        1.746 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 64.1 us / 104.6 us / 14.1 ms / 139.4 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 20.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 5.03 GiB, 4.12 k iops, 1.01 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    598.91 MiB/s
        2nd run:    775.34 MiB/s
        3rd run:    700.00 MiB/s
        average:    691.41 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        Cachefly CDN:         91.52 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        89.12 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   1.96 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      51.66 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         10.38 MiB/s
    
    Thanked by 1pullangcubo
  • Let me help you out: thats your shilling account, not the provider one. What made you login to your other profile just a minute before you posted this?

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire
    edited April 2018

    I actually planned to jump on VirMach storage deal but can't get the coupon to work, even when I saw the deal 1 min after it was posted. Tickets are not replied, maybe as someone mentioned above, I don't have enough services to count as old customer

    Whatever will be, will be

  • angstromangstrom Moderator
    edited April 2018

    @pullangcubo said: @angstrom can you do a GeekBench?

    Here it is: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7773840

    @Falzo said: I doubt the 2 dedicated cores are better than 8 shared ones, overall performance should be good anyway.

    Yeah, you're right that 2 dedicated cores can't normally win against 8 virtual (shared) cores, but single-core performance is nevertheless better.

    Thanked by 1pullangcubo
  • @Falzo said:
    I only jumped on that one. 4core/4GB, also much value for the money... https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7773892

     nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
    >  benchmark timestamp:    2018-04-02 15:36:46 UTC
    > -------------------------------------------------
    > 
    > Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
    > CPU cores:    4
    > Frequency:    2599.998 MHz
    > RAM:          3.9G
    > Swap:         
    > Kernel:       Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 x86_64
    > 
    > Disks:
    > vda    300G  HDD
    > 
    > CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    >     3.906 seconds
    > CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    >     5.842 seconds
    > CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    >     1.746 seconds
    > 
    > ioping: seek rate
    >     min/avg/max/mdev = 64.1 us / 104.6 us / 14.1 ms / 139.4 us
    > ioping: sequential read speed
    >     generated 20.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 5.03 GiB, 4.12 k iops, 1.01 GiB/s
    > 
    > dd: sequential write speed
    >     1st run:    598.91 MiB/s
    >     2nd run:    775.34 MiB/s
    >     3rd run:    700.00 MiB/s
    >     average:    691.41 MiB/s
    > 
    > IPv4 speedtests
    >     Cachefly CDN:         91.52 MiB/s
    >     Leaseweb (NL):        89.12 MiB/s
    >     Softlayer DAL (US):   1.96 MiB/s
    >     Online.net (FR):      51.66 MiB/s
    >     OVH BHS (CA):         10.38 MiB/s
    > 

    That's SATA, right? Nice iops and write speeds... And they have the same CPU as netcup's Root-Server Eierkanone.

    Choosing between the two, which do you prefer? :-)

    Thanked by 1First-Root
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Falzo said: @FR_Michael said:

       @imok said: @FR_Michael or you could do a couple of slots for 70% off :P
    
       People will become crazy.
    

    Fuck it, next 10 orders get's 60% discount (so 8,06EUR / month excluding VAT) with coupon: AM7J-KR4S-32NL-P4KJ ;)

    I only jumped on that one. 4core/4GB, also much value for the money... https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7773892

    Another great deal.

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @FAT32 said: Whatever will be, will be

    The positive outlook is that you have more money now than if you had purchased something. ;-)

    Thanked by 2FAT32 proxima
  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @pullangcubo said:

    @Falzo said:
    I only jumped on that one. 4core/4GB, also much value for the money... https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7773892

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 598.91 MiB/s
    2nd run: 775.34 MiB/s
    3rd run: 700.00 MiB/s
    average: 691.41 MiB/s

    That's SATA, right? Nice iops and write speeds... And they have the same CPU as netcup's Root-Server Eierkanone.

    Choosing between the two, which do you prefer? :-)

    yes, afaik SATA. as it is 4core I went with that lovely box instead of another cupnet.
    only half the ram, but another location to add to the mix. choosing yearly term dropped the price another 10% ;-)

    while I am only customer since a few weeks with first-root, I really like their products and setup. as their usual prices are quite high it seems they're not so overrun and hopefully can keep up that impressive performance. also you can use nested virt oob and I have yet to run into any issue... I am confident that it's production ready, probably going to use it for some rendering or bigdata stuff, as the cores are quite powerful.

    if you don't need the RAM and can live with a bit higher price I'd suggest trying the first-root lineup. though I don't know if there are any discount codes left.

    Thanked by 1pullangcubo
  • First-RootFirst-Root Member, Host Rep

    @Falzo said:

    @pullangcubo said:

    @Falzo said:
    I only jumped on that one. 4core/4GB, also much value for the money... https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7773892

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 598.91 MiB/s
    2nd run: 775.34 MiB/s
    3rd run: 700.00 MiB/s
    average: 691.41 MiB/s

    That's SATA, right? Nice iops and write speeds... And they have the same CPU as netcup's Root-Server Eierkanone.

    Choosing between the two, which do you prefer? :-)

    yes, afaik SATA. as it is 4core I went with that lovely box instead of another cupnet.
    only half the ram, but another location to add to the mix. choosing yearly term dropped the price another 10% ;-)

    while I am only customer since a few weeks with first-root, I really like their products and setup. as their usual prices are quite high it seems they're not so overrun and hopefully can keep up that impressive performance. also you can use nested virt oob and I have yet to run into any issue... I am confident that it's production ready, probably going to use it for some rendering or bigdata stuff, as the cores are quite powerful.

    if you don't need the RAM and can live with a bit higher price I'd suggest trying the first-root lineup. though I don't know if there are any discount codes left.

    Correct Sata HW Raid10 with 12 disks. Currently there are still coupons left. Keep in mind that this discount is recurring and remains active until you cancel your service!

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran

    Eirkanone sold out?

Sign In or Register to comment.