New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Check it out every 1st and 7th day of the month..
I only clicked once to submit, the website response three times.
until you sue them, L.
Data replication: you're doing it wrong
need Luxembourg ryzen
LU Block Storage please...
I think torrenting on LUX should be limited at a rate of 10 or 20 mbps, subject to your package configuration.
Also why Utorrent of all things out there ?
They're up!
Francisco
Pony stampede incoming lol
Slices?
...working on that, LUX is outta IP's. Trying to scrounge some off shared/resellers.
Francisco
Are there any bandwidth caps, like throttling after X Gb?
The speeds are pretty decent and I am not going to knock it 24x7, will be used only while daily backups (approx 4-5GB daily).
Fair share, but you can use 100mbps per 4 GB 24/7.
So the next plan 8GB would be 200mbps 24/7 usage.
50mbps for the 2 GB, 25 mbps on the 1GB (constant 24/7 usage).
You can burst to 1gbps no issues just not hammering the port 24x7.
Can i buy Lux Block Storage Slab and buy and attach to slice later?
It blocks you at the moment. I had to do that since we'd get people buying slabs then get angry because they couldn't use it.
Francisco
One week to have 4 locations (4 slices, 3 slabs) from BuyVM.
Here's the first test to compare SLICES vs SLABS:
disk format: UFS
location: New York
fio command:
# fio --name=random-write --ioengine=posixaio --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=4g --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --end_fsync=1
SLABS
WRITE: bw=2100KiB/s (2150kB/s), 2100KiB/s-2100KiB/s (2150kB/s-2150kB/s), io=123MiB (129MB), run=60155-60155msec
SLICES
WRITE: bw=19.4MiB/s (20.4MB/s), 19.4MiB/s-19.4MiB/s (20.4MB/s-20.4MB/s), io=1166MiB (1223MB), run=60046-60046msec
Conclusion
Slices are faster than Slabs
Locally attached storage faster than networked ones. Shocking.
Definitely
sure, some speed difference is expected, but 2MB/s for SLABS are unbearably sloooooooooooooow
What did you expect?!
at least 10x more
Got 1, Thank's
However, on Slabs from Las Vegas, currently formatted as ext4 / Alpine Linux, SLABS speed seems better:
Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=26.0MiB/s (27.3MB/s), 26.0MiB/s-26.0MiB/s (27.3MB/s-27.3MB/s), io=1633MiB (1713MB), run=62785-62785msec
now we are talking
try harder, and give me 50+
joking
maybe it will help something to tweak mount options for ext4 (i.e. noatime etc.), or even to switch for some simpler fs with less overhead (i.e. FAT32), if usecase does not require fs advanced feature set (i.e. journaling) but prefer raw performance
Ticket and I can take a peak That's for sure low, but maybe that's a node doing a drive rebuild. I know I swapped a bad drive on a couple nodes this past weekend.
Francisco
A bit better
Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=13.0MiB/s (13.6MB/s), 13.0MiB/s-13.0MiB/s (13.6MB/s-13.6MB/s), io=911MiB (956MB), run=70265-70265msec Disk stats (read/write): sda: ios=0/223573, merge=0/18571, ticks=0/15522764, in_queue=15528667, util=99.43%
superb Contabo specs for 4x the price, love Cogent btw.
Where do the numbers come from?
Personal observations or communication with technical support?
Official discord @Francisco can verify
Anyone can share discord invite?