Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Black Friday 2020 - NVMe and Storage deals - deploy worldwide

1106107109111112151

Comments

  • @JohnFilch123 said: Pro bono lawyers approved it already I am sure.

    Speaking solely for myself, on one side I have a provider I have years of experience with politely asking for a little patience and on the other I have you who have been kind of whiny since the very beginning. Not hard to figure which one I sympathize with.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • @JohnFilch123 said:
    gosh, the oscar for the slowest delivery goes to HH, well deserved.

    Joking aside, we must appreciate the fact that provider admits this mistake (stating it publicly and in email messages), and offers to provide an easy refund, with due apologies. We are all humans after all, and sometimes we do mistakes, but it takes great power to admit our faulty nature, and man up with responsibility.

    Thanked by 3Falzo Ouji vimalware
  • @JohnFilch123 said: gosh, the oscar for the slowest delivery goes to HH, well deserved.

    @JohnFilch123 said: Both I suppose...ok last week (or earlier this week, cannot remember now) you said don't start it let's wait until 7th day. Now we are waiting for another x days until Monday. Wonder what would be the story on Monday. Ah yes, let's wait until 31st Dec when HK servers will be provisioned

    Pro bono lawyers approved it already I am sure.

    Enough already! Take the refund or shut up, you petulant child.

  • brueggusbrueggus Member, IPv6 Advocate

    That escalated quickly.

  • If I don't see one of my invoices in finalising , do I need to create ticket? Or If I just wait, you guys will sort it out?

  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @JohnFilch123 said:
    gosh, the oscar for the slowest delivery goes to HH, well deserved.

    I mean...I am sure there were people who were complaining why it took 2 hours to provision a server (even if we promised 7 working days), while DigitalOcean and AWS can do it instantly via their API.

    I am not saying not meeting our ETA is ideal. I have already apologized for it. And also said that it will be worth your time to wait a few more days (you can see the people sharing their experiences who got their servers) - but if you do not want to wait - you can take a full refund and a sincere apology, and find a provider who can meet your expectations.

    What would be a better way to handle this situation? How would you handle it better? Please tell me, I would like to know so I can do better.

    What would you like me to do more than a full refund? Or are you just bored and want to continue chatting?

  • Got my server provisioned today in Sydney

    Thanks @hosthatch

    Btw the server not come / assigned with IPv6, so i have created ticket about it to request

    Thanked by 1hosthatch
  • Don't worry, I am not asking for a refund or to upgrade the server for free. Simply disappointed, this is my first experience when provisioning takes more than 2 weeks.

    I also take this opportunity to ask you to stop sharing your PMs here without redacting it. There are different customers, some are hard, you should be ready for this.

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @add_iT said: the server not come / assigned with IPv6, so i have created ticket about it to request

    Yes, you’ll have to submit a ticket for it.

    Thanked by 1add_iT
  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran
    edited December 2020

    @JohnFilch123 said:
    Simply disappointed, this is my first experience when provisioning takes more than 2 weeks.

    But clearly the deal must be so very much valuable to you that you still keep waiting, even after so much disappointment?

  • @hosthatch I'd say you can simply relax and ignore ... some people come here to stir the drama. I have to admit on other occasions that could've been me as well, this is LET after all ^^

    people who flood this threads with sarcastic comments but carefully don't post their ticket numbers or the likes, obviously are quite satisfied with your service and don't want to risk you giving them a warm unwelcome together with a full refund ;-) ;-) ;-)

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @hosthatch said:

    @JohnFilch123 said:
    gosh, the oscar for the slowest delivery goes to HH, well deserved.

    I mean...I am sure there were people who were complaining why it took 2 hours to provision a server (even if we promised 7 working days), while DigitalOcean and AWS can do it instantly via their API.

    I am not saying not meeting our ETA is ideal. I have already apologized for it. And also said that it will be worth your time to wait a few more days (you can see the people sharing their experiences who got their servers) - but if you do not want to wait - you can take a full refund and a sincere apology, and find a provider who can meet your expectations.

    What would be a better way to handle this situation? How would you handle it better? Please tell me, I would like to know so I can do better.

    What would you like me to do more than a full refund? Or are you just bored and want to continue chatting?

    You’ve done your part now and there’s nothing left for you to do here, so shuh 😂

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited December 2020

    @hosthatch said:
    What would be a better way to handle this situation? How would you handle it better? Please tell me, I would like to know so I can do better.

    Refund represents an admission that you are powerless, did everything that you could, and could not do better. This is acting as a human, and it's great.

    However, along apologies, taking responsibility makes it all much better. This is done by making the customer feel valuable in a contract with a provider which strives to do better for his/her loved customers. As such, instead of letting customers go on refunds, try to keep them by giving an incentive: a free month (or a free week) of service, or some stickers, or some images of their servers, or something extra. Anything is better than nothing, or better than any refund, especially after customers waited to grab your offer (during Black Friday hype), waited to get provisioned, and meanwhile you held their money to use.

    Another example which caught my eye: you made a mistake and people order services with multiple IPs. You take that away, admit your mistake, but gave nothing back against this unmet expectation. This is technically OK, but it is not emotionally great, because customer does not feel valued in such scenario. A wallpaper or a signed letter of appreciation would have been much better instead of taking something away and say after days of customer waiting: "if you don't like it, we will refund", or something like "find a provider who can meet your expectations".

    Thanked by 2Ramsterdam EHRA
  • @default said: some images of their servers

    I'll take those pictures of Equinix AM5 :tongue:

    Thanked by 2fazar vimalware
  • fazarfazar Member
    edited December 2020

    I got my stacked deals provisioned last night. Its performance is awesome. Really more bang for bucks. :smile:

    120 GB NVMe, 3 CPU, 24 GB ram, AMS
    Benchmark: https://clbin.com/jhmFY

  • vyas11vyas11 Member
    edited December 2020

    @hosthatch kudos for pulling off (almost) with aplomb. You mentioned in one of the posts about the amount of storage (PB) great statistic to give an idea of scale.

    If possible, mentioning number of orders received versus completed at the end of Day 7 would be great. If not, a percentage.

    Why am I suggesting that?
    Because the hard work put in by your team will get greater visibility that way rather than just “I did not get my service delivery in time” kind of posts.

    Finally, how can next time be even more awesome?

    Maybe by setting delivery time lines as per order number. e.g
    first X orders delivery time 7 days
    Next X orders delivery time 14 days and so on...

    On a lighter note, you can add a 5 or 10 dollar fee for “rush delivery”. The impatient whiners are welcome to pay if they want a faster provisioning.

    HTH...

    (and I am aware this is sounding preachy but done with right intention)

    Thanked by 2fazar vimalware
  • Damn. I'm definitely waiting for another 10TB storage next year. Btw, @hosthatch was it possible to order 2x the 10TB storage?

  • Apologies if this is already shared, I want to install Windows, so I prepared a patched ISO but how can I now upload somewhere so I can provide link in hosthatch control panel?

  • @balaji_pitchumani said: Apologies if this is already shared, I want to install Windows, so I prepared a patched ISO but how can I now upload somewhere so I can provide link in hosthatch control panel?

    An s3 bucket, a VPS running a web server, or even your basic shared hosting plan should suffice.

  • finally sidney's delivered. just like action movies ... very close to the last seconds B)

    Thanked by 1JohnFilch123
  • @hosthatch said:
    We'll shortly send out an email to all customers with delayed deliveries. Sharing it here for the record.

    Thank you for placing an order with us in our Black Friday 2020 promotions.

    You currently have one or more pending servers in your account. While we promised a 7 working days delivery time, we were not, unfortunately, able to keep this promise for all of the customers who ordered new servers.

    We are changing the ETA of your service delivery to 14th December, 2020. This gives us a few more days to provision your server in a way that we feel more comfortable with as we are still processing pending servers in small batches, rather than one single go which can create unexpected issues. It is likely that you will get your new server in the next few hours, but it is also likely that it might take up till Monday. Due to the volume of the servers involved, we cannot give you an exact time. But we can promise you that it will not take more time than Monday.

    We understand that this delay may be inconvenient and as such, will provide you with a full refund and an apology, should you no longer want to proceed with creating these new servers after having waited for 7 working days. We do however hope that you will give us a few more days to get you up and running.

    Please do not hesitate to reach out if we can provide any assistance, but please note that we will not be able to entertain requests for faster deliveries. We are already doing the best we can, and cannot give priority to one customer over another.

    This email does not apply to pre-orders in Milan, Madrid and Hong Kong, which have an ETA of 31st December. We do not expect any delays on that ETA.

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Hello, according to your reply, have all the undelivered orders been notified by email? No one has responded to my application to upgrade the Los Angeles NVMe Ticket, and I have not received the notification email. The current status of the ticket is " "On Hold", I don’t know if I can reply to the ticket to break the "On Hold" status. I am willing to wait to get the upgrade, but the problem is that I don’t know whether my upgrade is approved. Please allow me to ask here first. Can I reply to the "On Hold" ticket, I am very eager to get an upgrade.

  • Sydney benches:

    $5 p/m ($60 yearly)

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 3000.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 15.7 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 77.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 251.94 MB/s  (62.9k) | 1.26 GB/s    (19.7k)
    Write      | 252.60 MB/s  (63.1k) | 1.27 GB/s    (19.8k)
    Total      | 504.54 MB/s (126.1k) | 2.53 GB/s    (39.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.20 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.56 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Write      | 1.27 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.66 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Total      | 2.47 GB/s     (4.8k) | 3.22 GB/s     (3.1k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 376 Mbits/sec   | 110 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 481 Mbits/sec   | 95.8 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 513 Mbits/sec   | 86.4 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 639 Mbits/sec   | 315 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 578 Mbits/sec   | 163 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 525 Mbits/sec   | 116 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 772 Mbits/sec   | 320 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | busy
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 617
    Multi Core      | 1791
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5251125
    

    $25 p/m

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3000.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 31.4 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 136.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 262.98 MB/s  (65.7k) | 1.33 GB/s    (20.8k)
    Write      | 263.67 MB/s  (65.9k) | 1.34 GB/s    (21.0k)
    Total      | 526.65 MB/s (131.6k) | 2.68 GB/s    (41.9k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.26 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.53 GB/s     (1.4k)
    Write      | 1.33 GB/s     (2.6k) | 1.63 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Total      | 2.59 GB/s     (5.0k) | 3.16 GB/s     (3.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 389 Mbits/sec   | 114 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 509 Mbits/sec   | 107 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 362 Mbits/sec   | 112 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 842 Mbits/sec   | 206 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 635 Mbits/sec   | 135 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 401 Mbits/sec   | 147 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 837 Mbits/sec   | 265 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | busy
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 626
    Multi Core      | 2424
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5250913
    
    Thanked by 2DarkCarnage FrankZ
  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited December 2020

    @itplanes01 said:

    @hosthatch said:
    We'll shortly send out an email to all customers with delayed deliveries. Sharing it here for the record.

    Thank you for placing an order with us in our Black Friday 2020 promotions.

    You currently have one or more pending servers in your account. While we promised a 7 working days delivery time, we were not, unfortunately, able to keep this promise for all of the customers who ordered new servers.

    We are changing the ETA of your service delivery to 14th December, 2020. This gives us a few more days to provision your server in a way that we feel more comfortable with as we are still processing pending servers in small batches, rather than one single go which can create unexpected issues. It is likely that you will get your new server in the next few hours, but it is also likely that it might take up till Monday. Due to the volume of the servers involved, we cannot give you an exact time. But we can promise you that it will not take more time than Monday.

    We understand that this delay may be inconvenient and as such, will provide you with a full refund and an apology, should you no longer want to proceed with creating these new servers after having waited for 7 working days. We do however hope that you will give us a few more days to get you up and running.

    Please do not hesitate to reach out if we can provide any assistance, but please note that we will not be able to entertain requests for faster deliveries. We are already doing the best we can, and cannot give priority to one customer over another.

    This email does not apply to pre-orders in Milan, Madrid and Hong Kong, which have an ETA of 31st December. We do not expect any delays on that ETA.

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Hello, according to your reply, have all the undelivered orders been notified by email? No one has responded to my application to upgrade the Los Angeles NVMe Ticket, and I have not received the notification email. The current status of the ticket is " "On Hold", I don’t know if I can reply to the ticket to break the "On Hold" status. I am willing to wait to get the upgrade, but the problem is that I don’t know whether my upgrade is approved. Please allow me to ask here first. Can I reply to the "On Hold" ticket, I am very eager to get an upgrade.

    It's not yet approved or rejected, still waiting to do for you.

    Thanked by 1itplanes01
  • desperanddesperand Member
    edited December 2020

    @Falzo said:
    it's LET after all

    We have with you different LET.
    For me this is a place with many interesting people, reviews, respectful conversations, and great offers from different types of providers, where are most of these deals - quality and great.

    With respectful owners that not treat LET users like a trash just because of the price of the service.
    Because a little bit wise people knows how hard and not cheap to find a new client and turn that client into regular client that will pay for your job year after year and will purchase more. And that's impossible to return a client that used something once and got bad impression.

    For sure there must be some dicks who will abuse kind offers, but for that must be adequate automatic solutions.

    People are the most important treasure for any business, and acting like a Dick can offend any dangerous guy, with real power, who can and probably will destroy your business. There are a lot of good examples even on let. Need to be polite, and respectful and stay as a human being instead of a shit.

  • @TimboJones said:

    @itplanes01 said:

    @hosthatch said:
    We'll shortly send out an email to all customers with delayed deliveries. Sharing it here for the record.

    Thank you for placing an order with us in our Black Friday 2020 promotions.

    You currently have one or more pending servers in your account. While we promised a 7 working days delivery time, we were not, unfortunately, able to keep this promise for all of the customers who ordered new servers.

    We are changing the ETA of your service delivery to 14th December, 2020. This gives us a few more days to provision your server in a way that we feel more comfortable with as we are still processing pending servers in small batches, rather than one single go which can create unexpected issues. It is likely that you will get your new server in the next few hours, but it is also likely that it might take up till Monday. Due to the volume of the servers involved, we cannot give you an exact time. But we can promise you that it will not take more time than Monday.

    We understand that this delay may be inconvenient and as such, will provide you with a full refund and an apology, should you no longer want to proceed with creating these new servers after having waited for 7 working days. We do however hope that you will give us a few more days to get you up and running.

    Please do not hesitate to reach out if we can provide any assistance, but please note that we will not be able to entertain requests for faster deliveries. We are already doing the best we can, and cannot give priority to one customer over another.

    This email does not apply to pre-orders in Milan, Madrid and Hong Kong, which have an ETA of 31st December. We do not expect any delays on that ETA.

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Hello, according to your reply, have all the undelivered orders been notified by email? No one has responded to my application to upgrade the Los Angeles NVMe Ticket, and I have not received the notification email. The current status of the ticket is " "On Hold", I don’t know if I can reply to the ticket to break the "On Hold" status. I am willing to wait to get the upgrade, but the problem is that I don’t know whether my upgrade is approved. Please allow me to ask here first. Can I reply to the "On Hold" ticket, I am very eager to get an upgrade.

    It's not yet approved or rejected, still waiting to do for you.

    Thanks, so I can rest assured, I can continue to wait.

  • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Region: AU-NZ  https://bench.monster v.1.5.5 2020-12-10 
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -AU-NZ
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : Debian GNU/Linux 10 (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 4.19.0-13-amd64
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
     CPU Cores    : 2 @ 3000.000 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Disabled
     Load Average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
     Total Space  : 39G (1.3G ~4% used)
     Total RAM    : 7978 MB (68 MB + 183 MB Buff in use)
     Total SWAP   : 1023 MB (0 MB in use)
     Uptime       : 0 days 6:59
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS63473, HostHatch
     Organization : HostHatch, LLC
     Location     : Sydney, Australia / AU
     Region       : New South Wales
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 2934  (GOOD)
       Multi Core : 5254
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     :  99.8 MB/s
       sha256     : 184 MB/s
       md5sum     : 488 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 2048.0 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 4676.3 MB/s
    
     Disk Speed:
       1st run    : 907 MB/s
       2nd run    : 925 MB/s
       3rd run    : 964 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 932.0 MB/s
    
     ## Australia & New Zealand Speedtest.net
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping   
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Nearby                         900.41 Mbit/s    842.13 Mbit/s    2.522 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Australia, Sydney (Optus)      924.64 Mbit/s    776.30 Mbit/s     1.517 ms
     Australia, Melbourne (Telstra) 710.30 Mbit/s    786.12 Mbit/s    11.934 ms
     Australia, Brisbane (Telstra)  684.65 Mbit/s    729.22 Mbit/s    15.471 ms
     Australia, Adelaide (AARNet)   621.07 Mbit/s    396.07 Mbit/s    18.676 ms
     Australia, Hobart (Optus)      713.46 Mbit/s    740.38 Mbit/s    12.865 ms
     Australia, Darwin (AARNet)     231.70 Mbit/s    207.60 Mbit/s    57.892 ms
     Australia, Perth (Telstra)     287.40 Mbit/s    310.93 Mbit/s    50.982 ms
     NZ, Auckland (MyRepublic)      300.14 Mbit/s    330.98 Mbit/s    50.817 ms
     NZ, Wellington (Spark)         430.37 Mbit/s    473.70 Mbit/s    34.511 ms
     NZ, Christchurch (Vodafone)    306.64 Mbit/s    463.86 Mbit/s    39.204 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 6 min 37 sec
     Timestamp   : 2020-12-10 03:33:48 GMT
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - https://www.speedtest.net/result/10562733916.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15930738
     - https://clbin.com/OCOfL
    
    Thanked by 2DarkCarnage FrankZ
  • @Unixfy said:

    @balaji_pitchumani said: Apologies if this is already shared, I want to install Windows, so I prepared a patched ISO but how can I now upload somewhere so I can provide link in hosthatch control panel?

    An s3 bucket, a VPS running a web server, or even your basic shared hosting plan should suffice.

    THANKS....in control panel, mounted ISO, set boot order to ISO, STOPPED and Started...still seeing centos login ONLY...tried multiple times..still could not see windows ISO...in noVNC....not sure what am I missing..!

  • @balaji_pitchumani said:

    @Unixfy said:

    @balaji_pitchumani said: Apologies if this is already shared, I want to install Windows, so I prepared a patched ISO but how can I now upload somewhere so I can provide link in hosthatch control panel?

    An s3 bucket, a VPS running a web server, or even your basic shared hosting plan should suffice.

    THANKS....in control panel, mounted ISO, set boot order to ISO, STOPPED and Started...still seeing centos login ONLY...tried multiple times..still could not see windows ISO...in noVNC....not sure what am I missing..!

    you're definitely not missing any full stops... ... ...

  • Hello @hosthatch
    Can you check my ticket? ##151518

  • @balaji_pitchumani said:

    @Unixfy said:

    @balaji_pitchumani said: Apologies if this is already shared, I want to install Windows, so I prepared a patched ISO but how can I now upload somewhere so I can provide link in hosthatch control panel?

    An s3 bucket, a VPS running a web server, or even your basic shared hosting plan should suffice.

    THANKS....in control panel, mounted ISO, set boot order to ISO, STOPPED and Started...still seeing centos login ONLY...tried multiple times..still could not see windows ISO...in noVNC....not sure what am I missing..!

    Try totally stop the VPS, mount the ISO, then wait a few minutes before starting it. The ISO mounting seems a bit flaky.

    Thanked by 2rickonair TimboJones
Sign In or Register to comment.