Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Needing feedback on our proposed Block Storage, "BuyVM Slabs" ( $5 per 1TB)!

13567…12

Comments

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    I've fiddled with the idea of using different CPUs but people really want to have a minimum of 3.5Ghz.

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said:
    I've fiddled with the idea of using different CPUs but people really want to have a minimum of 3.5Ghz.

    Francisco

    Just do like HVH and make it aggregate.

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @WSS said:

    @Francisco said:
    I've fiddled with the idea of using different CPUs but people really want to have a minimum of 3.5Ghz.

    Francisco

    Just do like HVH and make it aggregate.

    Jesus Christ.

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said:
    Jesus Christ.

    Francisco

    You may call me WSS.

    WSS

  • oh my cat!

  • I currently have roughly 30TB of raided storage. $5/TB seems like a great price for attached storage, it puts it in line with an OVH storage server or a WebNX large storage server.

    So the question comes to performance. You said 100MBps/100IOPS per volume, does that scale with size?

    What I mean is; would a 5TB volume get more performance or would you have to do 5x1TB to get more?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @HackedServer said:
    I currently have roughly 30TB of raided storage. $5/TB seems like a great price for attached storage, it puts it in line with an OVH storage server or a WebNX large storage server.

    So the question comes to performance. You said 100MBps/100IOPS per volume, does that scale with size?

    What I mean is; would a 5TB volume get more performance or would you have to do 5x1TB to get more?

    I want to do that long term but haven't decided for sure what the break points would be.

    We'll see how the beta goes :)

    Francisco

  • I like 1TB for $5. Would there be some sort of redundancy at the disk level?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @Microlinux said:
    I like 1TB for $5. Would there be some sort of redundancy at the disk level?

    RAID6 at minimum, RAID10 more likely.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 2vimalware xxdocobxx
  • Probably would grab a 1TB to go with slice. But I echo pleas to start at 0.5

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @caracal said:
    Probably would grab a 1TB to go with slice. But I echo pleas to start at 0.5

    I'll see how things go.

    I wanted to hit $3/TB but wasn't able to quite get there.

    Francisco

  • yes please

  • What does 100mbps mean? That's the transfer speed between the slab and its attached vps? That issue had slipped past me earlier. I do think that slow speed is a drawback, given that it's over a short range LAN.

  • @Francisco said:
    I wanted to hit $3/TB but wasn't able to quite get there.

    on 2year prepays maybe.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @willie said:
    What does 100mbps mean? That's the transfer speed between the slab and its attached vps? That issue had slipped past me earlier. I do think that slow speed is a drawback, given that it's over a short range LAN.

    No, that's VPS<>World.

    Each VPS node will have a 10Gbit link to the storage fabric, dedicated to just storage work.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1lukehebb
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @vimalware said:

    @Francisco said:
    I wanted to hit $3/TB but wasn't able to quite get there.

    on 2year prepays maybe.

    Not sure I'd have many people wanting to bite at that with a Slice on top. The cheapest setup would be $150/2y for a 1GB slice and 1TB storage.

    Francisco

  • williewillie Member
    edited November 2017

    Francisco said: The cheapest setup would be $150/2y for a 1GB slice and 1TB storage.

    That is interesting. It's $6.5/TB/mo including the slice, vs. $8.5 month-to-month. With 2TB it's $4.75/TB/mo which is official cheap storage range (under $5/TB). Month-to-month never reaches that level, even with 16TB ($5.22/TB/mo). I could see myself going for the 2 TB, 2 year option if it was available. But $3/TB sounds underwater cost-wise if you use raid 10.

    Thanked by 2caracal vimalware
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    willie said: But $3/TB sounds underwater cost-wise if you use raid 10.

    It would be but that's why we have testing going on :) While my caching results look very promising, I haven't made it face the torture test that is LE customers.

    Even at $5/TB, I think it's very affordable storage, especially from someone that isn't trying to make next months rent.

    Francisco

  • Francisco said: While my caching results look very promising

    What RAID controller will you use? I'm curious about the durability of the controller, fail rates, etc

  • Want! Filled out the form. :)

  • Hmm already been considering using buyvm for a project and this could push me over the edge!

  • Would definitely pick one up if it came to Lux :-)

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @jiggawattz said:

    Francisco said: While my caching results look very promising

    What RAID controller will you use? I'm curious about the durability of the controller, fail rates, etc

    I haven't hard decided on that, that's part of what the beta is. What options we're considering though will stay within the select few working on said project.

    @lurch said:
    Hmm already been considering using buyvm for a project and this could push me over the edge!

    Almost there~

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said:

    Almost there~

    Damn you waves fist I'm already chaneling funds for BF deals. If you are doing offers I will host it with you rather than my current provider.

  • edited November 2017

    [Francisco said]

    Not sure I'd have many people wanting to bite at that with a Slice on top. The cheapest setup would be $150/2y for a 1GB slice and 1TB storage.

    Francisco

    To me, you're one of the few providers I would do a multi year deal with, since I know you'll be around. I'd bite on the 2TB multi year deal for sure.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • msg7086msg7086 Member
    edited November 2017

    I'd also love to see a smaller but faster option. For example, a 200GB slab with 400iops would be very helpful for those (like me?) running MySQL replication. We have a pretty busy database and usually offsite HDD can't even catch up in realtime. We are currently using ramnode ssd-cached, very reliable but low spec and not quite good for dumping huge database etc. We would love to try somewhere different.

    EDIT: Also if you are considering to ban torrenting from that block storage?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    Are the bigger KVM slices not possible? Too costly?

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said:
    Are the bigger KVM slices not possible? Too costly?

    Francisco

    Yea it's a 30GB database, including relay log and some buffers I'd like to have at least 100GB space around, and that pushes the monthly cost too high.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @msg7086 said:

    @Francisco said:
    Are the bigger KVM slices not possible? Too costly?

    Francisco

    Yea it's a 30GB database, including relay log and some buffers I'd like to have at least 100GB space around, and that pushes the monthly cost too high.

    You'd be $15.00/month right now, I can spot the 20GB difference.

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said:

    You'd be $15.00/month right now, I can spot the 20GB difference.

    Francisco

    That's why we are on ramnode ssd-cache line, which is $8/qtr for 120GB.

    And that's why I'm interested in slice+slab which is not supposed to bring the cost too high.

Sign In or Register to comment.