Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Dacentec.com down - Page 8
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

Dacentec.com down

1568101113

Comments

  • KrisKris Member
    edited January 2016

    jamesrat said: Now would be the time to post some benchmarks of your network. Looks like I am jumping ship from dacentec.

    I have a E5420 I'm setting up, here ya go.

    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is X
    
    Location                Provider        Speed
    CDN                     Cachefly        108MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          90.8MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       69.6MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       27.2MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       28.8MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       14.6MB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan            Linode          12.1MB/s 
    Singapore               Softlayer       7.96MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         4.91MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        34.4MB/s 
    
  • edited January 2016

    @Kris said:

    I suggest you remove your IP before the LET ddos bot fires at it

    Thanked by 1Kris
  • ALinuxNinja said: I suggest you remove your IP before the LET ddos bot fires at it

    Whoops, good call.

  • @jamesrat said:
    mikeyur MarkTurner Now would be the time to post some benchmarks of your network. Looks like I am jumping ship from dacentec.

    From my personal box:

    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
    
    Location        Provider    Speed
    CDN         Cachefly    108MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      94.7MB/s
    Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   74.7MB/s
    Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   29.7MB/s
    San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   32.2MB/s
    Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   3.40MB/s
    
    Tokyo, Japan        Linode      13.7MB/s
    Singapore       Softlayer   7.92MB/s
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     8.85MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    76.2MB/s
    
  • A bit curious why washington is so slow, that's just up north a bit.

  • ALinuxNinja said: A bit curious why washington is so slow, that's just up north a bit.

    Softlayer's routing is really bizarre. Those Softlayer benchmarks are always strange when I've tested. They have 1-2 test sites per location, you can get drastically different tests depending on which one you use.

    If you need better routing to Softlayer WDC, stick in a ticket and ask them to escalate it to NetOps.

    Thanked by 1PrincessOfCats
  • Here's Dacentec's Bench / Mirror speed test list running on Delimiter, guessing a lot will compare.

    Network Tests
    Download speed from CacheFly: 108MB/s 
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 89.2MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 71.2MB/s 
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.9MB/s 
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 34.3MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.73MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 27.9MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 30.5MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 67.7MB/s 
    Download speed from Dacentec, Lenoir, NC USA: 108MB/s 
    
  • @ALinuxNinja said:
    A bit curious why washington is so slow, that's just up north a bit.

    It's specifically that test, it's slow on every box I try. Some days it'll be good, other days it'll be showing KB/s. Whatever test server that's pulling from is bunk.

    Thanked by 1PrincessOfCats
  • MarkTurner said: Softlayer's routing is really bizarre. Those Softlayer benchmarks are always strange when I've tested. They have 1-2 test sites per location, you can get drastically different tests depending on which one you use.

    Err, this.

    Thanked by 1PrincessOfCats
  • mike0000mike0000 Member
    edited January 2016

    @Kris said:

    > Download speed from Dacentec, Lenoir, NC USA: 108MB/s 
    > 

    I expect that link will be a bit saturated as their network comes up ;)

    Thanked by 1Brad
  • mikeyur said: I expect that link will be a bit saturated as their network comes up ;)

    Meh, they've got the aggregate & transit... it's more the... redundancy part.

  • edited January 2016

    I like this. Much less hops. (side note: latency is a bit high, but that's only because I'm maxing out my upload speed)

    Been a long time since I've seen twtelecom ever since they've been acquired lol

    Thanked by 1MarkTurner
  • @Kris said:

    T'was a Dacentec -> Delimiter joke :) Lots of new folks up tonight and trying to move stuff, plus the folks from last week.

    Thanked by 2PrincessOfCats Kris
  • @ALinuxNinja said:
    I like this. Much less hops. (side note: latency is a bit high, but that's only because I'm maxing out my upload speed)

    Drop @MarkTurner a PM with your IP if you notice quirky routes, he's been working to fix some bad Shaw routes for me and other Canadian customers.

    Thanked by 1PrincessOfCats
  • @mikeyur

    we will play the whole structure of Delimiter below
    to be taking advantage of the problem solved between us here
    coming soon
    let's see if he and capable of supporting 300GB ++ in its structure and leave it to be profiteer

  • @mikeyur dacentec and good company however you are taking advantage of cituaçao they were only need to take a corrective to meet more customers you soon will be the next target

  • @mikeyur said:
    Drop MarkTurner a PM with your IP if you notice quirky routes, he's been working to fix some bad Shaw routes for me and other Canadian customers.

    dacentec and good company however you are taking advantage of cituaçao they were only need to take a corrective to meet more customers you soon will be the next target
    with all its structure we will see what you will say to your customers
    dacentec receive in 5 transit links 200gb ddos+ u receive double!
    for being a charlatan

    Thanked by 1vpsGOD
  • Funny how you signed up less than 20 minutes ago to post this type of stuff

  • @msthteam said:

    Can anyone understand him?

    Thanked by 2doughmanes netomx
  • @doughmanes said:
    Funny how you signed up less than 20 minutes ago to post this type of stuff

    what is problem?

    Thanked by 1vpsGOD
  • msthteam said: dacentec and good company however you are taking advantage of cituaçao they were only need to take a corrective to meet more customers you soon will be the next target with all its structure we will see what you will say to your customers dacentec receive in 5 transit links 200gb ddos+ u receive double! for being a charlatan

    Irrespective of whether they are good or bad, many of the customers here have experienced quite a number of outages and they want to move to another provider.

    If you are happy with their service, then you should remain with it and enjoy it. There is no compulsion to move.

    As for your comment about DDOS, you seem to know more about this matter than anyone else here. Until your clarification about your DDOS, we believed it was just a failure of their backhaul.

    BTW situaçao not cituaçao - if you are going to play the 'I am really a foreigner' game then spell it right.

  • msthteam said: what is problem?

    We can't understand you other than you're talking about DDOS.

  • @mikeyur said:

    sure u received double ddos in struture
    expect to see :)
    like people who doubt as to dacentec doubted

    https://i.gyazo.com/b7f250d55319265b62b31053fee1b988.png
    https://i.gyazo.com/f46b088edde51a99d256cb7ac10bd455.png

  • Is there a RFO for tonight's outage?

  • Date

    Saturday January 30, 2016

    Impact
    Data Center Location(s):
    801 Main Street NW, Lenoir, NC

    Service:
    Network
    Details
    We are currently experiencing network issues at our Lenoir, NC Data Center which may potentially impact network quality and redundancy at that site. We are working with to restore services as quickly as possible, but have no ETA at this time.

  • @ThracianDog said:

    this issue has already been resolved

  • @ThracianDog said:

    they were applying their network on 26 and 30/31 on the day they received an attack by mistreatment and lack of disposition to solve problems with clients

  • Guys, you do realise that @msthteam is the guy hitting @Dacentec, right?

    @Jarland, pass his IP to Dacentec for legal followup...

    Thanked by 3doughmanes Kris netomx
  • Well he told them via support ticket, easy to follow the payment trail....

  • @0xdragon said:
    Guys, you do realise that msthteam is the guy hitting Dacentec, right?

    Jarland, pass his IP to Dacentec for legal followup...

    'm nothing of dacentec
    i client

This discussion has been closed.