Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


OVH 2016 SSD VPS 1 Review? - Page 4
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

OVH 2016 SSD VPS 1 Review?

124678

Comments

  • OVH support never lies - OVH support doesn't know better. That's a different thing! ;-)

  • vfusevfuse Member, Host Rep

    Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • @vfuse said:
    Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?

    Dont believe the e3 12xx thing, I cant remeber where I read it, but somewhere it tells you on their site the CPU's they use.

    Thanked by 1vfuse
  • They Use E5's you can make the CPU show up as anything on KVM (look at vultr for example)

    Thanked by 2vfuse 4n0nx
  • FredQcFredQc Member
    edited October 2015
    Thanked by 2vfuse vimalware
  • @Amitz said:
    How long did it take them to answer in the end?

    2 days

    Thanked by 3Amitz 4n0nx Frecyboy
  • Benchmarks from the 1 Gig VPS I just bought for testing -

    CPU model            : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
    Number of cores      : 1
    CPU frequency        : 2394.436 MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 1964 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime        : 0days, 0:30:8
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       Node IP address         Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         10.0MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          3.47MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            2.77MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           11.9MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           11.8MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             5.95MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, TX               108.61.224.175          6.03MB/s
    Vultr, Seattle, WA              108.61.194.105          5.47MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, CA          108.61.219.200          6.15MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE            108.61.210.117          11.7MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP                108.61.201.151          2.61MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           7.26MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          5.39MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            11.7MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           3.33MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          3.24MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed : 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.97229 s, 361 MB/s
    
    CPU model :  Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency :  2394.436 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 1964 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime :   37 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 9.79MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 7.13MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 7.32MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.57MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.8MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.9MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.19MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 5.42MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 5.54MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 4.00MB/s
    I/O speed :  349 MB/s
    
    Thanked by 14n0nx
  • @vfuse said:
    Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?

    Did you run any dd test on it? Just curious about the performance on that plan.

  • vfusevfuse Member, Host Rep

    @Geekoine said:

    I didn't run any benchmark on it but comparing it to their runabove high i/o attached disk it's a bit faster. I'm running a replicaset for nixstats on it and it runs pretty well.

    Thanked by 1Geekoine
  • sinsin Member
    edited November 2015

    I finally picked up one of the OVH Cloud VPS 2016 in BHS yesterday (switching from regular SSD VPS) and I'm very happy with the performance. The VPS is really fast/snappy and my websites load great on it. This one has the ceph high availability disk setup and is the $8.99 Cloud 1.

    root@nyx:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency : 3092.820 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 1962 MB
    Total amount of swap : 511 MB
    System uptime : 4 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 12.0MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.46MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 11.2MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.63MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 5.56MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.3MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.29MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 9.77MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.3MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 9.78MB/s
    I/O speed : 553 MB/s

    root@nyx:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync; rm test
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.09451 s, 513 MB/s

    root@nyx:~# ioping . -c 10
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=178 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=255 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=146 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=275 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=291 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=6 time=284 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=7 time=188 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=8 time=242 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=9 time=268 us
    4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=10 time=284 us

    --- . (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9.01 s, 4.15 k iops, 16.2 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 146 us / 241 us / 291 us / 49 us

    Thanked by 1chrisfe
  • Note: That at the moment reverse dns on VPS SSD 2016 is not working.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    http://status.ovh.com/?do=details&id=11593

    Hmmm... thats a lotz on a box.

    Thanked by 3howardsl2 Amitz GCat
  • random io sucks on the SSD VPS line

    can someone post a serverbear benchmark on the 2016 cloud line?

  • @Infinity580 said:
    http://status.ovh.com/?do=details&id=11593

    Hmmm... thats a lotz on a box.

    120 VPS? I would put at least 240 on each node.

  • Depends on the node specs anyway, huh?

  • @Shigawire said:
    Depends on the node specs anyway, huh?

    Let's just say I think they know what they are doing :) Mines been running better than most they have previously claimed to be on 'E5s' very impressed with price2spec.

  • @Infinity580 said:
    http://status.ovh.com/?do=details&id=11593

    Hmmm... thats a lotz on a box.

    Had to figure density was up there with a dirt cheap 2GB KVM. Probably 256GB ram per node, as long as they balance out heavy cpu/io users across nodes it shouldn't cause any issues.

    @DrFallen said:

    Good to know. Thinking of grabbing one to run a few small things.

  • Anyone knows if it is possible to add some extra SSD space on VPS SSD 1 and what is the price?

  • I currently am using one, their amazing. Its really good specs for the price as well.

  • @buderus199 said:
    Anyone knows if it is possible to add some extra SSD space on VPS SSD 1 and what is the price?

    yes it is, if you order the ssd vps within their cloud range (same price, different setup)
    you will be able to add additional harddisks: https://www.ovh.com/us/cloud/storage/additional-disks.xml

  • nfnnfn Veteran
    edited January 2016

    1> @Falzo said:

    you will be able to add additional harddisks: https://www.ovh.com/us/cloud/storage/additional-disks.xml

    I think this only applies to the cloud vps, not the SSD Vps .
    Can you confirm this these disks can be mounted in the new SSD 2016 VPS?

  • let me highlight that for you:

    @Falzo said:
    yes it is, if you order the ssd vps within their cloud range (same price, different setup)

    it means there TWO ways to order an SSD VPS from OVH. product will be the same on price and specs, but they are different how they are listed and managed within their control panel and so is the handling of addons.

    so I am not talking about this: https://www.ovh.ie/vps/vps-ssd.xml
    but this: https://www.ovh.ie/cloud/instances/
    (scroll down to the grey plus and open it for VPS SSD Instances)

    posted a sample setup of the small 2,99 SSD VPS with two additional disk earlier on LET, here it is again:

    Thanked by 3nfn buderus199 Rolter
  • nfnnfn Veteran

    @Falzo thanks ... I didn't knew that service, sorry.

    Have you notice any performance diference between SSD line vs Cloud SSD?

  • nfn said: Have you notice any performance diference between SSD line vs Cloud SSD?

    disk speed & size & cpu & SLA only.
    Perfomance with SSD line a little bit lower then Cloud One.
    But both very good.

    Thanked by 2nfn Rolter
  • @nfn said:
    Have you notice any performance diference between SSD line vs Cloud SSD?

    nope, can't exactly tell if I benched both service, did play around a lot with those cheap things anyways... can recommend that setup, waiting for vrack to arrive and connect a setup of 3 SSD VPS with more than one additional disk and such things together. overall very decent and stable so far and ... cheapish ;-)

    Thanked by 1nfn
  • nfnnfn Veteran

    Looking for the diference (between SSD line), cloud instances are "best effort" regarding CPU and network while VPS are dedicated, so we should expect better performance in the last one!

    I'm going to play around with a "Cloud". Do they have IPv6 or only IPv4 like VPS?

  • nfn said: I'm going to play around with a "Cloud". Do they have IPv6 or only IPv4 like VPS?

    i do not have any ipv6 with their VPSes....
    Only with VPS-game...

  • up to those ressources they IMHO are the same, no SLA either on VPS SSD or Public Cloud SSD.
    I can't see any mentioning of "dedicated" or "guaranteed" with their normal VPS SSD line.
    I assume they only added "best effort" within their public cloud range offer, to make it explicitly clear, that these are not up to the regular SLAs

    neither product is mentioned in their international terms&conditions, but if german is not a problem, you might want to read their AGBs, as there are some differences:
    https://www.ovh.de/support/agb/Anlage_VPS_2016.pdf
    thats for the plain VPS and there are the SSD VPS mentioned explicitly as not under their SLA

    Dem Kunden ist bekannt und er stimmt ausdrücklich zu, dass für einen Virtual Private Server der SSD-Reihe die nachstehend aufgeführte Service Level Verpflichtung nicht gilt.

    after all, I wouldn't think to much about. its mostly the same product either way.

    no IPv6 so far as I can tell, and afaik no additional IPv4 within their public cloud before vRack becomes available - but that's something I didn't need so far, so maybe I am not up to date on this...

  • nfnnfn Veteran
    edited January 2016

    @Falzo, how do you mount the adicional disk inside your VM?

  • GeekoineGeekoine Member
    edited January 2016

    @Falzo said:
    up to those ressources they IMHO are the same, no SLA either on VPS SSD or Public Cloud SSD.
    I can't see any mentioning of "dedicated" or "guaranteed" with their normal VPS SSD line.
    I assume they only added "best effort" within their public cloud range offer, to make it explicitly clear, that these are not up to the regular SLAs

    Actually there is a difference between standard VPS SSD and VPS SSD under the public cloud, and that "best effort" isn't meaningless (according to what the support told me). BTW: VPS SSD on the public cloud share the same SLA of the public cloud.
    As for the resources, they are not "full" dedicated on the VPS ssd nor on VPS Cloud (on the VPS Cloud you cannot exceed the 90% CPU usage for more than 6 consecutive hours): only public cloud offers full dedicated resources (except for the VPS SSD on the public cloud)

    Thanked by 1nfn
Sign In or Register to comment.