Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?
@vfuse said:
Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?
Dont believe the e3 12xx thing, I cant remeber where I read it, but somewhere it tells you on their site the CPU's they use.
@vfuse said:
Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?
Did you run any dd test on it? Just curious about the performance on that plan.
I didn't run any benchmark on it but comparing it to their runabove high i/o attached disk it's a bit faster. I'm running a replicaset for nixstats on it and it runs pretty well.
I finally picked up one of the OVH Cloud VPS 2016 in BHS yesterday (switching from regular SSD VPS) and I'm very happy with the performance. The VPS is really fast/snappy and my websites load great on it. This one has the ceph high availability disk setup and is the $8.99 Cloud 1.
[email protected]:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 3092.820 MHz
Total amount of ram : 1962 MB
Total amount of swap : 511 MB
System uptime : 4 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 12.0MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.46MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 11.2MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.63MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 5.56MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.29MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 9.77MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 9.78MB/s
I/O speed : 553 MB/s
[email protected]:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync; rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.09451 s, 513 MB/s
[email protected]:~# ioping . -c 10
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=178 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=255 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=146 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=275 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=291 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=6 time=284 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=7 time=188 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=8 time=242 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=9 time=268 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=10 time=284 us
--- . (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.01 s, 4.15 k iops, 16.2 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 146 us / 241 us / 291 us / 49 us
@Shigawire said:
Depends on the node specs anyway, huh?
Let's just say I think they know what they are doing Mines been running better than most they have previously claimed to be on 'E5s' very impressed with price2spec.
Had to figure density was up there with a dirt cheap 2GB KVM. Probably 256GB ram per node, as long as they balance out heavy cpu/io users across nodes it shouldn't cause any issues.
@Falzo said:
yes it is, if you order the ssd vps within their cloud range (same price, different setup)
it means there TWO ways to order an SSD VPS from OVH. product will be the same on price and specs, but they are different how they are listed and managed within their control panel and so is the handling of addons.
@nfn said:
Have you notice any performance diference between SSD line vs Cloud SSD?
nope, can't exactly tell if I benched both service, did play around a lot with those cheap things anyways... can recommend that setup, waiting for vrack to arrive and connect a setup of 3 SSD VPS with more than one additional disk and such things together. overall very decent and stable so far and ... cheapish ;-)
Looking for the diference (between SSD line), cloud instances are "best effort" regarding CPU and network while VPS are dedicated, so we should expect better performance in the last one!
I'm going to play around with a "Cloud". Do they have IPv6 or only IPv4 like VPS?
up to those ressources they IMHO are the same, no SLA either on VPS SSD or Public Cloud SSD.
I can't see any mentioning of "dedicated" or "guaranteed" with their normal VPS SSD line.
I assume they only added "best effort" within their public cloud range offer, to make it explicitly clear, that these are not up to the regular SLAs
neither product is mentioned in their international terms&conditions, but if german is not a problem, you might want to read their AGBs, as there are some differences: https://www.ovh.de/support/agb/Anlage_VPS_2016.pdf
thats for the plain VPS and there are the SSD VPS mentioned explicitly as not under their SLA
Dem Kunden ist bekannt und er stimmt ausdrücklich zu, dass für einen Virtual Private Server der SSD-Reihe die nachstehend aufgeführte Service Level Verpflichtung nicht gilt.
after all, I wouldn't think to much about. its mostly the same product either way.
no IPv6 so far as I can tell, and afaik no additional IPv4 within their public cloud before vRack becomes available - but that's something I didn't need so far, so maybe I am not up to date on this...
@Falzo said:
up to those ressources they IMHO are the same, no SLA either on VPS SSD or Public Cloud SSD.
I can't see any mentioning of "dedicated" or "guaranteed" with their normal VPS SSD line.
I assume they only added "best effort" within their public cloud range offer, to make it explicitly clear, that these are not up to the regular SLAs
Actually there is a difference between standard VPS SSD and VPS SSD under the public cloud, and that "best effort" isn't meaningless (according to what the support told me). BTW: VPS SSD on the public cloud share the same SLA of the public cloud.
As for the resources, they are not "full" dedicated on the VPS ssd nor on VPS Cloud (on the VPS Cloud you cannot exceed the 90% CPU usage for more than 6 consecutive hours): only public cloud offers full dedicated resources (except for the VPS SSD on the public cloud)
Comments
OVH support never lies - OVH support doesn't know better. That's a different thing! ;-)
Just created a 35 euro per month 30gb ram/2 core instance, it seems to be a e3 12xx processor. Since the limit on this machine would be 32gb ram I guess the rest of the machine goes unused?
Dont believe the e3 12xx thing, I cant remeber where I read it, but somewhere it tells you on their site the CPU's they use.
They Use E5's you can make the CPU show up as anything on KVM (look at vultr for example)
They use Intel Xeon E5 v3
https://www.ovh.com/ca/en/vps/vps-cloud.xml
2 days
Benchmarks from the 1 Gig VPS I just bought for testing -
Did you run any dd test on it? Just curious about the performance on that plan.
I didn't run any benchmark on it but comparing it to their runabove high i/o attached disk it's a bit faster. I'm running a replicaset for nixstats on it and it runs pretty well.
I finally picked up one of the OVH Cloud VPS 2016 in BHS yesterday (switching from regular SSD VPS) and I'm very happy with the performance. The VPS is really fast/snappy and my websites load great on it. This one has the ceph high availability disk setup and is the $8.99 Cloud 1.
[email protected]:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 3092.820 MHz
Total amount of ram : 1962 MB
Total amount of swap : 511 MB
System uptime : 4 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 12.0MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.46MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 11.2MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.63MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 5.56MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.29MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 9.77MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 9.78MB/s
I/O speed : 553 MB/s
[email protected]:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync; rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.09451 s, 513 MB/s
[email protected]:~# ioping . -c 10
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=178 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=255 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=146 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=275 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=291 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=6 time=284 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=7 time=188 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=8 time=242 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=9 time=268 us
4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=10 time=284 us
--- . (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.01 s, 4.15 k iops, 16.2 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 146 us / 241 us / 291 us / 49 us
Note: That at the moment reverse dns on VPS SSD 2016 is not working.
http://status.ovh.com/?do=details&id=11593
Hmmm... thats a lotz on a box.
random io sucks on the SSD VPS line
can someone post a serverbear benchmark on the 2016 cloud line?
120 VPS? I would put at least 240 on each node.
Depends on the node specs anyway, huh?
Let's just say I think they know what they are doing
Mines been running better than most they have previously claimed to be on 'E5s' very impressed with price2spec.
Had to figure density was up there with a dirt cheap 2GB KVM. Probably 256GB ram per node, as long as they balance out heavy cpu/io users across nodes it shouldn't cause any issues.
Good to know. Thinking of grabbing one to run a few small things.
Anyone knows if it is possible to add some extra SSD space on VPS SSD 1 and what is the price?
I currently am using one, their amazing. Its really good specs for the price as well.
yes it is, if you order the ssd vps within their cloud range (same price, different setup)
you will be able to add additional harddisks: https://www.ovh.com/us/cloud/storage/additional-disks.xml
1> @Falzo said:
I think this only applies to the cloud vps, not the SSD Vps .
Can you confirm this these disks can be mounted in the new SSD 2016 VPS?
let me highlight that for you:
it means there TWO ways to order an SSD VPS from OVH. product will be the same on price and specs, but they are different how they are listed and managed within their control panel and so is the handling of addons.
so I am not talking about this: https://www.ovh.ie/vps/vps-ssd.xml
but this: https://www.ovh.ie/cloud/instances/
(scroll down to the grey plus and open it for VPS SSD Instances)
posted a sample setup of the small 2,99 SSD VPS with two additional disk earlier on LET, here it is again:
@Falzo thanks ... I didn't knew that service, sorry.
Have you notice any performance diference between SSD line vs Cloud SSD?
disk speed & size & cpu & SLA only.
Perfomance with SSD line a little bit lower then Cloud One.
But both very good.
nope, can't exactly tell if I benched both service, did play around a lot with those cheap things anyways... can recommend that setup, waiting for vrack to arrive and connect a setup of 3 SSD VPS with more than one additional disk and such things together. overall very decent and stable so far and ... cheapish ;-)
Looking for the diference (between SSD line), cloud instances are "best effort" regarding CPU and network while VPS are dedicated, so we should expect better performance in the last one!
I'm going to play around with a "Cloud". Do they have IPv6 or only IPv4 like VPS?
i do not have any ipv6 with their VPSes....
Only with VPS-game...
up to those ressources they IMHO are the same, no SLA either on VPS SSD or Public Cloud SSD.
I can't see any mentioning of "dedicated" or "guaranteed" with their normal VPS SSD line.
I assume they only added "best effort" within their public cloud range offer, to make it explicitly clear, that these are not up to the regular SLAs
neither product is mentioned in their international terms&conditions, but if german is not a problem, you might want to read their AGBs, as there are some differences:
https://www.ovh.de/support/agb/Anlage_VPS_2016.pdf
thats for the plain VPS and there are the SSD VPS mentioned explicitly as not under their SLA
after all, I wouldn't think to much about. its mostly the same product either way.
no IPv6 so far as I can tell, and afaik no additional IPv4 within their public cloud before vRack becomes available - but that's something I didn't need so far, so maybe I am not up to date on this...
@Falzo, how do you mount the adicional disk inside your VM?
Actually there is a difference between standard VPS SSD and VPS SSD under the public cloud, and that "best effort" isn't meaningless (according to what the support told me). BTW: VPS SSD on the public cloud share the same SLA of the public cloud.
As for the resources, they are not "full" dedicated on the VPS ssd nor on VPS Cloud (on the VPS Cloud you cannot exceed the 90% CPU usage for more than 6 consecutive hours): only public cloud offers full dedicated resources (except for the VPS SSD on the public cloud)