New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Jonathan Nguyen resigns as GreenValueHost Operations Director
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
maybe under NAT !?
Be a fucking ninja move though, wouldn't it; go to non CC locations to get the customers in, then move back to CC where the plans are actually viable due to 'technical issues'.
Edit:
Were @alanromano's AcclaimedHost at 100% CC shop?
From a cursory glance it looks like it. Their initial location was Buffalo and while he said that they'd be moving to non-CC location in LA, their website seems to trace into ColoCrossing at LA.
Also, UGVPS was in Lenoir for a while, so..
It would be, but it'd be a huge blow to GVH. For one, they're going to ask CC haters to use CC, which means paypal disputes / cancellations / overall more bashing for GVH.
OVH too now.
Ninja move indeed, but in this case, definitely not true.
Yes, we do. Since I didn't know the new IP beforehand, I have to keep refreshing SolusVM up to the moment the new IP appears. I'd then have to very rapidly change DNS records to limit the downtime.
There's even a third account with that IP, though it seems dormant.
They are domestic IPs (Comcast).
How do you know, Mr Biloh? I thought GVH were just a customer of yours, I didn't know you had any insight into their management and strategy.
Thanks for you and @Nekki's honesty/transparency.
So, @GreenValueHost / @GVH_Jaroslav / @alanromano... Sup?
The Acclaimed Host team seem to be models...
http://acclaimedhost.com/team
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-124797790/stock-photo-portrait-of-a-young-businessman.html?src=PS5DwrRy6S3EBRIUs8iKRA-1-1
http://depositphotos.com/19065839/stock-photo-portrait-of-businessman.html
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-124797694/stock-photo-portrait-of-a-mulatto-man.html?src=PS5DwrRy6S3EBRIUs8iKRA-1-1
Tineye is fun.
So acclaimed host isn't legit?
That's a bit disappointing.
@colm great job.
I still don't get why CC haters come to a CC owned and operated forum...
Goodness. That isn't the most professional way to put yourself on the internet if you own a hosting company.
Because there aren't really any other sites like LET.
Because some people were here before it was a ColoCrossing O&O?
Interesting.
I haven't read the thread but:
literally means that GVH was to date neither quality nor stable nor reputable
I thought we all knew this by now?
We all do, but it's interesting to hear it coming from GVH's COO (?)
My words for this thread.
Smoke, Mirrors, Fail, Again.
Honestly it's a fad. Jon still runs the show, and this is just another coverup for the fact that they are having "difficulties" and therefore "need" to move to CC. This, of course, is a croc of shit.
GVH=CC. Always has been.
And what evidence do you have to support this?
Negative publicity increases brand awareness, a brand might also consider undertaking potentially controversial moves to increase their visibility. If a risky tactic gets a bad response, the attention might nevertheless increase product recognition and ultimately boost sales. source
GVHTalk.com - Had a few new signups recently
Its also getting neg SEO'd by someone to try and get it out of Google ( http://gvhtalk.com/discussion/22/blackhat-spamseo-towards-gvhtalk-com ).
On a somewhat-related note: Figured out my connection issues with GVH Seattle.
All IPs are tunneled through CC Buffalo so.. I'm guessing that's where the congestion is.Quite possible that I was never in Seattle, despite being on "SeattleNode1":
traceroute to google.com (173.194.33.38), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 host.colocrossing.com (23.94.74.2) 0.021 ms 0.007 ms 0.006 ms 2 g2-33.rtr3.lw.netriver.net (69.46.34.17) 71.963 ms 72.193 ms 72.181 ms 3 br2.te1-0-0.lw.netriver.net (69.46.33.218) 71.820 ms 71.813 ms 71.803 ms 4 cr1-nr-g1-1.bb.spectrumnet.us (216.243.26.229) 72.757 ms 72.996 ms 72.985 ms 5 cr2-sea-b-te-0-1-0-18.bb.spectrumnet.us (174.127.141.57) 72.814 ms 72.805 ms 73.018 ms 6 google-peer-sea-spectrum-1.1e100.net (216.243.15.202) 72.267 ms 109.645 ms 109.637 ms 7 209.85.249.34 (209.85.249.34) 109.502 ms * * 8 sea09s02-in-f6.1e100.net (173.194.33.38) 85.611 ms * *@GreenValueHost @GVH_Jaroslav - Can I trade in my 3 tunneled IPs for 1 non-tunneled?
None of which are wrong, or a surprise to anyone -- if you think about it. :P
TBH that doesn't make any sense. If CC wanted a lowend undercover brand, they probably wouldn't select a 16 years old to run it. It is much more likely that they'd select a winning shoe salesman to do so