BERO HOST 10th Anniversary Deals – EPYC Turin / Ryzen 9950X / IPv6-only VPS

berohost · 8:45AM

@zhili said:
I noticed in recent replies that tickets around #20900+ have already received their pre-order invoices/links. However, my ticket #20803 (queue request for Anniversary XL) hasn't received any response yet.

Could you please take a look when you have a moment? Just wanted to make sure it didn't get missed.

Thanks in advance!

Most pre-orders will be shipped this evening. Please be patient a little longer.

berohost · 8:46AM

@abitstack said:
@berohost said:
@Hitori0221 said:
Geekbench 7 result of Anniversary XL after 24hrs, 2197 | 9919.
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 347.87 MB/s  (84.9k) | 2.57 GB/s    (39.3k)
Write      | 348.79 MB/s  (85.1k) | 2.59 GB/s    (39.5k)
Total      | 696.66 MB/s (170.0k) | 5.16 GB/s    (78.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.28 GB/s    (11.9k) | 8.65 GB/s     (8.2k)
Write      | 6.61 GB/s    (12.6k) | 9.23 GB/s     (8.8k)
Total      | 12.89 GB/s   (24.5k) | 17.89 GB/s   (17.0k)
looks pretty good.
We're also adding hardware to ensure that performance remains the same or improves.
This is great because performance degraded pretty quickly on the new epyc machines. Geekbench is down ~15% although steal time is still 0, so probably throttling. 4k iops started at ~140k, now more in the 80-90k region (compare this to the first yabs from the beginning of this thread - very bad for dbs). Pings now have spikes vm to vm of up to several ms, overall the ping between vms on this cluster is 0.25-0.3ms - direct ping on the old cluster used to be consistent ~0.15ms - which is a bummer. +overall the send speed to the internet went down quite a bit for everyone - old + new - which is not so bad in my case, since I need this for real production and not for file sharing, but disk and vm-vm ping are.
It's a little bit like you get what you pay for right now, so lets see how this plays out.

Feel free to submit a ticket if things haven't improved in 2–3 days. We're already working hard to significantly improve the situation, but it will take at least another 1–2 days.

hyperblast · 9:41AM

@radex said:

@Motion3549 said:
Which one better 9575f vs 9275f?

https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/19296362

Base Frequency 3.30 GHz

9575F seems not to work with boost frequency!

network · 9:57AM

My 9275F (4 cores): https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/19300761. Thanks @berohost.

abitstack · 9:58AM

@berohost said:
@abitstack said:
@berohost said:
@Hitori0221 said:
Geekbench 7 result of Anniversary XL after 24hrs, 2197 | 9919.
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 347.87 MB/s  (84.9k) | 2.57 GB/s    (39.3k)
Write      | 348.79 MB/s  (85.1k) | 2.59 GB/s    (39.5k)
Total      | 696.66 MB/s (170.0k) | 5.16 GB/s    (78.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.28 GB/s    (11.9k) | 8.65 GB/s     (8.2k)
Write      | 6.61 GB/s    (12.6k) | 9.23 GB/s     (8.8k)
Total      | 12.89 GB/s   (24.5k) | 17.89 GB/s   (17.0k)
looks pretty good.
We're also adding hardware to ensure that performance remains the same or improves.
This is great because performance degraded pretty quickly on the new epyc machines. Geekbench is down ~15% although steal time is still 0, so probably throttling. 4k iops started at ~140k, now more in the 80-90k region (compare this to the first yabs from the beginning of this thread - very bad for dbs). Pings now have spikes vm to vm of up to several ms, overall the ping between vms on this cluster is 0.25-0.3ms - direct ping on the old cluster used to be consistent ~0.15ms - which is a bummer. +overall the send speed to the internet went down quite a bit for everyone - old + new - which is not so bad in my case, since I need this for real production and not for file sharing, but disk and vm-vm ping are.
It's a little bit like you get what you pay for right now, so lets see how this plays out.
Feel free to submit a ticket if things haven't improved in 2–3 days. We're already working hard to significantly improve the situation, but it will take at least another 1–2 days.

Of course. Thank you for taking care.
Before starting submitting tickets I will rather wait a couple of days for things to settle down. At the moment it makes no sense to rush things since you are expecting a second wave once restock arrives. Right now I think all customers on the new cluster have a degraded experience (I have on all my servers) so it makes sense to wait until everybody gets great performance again (this is not a problem on a particular vm or host) instead of ticketing and stealing your time. It's just a bit annoying, since one used to order a server and use it full send right away.

Anyways congrats on the anniversary and on the fire sale - wish you all the best !

BTW is the network setup different on this cluster - asking because of the 0.25ms ping minimum - on the old cluster ping vm to vm is consistent at ~0.15ms if not going through the gateway (5.175.220.3) ?

lovelyserver · 9:58AM

@abitstack said:
@berohost said:
@Hitori0221 said:
Geekbench 7 result of Anniversary XL after 24hrs, 2197 | 9919.
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 347.87 MB/s  (84.9k) | 2.57 GB/s    (39.3k)
Write      | 348.79 MB/s  (85.1k) | 2.59 GB/s    (39.5k)
Total      | 696.66 MB/s (170.0k) | 5.16 GB/s    (78.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.28 GB/s    (11.9k) | 8.65 GB/s     (8.2k)
Write      | 6.61 GB/s    (12.6k) | 9.23 GB/s     (8.8k)
Total      | 12.89 GB/s   (24.5k) | 17.89 GB/s   (17.0k)
looks pretty good.
We're also adding hardware to ensure that performance remains the same or improves.
This is great because performance degraded pretty quickly on the new epyc machines. Geekbench is down ~15% although steal time is still 0, so probably throttling. 4k iops started at ~140k, now more in the 80-90k region (compare this to the first yabs from the beginning of this thread - very bad for dbs). Pings now have spikes vm to vm of up to several ms, overall the ping between vms on this cluster is 0.25-0.3ms - direct ping on the old cluster used to be consistent ~0.15ms - which is a bummer. +overall the send speed to the internet went down quite a bit for everyone - old + new - which is not so bad in my case, since I need this for real production and not for file sharing, but disk and vm-vm ping are.
It's a little bit like you get what you pay for right now, so lets see how this plays out.

Do not forget the most probably heavy YABS runnings because anyone want to see the results.

As Berohost has said, in 2-3 days the situation will improve.

barbaros · 10:33AM

All the MJJs will abuse the shit out of the nodes, last time someone was asking in this thread if it's okay to burst the core for 24hours. So performance degrade will happen.

allthemtings · 10:35AM

@barbaros said:
All the MJJs will abuse the shit out of the nodes, last time someone was asking in this thread if it's okay to burst the core for 24hours. So performance degrade will happen.

Lkwang · 10:47AM

Hope to restock soon, looking forward to pre-ordering or buying, the money is ready

berohost · 10:53AM

@abitstack said:
@berohost said:
@abitstack said:
@berohost said:
@Hitori0221 said:
Geekbench 7 result of Anniversary XL after 24hrs, 2197 | 9919.
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 347.87 MB/s  (84.9k) | 2.57 GB/s    (39.3k)
Write      | 348.79 MB/s  (85.1k) | 2.59 GB/s    (39.5k)
Total      | 696.66 MB/s (170.0k) | 5.16 GB/s    (78.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.28 GB/s    (11.9k) | 8.65 GB/s     (8.2k)
Write      | 6.61 GB/s    (12.6k) | 9.23 GB/s     (8.8k)
Total      | 12.89 GB/s   (24.5k) | 17.89 GB/s   (17.0k)
looks pretty good.
We're also adding hardware to ensure that performance remains the same or improves.
This is great because performance degraded pretty quickly on the new epyc machines. Geekbench is down ~15% although steal time is still 0, so probably throttling. 4k iops started at ~140k, now more in the 80-90k region (compare this to the first yabs from the beginning of this thread - very bad for dbs). Pings now have spikes vm to vm of up to several ms, overall the ping between vms on this cluster is 0.25-0.3ms - direct ping on the old cluster used to be consistent ~0.15ms - which is a bummer. +overall the send speed to the internet went down quite a bit for everyone - old + new - which is not so bad in my case, since I need this for real production and not for file sharing, but disk and vm-vm ping are.
It's a little bit like you get what you pay for right now, so lets see how this plays out.
Feel free to submit a ticket if things haven't improved in 2–3 days. We're already working hard to significantly improve the situation, but it will take at least another 1–2 days.
Of course. Thank you for taking care.
Before starting submitting tickets I will rather wait a couple of days for things to settle down. At the moment it makes no sense to rush things since you are expecting a second wave once restock arrives. Right now I think all customers on the new cluster have a degraded experience (I have on all my servers) so it makes sense to wait until everybody gets great performance again (this is not a problem on a particular vm or host) instead of ticketing and stealing your time. It's just a bit annoying, since one used to order a server and use it full send right away.

Anyways congrats on the anniversary and on the fire sale - wish you all the best !

BTW is the network setup different on this cluster - asking because of the 0.25ms ping minimum - on the old cluster ping vm to vm is consistent at ~0.15ms if not going through the gateway (5.175.220.3) ?

The network setup shouldn't be any different. We'd be happy to take a closer look if the issue persists in 1–2 days.

berohost · 10:54AM

@Lkwang said:
Hope to restock soon, looking forward to pre-ordering or buying, the money is ready

It will take another 2–3 days to restock

hyperblast · 11:06AM

@network said:
My 9275F (4 cores): https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/19300761. Thanks @berohost.

lucky you!

mine:

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 1 days, 14 hours, 32 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 3300 MHz <----------------------base clock
AES-NI     : ? 
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 20.0 GiB
Swap       : 3.0 GiB
Disk       : 198.9 GiB
Distro     : Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (64-Bit)
Kernel     : 10.0.26100 Build 26100
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2129
Multi Core      | 6460

network · 11:09AM

@hyperblast said:

@network said:
My 9275F (4 cores): https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/19300761. Thanks @berohost.

lucky you!

mine:

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 1 days, 14 hours, 32 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 3300 MHz <----------------------base clock
AES-NI     : ? 
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 20.0 GiB
Swap       : 3.0 GiB
Disk       : 198.9 GiB
Distro     : Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (64-Bit)
Kernel     : 10.0.26100 Build 26100
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2129
Multi Core      | 6460

4.1 Ghz here.

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 3 hours, 24 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9275F 24-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 4099.992 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 11.7 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 118.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)
Kernel     : 6.12.38+deb13-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

hyperblast · 11:10AM

i see. and base clock for 9275f is?

berohost · 11:14AM

@hyperblast said:
i see. and base clock for 9275f is?

4.1 GHz

hyperblast · 11:22AM

@berohost said:

@hyperblast said:
i see. and base clock for 9275f is?

4.1 GHz

ok. and both 9275f and 9575f always run with base block?

alincupunct · 11:27AM

@hyperblast said:

@berohost said:

@hyperblast said:
i see. and base clock for 9275f is?

4.1 GHz

ok. and both 9275f and 9575f always run with base block?

No, I don’t think you ever get the actual boost clocks in VM’s.

ascicode · 11:30AM

Almost forgot my 3 vps from last year.

yforward77 · 11:44AM

Hi, will the Anniversary S Ryzen VPS plan be restocked again? If so, do you know roughly when it will become available?
Also, would it be possible for me to top up my account balance first, open a support ticket, and then wait for a server to be allocated when stock becomes available?
I would really appreciate it if you could reply to me, as I’m very interested in purchasing this plan. Thank you!

JohnFilch123 · 11:46AM

@yforward77 said: as I’m very interested

If you are - open a ticket and see what will happen.

Lkwang · 12:06PM

@yforward77 said:
Hi, will the Anniversary S Ryzen VPS plan be restocked again? If so, do you know roughly when it will become available?
Also, would it be possible for me to top up my account balance first, open a support ticket, and then wait for a server to be allocated when stock becomes available?
I would really appreciate it if you could reply to me, as I’m very interested in purchasing this plan. Thank you!

It’s now
I see it's in stock right now, 9950x

berohost · 12:06PM

@yforward77 said:
Hi, will the Anniversary S Ryzen VPS plan be restocked again? If so, do you know roughly when it will become available?
Also, would it be possible for me to top up my account balance first, open a support ticket, and then wait for a server to be allocated when stock becomes available?
I would really appreciate it if you could reply to me, as I’m very interested in purchasing this plan. Thank you!

We've restocked the Ryzen VPS.
EPYC Turin will take another 2–3 days.

Lkwang · 12:19PM

@berohost said:

@yforward77 said:
Hi, will the Anniversary S Ryzen VPS plan be restocked again? If so, do you know roughly when it will become available?
Also, would it be possible for me to top up my account balance first, open a support ticket, and then wait for a server to be allocated when stock becomes available?
I would really appreciate it if you could reply to me, as I’m very interested in purchasing this plan. Thank you!

We've restocked the Ryzen VPS.
EPYC Turin will take another 2–3 days.

Looking forward to it, looking forward to the stock replenishment as soon as possible - I need it

lbroot · 12:23PM

@berohost said:

@lbroot said:
Can I upgrade Anniversary M to Anniversary L?

Yes, via a support ticket

Support PIN 223289 I have top up the credit and opened a ticket, thx!

yforward77 · 12:54PM

@Lkwang said:

@yforward77 said:
Hi, will the Anniversary S Ryzen VPS plan be restocked again? If so, do you know roughly when it will become available?
Also, would it be possible for me to top up my account balance first, open a support ticket, and then wait for a server to be allocated when stock becomes available?
I would really appreciate it if you could reply to me, as I’m very interested in purchasing this plan. Thank you!

It’s now
I see it's in stock right now, 9950x

@berohost said:

@yforward77 said:
Hi, will the Anniversary S Ryzen VPS plan be restocked again? If so, do you know roughly when it will become available?
Also, would it be possible for me to top up my account balance first, open a support ticket, and then wait for a server to be allocated when stock becomes available?
I would really appreciate it if you could reply to me, as I’m very interested in purchasing this plan. Thank you!

We've restocked the Ryzen VPS.
EPYC Turin will take another 2–3 days.

Thanks!

kenjing789 · 1:33PM

@barbaros said:
All the MJJs will abuse the shit out of the nodes, last time someone was asking in this thread if it's okay to burst the core for 24hours. So performance degrade will happen.

+1 block MJJ unless ticket open

Jinjo · 1:39PM

@hyperblast said:

@berohost said:

@hyperblast said:
i see. and base clock for 9275f is?

4.1 GHz

ok. and both 9275f and 9575f always run with base block?

The hypervisor usually exposes the base clock to the guest rather than the CPU’s real-time boost frequency.

Lkwang · 1:44PM

If it runs out of stock and I don't get one, that would be really frustratingt would be really frustrating if I missed out on the restock.
I need EPYC Anniversary M

JohnFilch123 · 1:52PM

@Lkwang said: that would be really frustratingt would be really frustrating

I do not do not repeat twice.

liwin1 · 1:52PM

@berohost Hello, my ticket number is #20822. I have pre-ordered an XXL size item, but no one has replied to me yet

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

BERO HOST 10th Anniversary Deals – EPYC Turin / Ryzen 9950X / IPv6-only VPS

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

BERO HOST 10th Anniversary Deals – EPYC Turin / Ryzen 9950X / IPv6-only VPS

Comments