Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...] - Page 7
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...]

145791037

Comments

  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    I would fry and eat my hat if someone would offer such a deal with dedicated cores. 🙈
    No, we are not the right choice for you.

    That's right I stand on business and logic, not heard of people. So over-provisioned then? What's the ratio? 8/12 or 100/110

    The OP ratio doesn't matter. CPU Time matters. More accurately, trying to keep guest stealtime low.

    This is why we usually don't utilize hosts more then 60%

    Gotcha, but that's the point utilization is by default a measure of time utilized by the processes. Over-provisioning is usually distribution of resources in a way that makes your servers ~95% utilized at all times, but that comes with its own drawbacks. You either expel misbehaving pods(vms) or you have a separate server for them, which also eats at the cost but still keeps it lower than outright rigid provisioning. 6/10 and 4/10 for burst, not bad. I would keep it at 3/4 and 1/4 for burst.

    Thank you.

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @ktalap said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    I would fry and eat my hat if someone would offer such a deal with dedicated cores. 🙈
    No, we are not the right choice for you.

    That's right I stand on business and logic, not heard of people. So over-provisioned then? What's the ratio? 8/12 or 100/110

    The OP ratio doesn't matter. CPU Time matters. More accurately, trying to keep guest stealtime low.

    This is why we usually don't utilize hosts more then 60%

    Gotcha, but that's the point utilization is by default a measure of time utilized by the processes. Over-provisioning is usually distribution of resources in a way that makes your servers ~95% utilized at all times, but that comes with its own drawbacks. You either expel misbehaving pods(vms) or you have a separate server for them, which also eats at the cost but still keeps it lower than outright rigid provisioning. 6/10 and 4/10 for burst, not bad. I would keep it at 3/4 and 1/4 for burst.

    Thank you.

    Very appreciated!

  • No need to wait for Black Friday. Haha. This deal is awesome!

  • @kontana said:
    No need to wait for Black Friday. Haha. This deal is awesome!

    Last cyber monday ph24 give 25% bonus on credit topup. If it they do this again, 4c 16g genoa will be only 4 EUR per month.

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @faleddo said:

    @kontana said:
    No need to wait for Black Friday. Haha. This deal is awesome!

    Last cyber monday ph24 give 25% bonus on credit topup. If it they do this again, 4c 16g genoa will be only 4 EUR per month.

    👀

    Thanked by 2loay Frameworks
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @kontana said:
    No need to wait for Black Friday. Haha. This deal is awesome!

    We will do something similarly black friday too 😎

  • do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Mining is not allowed if this causes a persistently high CPU load, as this offer does not include virtual dedicated but shared cores.

  • @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Yes. Fair use policy.
    As it's not dedicated, please stay away with abusing crypto stuff that eats up cpu power for everyone else. Thanks.

  • @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Since you mentioned related word, reading blogs related to cryptocurrency should be allowed. :)

    Thanked by 1Frameworks
  • RayReddRayRedd Member
    edited September 2024

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Mining is not allowed if this causes a persistently high CPU load, as this offer does not include virtual dedicated but shared cores.

    no, i won't use it for mining as it will persistently hit 100%
    what i mean by cryptocurrency related are like running rpc, validator, verifier and light node?
    it won't use 80-100% cpu persistently, but sometimes it will reach 100%
    with 8vcpu, my current usage is never below than 30%
    is it still allowed?

    the average usage is like this

  • @dev_vps said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Since you mentioned related word, reading blogs related to cryptocurrency should be allowed. :)

    yes, and this also, some of providers even strictly prohibits anything related to crypto
    if the main concern is CPU usage, then i guess it's still permissible to host it. :#

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @RayRedd said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Since you mentioned related word, reading blogs related to cryptocurrency should be allowed. :)

    yes, and this also, some of providers even strictly prohibits anything related to crypto
    if the main concern is CPU usage, then i guess it's still permissible to host it. :#

    That should be fine.

  • minenceminence Member
    edited September 2024

    80% cpu already used.

    That's awesome, I haven't even logged in yet...

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @minence said:
    80% cpu already used.

    That's awesome, I haven't even logged in yet...

    Booting the kernel + fetching updates and upgrading system packages on boot is not for free. ;)

    Thanked by 2Frameworks emgh
  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @minence said:
    80% cpu already used.

    That's awesome, I haven't even logged in yet...

    Booting the kernel + fetching updates and upgrading system packages on boot is not for free. ;)

    YABS to confirm with @hyperblast's recent Geekbench test results.

    Sat Sep  7 12:52:10 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3099.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.10.6+bpo-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host       : Prohosting24
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 88.40 MB/s   (22.1k) | 1.35 GB/s    (21.2k)
    Write      | 88.63 MB/s   (22.1k) | 1.36 GB/s    (21.3k)
    Total      | 177.03 MB/s  (44.2k) | 2.72 GB/s    (42.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.89 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.94 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.99 GB/s     (3.9k) | 2.07 GB/s     (2.0k)
    Total      | 3.89 GB/s     (7.6k) | 4.01 GB/s     (3.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.88 Gbits/sec  | 1.93 Gbits/sec  | 11.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.02 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 7.47 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 543 Mbits/sec   | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 95.0 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 305 Mbits/sec   | 1.31 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 418 Mbits/sec   | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 397 Mbits/sec   | 1.60 Gbits/sec  | 84.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 389 Mbits/sec   | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 197 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 1.91 Gbits/sec  | 11.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.00 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 7.41 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 362 Mbits/sec   | 1.78 Gbits/sec  | 91.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 337 Mbits/sec   | 1.37 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 471 Mbits/sec   | 1.40 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 452 Mbits/sec   | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 82.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 366 Mbits/sec   | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 197 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1017
    Multi Core      | 3857
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22844592
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1461
    Multi Core      | 4649
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7658032
    
    YABS completed in 16 min 33 sec
    

    Previous YABS data (September 4, 2024)

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3099.996 MHz
    AES-NI     :  Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V :  Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.10.6+bpo-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  :  Online /  Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host       : Prohosting24
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 93.24 MB/s   (23.3k) | 1.09 GB/s    (17.0k)
    Write      | 93.49 MB/s   (23.3k) | 1.09 GB/s    (17.1k)
    Total      | 186.73 MB/s  (46.6k) | 2.19 GB/s    (34.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.86 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.96 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Write      | 1.96 GB/s     (3.8k) | 2.09 GB/s     (2.0k)
    Total      | 3.82 GB/s     (7.4k) | 4.06 GB/s     (3.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 11.5 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.06 Gbits/sec  | 1.99 Gbits/sec  | 7.04 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 323 Mbits/sec   | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 92.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 31.9 Mbits/sec  | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 156 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 379 Mbits/sec   | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 350 Mbits/sec   | 1.83 Gbits/sec  | --
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 295 Mbits/sec   | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 196 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 11.5 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 7.03 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 292 Mbits/sec   | 1.82 Gbits/sec  | 91.8 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 257 Mbits/sec   | 1.45 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 425 Mbits/sec   | 1.35 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 418 Mbits/sec   | 1.70 Gbits/sec  | 81.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 293 Mbits/sec   | 823 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1311
    Multi Core      | 4534
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22837650
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1750
    Multi Core      | 5681
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7627090
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 33 sec
    
    
  • @loay said: YABS to confirm with @hyperblast's recent Geekbench test results.

    Yeah, pretty much expected, this is a great deal, hundreds of people have allocated and started using their share of resources, the CPU has started being really used and warmed up, CPU clock is going down to cool itself, and the performance as measured by yabs reflects that and numbers go down. This is a quite normal process.

    I've discussed this with Advin in some topic on LET several days ago, and in the past he definitely did even more thorough benchmarks of modern Epycs as soon as they get close to 50% usage.

    You are now in good hands of pf24 to stop admitting new customers and keep the performance at this level (which is still very good). Or quickly order more horsepower and keep the show going...

    Thanked by 2loay hyperblast
  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Since you mentioned related word, reading blogs related to cryptocurrency should be allowed. :)

    yes, and this also, some of providers even strictly prohibits anything related to crypto
    if the main concern is CPU usage, then i guess it's still permissible to host it. :#

    That should be fine.

    Sorry, may I reconfirm if this condition below is also ok before I share it to my friends ?
    because you quoted my other post

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Mining is not allowed if this causes a persistently high CPU load, as this offer does not include virtual dedicated but shared cores.

    no, i won't use it for mining as it will persistently hit 100%
    what i mean by cryptocurrency related are like running rpc, validator, verifier and light node?
    it won't use 80-100% cpu persistently, but sometimes it will reach 100%
    with 8vcpu, my current usage is never below than 30%
    is it still allowed?

    the average usage is like this

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Since you mentioned related word, reading blogs related to cryptocurrency should be allowed. :)

    yes, and this also, some of providers even strictly prohibits anything related to crypto
    if the main concern is CPU usage, then i guess it's still permissible to host it. :#

    That should be fine.

    Sorry, may I reconfirm if this condition below is also ok before I share it to my friends ?
    because you quoted my other post

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:
    do you have any policy that prohibit any cryptocurrency related activity?

    Mining is not allowed if this causes a persistently high CPU load, as this offer does not include virtual dedicated but shared cores.

    no, i won't use it for mining as it will persistently hit 100%
    what i mean by cryptocurrency related are like running rpc, validator, verifier and light node?
    it won't use 80-100% cpu persistently, but sometimes it will reach 100%
    with 8vcpu, my current usage is never below than 30%
    is it still allowed?

    the average usage is like this

    validator can cause lot of problems
    @ProHosting24 — in my opinion, not a good idea to permit validators and verifiers.

    Validator Nodes: 
    These nodes actively participate in the consensus 
    mechanism (e.g., staking, mining, or validating transactions). 
    Validators, especially in Proof of Stake (PoS) or Proof of Work (PoW) 
    systems, usually require significant CPU, memory, 
    and sometimes even GPU resources. 
    
    The CPU demand can be particularly high during 
    block generation and validation periods.
    
    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • Please include other locations such as the US and Asia <3

    Thanked by 1lala_th
  • Ignoring the DMCA?

  • Yes other locations mainly USA with same plans

  • Is paypal available?

  • @xiaodaiwl said:
    Is paypal available?

    Yes

  • degraded day by day :)

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1533
    Multi Core | 4011

    Thanked by 2faleddo TODO
  • Please open Alipay transaction gateway

  • @maverick said:

    @loay said: YABS to confirm with @hyperblast's recent Geekbench test results.

    Yeah, pretty much expected, this is a great deal, hundreds of people have allocated and started using their share of resources, the CPU has started being really used and warmed up, CPU clock is going down to cool itself, and the performance as measured by yabs reflects that and numbers go down. This is a quite normal process.

    I've discussed this with Advin in some topic on LET several days ago, and in the past he definitely did even more thorough benchmarks of modern Epycs as soon as they get close to 50% usage.

    You are now in good hands of pf24 to stop admitting new customers and keep the performance at this level (which is still very good). Or quickly order more horsepower and keep the show going...

    you @loay & @maverick are referring to this:

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4014485/#Comment_4014485

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • @hyperblast said:

    @maverick said:

    @loay said: YABS to confirm with @hyperblast's recent Geekbench test results.

    Yeah, pretty much expected, this is a great deal, hundreds of people have allocated and started using their share of resources, the CPU has started being really used and warmed up, CPU clock is going down to cool itself, and the performance as measured by yabs reflects that and numbers go down. This is a quite normal process.

    I've discussed this with Advin in some topic on LET several days ago, and in the past he definitely did even more thorough benchmarks of modern Epycs as soon as they get close to 50% usage.

    You are now in good hands of pf24 to stop admitting new customers and keep the performance at this level (which is still very good). Or quickly order more horsepower and keep the show going...

    you @loay & @maverick are referring to this:

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4014485/#Comment_4014485

    Yes. And this https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4006206/#Comment_4006206

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @minence said:
    80% cpu already used.

    That's awesome, I haven't even logged in yet...

    Booting the kernel + fetching updates and upgrading system packages on boot is not for free. ;)

    YABS to confirm with @hyperblast's recent Geekbench test results.

    Sat Sep  7 12:52:10 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3099.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.10.6+bpo-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host       : Prohosting24
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 88.40 MB/s   (22.1k) | 1.35 GB/s    (21.2k)
    Write      | 88.63 MB/s   (22.1k) | 1.36 GB/s    (21.3k)
    Total      | 177.03 MB/s  (44.2k) | 2.72 GB/s    (42.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.89 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.94 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.99 GB/s     (3.9k) | 2.07 GB/s     (2.0k)
    Total      | 3.89 GB/s     (7.6k) | 4.01 GB/s     (3.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.88 Gbits/sec  | 1.93 Gbits/sec  | 11.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.02 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 7.47 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 543 Mbits/sec   | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 95.0 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 305 Mbits/sec   | 1.31 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 418 Mbits/sec   | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 397 Mbits/sec   | 1.60 Gbits/sec  | 84.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 389 Mbits/sec   | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 197 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 1.91 Gbits/sec  | 11.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.00 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 7.41 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 362 Mbits/sec   | 1.78 Gbits/sec  | 91.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 337 Mbits/sec   | 1.37 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 471 Mbits/sec   | 1.40 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 452 Mbits/sec   | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 82.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 366 Mbits/sec   | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 197 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1017
    Multi Core      | 3857
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22844592
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1461
    Multi Core      | 4649
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7658032
    
    YABS completed in 16 min 33 sec
    

    Previous YABS data (September 4, 2024)

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3099.996 MHz
    AES-NI     :  Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V :  Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.10.6+bpo-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  :  Online /  Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host       : Prohosting24
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 93.24 MB/s   (23.3k) | 1.09 GB/s    (17.0k)
    Write      | 93.49 MB/s   (23.3k) | 1.09 GB/s    (17.1k)
    Total      | 186.73 MB/s  (46.6k) | 2.19 GB/s    (34.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.86 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.96 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Write      | 1.96 GB/s     (3.8k) | 2.09 GB/s     (2.0k)
    Total      | 3.82 GB/s     (7.4k) | 4.06 GB/s     (3.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 11.5 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.06 Gbits/sec  | 1.99 Gbits/sec  | 7.04 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 323 Mbits/sec   | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 92.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 31.9 Mbits/sec  | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 156 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 379 Mbits/sec   | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 350 Mbits/sec   | 1.83 Gbits/sec  | --
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 295 Mbits/sec   | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 196 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 11.5 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 7.03 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 292 Mbits/sec   | 1.82 Gbits/sec  | 91.8 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 257 Mbits/sec   | 1.45 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 425 Mbits/sec   | 1.35 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 418 Mbits/sec   | 1.70 Gbits/sec  | 81.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 293 Mbits/sec   | 823 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1311
    Multi Core      | 4534
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22837650
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1750
    Multi Core      | 5681
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7627090
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 33 sec
    
    

    @maverick said:

    @loay said: YABS to confirm with @hyperblast's recent Geekbench test results.

    Yeah, pretty much expected, this is a great deal, hundreds of people have allocated and started using their share of resources, the CPU has started being really used and warmed up, CPU clock is going down to cool itself, and the performance as measured by yabs reflects that and numbers go down. This is a quite normal process.

    I've discussed this with Advin in some topic on LET several days ago, and in the past he definitely did even more thorough benchmarks of modern Epycs as soon as they get close to 50% usage.

    You are now in good hands of pf24 to stop admitting new customers and keep the performance at this level (which is still very good). Or quickly order more horsepower and keep the show going...

    @asthen said:
    degraded day by day :)

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1533
    Multi Core | 4011

    Sorry that you had to wait so long for a response.
    Well the hosts are still far below 50% CPU Utilization or a 64. load average:

    We have to admit, we did not expect such a decrease in single core performance with Host CPU utilizations between 30 and 40%.

    We took a small counter measure by ensuring cpu frequency downscaling is not the case even when disabling idle-states to let the CPU polling. (We will keep it this way)

    We just ran a benchmark too, we at least have also not been able to spot stealtime.

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1436
    Multi Core      | 4359
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7661950
    

    We will take away from this that running benchmarks for such a deal should happen only when there is enough load on the hosts already present to be able to showcase only what the buyers are gonna get realistically.

    We are stopping the deployment of new VMs to genoa hosts and will activate older generation hosts too.
    Every customer that booked a genoa deal or has been migrated to genoa by restarting his vm is now locked to genoa nodes, while new VMs are not going to be scheduled to those nodes any more.

    Whoever is interested to be able to run on different nodes as well should just contact us.

    We are still discussing on if we are going to close this whole deal right now where we are at or if we still going to sell some of our popular packages with other node configurations.

Sign In or Register to comment.