Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...] - Page 10
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...]

1…78101213…38

Comments

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    i hope so too. i just thought that the announced measures would have an effect. i did not and never did expect the node to be kept free exclusively for me.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @techdragon said:

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Single core seems to be more consistent. Also, on the YABS thread some Frameworks servers on 'older hardware' are scoring very high.

    For the price however, about fifty percent of the offer is fair and what I expected.

    this is about prohosting24 and not about frameworks.

    Thanked by 1Frameworks
  • techdragontechdragon Member
    edited September 2024

    @hyperblast said:

    @techdragon said:

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Single core seems to be more consistent. Also, on the YABS thread some Frameworks servers on 'older hardware' are scoring very high.

    For the price however, about fifty percent of the offer is fair and what I expected.

    this is about prohosting24 and not about frameworks.

    I didn't say it was not. I'm just pointing out for comparison. Frameworks should have been FameSystems, I made an error.

    AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\' is the ASN of both brands though.

    FameSystems (typo above):

    ISP: Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN: AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host: FameSystems GmbH \u0026 Co. KG
    Location: Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)

    PH24:

    ISP: Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN: AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host: Prohosting24
    Location: Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)

    :)

  • silunsilun Member

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Therefore we can still offer to migrate chosen VMs to hose nodes if the utilization behavior matches, just post your VM id for a review.

    Could you take a look at ID 7202, please? Would love to be migrated to Genoa.

  • WhiteRoseGWhiteRoseG Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @WhiteRoseG said:
    this is Genoa run hopping around looking for the best Genoa, providers changing rules and performance

    is that good or bad? is that why you're accusing me? they all start with very good scores and then it drops massively. (but at least the vps is stable! 100% so far)

    No iam talking about me, i find NetCup the most stable.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @techdragon said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @techdragon said:

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Single core seems to be more consistent. Also, on the YABS thread some Frameworks servers on 'older hardware' are scoring very high.

    For the price however, about fifty percent of the offer is fair and what I expected.

    this is about prohosting24 and not about frameworks.

    I didn't say it was not. I'm just pointing out for comparison. Frameworks should have been FameSystems, I made an error.

    AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\' is the ASN of both brands though.

    FameSystems (typo above):

    ISP: Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN: AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host: FameSystems GmbH \u0026 Co. KG
    Location: Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)

    PH24:

    ISP: Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN: AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host: Prohosting24
    Location: Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)

    :)

    famesystems offered dedicated ressources - https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/summer-sale

  • techdragontechdragon Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @techdragon said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @techdragon said:

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Single core seems to be more consistent. Also, on the YABS thread some Frameworks servers on 'older hardware' are scoring very high.

    For the price however, about fifty percent of the offer is fair and what I expected.

    this is about prohosting24 and not about frameworks.

    I didn't say it was not. I'm just pointing out for comparison. Frameworks should have been FameSystems, I made an error.

    AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\' is the ASN of both brands though.

    FameSystems (typo above):

    ISP: Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN: AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host: FameSystems GmbH \u0026 Co. KG
    Location: Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)

    PH24:

    ISP: Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN: AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host: Prohosting24
    Location: Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)

    :)

    famesystems offered dedicated ressources - https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/summer-sale

    Yes. They also have resellers.

  • hal0annhal0ann Member

    Hello, I purchased Genoa M, can I upgrade to Genoa XL?

  • CybrCybr Member

    @hyperblast said:

    famesystems offered dedicated ressources - https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/summer-sale

    It's a lie. Resources aren't actually dedicated. You get huge levels of steal using less than 50% CPU and they just ignore tickets. Avoid.

  • corenetcorenet Member

    @ProHosting24 have from amsterdam ...

  • faleddofaleddo Member

    1073 GB6 score but I got 7.5 in WP benchmark score while netcup RS G11 only scored 7.3 with 1900-2000 GB6 score.

    Thanked by 4loay Frameworks emgh hyperblast
  • loayloay Member

    @faleddo said:
    1073 GB6 score but I got 7.5 in WP benchmark score while netcup RS G11 only scored 7.3 with 1900-2000 GB6 score.

    Can you share the full data maybe an a separate post or something? I think both the ram and disk speed would make huge difference here.

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @faleddo said:
    1073 GB6 score but I got 7.5 in WP benchmark score while netcup RS G11 only scored 7.3 with 1900-2000 GB6 score.

    yeah. actually a perfect example why regular users shouldn't be allowed to use any benchmarks...

    Thanked by 5emgh Frameworks hyperblast Advin MaxTakeba
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Falzo said:

    @faleddo said:
    1073 GB6 score but I got 7.5 in WP benchmark score while netcup RS G11 only scored 7.3 with 1900-2000 GB6 score.

    yeah. actually a perfect example why regular users shouldn't be allowed to use any benchmarks...

    Yabsflation

    Thanked by 1Frameworks
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    yabs please!

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @Falzo said:

    @faleddo said:

    1073 GB6 score but I got 7.5 in WP benchmark score while netcup RS G11 only scored 7.3 with 1900-2000 GB6 score.

    yeah. actually a perfect example why regular users shouldn't be allowed to use any benchmarks...

    GB6 score just reflects one key aspect -- computational power

    It should be viewed along with disk IOPS, memory oversell, and other functional factors.

    Thanked by 1faleddo
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    how run run gb5 on windows on commandline? ;)

    Thanked by 1loay
  • radexradex Member

    @Cybr said:

    @hyperblast said:

    famesystems offered dedicated ressources - https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/summer-sale

    It's a lie. Resources aren't actually dedicated. You get huge levels of steal using less than 50% CPU and they just ignore tickets. Avoid.

    Any proofs for this? It´s like the typical BS talk. I have a server from them and everything is perfect.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @radex said:

    @Cybr said:

    @hyperblast said:

    famesystems offered dedicated ressources - https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/summer-sale

    It's a lie. Resources aren't actually dedicated. You get huge levels of steal using less than 50% CPU and they just ignore tickets. Avoid.

    Any proofs for this? It´s like the typical BS talk. I have a server from them and everything is perfect.

    yabs please!

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited September 2024
    1. september 2024
    Thanked by 1loay
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @hyperblast said:

    how run run gb5 on windows on command line? ;)

    GB5 and GB6 are not completely accurate on Windows Server OS.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited September 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @hyperblast said:

    how run run gb5 on windows on command line? ;)

    GB5 and GB6 are not completely accurate on Windows Server OS.

    values that fall by 5-10% every day are also not accurate, regardless of the basis of calculation.

    i would roughly expect something like this. too much to ask?
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/197609/vps-from-berohost-available-for-transfer

    Thanked by 1loay
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @hyperblast said:
    how run run gb5 on windows on commandline? ;)

    # Install WSL2
wsl --install

# Set WSL2 as the default version
wsl --set-default-version 2

# Install Ubuntu
wsl --install -d Ubuntu

# Update and upgrade Ubuntu
wsl -e sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade -y

# Install GB6
wsl -e sudo apt install gb6
  • radexradex Member
    edited September 2024

    @hyperblast said:

    @radex said:

    @Cybr said:

    @hyperblast said:

    famesystems offered dedicated ressources - https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/summer-sale

    It's a lie. Resources aren't actually dedicated. You get huge levels of steal using less than 50% CPU and they just ignore tickets. Avoid.

    Any proofs for this? It´s like the typical BS talk. I have a server from them and everything is perfect.

    yabs please!

    Posted it already in yabs thread, you even thanked me

      # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Fr 6. Sep 18:15:36 CEST 2024

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 6 days, 11 hours, 54 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 2849.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 47.0 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 391.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-23-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host       : FameSystems GmbH \u0026 Co. KG
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 223.21 MB/s  (55.8k) | 1.14 GB/s    (17.9k)
    Write      | 223.80 MB/s  (55.9k) | 1.15 GB/s    (18.0k)
    Total      | 447.01 MB/s (111.7k) | 2.29 GB/s    (35.9k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.49 GB/s     (8.7k) | 5.51 GB/s     (5.3k)
    Write      | 4.73 GB/s     (9.2k) | 5.88 GB/s     (5.7k)
    Total      | 9.23 GB/s    (18.0k) | 11.39 GB/s   (11.1k)

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1854
    Multi Core      | 12203
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7654186

    YABS completed in 5 min 30 sec
    Thanked by 1hyperblast
  • loayloay Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @hyperblast said:

    how run run gb5 on windows on command line? ;)

    GB5 and GB6 are not completely accurate on Windows Server OS.

    values that fall by 5-10% every day are also not accurate, regardless of the basis of calculation.

    i would roughly expect something like this. too much to ask?
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/197609/vps-from-berohost-available-for-transfer

    Bero-host is very stable in performance. I run windows server on a 10€/ ipv6 only yearly deal I got from them.
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3891691/#Comment_3891691

  • CybrCybr Member
    edited September 2024

    @radex said:

    Any proofs for this? It´s like the typical BS talk. I have a server from them and everything is perfect.

    I have no reason to BS anyone. I have over 50 servers with dozens of providers, some spanning over a decade, and only share negative experiences when I'm given serious reason to.

    I'm very patient with LET providers, and if they respond to tickets and make an effort to solve problems, I'll often wait months for them to provide a stable service.

    I've started using over 20 new LET providers this year, and may decide to do a round up of my experience with them at some point. Many had performance and/or stability issues due to faulty hardware, but almost all of them have solved the issues. We'll see if performance/stability holds up over time.

    To put things into perspective, even the lowest end shit-tier providers like Evos (who is now banned from LET) and HT-Hosting (who is infamous for being unstable) have provided better service and support than Fame.

  • radexradex Member

    @Cybr said:

    @radex said:

    Any proofs for this? It´s like the typical BS talk. I have a server from them and everything is perfect.

    I have no reason to BS anyone. I have over 50 servers with dozens of providers, some spanning over a decade, and only share negative experiences when I'm given serious reason to.

    I'm very patient with LET providers, and if they respond to tickets and make an effort to solve problems, I'll often wait months for them to provide a stable service.

    I've started using over 20 new LET providers this year, and may decide to do a round up of my experience with them at some point. Many had performance and/or stability issues due to faulty hardware, but almost all of them have solved the issues. We'll see if performance/stability holds up over time.

    To put things into perspective, even the lowest end shit-tier providers like Evos (who is now banned from LET) and HT-Hosting (who is infamous for being unstable) have provided better service and support than Fame.

    I get ticket replies on time, even migrated my server to new host with another cpu in middle of the night from friday to saturday. No Downtimes, yabs always high, 0 CPU Steal. I think it always depends how you write, when a customer is not polite i wouldnt reply to him too.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @Cybr said:

    @radex said:

    [...]

    To put things into perspective, even the lowest end shit-tier providers like Evos (who is now banned from LET) and HT-Hosting (who is infamous for being unstable) have provided better service and support than Fame.

    oioioi. and both are hard to beat.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @hyperblast said:
    how run run gb5 on windows on commandline? ;)

    # Install WSL2
wsl --install

# Set WSL2 as the default version
wsl --set-default-version 2

# Install Ubuntu
wsl --install -d Ubuntu

# Update and upgrade Ubuntu
wsl -e sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade -y

# Install GB6
wsl -e sudo apt install gb6

    http://support.primatelabs.com/kb/geekbench/geekbench-6-command-line-tool

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    general observation: there has also been silence from @ProHosting24 for two days now. are they ducking away? ;)

Sign In or Register to comment.