Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...] - Page 9
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...]

1…6791112…38

Comments

  • loayloay Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    (September 27, 2024)

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 16
Multi Core      | 53
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666

    c1v offers :D

    Thanked by 6emgh hyperblast nick_ Kris dsbnoob TODO
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 16
    Multi Core | 53
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666
    ```

    This is not going to happen 🥲

    I actually just started getting rid of people utilizing 100% of their cores again.
    Although I have to admit that there are far fewer than last year.

    Thanked by 9emgh Frameworks OsirisBlack nick_ amaeva080 loay dev_vps Falzo TODO
  • noisycodenoisycode Member
    edited September 2024

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 16
    Multi Core | 53
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666
    ```

    This is not going to happen 🥲

    I actually just started getting rid of people utilizing 100% of their cores again.
    Although I have to admit that there are far fewer than last year.

    quick question: can i compile some large project, say chromium, which takes about 3hrs, on these machines? the compilation takes into place occasionally, that is, about twice a day.

    btw i got an 7443 months ago and now a Genova vps, but i have kept them idling. so it is a serious puzzle for me.

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @noisycode said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 16
    Multi Core | 53
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666
    ```

    This is not going to happen 🥲

    I actually just started getting rid of people utilizing 100% of their cores again.
    Although I have to admit that there are far fewer than last year.

    quick question: can i compile some large project, say chromium, which takes about 3hrs, on these machines? the compilation takes into place occasionally, that is, about twice a day.

    btw i got an 7443 months ago and now a Genova vps, but i have kept them idling. so it is a serious puzzle for me.

    That will be okay

    Thanked by 1noisycode
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited September 2024

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 16
    Multi Core | 53
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666
    ```

    This is not going to happen 🥲

    I actually just started getting rid of people utilizing 100% of their cores again.
    Although I have to admit that there are far fewer than last year.

    hmm...

    in my opinion, none of these actions are noticeable yet, at least on the node on which my vps is running.

    also look here for comparison:

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4014485/#Comment_4014485

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 16
    Multi Core | 53
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666
    ```

    This is not going to happen 🥲

    I actually just started getting rid of people utilizing 100% of their cores again.
    Although I have to admit that there are far fewer than last year.

    hmm...

    in my opinion, none of these actions are noticeable yet, at least on the node on which my vps is running.

    also look here for comparison:

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4014485/#Comment_4014485

    Those results would have been even worse probably:

    (Yes, we do get a 9554 CPU Utilized to 30% with only 192GB of memory installed)



    Thanked by 1maverick
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    i can't see which of the three graphs represents the node on which my vps is running. can i see this in the backend? @ProHosting24

    however, the vps has been running stable with windows server 2022 for days. that's worth a lot. :)

    Thanked by 1TODO
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:
    i can't see which of the three graphs represents the node on which my vps is running. can i see this in the backend? @ProHosting24

    however, the vps has been running stable with windows server 2022 for days. that's worth a lot. :)

    Stability has not been an issue so far anyway, there is even no noteworthy amount of stealtime accounting happening. I think there have already been enough comments on this topic that have shown what went wrong or what went well and what happened at all etc. bla bla... ^^

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    ok. then blah blah blah.
    i didn't attack you. or did you perceive it that way?

  • lowendlurkerlowendlurker Member

    We need let exclusive access to host statistics of our corresponding vms :blush:

    Thanked by 1loay
  • RichardGrantRichardGrant Member

    @ProHosting24 Can you help me migrate to the genoa node? I accidentally bought an old eypc today.

  • lowendlurkerlowendlurker Member

    afaik the fixed Genoa special ended

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:
    ok. then blah blah blah.
    i didn't attack you. or did you perceive it that way?

    Oh no, not at all. Sorry.
    I didn't want to make you feel uncomfortable

    Thanked by 2Frameworks hyperblast
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @lowendlurker said:
    We need let exclusive access to host statistics of our corresponding vms :blush:

    We had something like that before (public grafana), but it was kind of abused.

  • lowendlurkerlowendlurker Member

    Understable, was just daydreaming since graphs are porn in general, Genoa graphs are hardcore...

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • _cece_cece Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    (September 27, 2024)

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 16
Multi Core      | 53
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666

    ouch that one is ridiculous

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @_cece said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    (September 27, 2024)

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 16
Multi Core      | 53
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666

    ouch that one is ridiculous

    Sure it is, because it's a joke :D

    Thanked by 2hyperblast emgh
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited September 2024

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @_cece said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @loay said:

    @ProHosting24 said: We just did the mistake of posting a yabs benchmark with those new nodes still idling.

    I don't know what it should be the expected GB6 result for GENOA but I think @dev_vps have good data on this. Geekbench results:

    (September 4, 2024)

    [...]

    (September 27, 2024)

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 16
Multi Core      | 53
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666

    ouch that one is ridiculous

    Sure it is, because it's a joke :D

    and its gb7!!!111
    gb7 16 is gb6 1200 ;)

  • notdennisnotdennis Member

    hey -- so if we purchase it now we will be put on a older amd epyc node?

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @notdennis said:
    hey -- so if we purchase it now we will be put on a older amd epyc node?

    Correct

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Arirang said:

    (September 27, 2024)

    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 16
    Multi Core | 53
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/6666666
    ```

    c1v offers :D

    c1v YABS

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2596.990 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 7.6 GiB
Disk       : 79.9 GiB
Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.4
Kernel     : 5.15.0-206.153.7.el9uek.x86_64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
ASN        : AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
Host       : C1V Hosting
Location   : Milan, Lombardy (25)
Country    : Italy

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 228
Multi Core      | 441
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22846600
.
    Thanked by 1loay
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Arirang said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Looks like people love to surf on our control panel: <3

    Interesting to see your panel on Kubernetes platform.

    Well its self developed just like our new control panel which will bring LBaaS, Floating IPs, Tenant Networks, Volume Service, Object Storage, Endpoints to upload your own real VM image etc. and what we love most ✨ Kubernetes as a Service ✨.

    The control plane hosting will be free while the instances you get deployed automatically to your own cloud project will be accounted.

    Working with high automation, pipelines and stuff is just fu**ing awesome!

    Especially when you've been able to decrease the count of infrastructure VMs by somewhere around 20 through deploying everything to Kubernetes.

    Knowing all PVC's are getting backed up anyway makes your life as Sysadmin even more chill.

    Awesome 👍🏼👍🏼

    I am setting up a project with distributed architecture — one master VPS and two worker VPS. Initially I was thinking of just one worker vps, having two worker VPS will keep overall load under fair usage limits.

    Thanks @ProHosting24

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • eaglexiangeaglexiang Member

    YABS 20240909

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 12 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 4 @ 3099.996 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 15.6 GiB
    Swap : 4.0 GiB
    Disk : 191.8 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-25-cloud-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host : Prohosting24
    Location : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country : Germany

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda5):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 58.31 MB/s (14.5k) 823.80 MB/s (12.8k)
    Write 58.43 MB/s (14.6k) 828.14 MB/s (12.9k)
    Total 116.75 MB/s (29.1k) 1.65 GB/s (25.8k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.21 GB/s (2.3k) 1.32 GB/s (1.2k)
    Write 1.27 GB/s (2.4k) 1.41 GB/s (1.3k)
    Total 2.49 GB/s (4.8k) 2.74 GB/s (2.6k)

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1079
    Multi Core | 3826
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22850014

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1441
    Multi Core | 4589
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7683352

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Potentially a node5 issue?

    Thanked by 1amaeva080
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @allthemtings said:

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Potentially a node5 issue?

    oh my god, i hope not! ;)

  • WhiteRoseGWhiteRoseG Member
    edited September 2024

    this is Genoa run hopping around looking for the best Genoa, providers changing rules and performance

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited September 2024

    @WhiteRoseG said:
    this is Genoa run hopping around looking for the best Genoa, providers changing rules and performance

    is that good or bad? is that why you're accusing me? they all start with very good scores and then it drops massively. (but at least the vps is stable! 100% so far)

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @hyperblast said: they all start with very good scores and then it drops massively.

    of course it does. no one is gonna provide you an forever empty node. it's clearly been pointed out, that it's not dedicated cores either ;-)

    quite a lot of your neighbours probably will not idle their cores. I mean the questions about what can be run on it in this very thread here were already obvious.
    and with everything being locked to the genoa nodes, automatic migration and balancing won't be that helpful.

    I would assume with that price tag PH24 still attracts quillibrium nodes and comparable sh*t, which we all know do not just use cpu power but consume cache and can hurt performance in other ways.

    so hopefully they manage to keep it at a fair level for everyone, but please don't expect raw cpu performance in any shared environment. it's simply not a realistic thing, esp. with the price in mind.

    Thanked by 3emgh Frameworks TODO
  • techdragontechdragon Member
    edited September 2024

    @hyperblast said:
    unfortunately still no noticeable improvements. on the contrary, the values are deteriorating... @ProHosting24

    Single core seems to be more consistent. Also, on the YABS thread some FameSystems servers on 'older hardware' are scoring very high.

    For the price however, about fifty percent of the offer is fair and what I expected.

Sign In or Register to comment.