Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...] - Page 5
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...]

1235737

Comments

  • Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    Thanked by 1mandala
  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @Dylhost said:

    @tra10000 said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @themantra said:
    How is the server uptime quality? Does it experience frequent downtime?

    The hypervisor makes use of a storage area network. Therefore VM Data is present on all nodes anytime with inluded 3x replication of vm data, which makes our service high available.

    So in case of storage failure all nodes will be inaccessible :)

    It would be redundant storage I assume, copies across ALL nodes. One storage failure means it falls back to another nodes storage

    Kind of.
    It is not only redundant, but also highly available, i.e. we still have redundancy in the event that a storage node fails. At least as long as it takes for the storage cluster to repair itself.

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Dylhost said:

    @tra10000 said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @themantra said:
    How is the server uptime quality? Does it experience frequent downtime?

    The hypervisor makes use of a storage area network. Therefore VM Data is present on all nodes anytime with inluded 3x replication of vm data, which makes our service high available.

    So in case of storage failure all nodes will be inaccessible :)

    It would be redundant storage I assume, copies across ALL nodes. One storage failure means it falls back to another nodes storage

    Kind of.
    It is not only redundant, but also highly available, i.e. we still have redundancy in the event that a storage node fails. At least as long as it takes for the storage cluster to repair itself.

    Oh bit different to what I assumed - I've seen setups where copies of storage are on ALL servers and machines can just use other nodes copies when their own storage fails completely.

    With Hyper-V you can even have RAM synced across servers via 40Gbit links and machines failing over in real time without downtime.

    Thanked by 1mandala
  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:
    stack together 2 genoa m would safe 4,95€. :) it would be a genoa xl for 9,90€.

    Unfortunately we do not offer that.

    of course not! that would be kind of stupid. but a genoa xl for €9.90 would be awesome, but it would definitely break your neck. millions of dubious characters would overrun you.

  • @ProHosting24 look like I'm not allowed to have this VM 🥹, please check Ticket 205511

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @Dylhost said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Dylhost said:

    @tra10000 said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @themantra said:
    How is the server uptime quality? Does it experience frequent downtime?

    The hypervisor makes use of a storage area network. Therefore VM Data is present on all nodes anytime with inluded 3x replication of vm data, which makes our service high available.

    So in case of storage failure all nodes will be inaccessible :)

    It would be redundant storage I assume, copies across ALL nodes. One storage failure means it falls back to another nodes storage

    Kind of.
    It is not only redundant, but also highly available, i.e. we still have redundancy in the event that a storage node fails. At least as long as it takes for the storage cluster to repair itself.

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Dylhost said:

    @tra10000 said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @themantra said:
    How is the server uptime quality? Does it experience frequent downtime?

    The hypervisor makes use of a storage area network. Therefore VM Data is present on all nodes anytime with inluded 3x replication of vm data, which makes our service high available.

    So in case of storage failure all nodes will be inaccessible :)

    It would be redundant storage I assume, copies across ALL nodes. One storage failure means it falls back to another nodes storage

    Kind of.
    It is not only redundant, but also highly available, i.e. we still have redundancy in the event that a storage node fails. At least as long as it takes for the storage cluster to repair itself.

    Oh bit different to what I assumed - I've seen setups where copies of storage are on ALL servers and machines can just use other nodes copies when their own storage fails completely.

    With Hyper-V you can even have RAM synced across servers via 40Gbit links and machines failing over in real time without downtime.

    On our setup we utilize erasure coding, your data is actually stored across 6 nodes.
    Thats also the reason why we use breakout 100GbE.

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    I would fry and eat my hat if someone would offer such a deal with dedicated cores. 🙈
    No, we are not the right choice for you.

    Thanked by 2Falzo dev_vps
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @Vikasverma said:
    @ProHosting24 look like I'm not allowed to have this VM 🥹, please check Ticket 205511

    Yes, wait a moment.

  • Ordered, so far so good!

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    Well let's see how long this years deal is going to be available :D
    Seems like over 1.5 TiB of RAM is already eaten up by new deal customers

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • @ProHosting24 said:
    Well let's see how long this years deal is going to be available :D
    Seems like over 1.5 TiB of RAM is already eaten up by new deal customers

    I'm in B)

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    Alma Linux Images are now available, a lot people requested that.

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

  • @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    Amazing work and great offer!

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned?
    I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores.

    No one will offer you even 2x cpu vCore dedicated for $5. I won't be surprised if this offer is sold out in next 24 hours.

    --- customer of @ProHosting24 since Nov 2023

  • @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    You can't see the real live frequency inside a virtual machine, it's 3.8 GHZ already.

  • @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    I don't think you can.

  • @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    Why ? Scheduler is very fast to adjust frequency
    No need to waste energy for idling :p

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @remy said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    Why ? Scheduler is very fast to adjust frequency
    No need to waste energy for idling :p

    We disable deeper c-states for optimized latency.

    Thanked by 2maverick dev_vps
  • @remy said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    Why ? Scheduler is very fast to adjust frequency
    No need to waste energy for idling :p

    its not an idler, its a windows server and makes millions a day. every 0.x GHZ counts!

  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    I would fry and eat my hat if someone would offer such a deal with dedicated cores. 🙈
    No, we are not the right choice for you.

    That's right I stand on business and logic, not heard of people. So over-provisioned then? What's the ratio? 8/12 or 100/110

  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    You can't see the real live frequency inside a virtual machine, it's 3.8 GHZ already.

    what shows windows taskmanager? "faked" 3.1 GHZ. dont get me wrong, the machine ist beefy!!! 👍🏻

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • @ktalap said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    I would fry and eat my hat if someone would offer such a deal with dedicated cores. 🙈
    No, we are not the right choice for you.

    That's right I stand on business and logic, not heard of people. So over-provisioned then? What's the ratio? 8/12 or 100/110

    Probably around 5k per CPU core. Please move on to another provider who can offer you deal you are looking for.

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @ProHosting24 said:
    Great to see those beefy CPUs at work!

    It even seems like we are running all CPU Cores at astonishing ⚡ 3.7GHZ ⚡

    hmm. how can i activate the turbo to get 3.8 GHZ on windows server permanent.

    You can't see the real live frequency inside a virtual machine, it's 3.8 GHZ already.

    what shows windows taskmanager? "faked" 3.1 GHZ. dont get me wrong, the machine ist beefy!!! 👍🏻

    No that will always just be the clock speed of the installed CPU

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @ktalap said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @ktalap said:
    Are the cores dedicated or over-provisioned? I would look into it if I am allowed to max out all of the cores. + the number of tenants sharing that gigabit connection. Fair-use traffic how much goes for free, and how much is 1TB goes for after that.

    I would fry and eat my hat if someone would offer such a deal with dedicated cores. 🙈
    No, we are not the right choice for you.

    That's right I stand on business and logic, not heard of people. So over-provisioned then? What's the ratio? 8/12 or 100/110

    The OP ratio doesn't matter. CPU Time matters. More accurately, trying to keep guest stealtime low.

    This is why we usually don't utilize hosts more then 60%

  • ok. but didnt you say, that all "CPU Cores at astonishing runnunig with 3.7GHZ" why does the 3.7 not reach the windows server? i'm only interested technically, not because i want to annoy you. as i said, i really like the vps so far!

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:
    ok. but didnt you say, that all "CPU Cores at astonishing runnig with 3.7GHZ" why does the 3.7 not reach the windows server? i'm only interested technically, not because i want to annoy you. as i said, i really like the vps so far!

    The VMs resources are not real, you don't have hardware access to the installed memory of the host, the cpu or other installed peripherals.

    KVM basically creates a virtualized "KVM CPU" and depending on which kind of model is being virtualized or emulated, the information presented in your OS varies.

    A common approach by a lot smaller companies with various different hypervisor and qemu/kvm binaries or running host kernels, is to set the cpu model to "KVM64" only with some flags supported by most cpus passed to that virtualized/emulated cpu. (In most cases aes specific features for using more efficient instruction sets in that belongings)

    But we actually pass through as much of our CPU as possible by KVM to maximize efficiency. That's the reason why you are able to tell which CPU is used on the Hypervisor.

    But as you are inside your VM only looking at a "fake" virtualized CPU, you will not be able to track actual Host CPU frequencies. KVM is just presenting you static information.

    This makes it more complicated for us to migrate VMs between nodes etc. and that's the reason why we bought three of the exact same machines for something around 60k€ although we didn't really needed 3 of them at once.

  • DCMA ignored ?

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @Developer said:
    DCMA ignored ?

    No, we follow the German laws.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @Developer said:
    DCMA ignored ?

    "DCMA ignored" is ignored

    PS - it is actually spelled DMCA -- The Digital Millennium Copyright Act

    Thanked by 1mandala
Sign In or Register to comment.