Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Starting at $3.50 | KVM | Virtualizor| NVME | 24/7 Support - Page 4
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

Starting at $3.50 | KVM | Virtualizor| NVME | 24/7 Support

1246

Comments

  • @Privacy said:

    @webcraft said: So you rather want to be throttled to 100MBit/s right away instead of being allowed to burst to 1GBit/s for a limited time?

    For my use case, non-production hobbyist things, I'm happy with an 100Mbit port.

    Throttling can occur even with 100 Mbit data port.

    My guess is that the port throttling to 20 Mbps is based on data downloaded in last one hour. The provider has not explained when throttling kicks in.

  • @LittleCreek said:
    I will make it more clear next time.

    The best price I have found so far for a 1 gbps is $2/mbps. So if you need sustained 10 mbps the costs associated with just the bandwidth is $20/month. If somebody knows of a better price please let me know.

    I don't think there should be a speed limit because it pauses when you run out of 2Tb.

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    I actually wanted to thank everybody for their criticism because it has pushed me to look for a better solution. I believe within the next month I will have full 1 gbps speed, maybe 2 months. We are still working out the details. It will be better service for clients and cost savings for me. So its good for everybody.

  • ArkasArkas Member, Moderator

    @LittleCreek said: So its good for everybody.

    That sounds great. I have the $3.50 VPS and it would inspire me to use it If the bw can be improved. Please let us know If/When you get it working.

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    I just learned that the bandwidth provider will not be in that particular build until the end of Q1 this year. So it looks like a couple of months.

  • Hello, I tested the disk writing speed, but it is slow. I thought NVMe is faster.

    [email protected]:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync
    1+0 records in
    1+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 39.1326 s, 27.4 MB/s
    [email protected]:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test2.img bs=512 count=1000 oflag=dsync
    1000+0 records in
    1000+0 records out
    512000 bytes (512 kB, 500 KiB) copied, 92.5723 s, 5.5 kB/s
    

    Virtualizor panel server id is 1756

  • GhtGht Member

    I wish i could find this offers somewhere into EU !

  • AlaisterAlaister Member
    edited February 12

    @Alaister said:
    Hello, I tested the disk writing speed, but it is slow. I thought NVMe is faster.

    It turns out that the weak CPU causes the problem.

    First run:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-28                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat 12 Feb 2022 04:07:15 AM UTC
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
    CPU cores  : 8 @ 2499.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 153.5 GiB
    
    Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 4k block siRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 64k block sRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 512k block Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 1m block sifio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.03 MB/s     (1.2k) | 82.30 MB/s    (1.2k)
    Write      | 5.05 MB/s     (1.2k) | 82.73 MB/s    (1.2k)
    Total      | 10.09 MB/s    (2.5k) | 165.03 MB/s   (2.5k)
               |                      |                    
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 383.06 MB/s    (748) | 579.04 MB/s    (565)
    Write      | 403.41 MB/s    (787) | 617.61 MB/s    (603)
    Total      | 786.48 MB/s   (1.5k) | 1.19 GB/s     (1.1k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (AttempClouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 170 Mbits/sec   | 77.5 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Online.net (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 send test to Online.net (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Online.net (AttemOnline.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 81.7 Mbits/sec  | 231 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to WorldStream (AttempPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WorldStream (AtteWorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 126 Mbits/sec   | 274 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to WebHorizon (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 send test to WebHorizon (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemWebHorizon      | Singapore (400M)          | 62.1 Mbits/sec  | 263 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (AttempClouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 209 Mbits/sec   | 376 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Velocity Online (AtPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Velocity Online (Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 281 Mbits/sec   | 507 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (AttempClouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 307 Mbits/sec   | 332 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Iveloz Telecom (AttPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Iveloz Telecom (AIveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 96.5 Mbits/sec  | 89.6 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 91
    Multi Core      | 317
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12723760
    
    

    Second run:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-28                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat 12 Feb 2022 04:33:06 AM UTC
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
    CPU cores  : 8 @ 2499.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 153.5 GiB
    
    Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 4k block siRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 64k block sRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 512k block Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 1m block sifio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.50 MB/s     (1.1k) | 55.04 MB/s     (860)
    Write      | 4.52 MB/s     (1.1k) | 55.55 MB/s     (867)
    Total      | 9.02 MB/s     (2.2k) | 110.59 MB/s   (1.7k)
               |                      |                    
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 230.20 MB/s    (449) | 404.78 MB/s    (395)
    Write      | 242.44 MB/s    (473) | 431.73 MB/s    (421)
    Total      | 472.65 MB/s    (922) | 836.51 MB/s    (816)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (AttempClouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 121 Mbits/sec   | 97.2 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Online.net (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Online.net (AttemPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Online.net (AttemOnline.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 234 Mbits/sec   | 196 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to WorldStream (AttempPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WorldStream (AtteWorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 194 Mbits/sec   | 77.1 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to WebHorizon (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 send test to WebHorizon (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 send test to WebHorizon (AttemptPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from WebHorizon (AttemWebHorizon      | Singapore (400M)          | 51.6 Mbits/sec  | busy
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (AttempClouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 192 Mbits/sec   | 519 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Velocity Online (AtPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Velocity Online (Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 296 Mbits/sec   | 361 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (AttempClouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 175 Mbits/sec   | 322 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Iveloz Telecom (AttPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Iveloz Telecom (AIveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 137 Mbits/sec   | 87.6 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 113
    Multi Core      | 287
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12724074
    
    

    @LittleCreek Please fix the problem!

  • @Alaister your 8 core cpu's value is smaller than my single core :D https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11284713

  • @Alaister said: Single Core | 91

    Multi Core | 317

    WOW! Not even the KS1 has that bad values

  • They were very reliable.
    Unfortunately, the disk i/o seems to be a big issue in the recent past. I belive there are some abusers on the node who needs to be restricted.
    I was transferred to a different node but still the cpu steal reaches upto 40-50. Hope it will be fixed shortly.

    Thanked by 1Alaister
  • webcraftwebcraft Member
    edited February 12

    @niceboy said:
    They were very reliable.
    Unfortunately, the disk i/o seems to be a big issue in the recent past. I belive there are some abusers on the node who needs to be restricted.
    I was transferred to a different node but still the cpu steal reaches upto 40-50. Hope it will be fixed shortly.

    Yes, indeed it looks like there's an abuser working on the node. Unfortunately, the support isn't taking care of in time.

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    I got a lot of signups in January, a lot more than expected. I was supposed to have a new server last week but the board was malfunctioning so I had to order a replacement. If all goes well the issue will be resolved by the end of the week.

  • ArkasArkas Member, Moderator

    I just would like to add that Floyd and LittleCreek hosting has probably the best support I have ever seen here. The man is not only an expert in DA but has the patience of an Elephant that has been stepped on. One can NOT find this level of service for these kind of prices!

  • MaxMind has deemed your order to be potentially high risk and therefore it has been held for manual review.

    If you feel you have received this message in error, then please accept our apologies and submit a support ticket to our Customer Service Team. Thank you

    Why did I send a ticket and it was closed directly?

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @therain said:

    Why did I send a ticket and it was closed directly?

    Ticket number?

  • Performance comparison littlecreekhosting VPS 4 cores (3.5$/m) and PHP-Friends VPS 2 Cores (3.8$/m)

    littlecreekhosting @LittleCreek

    PHP-Friends @PHP_Friends

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    Guys keep in mind that none of these tests matter right now and it only makes things worse. Check again in April when I will have plenty of bandwidth. In a couple of days the CPU performance will better. All of this has already been mentioned.

  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep
    edited February 18

    You heard that right everyone cancel and refund until April comes around because he can’t deliver a decent service right now

  • @bruh21 said:
    You heard that right everyone cancel and refund until April comes around because he can’t deliver a decent service right now

    Yh, his service was very decent but now it appears like he all messed it up. I'm surprised by this.

  • @bruh21 said:
    You heard that right everyone cancel and refund until April comes around because he can’t deliver a decent service right now

    Does @LittleCreek provide full or partial refund?

  • @Alaister said:

    @bruh21 said:
    You heard that right everyone cancel and refund until April comes around because he can’t deliver a decent service right now

    Does @LittleCreek provide full or partial refund?

    I got a full refund

    Thanked by 1Alaister
  • LittleCreek was so fine and stable before this post. Now the VPS is really slow. But I will keep paying and see if things will change.

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Patron Provider
    edited February 19

    Wow this thread was a complete disaster offer for @LittleCreek - I feel bad

    I would maybe close orders until April comes around or until the issues have been fixed, it would likely result in less unhappy customers + less VM's on each node.

    Thanked by 1Alaister
  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    Tomorrow will bring relief on the CPU load. Bandwidth will be first week of April. This has been explained several times. Most (about 90%) have been very understanding and have not cancelled. I had about 4 times the normal amount of signups in January and I was not prepared for that.

    Thanked by 2Alaister niceboy
  • @LittleCreek said:
    Tomorrow will bring relief on the CPU load. Bandwidth will be first week of April. This has been explained several times. Most (about 90%) have been very understanding and have not cancelled. I had about 4 times the normal amount of signups in January and I was not prepared for that.

    Hello, I would like to pay my bill but I can't access your website (We are doing maintenance). Is there any way I can pay it? (I will pay with a card)

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @LittleCreek said:
    Tomorrow will bring relief on the CPU load.

    I meant Tuesday.

    Thanked by 1Alaister
  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    New server going in today and will bring CPU relief.

  • @LittleCreek,
    will you transfer part of the accounts from the old server to the new one? Can you move my VPS too?

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @snevsky said:
    @LittleCreek,
    will you transfer part of the accounts from the old server to the new one? Can you move my VPS too?

    I am transferring accounts now.

Sign In or Register to comment.