Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


[Central.so] Holiday Overhaul! Huge Discounts & Tons of Giveaways! - Page 9
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[Central.so] Holiday Overhaul! Huge Discounts & Tons of Giveaways!

16791112

Comments

  • What's the consolation prize?

  • Thanks for the Giveaways!

  • thanks to @aqua for the giveaway.

    wasted no time in converting the credits in Sydney:

    [root@cybertech ~]# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -9
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-28                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Jan  3 21:15:57 EST 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 3791.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 512.0 MiB
    Disk       : 48.6 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 48.03 MB/s   (12.0k) | 358.28 MB/s   (5.5k)
    Write      | 48.08 MB/s   (12.0k) | 360.16 MB/s   (5.6k)
    Total      | 96.11 MB/s   (24.0k) | 718.44 MB/s  (11.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 378.73 MB/s    (739) | 360.49 MB/s    (352)
    Write      | 398.85 MB/s    (779) | 384.50 MB/s    (375)
    Total      | 777.58 MB/s   (1.5k) | 744.99 MB/s    (727)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed   
                    |                           |                 |              
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 403 Mbits/sec   | 533 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 393 Mbits/sec   | 583 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 373 Mbits/sec   | 426 Mbits/sec
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (400M)          | 223 Mbits/sec   | 316 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 428 Mbits/sec   | 728 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 375 Mbits/sec   | 460 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 447 Mbits/sec   | 848 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | 358 Mbits/sec
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed   
                    |                           |                 |              
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 382 Mbits/sec   | 576 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 386 Mbits/sec   | 546 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 364 Mbits/sec   | 437 Mbits/sec
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (400M)          | 321 Mbits/sec   | 343 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 423 Mbits/sec   | 701 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 445 Mbits/sec   | 842 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 4644
    Multi Core      | 7918
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16455406
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 974
    Multi Core      | 1707
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11973465
    
  • Got one, Thank you! <3

  • will netboot iso be supported?

  • I have got the gift!Thanks for the Giveaways!

  • Thanks @aqua for this, this year is really awesome for me!

  • Thanks for the giveaways, got one! <3

  • Unexpected, I actually won something. Thank you for the giveaway, I'm going to be trying out the services.

  • @aqua said:
    Hello everyone,

    The giveaway has concluded, here are the winners. Please read below the terms aswell!

    • Giveaway Winners pulled on Jan 3rd, I'll be posting a video of spinning an online wheel, winners will have 7 days to contact me via LET PM to claim the prize.

    • VPS - There is a total of 8 VPS giveaways (2 for each plan, 4 total plans), you will have a full free year of our service, renewal is not required, but is appreciated.

    • Dedicated - The dedicated will be valid for one month, renewal is not required, but is appreciated.

    • Amazon Giftcards - if you do not have Amazon in your region, we will be able to equal amount in account credit or some other type of gift card.

    • Central.so stickers - We will only be mailing this to US/CA residents as shipping internationally is far too expensive. If a winner is pulled that lives outside of the US, we will resort to giving $15 account credit on Central.so

    • Discount - Discount will end on Jan 3rd as well, so get your orders in by then.

    Bronze VPS - @KENTKING @raynor
    Silver VPS - @Beny @Privacy
    Gold VPS - @xfm @tototo
    Enterprise VPS - @forces @Peach
    E5-2680 - 64GB - 256GB SSD Dedi - @pouyam
    $20 Central.so Account Credit - @contactwajeeh @cybertech @commercial
    $25 Amazon Giftcard - @Flash
    Central.so Stickers - @Ryuko_Matoi @toumi111 @aniruddhnishad @kalimov622 @DogbertPrime

    If you would like to watch the video - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SN2t5pAUnhaJlEwDPs2TxT2TbRGjdL5m/view?usp=sharing

    Thank you to everyone who participated, we will hopefully do something of the same caliber soon!

    yahoooooo..... another win on lowentalk. thank you @aqua .

    I`m from outside the USA/Canada account so, credit please!

  • @aniruddhnishad, please do not quote the entire post as it tags everyone in it.

  • @kalimov622 said:
    @aniruddhnishad, please do not quote the entire post as it tags everyone in it.

    ok, Im dont know about it. next time i will be careful.

    Thanked by 1kalimov622
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited January 2022

    You can quote it, just remove the '@'s

  • Which makes more work than just quoting "specific" important part you want to answer... or not quoting at all if not needed.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited January 2022

    Central.co / @aqua kindly provided 3 of their "Silver" VPS to me for benchmarking, one in Dallas, one in NYC, and one in France.

    As much as I dislike to reward their generosity with a tendentially negative review, I had to come to the conclusion that only one of the 3 VPS was decent. In fact the NYC VPS was so terrible that I managed to complete only 10 runs while in the other two locations I managed to do 80 - 90 runs (in the same time). In fact while a benchmark run usually takes anywhere between 20 and 45 minutes, depending on the system, the NYC runs took about 6 hours (per run)!

    Here's the core of the Dallas result:

    Version 2.5.0, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com)
    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    OS, version: FreeBSD 13.0, Mem.: 1.990 GB
    CPU - Cores: 2, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/62/4
    Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 256K L2, 25M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid
              sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave osxsave avx f16c
              rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust smep erms syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm
    
    AES? Yes
    Nested Virt.? No
    HW RNG? Yes
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 109.8 - min 36.0 (32.8 %), max 204.2 (186.0 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 385.5 - min 304.5 (79.0 %), max 426.6 (110.7 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 396.6 - min 353.7 (89.2 %), max 430.8 (108.6 %)
    ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 424.3 - min 363.5 (85.7 %), max 491.9 (115.9 %)
    ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 42.1 - min 36.0 (85.6 %), max 53.2 (126.4 %)
    
    --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 3.28 - min 2.55 (77.7%), max 4.61 (140.5%)
    IOps             : avg 840.12 - min 652.64 (77.7%), max 1180.11 (140.5%)
    

    Both the very high spread and the (too) low numbers (for that processor) suggest a heavily overcrowded node. Funnily the NYC VPS, while having a nightmare disk has better results with the same processor.
    The SSD is certainly not a speed demon but quite OK.

    Here's the Dallas network:

    --- Network ---
    US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 283.9 - min 262.3 (92.4%), max 295.8 (104.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 42.5 - min 42.1 (99.1%), max 46.3 (109.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.0 - min 42.2 (98.2%), max 51.1 (118.9%)
    
    NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 75.3 - min 49.2 (65.3%), max 80.5 (106.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 126.3 - min 125.6 (99.4%), max 130.1 (103.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 131.7 - min 125.7 (95.4%), max 526.2 (399.5%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 248.6 - min 183.1 (73.6%), max 276.1 (111.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 41.8 - min 41.2 (98.5%), max 45.7 (109.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 60.4 - min 41.2 (68.2%), max 615.9 (1018.9%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.5 - min 46.6 (98.0%), max 48.9 (103.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 207.5 - min 207.0 (99.8%), max 208.7 (100.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 210.5 - min 208.3 (98.9%), max 217.5 (103.3%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.5 - min 49.8 (67.8%), max 82.4 (112.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 144.7 - min 144.2 (99.7%), max 147.3 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 145.4 - min 144.2 (99.2%), max 148.5 (102.1%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.2 - min 45.6 (62.3%), max 78.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 127.8 - min 126.3 (98.8%), max 136.9 (107.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 129.6 - min 126.3 (97.5%), max 143.2 (110.5%)
    
    TR UNK 185.65.204.169 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 68.9 - min 41.0 (59.6%), max 72.0 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 159.1 - min 158.4 (99.6%), max 166.5 (104.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 160.4 - min 158.4 (98.7%), max 173.4 (108.1%)
    
    FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 8]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 77.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 90.4 (117.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 117.1 - min 115.0 (98.2%), max 133.9 (114.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.7 - min 115.0 (85.4%), max 1243.9 (923.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.6 - min 45.8 (85.3%), max 56.1 (104.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 206.6 - min 205.3 (99.4%), max 280.9 (135.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 219.6 - min 205.3 (93.5%), max 1322.9 (602.3%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 65.9 - min 47.5 (72.0%), max 73.5 (111.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 143.9 - min 139.6 (97.0%), max 149.3 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 153.5 - min 139.6 (91.0%), max 574.9 (374.6%)
    
    IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 37.6 - min 22.8 (60.6%), max 40.0 (106.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 249.6 - min 248.9 (99.7%), max 252.8 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 250.7 - min 248.9 (99.3%), max 258.0 (102.9%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 33]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 44.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 78.6 (176.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 85.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 146.9 (172.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 87.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 310.1 (356.0%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 296.3 - min 174.6 (58.9%), max 352.0 (118.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 35.7 - min 35.1 (98.4%), max 38.0 (106.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 36.3 - min 35.1 (96.6%), max 45.4 (125.0%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 69.5 - min 51.3 (73.7%), max 76.1 (109.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 149.3 - min 149.0 (99.8%), max 150.1 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 151.5 - min 149.3 (98.6%), max 161.1 (106.4%)
    
    US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 987.6 - min 890.4 (90.2%), max 1081.0 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 2.3 - min 2.0 (85.7%), max 5.1 (218.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 15.6 - min 2.1 (13.5%), max 1135.0 (7271.5%)
    
    UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 88.9 - min 67.7 (76.1%), max 93.3 (105.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 109.6 - min 109.1 (99.5%), max 112.1 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 124.4 - min 109.4 (88.0%), max 1249.6 (1004.8%)
    
    US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 280.6 - min 225.1 (80.2%), max 317.2 (113.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 42.3 - min 40.1 (94.8%), max 46.6 (110.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.4 - min 40.2 (92.6%), max 74.1 (170.7%)
    
    RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 74.7 - min 72.3 (96.7%), max 77.8 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 155.2 - min 152.7 (98.4%), max 164.5 (106.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.6 - min 152.7 (98.1%), max 169.0 (108.6%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 78.5 - min 50.8 (64.7%), max 97.6 (124.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 120.6 - min 120.2 (99.6%), max 123.0 (102.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 121.0 - min 120.2 (99.4%), max 123.7 (102.3%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 50.7 - min 43.1 (85.0%), max 58.5 (115.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 221.6 - min 191.6 (86.5%), max 225.2 (101.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 222.2 - min 191.7 (86.3%), max 227.6 (102.4%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 84.9 - min 56.8 (66.9%), max 100.5 (118.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 117.3 - min 116.9 (99.6%), max 122.5 (104.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 118.2 - min 116.9 (98.9%), max 137.7 (116.5%)
    

    Now, on to the NYC VPS ...

    AES? Yes
    Nested Virt.? No
    HW RNG? Yes
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 145.5 - min 51.4 (35.3 %), max 248.8 (171.0 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 427.7 - min 369.7 (86.4 %), max 449.0 (105.0 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 445.7 - min 410.8 (92.2 %), max 485.9 (109.0 %)
    ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 540.2 - min 514.1 (95.2 %), max 573.7 (106.2 %)
    ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 55.8 - min 51.4 (92.2 %), max 59.5 (106.7 %)
    
    --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.18 - min 0.09 (51.3%), max 0.70 (398.7%)
    IOps             : avg 45.01 - min 22.66 (50.3%), max 178.33 (396.2%)
    

    Here the processor is quite a bit better (or should I say less brutally overcrowded?) but look the SSD! 180 KB/s and not even 50 IOPS on average ... yuck.

    Here's the NYC network:

    --- Network ---
    US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 154.3 - min 149.9 (97.2%), max 156.9 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 72.6 - min 72.3 (99.6%), max 72.8 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 72.7 - min 72.4 (99.5%), max 73.6 (101.2%)
    
    NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 26.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (201.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 129.3 - min 128.8 (99.6%), max 130.0 (100.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 129.4 - min 128.8 (99.6%), max 130.0 (100.5%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 55.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 148.5 (269.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 69.1 - min 67.1 (97.1%), max 70.1 (101.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 69.6 - min 68.0 (97.7%), max 70.3 (101.0%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 17.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 34.8 (202.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 235.8 - min 235.5 (99.9%), max 236.6 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 237.9 - min 235.5 (99.0%), max 239.9 (100.8%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 72.5 (182.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 155.6 - min 155.1 (99.7%), max 156.0 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 156.0 - min 155.7 (99.8%), max 156.6 (100.4%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 71.0 (200.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 92.6 - min 92.2 (99.5%), max 93.1 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 92.7 - min 92.2 (99.5%), max 93.1 (100.5%)
    
    TR UNK 185.65.204.169 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.4 - min 79.9 (99.4%), max 80.7 (100.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 115.9 - min 115.6 (99.8%), max 116.2 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 116.3 - min 115.9 (99.6%), max 117.1 (100.7%)
    
    FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 41.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 103.6 (248.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 78.9 - min 78.7 (99.7%), max 79.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 205.0 - min 78.7 (38.4%), max 1213.8 (592.1%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 19.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 44.5 (225.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 220.7 - min 220.2 (99.8%), max 221.4 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 220.8 - min 220.2 (99.7%), max 221.5 (100.3%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 15.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 31.2 (204.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 144.9 - min 144.8 (99.9%), max 145.1 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 145.5 - min 144.8 (99.5%), max 150.5 (103.4%)
    
    IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 16.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 30.9 (189.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.0 - min 227.9 (98.2%), max 259.3 (111.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 232.4 - min 227.9 (98.1%), max 259.3 (111.6%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 24.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 79.6 (321.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 63.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 115.0 (182.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 63.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 115.3 (181.5%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 772.7 - min 632.0 (81.8%), max 934.1 (120.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.4 - min 7.9 (94.2%), max 10.2 (121.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 8.5 - min 7.9 (92.7%), max 10.2 (119.7%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.3 - min 23.2 (65.6%), max 48.3 (136.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 107.5 - min 107.1 (99.6%), max 108.0 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 107.8 - min 107.3 (99.6%), max 108.5 (100.7%)
    
    US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 79.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 147.3 (185.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 42.0 - min 41.1 (97.9%), max 43.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.4 - min 42.0 (96.7%), max 44.9 (103.4%)
    
    UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 118.0 (242.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.6 - min 71.4 (99.7%), max 72.1 (100.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 74.1 - min 71.5 (96.5%), max 85.9 (115.9%)
    
    US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 986.1 - min 856.6 (86.9%), max 1038.6 (105.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 2.0 - min 1.8 (91.5%), max 2.2 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 4.2 - min 1.9 (45.7%), max 18.4 (442.8%)
    
    RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 51.9 - min 29.2 (56.4%), max 102.0 (196.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 109.0 - min 108.6 (99.6%), max 109.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 109.6 - min 108.9 (99.3%), max 110.4 (100.7%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 143.5 - min 111.0 (77.4%), max 150.3 (104.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 79.6 (99.7%), max 80.1 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 79.9 - min 79.6 (99.7%), max 80.1 (100.3%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 12.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 36.3 (292.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 235.8 - min 208.2 (88.3%), max 239.8 (101.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 235.8 - min 208.2 (88.3%), max 239.8 (101.7%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.4 - min 35.6 (48.5%), max 144.7 (197.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.6 - min 79.3 (99.6%), max 80.0 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.3 - min 79.6 (99.2%), max 80.8 (100.7%)
    
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited January 2022

    -- part 2, the France VPS --

    Finally on to the France VPS (on an OVH dedi, it seems).

    Version 2.5.0, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com)
    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    OS, version: FreeBSD 13.0, Mem.: 1.990 GB
    CPU - Cores: 2, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/79/1
    Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 256K L2, 15M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid
              sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave osxsave avx
              f16c rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed
              adx smap syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm lzcnt
    
    AES? Yes
    Nested Virt.? No
    HW RNG? Yes
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 215.5 - min 99.2 (46.1 %), max 334.0 (155.0 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 591.3 - min 474.8 (80.3 %), max 654.3 (110.7 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 612.6 - min 546.0 (89.1 %), max 656.4 (107.2 %)
    ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 792.0 - min 740.2 (93.5 %), max 805.1 (101.7 %)
    ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 110.5 - min 99.2 (89.8 %), max 119.3 (108.0 %)
    
    --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 8.53 - min 8.12 (95.2%), max 8.69 (101.9%)
    IOps             : avg 2183.51 - min 2078.05 (95.2%), max 2223.52 (101.8%)
    

    Much nicer than the other two nodes. Somewhat crowded too it seems but still quite decent performance. And even over the magic 100 kp/s RSA barrier, really nice for a quite cheap 2 vCores, 2 GB box, me pleased to see such a cheap VM approach (lower end) Epyc performance.
    And also the SSD is quite decent with about 2k IOPS.

    --- Network ---
    US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.8 - min 79.7 (95.1%), max 87.1 (103.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.0 - min 132.5 (98.2%), max 139.3 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.5 - min 132.5 (97.1%), max 184.5 (135.2%)
    
    NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 283.6 - min 153.2 (54.0%), max 396.6 (139.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.2 - min 25.0 (99.3%), max 25.4 (100.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 28.0 - min 25.0 (89.2%), max 279.5 (996.9%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 57.9 - min 53.6 (92.5%), max 62.3 (107.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 148.4 - min 148.1 (99.8%), max 150.4 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 163.4 - min 148.2 (90.7%), max 1340.3 (820.5%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 28.5 - min 27.5 (96.3%), max 30.4 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 304.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 307.9 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 304.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 311.3 (102.3%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 44.8 - min 34.1 (76.2%), max 48.4 (108.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 245.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 259.0 (105.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 257.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1209.0 (469.4%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 337.0 - min 259.7 (77.1%), max 407.1 (120.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.2 - min 25.0 (99.2%), max 25.4 (100.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 25.2 - min 25.0 (99.2%), max 25.4 (100.8%)
    
    TR UNK 185.65.204.169 [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 85.8 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 56.7 - min 56.2 (99.1%), max 64.0 (112.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 56.8 - min 56.2 (98.9%), max 64.2 (113.0%)
    
    FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 8]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 583.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 680.2 (116.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 11.3 - min 11.1 (97.9%), max 11.6 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.5 - min 11.2 (89.7%), max 111.7 (894.4%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 46.5 - min 43.6 (93.9%), max 48.9 (105.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 231.8 - min 231.4 (99.8%), max 232.1 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 241.9 - min 231.7 (95.8%), max 258.9 (107.0%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 46.7 - min 21.5 (46.0%), max 52.5 (112.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 209.5 - min 200.6 (95.8%), max 214.6 (102.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.0 - min 200.6 (89.2%), max 1349.7 (600.0%)
    
    IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 67.2 - min 61.7 (91.9%), max 72.9 (108.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 142.6 - min 136.7 (95.9%), max 148.4 (104.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 148.2 - min 137.4 (92.7%), max 362.2 (244.4%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 29]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 157.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 263.4 (167.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 29.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 46.5 (155.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 46.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1074.3 (2326.2%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 140.0 - min 133.4 (95.3%), max 149.2 (106.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.8 - min 78.2 (98.0%), max 80.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 81.2 - min 78.3 (96.4%), max 87.4 (107.6%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 211.0 - min 149.6 (70.9%), max 236.8 (112.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 56.1 - min 55.9 (99.7%), max 56.3 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 56.5 - min 55.9 (98.9%), max 61.3 (108.4%)
    
    US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 72.4 - min 68.9 (95.1%), max 77.1 (106.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 119.6 - min 119.4 (99.8%), max 122.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.7 - min 119.4 (89.3%), max 1300.0 (972.6%)
    
    UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 437.7 - min 214.6 (49.0%), max 725.0 (165.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.7 (97.4%), max 9.2 (103.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.3 - min 8.8 (32.2%), max 1467.4 (5368.3%)
    
    US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 96.1 - min 85.9 (89.4%), max 101.5 (105.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 114.3 - min 112.2 (98.1%), max 118.2 (103.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 117.4 - min 112.3 (95.7%), max 151.5 (129.1%)
    
    RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 230.1 - min 90.2 (39.2%), max 239.7 (104.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 48.9 - min 48.7 (99.7%), max 50.3 (103.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.2 - min 48.7 (96.9%), max 75.0 (149.3%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 839.5 - min 587.3 (70.0%), max 917.4 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 7.2 - min 7.1 (98.6%), max 7.4 (102.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 7.4 - min 7.1 (95.6%), max 8.1 (109.1%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 9]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 48.8 (124.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 243.9 - min 239.3 (98.1%), max 367.3 (150.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 249.1 - min 239.3 (96.1%), max 368.9 (148.1%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 884.8 - min 861.5 (97.4%), max 916.9 (103.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 9.2 - min 9.0 (98.2%), max 9.4 (102.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 10.2 - min 9.1 (89.6%), max 12.3 (121.1%)
    

    And the network is quite nice too. All major european targets in 3 digits Mb/s and quite decent results across the Atlantic too, and even to Asia the connectivity is reasonably usable, yay!

    TL;DR: I don't know the US market very well, maybe for them the results are OK but IMO the NYC node is a clear no-go, the Dallas node also isn't enticing albeit not particularly crappy.
    The France node though is quite nice and with the current promo prices it's quite attractive.

  • Thanks for the Giveaways! :)

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    I am in France and can say it is great.
    Didn't expect such a good service especially since my other VM with them is in Dallas.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @Andrews said:

    Central.co/aqua kindly provided 3 of their "Silver" VPS to me

    and later because of scrolling all this two miles long completely useless yellow shit ...

    You are yellow? Me surprised.

  • aquaaqua Member, Patron Provider

    Thank you @jsg for the honest review. We will evaluate what needs to be fixed and contact you again when we put something new in place. I feel that for the price customers are paying, these speeds and specs are expected.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • @jsg said:

    @Andrews said:

    Central.co/aqua kindly provided 3 of their "Silver" VPS to me

    and later because of scrolling all this two miles long completely useless yellow shit ...

    You are yellow? Me surprised.

    next time just use spoiler tag for your endless "yellow precious treasures" to spare people scrolling:

    https://success.vanillaforums.com/kb/articles/12-advanced-editor#headings-and-special-text-formatting

  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep

    Well @andrews you got your own thread where you can unleash all you want.

  • @aqua said:
    Thank you jsg for the honest review. We will evaluate what needs to be fixed and contact you again when we put something new in place. I feel that for the price customers are paying, these speeds and specs are expected.

    For the price I'm paying, it's f*cking fantastic. I'm only wondering if I should have got Silver instead of Bronze. Oh well.

  • ColderCoderColderCoder Member
    edited January 2022

    Screenshot_20220106-015719_Firefox~3.png

  • @ColderCoder said:
    [image about whmcs not valid]

    Not saying it's the reason, but that WHMCS tool is shitty AF and returns "not authorized" for a lot of authorized results.

  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep

    @aqua WHMCS expired ?

  • aquaaqua Member, Patron Provider

    @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    @aqua WHMCS expired ?

    Yeah, they’re auto-renew system doesn’t like to work. Should be fixed now.

  • aquaaqua Member, Patron Provider

    @niknar1900 said:

    @aqua said:
    Thank you jsg for the honest review. We will evaluate what needs to be fixed and contact you again when we put something new in place. I feel that for the price customers are paying, these speeds and specs are expected.

    For the price I'm paying, it's f*cking fantastic. I'm only wondering if I should have got Silver instead of Bronze. Oh well.

    Upgrades are do-able if you’d like. Open a ticket and we’ll get it sorted.

    Thanked by 1niknar1900
  • I got the prize! Thanks for the Giveaways! ❤️

  • @aqua i guess your inbox must be filled with tons of msg, just wanna let you know that i made a couple dm to you regarding redemption of the prize. Thank you again for the prize ya.

Sign In or Register to comment.