New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Is it really possible to send 21TB in a month without trigger any point in AUP ?
Anyone here using VPSHARED service from Virmach?
yes.
I can send 108 Gbps using 6 Cascade Lake cores running at full speed.
Assuming Virmach's core is half as powerful and you can only use 1 core (33% of 3 cores), my program could transmit at 9 Gbps - faster than the Ethernet port.
Therefore, CPU isn't a bottleneck.
Suppose you can use half of the 1 Gbps port, at 500 Mbps, you can transmit 5400 GByte daily. You can use up 21 TB in less than 4 days.
As for "conntrack sessions", you can work around that by always sending to the same destination.
ny1.vpshared.com by any chance? httpd has been down for 20 hours now and no response from Virmach
I personally would bet that if you locked in a 500Mbps link you'd be suspended well before four days were up.... ;-)
You can buy the package and try. If you get suspended, I'll do 47 push-ups in your honor.
Oh man i feel totally lost with Virmach xD! It's like their solusvm panel is not linked to the VPS at all.
What i just want is an Alpine Linux, and i wanted to be a nice customer and not asking them to download and mount the iso for me. I guess this is the purpose of "KVM lite" mention.
Anyone figured it out with this? Should i ask for the Alpine Linux iso i want (using the field in the VPS configuration in the billing panel)?
There have been some issues recently but I believe they're fixed now. A quick question - did you shutdown and restart the VPS after changing SolusVM options? If not, try that.
Another idea to get netboot.xyz working...
Download some files...
cd /
wget -4 https://boot.netboot.xyz/ipxe/netboot.xyz.lkrn
wget -4 https://boot.netboot.xyz/ipxe/netboot.xyz.efi
Add this to /etc/grub.d/40_custom
menuentry "netboot.xyz" --hotkey=n {
if [ "${grub_platform}" == "efi" ]; then
chainloader /netboot.xyz.efi
else
linux16 /netboot.xyz.lkrn
fi
}
Start watching the VPS console via vnc / novnc etc
Run these back in the ssh session...
update-grub
reboot
Watch the VPS console. When it reboots it will have a netboot.xyz option on the grub boot menu, choose that.
Hope it helps get you going.
Yeah as stated in my first post i've trop power off, shutdown and reboot from both panels (whmcs and solusvm).
Wow cool thanks ! I was looking to bootstrap Alpine from Ubuntu ahah ^^. Thanks for this howto, i appreciate and will probably use it.
Those instructions will probably work on Ubuntu as well.
I don't know Alpine, but if they have a small ISO like Debian's netinst you might be able to boot that up from grub using a similar entry in the 40_custom file. Search around and you might find the right entry to make.
There's a few ways to get things going. Enjoy!
Yeah Alpine Linux is really light, less than 100mb. It's a lot used as base image with Docker container, there is almost nothing installed by default on Alpine XD.
I was going to follow this:
https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Replacing_non-Alpine_Linux_with_Alpine_remotely
https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Replacing_non-Alpine_Linux_with_Alpine_remotely
Haha. Yep, this kind of install style will work with almost any initial distro...
dd if=alpine-virt-3.5.2-x86_64.iso of=/dev/sda
You'll find you just need to change the device name to this...
dd if=alpine-virt-3.5.2-x86_64.iso of=/dev/vda
Apologies if you knew that one already. Overall those instructions look pretty tidy and easy to follow.
No worry, more help is better than not enough ; also it can helps any other reader. Thanks for pointing this
vm is not attached to given i.p.
I think the flash deals bot is borked again.
All this talk about Alpine Linux has VirBot doling out the tiny storage VMs again...
For the next 20 posts, nobody talk about anything else, but Windows 2016 Server, and Oracle 18c XE then! That should guarantee us ~40 GB disks as a minimum!
I've got one VM from 2019 that's just like this, the rest of mine work fine. I don't know if there was an error in the creation process or what happened, but no matter what iso you select, the cdrom is empty. Trying to mount the cdrom from a shell says the same. I never got around to putting a ticket in about it and worked around it doing something similar to the suggestion from @8nation. If you don't have any luck with netboot, you should open a ticket, the iso mount in solus should normally work.
$5/yr
KVM - 1 GIGABIT
384MB RAM
1 vCORE
10GB SSD (RAID 10)
1000GB BANDWIDTH
BUFFALO, NY LOCATION
1 DEDICATED IPv4
CHEAP IP, yet @Neoon says it's a no go!
Yes same. NY1
For what?
It would be great for starting a summer host: 50MB disk with a generous 1GB BW and you'll still have a huge BW buffer.
The true summer host offers generous unlimited transfer in exotic locations, albeit at a lower bandwidth because satellites.
edited
Today deals lack of manual deals, @VirMach is MIA (or working hard and have no time for us).
>
Region: Global https://bench.monster v.1.5.4 2020-09-30
Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Global
OS : CentOS 7.9.2009 (64 Bit)
Virt/Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-1160.6.1.el7.x86_64
CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores : 1 @ 2199.998 MHz x86_64 4096 KB Cache
CPU Flags : AES-NI Disabled & VM-x/AMD-V Disabled
Load Average : 0.22, 0.11, 0.06
Total Space : 9.6G (1.7G ~18% used)
Total RAM : 361 MB (101 MB + 200 MB Buff in use)
Total SWAP : 255 MB (0 MB in use)
Uptime : 0 days 0:4
ASN & ISP : AS36352, ColoCrossing
Organization : Virtual Machine Solutions LLC
Location : Buffalo, United States / US
Region : New York
## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
Single Core : 1344 (POOR)
Multi Core : 1377
## IO Test
CPU Speed:
bzip2 : 44.5 MB/s
sha256 : 76.7 MB/s
md5sum : 185 MB/s
RAM Speed:
Avg. write : 952.1 MB/s
Avg. read : 2389.3 MB/s
Disk Speed:
1st run : 82.7 MB/s
2nd run : 121 MB/s
3rd run : 170 MB/s
Average : 124.6 MB/s
## Global Speedtest
Location Upload Download Ping
Nearby 217.02 Mbit/s 413.61 Mbit/s 35.295 ms
USA, New York (Optimum) 354.79 Mbit/s 448.21 Mbit/s 11.554 ms
USA, Chicago (Windstream) 395.18 Mbit/s 386.40 Mbit/s 10.968 ms
USA, Dallas (Frontier) 135.46 Mbit/s 323.75 Mbit/s 46.083 ms
USA, Miami (Frontier) 121.80 Mbit/s 289.21 Mbit/s 42.596 ms
USA, Los Angeles (Windstream) 143.08 Mbit/s 322.51 Mbit/s 52.753 ms
UK, London (toob Ltd) 108.93 Mbit/s 225.36 Mbit/s 76.829 ms
France, Lyon (SFR) 151.05 Mbit/s 49.74 Mbit/s 88.087 ms
Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 136.61 Mbit/s 60.74 Mbit/s 105.827 ms
Spain, Madrid (MasMovil) 121.91 Mbit/s 204.09 Mbit/s 107.949 ms
Italy, Rome (Unidata) 129.01 Mbit/s 119.14 Mbit/s 113.804 ms
Russia, Moscow (Rostelecom) 16.09 Mbit/s 137.05 Mbit/s 126.956 ms
Israel, Haifa (013Netvision) 102.89 Mbit/s 70.48 Mbit/s 148.262 ms
India, New Delhi (GIGATEL) 59.82 Mbit/s 107.90 Mbit/s 225.835 ms
Singapore (FirstMedia) 22.60 Mbit/s 13.52 Mbit/s 231.351 ms
Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther) 110.38 Mbit/s 118.24 Mbit/s 160.475 ms
Australia, Sydney (Optus) 40.24 Mbit/s 67.99 Mbit/s 230.559 ms
RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas) 45.38 Mbit/s 74.72 Mbit/s 229.032 ms
Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare) 51.06 Mbit/s 156.30 Mbit/s 159.225 ms
Finished in : 13 min 59 sec
Timestamp : 2020-12-10 03:14:56 GMT
Saved in : /root/speedtest.log
thank you virmach
cheaper than shared hosting
Thanks for your information - well - I can't answer on the behalf of anyone else but let me share with you my thoughts.
Yes, indeed I am new and haven't heard of VirMach before this sales thread. I did grab some BF deals from providers where people have been crying all day long, asking for delivery time. Let me give you two most relevant examples.
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/168148/george-datacenter-black-weekend-black-friday-every-day#latest
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/168301/black-friday-2020-nvme-and-storage-deals-deploy-worldwide#latest
I didn't even bother to leave a message under the thread or contact via ticekt after paying. Why? Because the provision time has been clearly stated in the first page - George 24 hours (or more) and HostHatch by 31 Dec. Simple as that.
Correct me if I am wrong - I didn't read every page so I only referred to the first post - There seems to be without clear indication of delivery time. The closest bet is "Please anticipate your service to potentially not be functional for a few days before you can contact us for a resolution".
Well again - With such crazy price, I guess it is not too bad to wait for a month (like HostHatch) but would it be better if they could remove "the 1-2 hours provision time" on the invoice? I believe it could have helped avoided many enquiries from their clientele. Just let people know the timeframe clearly and everyone is happy.
For me, I really don't mind the wait - As I have too many boxes, I need to rely on monitor tool to organize them. So my practice is - Once a VPS is provisioned, I will organize the filing of the invoice and put it up on the uptime monitor and off I go. It just sits there. Once this is done, then done.
What are people using their windows server for?