Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


HostSolutions.ro New location in 5-4-3-2-1 days ! Enjoy a top storage plan ! - Page 16
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostSolutions.ro New location in 5-4-3-2-1 days ! Enjoy a top storage plan !

1131416181922

Comments

  • That's bad... The question, is this migration will end daily downtime?

  • Can anyone tell how to add name-servers from client area webpage . It has ns1 and ns2 what i had put earlier when didnt have a domain
    Now i have a domain from name cheap , have added proper dns entires in namecheap but its still not resolving due to probably this issue
    Dont want to open a ticket with @cociu if can be resolved as someone esle also must have faced it

  • Did you buy shared hosting or VPS?

  • @Hakim said:
    Did you buy shared hosting or VPS?

    same as urs ,2GB ,200GB NVME

  • You have to set up a DNS server in your VPS or use an external DNS service like Cloudflare or your domain providers. Personally, I like Cloudflare one.

  • FYI, entering nameservers while ordering VPS or a dedicated server means nothing.

  • @Hakim said:
    You have to set up a DNS server in your VPS or use an external DNS service like Cloudflare or your domain providers. Personally, I like Cloudflare one.

    I am using namecheap DNS service and have added in that . Earlier VPSs didnt give this issue

  • Did you point the VPS IP address in A record?

  • @Hakim said:
    Did you point the VPS IP address in A record?

    yes pls
    I already have other domains linked to different VPSs

  • Mine is resolving without any issue. Don't know what's wrong with your one.

  • @Hakim said:
    Mine is resolving without any issue. Don't know what's wrong with your one.

    hey hakim, would you mind sharing the yabs result of your 2gb 2core 200gb nvme. and which os you are currently using. thanks

  • isunbejoisunbejo Member
    edited January 2021
    4 core E5-2680V4
    4gb RAM (ddr4)
    250 GB NVME
    10 tb traffic/mo
    1 ipv4
    
    7 eur/mo no cupon need : https://secure.hostsolutions.ro/cart.php?a=add&pid=543
    
    Happy new year !
    

    yabs.sh Results:

    Sun Jan  3 15:39:21 UTC 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2397.222 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 246.0 GiB
    
    Running GB5 benchmark test... *cue elevator music*
    
    
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 252
    Multi Core      | 269
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5682236
    
    

    is this just the addition of cores ?

  • edited January 2021

    @isunbejo said:

    > Basic System Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    > CPU cores  : 4 @ 2397.222 MHz
    > AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    > VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    > RAM        : 3.9 GiB
    > Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    > Disk       : 246.0 GiB
    > 
    > Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Test            | Value
    >                 |
    > Single Core     | 252
    > Multi Core      | 269
    > Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5682236
    > 

    looks like the core count doesn't matter, the 2 core plan gets the same score.

    Thanked by 1password_
  • @ravenchad said: hey hakim, would you mind sharing the yabs result of your 2gb 2core 200gb nvme. and which os you are currently using. thanks

    Here you go.

    Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores : 2 @ 2397.222 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 1.9 GiB
    Swap : 0.0 KiB
    Disk : 196.8 GiB
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    Block Size  4k (IOPS)   64k (IOPS)
    Read    40.34 MB/s (10.0k)  428.52 MB/s (6.6k)
    Write   40.44 MB/s (10.1k)  430.78 MB/s (6.7k)
    Total   80.78 MB/s (20.1k)  859.31 MB/s (13.4k)
            
    Block Size  512k (IOPS)     1m (IOPS)
    ------  --- ----    ---- ----
    Read    1.36 GB/s (2.6k)    1.67 GB/s (1.6k)
    Write   1.43 GB/s (2.8k)    1.78 GB/s (1.7k)
    Total   2.80 GB/s (5.4k)    3.46 GB/s (3.3k)
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 656 Mbits/sec | busy
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 861 Mbits/sec | 311 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | 390 Mbits/sec
    Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | 609 Mbits/sec | 64.6 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 797 Mbits/sec | 14.4 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 508 Mbits/sec | 201 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy | busy
    Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | busy | busy
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 257
    Multi Core | 260
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5679727 
    Thanked by 3ravenchad isunbejo k4zz
  • > > Basic System Information:
    > > ---------------------------------
    > > Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    > > CPU cores  : 4 @ 2397.222 MHz
    > > AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    > > VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    > > RAM        : 3.9 GiB
    > > Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    > > Disk       : 246.0 GiB
    > > 
    > > Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    > > ---------------------------------
    > > Test            | Value
    > >                 |
    > > Single Core     | 252
    > > Multi Core      | 269
    > > Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5682236
    > > 

    looks like the core count doesn't matter, the 2 core plan gets the same score.

    just number count, not core :smiley:

  • @cociu Thank you for fixing the issue with the 45.* IPs. My monitors are showing better uptime these past couple of days. :)

  • nice to see that CPU host and AES enabled is available now :)
    Hope that we can get that activated on older plans too in the future

  • @Hakim said:

    @ravenchad said: hey hakim, would you mind sharing the yabs result of your 2gb 2core 200gb nvme. and which os you are currently using. thanks

    Here you go.

    > Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    > CPU cores : 2 @ 2397.222 MHz
    > AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    > VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    > RAM : 1.9 GiB
    > Swap : 0.0 KiB
    > Disk : 196.8 GiB
    > fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    > Block Size    4k (IOPS)   64k (IOPS)
    > Read  40.34 MB/s (10.0k)  428.52 MB/s (6.6k)
    > Write     40.44 MB/s (10.1k)  430.78 MB/s (6.7k)
    > Total     80.78 MB/s (20.1k)  859.31 MB/s (13.4k)
    >       
    > Block Size    512k (IOPS)     1m (IOPS)
    > ------    --- ----    ---- ----
    > Read  1.36 GB/s (2.6k)    1.67 GB/s (1.6k)
    > Write     1.43 GB/s (2.8k)    1.78 GB/s (1.7k)
    > Total     2.80 GB/s (5.4k)    3.46 GB/s (3.3k)
    > iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    > 
    > Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    > | | |
    > Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 656 Mbits/sec | busy
    > Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 861 Mbits/sec | 311 Mbits/sec
    > WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | 390 Mbits/sec
    > Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | 609 Mbits/sec | 64.6 Mbits/sec
    > Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 797 Mbits/sec | 14.4 Mbits/sec
    > Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 508 Mbits/sec | 201 Mbits/sec
    > Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy | busy
    > Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | busy | busy
    > Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    > 
    > Test | Value
    > |
    > Single Core | 257
    > Multi Core | 260
    > Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5679727 

    thanks. by the way, what OS you are using?

  • @Edding said:
    Hope that we can get that activated on older plans too in the future

    co-ask

  • @ravenchad said: thanks. by the way, what OS you are using?

    Oh! forgot to add that. It's Debian 10

    Thanked by 1ravenchad
  • @Doragon said: @cociu Thank you for fixing the issue with the 45.* IPs. My monitors are showing better uptime these past couple of days

    is only temporary fixed , we will change all ips from oradea location start from tumorrow , after this task no problem anymore.

    Thanked by 2mikewazar Doragon
  • @Edding said: Hope that we can get that activated on older plans too in the future

    yes we are working in this .

    Thanked by 2mikewazar Edding
  • @ServerNotFound said: looks like the core count doesn't matter, the 2 core plan gets the same score.

    i think is something related to proxmox but not sure yet ... still investigating.

    Thanked by 2mikewazar Doragon
  • @cociu said:

    @ServerNotFound said: looks like the core count doesn't matter, the 2 core plan gets the same score.

    i think is something related to proxmox but not sure yet ... still investigating.

    I've got a ticket response to rerun the test, but the result was the same, CPU's not performing right. Wait for your good news then! Good luck!!

  • @cociu said:

    @Doragon said: @cociu Thank you for fixing the issue with the 45.* IPs. My monitors are showing better uptime these past couple of days

    is only temporary fixed , we will change all ips from oradea location start from tumorrow , after this task no problem anymore.

    hi @cociu , just checking. my ip starts in 45.* too, but i believed i got this storage in Bucharest location. Does this included in the migration too? I am also having lots of packet loss. thanks

  • @cociu said:

    @ServerNotFound said: looks like the core count doesn't matter, the 2 core plan gets the same score.

    i think is something related to proxmox but not sure yet ... still investigating.

    Maybe try 1 socket and n cores?

  • @ravenchad said: hi @cociu , just checking. my ip starts in 45.* too, but i believed i got this storage in Bucharest location. Does this included in the migration too? I am also having lots of packet loss. thanks

    bouth location is affected , but we will change the ip only for the vm from oradea , after this all back to normal.

  • @cociu said:

    @ravenchad said: hi @cociu , just checking. my ip starts in 45.* too, but i believed i got this storage in Bucharest location. Does this included in the migration too? I am also having lots of packet loss. thanks

    bouth location is affected , but we will change the ip only for the vm from oradea , after this all back to normal.

    thanks @cociu , you mean bucharest will be fixed too because of the ip change that will happen in oradea vms?

  • @ravenchad said: thanks @cociu , you mean bucharest will be fixed too because of the ip change that will happen in oradea vms?

    once the oradea vms will resolved automatically the bucharest location will work like a charm , is a issue related to bgp because right now we have half ips in oradea and half in bucharest , when we have made the test no issue , when we start the production with such pps and many traffic was start the issues .... so the most easy for us and with less downtime is change oradea ips and let the entirely /45 for bucarest. i repeat this will tard maximum 3 days.

  • @cociu said:

    @ravenchad said: thanks @cociu , you mean bucharest will be fixed too because of the ip change that will happen in oradea vms?

    once the oradea vms will resolved automatically the bucharest location will work like a charm , is a issue related to bgp because right now we have half ips in oradea and half in bucharest , when we have made the test no issue , when we start the production with such pps and many traffic was start the issues .... so the most easy for us and with less downtime is change oradea ips and let the entirely /45 for bucarest. i repeat this will tard maximum 3 days.

    okay. understood. thanks @cociu. hope it will go smoothly. all the best.

Sign In or Register to comment.