New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
BudgetNode uses a CPU that doesn't meet my requirements
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
So cluster sync issue or sinister conspiracy.
Which is another way of saying "was it random chance, incompetence, or malice?"
It's amazing how often those things look identical.
Of course, some theorize there is no cluster at all and the various "database errors" and "captcha needed" and "checking your browser" stuff are all an elaborate ruse to disguise...ah, something. I missed the last meeting in @jarland's basement so I don't know which world domination plan is currently on queue...
Just to point out that @Ixalyon (the OP) joined only this morning and this is his/her first and only post. We'll see if he/she appears again to react.
Where we think it may be significant to performance, the exact processor has been given. Check the OpenVZ pages for example, where we are happy to admit we use Dual X5650 processors.
That's great! ...but you are changing the topic. Now you are trying to convince me that there is no "significant" difference in your opinion between e.g. E5-2650 and E5-1650v4. Both processors qualifies to "E5" term and both potentially could by used for virtualization.
I better recommend you to explain how QEMU works to OP, rather than fighting with me as it leads to nowhere.
Well, that was a lame ass response. Good on ya BudgetNode!
First post or last post is irrelevant.
On the other hand good practice is to always give the provider time to look into the problem. This could of all been prevented with a simple support ticket.
You are irrelevant.
Aren't we all irrelevant, really?
Much like this thread is pretty much irrelevant until we see support tickets.
KeKe is Joshua Prout, he is a little more irrelevant.
Ah, LET's very own King of Nonce-sence.
Relevant enough for you to bring up.
@OP just put in a ticket and problem solved I highly doubt a moderator of this forum wants to rabble back and forth on a simple issue that could of been fixed hours ago and not publicly noticed js.
I brought it up so Nekki is aware you are scum.
@ScammerProut make sure to use your new username to log in next time
I'd have to say I'm so offended .....
I like it thanks.
You don't seem to have such a good reputation here, so I would be hesitant to start arguing with you.
That said, there have been many fly-by-nighters on LET who post once, opening a thread, often a critical post, and then disappear. A sign of seriousness/sincerity is that one makes a follow-up to one's critical post after others have bothered to react.
Understatement. Don't even converse with him.
Yeah, you're right about this, no doubt.
By the way, is this the original Prout or an impostor?
Life and business go on.
Original. Lord Jar has had proof non public though.
I don't think anyone but the original would accept being given the name, considering the implication.
It seems that proof is never applied to anything around here but it's kinda a joke to me honestly. I know I'm not the person but I'm not going to start a huge argument with the administrators of this forum of who I am and who I'm not. I can clearly verify my identity but I was never asked to. So the question is why not play along ignorance is quite amusing sometimes especially when it does not directly affect me but someone I don't even know.
If I may ask, why did you choose "ScammerProut" as your name?
Jarland set it.
Prout always maintains a very calm and level-headed reaction to being called by his name, and always maintains that it isn't him. He speaks very maturely and is very friendly in his posts. He hopes that one day someone will call him the victim of my crusade against his latest scam.
Okay, I see, this is beginning to make sense ...
I didn't request anything but I'm also not the arguing type. I haven't even started a company, I don't sell products of any sort yet. I usually come to this forum for advise nothing more. Again I was never asked to verify my identity or my business which isent open yet.
Can you point to where the evil man touched you?
Crusade with no public proof just accusing random individuals who join the forum. I'd have to say a very bright crusade.
Sure, just carrier-4.com.
No one better lay a finger on my butterfin...I mean LET members.