America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

benha · July 20

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

rpqu · July 20

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Okay, I will generate more bugs

crunchbits · July 20

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Okay, I will generate more bugs

rpqu · July 20

@crunchbits said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Okay, I will generate more bugs

Can't you post the whole story?

forest · July 20

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Anything you want me to prioritize testing?

Will wet get access to (brief) GPU cloud servers to test provisioning and resizing them as well?

pwned · July 24

I've not opened any tickets for a few days, and I don't see any update notes here or in the beta support/ticket/announcement page. Should we just hang tight for now?

crunchbits · July 24

@pwned said:
I've not opened any tickets for a few days, and I don't see any update notes here or in the beta support/ticket/announcement page. Should we just hang tight for now?

Yessir. Myself or @benha will update, but short gist: fantastic feedback, very very helpful.

allthemtings · July 24

@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

crunchbits · July 24

@allthemtings said:
@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

find one of @beanman109's proxy accounts and delete them while sipping a celsius at 5:45am

allthemtings · July 24

@crunchbits said:

@allthemtings said:
@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

find one of @beanman109's proxy accounts and delete them while sipping a celsius at 5:45am

yoursunny · July 25

YABS on 2C3G20G:

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2026-07-03                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Jul 24 23:46:51 UTC 2026

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8260 CPU @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2399.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 2.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 19.3 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 26.04 LTS
Kernel     : 7.0.0-15-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Redoubt Networks
ASN        : AS400304 Redoubt Networks
Host       : Redoubt Networks
Location   : Spokane, Washington (WA)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 84.22 MB/s   (20.5k) | 626.08 MB/s   (9.5k)
Write      | 84.44 MB/s   (20.6k) | 629.38 MB/s   (9.6k)
Total      | 168.66 MB/s  (41.1k) | 1.25 GB/s    (19.1k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.18 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.14 GB/s     (1.0k)
Write      | 1.24 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.22 GB/s     (1.1k)
Total      | 2.43 GB/s     (4.6k) | 2.37 GB/s     (2.2k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 344 Mbits/sec   | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 115 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 207 Mbits/sec   | 1.99 Gbits/sec  | 124 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 245 Mbits/sec   | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 204 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 361 Mbits/sec   | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 228 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 630 Mbits/sec   | 2.36 Gbits/sec  | 44.9 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 503 Mbits/sec   | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 46.3 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 2.14 Gbits/sec  | 139 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 270 Mbits/sec   | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 109 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 260 Mbits/sec   | 1.89 Gbits/sec  | 125 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 252 Mbits/sec   | 1.63 Gbits/sec  | 204 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 306 Mbits/sec   | 1.33 Gbits/sec  | 230 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 804 Mbits/sec   | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 31.9 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 438 Mbits/sec   | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 46.2 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 303 Mbits/sec   | 2.07 Gbits/sec  | 145 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     |
Multi Core      |
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18817550

YABS completed in 15 min 0 sec

https://serververify.com/benchmarks/5952ab2d-dc77-490b-aa8a-6dc33fd869c8

fio on NVMe boot drive:

root@host-01:~# fio --name=mixed-workload --rw=randrw --rwmixread=75 --bs=4k --size=512m --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=16 --numjobs=4 --group_reporting --runtime=60
mixed-workload: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16
...
fio-3.41
Starting 4 processes
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
Jobs: 3 (f=3): [m(1),_(1),m(2)][100.0%][r=102MiB/s,w=34.1MiB/s][r=26.1k,w=8728 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
mixed-workload: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=4084: Sat Jul 25 00:13:55 2026
  read: IOPS=26.2k, BW=102MiB/s (107MB/s)(1534MiB/14970msec)
    slat (nsec): min=1960, max=6818.3k, avg=10541.11, stdev=71903.30
    clat (usec): min=15, max=24717, avg=1722.82, stdev=681.13
     lat (usec): min=244, max=24722, avg=1733.36, stdev=681.29
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  603],  5.00th=[  898], 10.00th=[ 1057], 20.00th=[ 1254],
     | 30.00th=[ 1401], 40.00th=[ 1532], 50.00th=[ 1647], 60.00th=[ 1762],
     | 70.00th=[ 1909], 80.00th=[ 2073], 90.00th=[ 2376], 95.00th=[ 2704],
     | 99.00th=[ 4424], 99.50th=[ 5407], 99.90th=[ 7177], 99.95th=[ 7635],
     | 99.99th=[ 8586]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=100176, max=111040, per=100.00%, avg=105324.62, stdev=630.90, samples=116
   iops        : min=25044, max=27760, avg=26330.66, stdev=157.71, samples=116
  write: IOPS=8790, BW=34.3MiB/s (36.0MB/s)(514MiB/14970msec); 0 zone resets
    slat (usec): min=2, max=5130, avg=12.48, stdev=81.11
    clat (usec): min=48, max=50047, avg=2055.21, stdev=754.72
     lat (usec): min=529, max=50052, avg=2067.68, stdev=754.35
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  938],  5.00th=[ 1221], 10.00th=[ 1369], 20.00th=[ 1565],
     | 30.00th=[ 1696], 40.00th=[ 1827], 50.00th=[ 1942], 60.00th=[ 2073],
     | 70.00th=[ 2212], 80.00th=[ 2409], 90.00th=[ 2737], 95.00th=[ 3163],
     | 99.00th=[ 5080], 99.50th=[ 5997], 99.90th=[ 7570], 99.95th=[ 8029],
     | 99.99th=[10814]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=33032, max=37536, per=100.00%, avg=35313.86, stdev=278.52, samples=116
   iops        : min= 8258, max= 9384, avg=8827.86, stdev=69.65, samples=116
  lat (usec)   : 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.04%, 250=0.02%, 500=0.28%
  lat (usec)   : 750=1.50%, 1000=4.44%
  lat (msec)   : 2=64.35%, 4=27.81%, 10=1.55%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 100=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=2.96%, sys=11.48%, ctx=102244, majf=0, minf=50
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=100.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=392692,131596,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=16

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=102MiB/s (107MB/s), 102MiB/s-102MiB/s (107MB/s-107MB/s), io=1534MiB (1608MB), run=14970-14970msec
  WRITE: bw=34.3MiB/s (36.0MB/s), 34.3MiB/s-34.3MiB/s (36.0MB/s-36.0MB/s), io=514MiB (539MB), run=14970-14970msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=390781/130969, sectors=3126248/1048888, merge=0/0, ticks=592147/240045, in_queue=832193, util=73.17%

fio on HDD block volume:

root@host-01:/mnt# fio --name=mixed-workload --rw=randrw --rwmixread=75 --bs=4k --size=512m --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=16 --numjobs=4 --group_reporting --runtime=60
mixed-workload: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16
...
fio-3.41
Starting 4 processes
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [m(4)][100.0%][r=3008KiB/s,w=1104KiB/s][r=752,w=276 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
mixed-workload: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=4042: Sat Jul 25 00:09:27 2026
  read: IOPS=912, BW=3650KiB/s (3738kB/s)(214MiB/60058msec)
    slat (usec): min=2, max=3612, avg=13.96, stdev=26.15
    clat (usec): min=875, max=418773, avg=33632.14, stdev=22783.18
     lat (usec): min=887, max=418788, avg=33646.10, stdev=22782.52
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[    6],  5.00th=[   10], 10.00th=[   13], 20.00th=[   18],
     | 30.00th=[   22], 40.00th=[   26], 50.00th=[   30], 60.00th=[   35],
     | 70.00th=[   40], 80.00th=[   46], 90.00th=[   56], 95.00th=[   68],
     | 99.00th=[  122], 99.50th=[  146], 99.90th=[  241], 99.95th=[  321],
     | 99.99th=[  372]
   bw (  KiB/s): min= 1520, max= 5776, per=100.00%, avg=3652.08, stdev=176.02, samples=480
   iops        : min=  380, max= 1444, avg=913.02, stdev=44.01, samples=480
  write: IOPS=308, BW=1234KiB/s (1264kB/s)(72.4MiB/60058msec); 0 zone resets
    slat (usec): min=2, max=3687, avg=15.54, stdev=49.77
    clat (msec): min=2, max=527, avg=107.82, stdev=50.09
     lat (msec): min=2, max=527, avg=107.83, stdev=50.09
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[   17],  5.00th=[   35], 10.00th=[   47], 20.00th=[   66],
     | 30.00th=[   81], 40.00th=[   94], 50.00th=[  106], 60.00th=[  117],
     | 70.00th=[  130], 80.00th=[  146], 90.00th=[  167], 95.00th=[  186],
     | 99.00th=[  253], 99.50th=[  296], 99.90th=[  443], 99.95th=[  443],
     | 99.99th=[  472]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=  480, max= 2056, per=99.88%, avg=1233.07, stdev=67.70, samples=480
   iops        : min=  120, max=  514, avg=308.27, stdev=16.92, samples=480
  lat (usec)   : 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.04%, 4=0.33%, 10=3.63%, 20=16.23%, 50=46.13%
  lat (msec)   : 100=18.54%, 250=14.76%, 500=0.33%, 750=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=0.18%, sys=0.64%, ctx=49203, majf=0, minf=49
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=99.9%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=54802,18535,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=16

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=3650KiB/s (3738kB/s), 3650KiB/s-3650KiB/s (3738kB/s-3738kB/s), io=214MiB (224MB), run=60058-60058msec
  WRITE: bw=1234KiB/s (1264kB/s), 1234KiB/s-1234KiB/s (1264kB/s-1264kB/s), io=72.4MiB (75.9MB), run=60058-60058msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sdb: ios=54741/18497, sectors=437928/147969, merge=0/0, ticks=1838613/1993040, in_queue=3831654, util=97.34%

Yes, this HDD is slightly faster than Daniel's NVMe.

bdl · July 25

@crunchbits said:

@allthemtings said:
@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

find one of @beanman109's proxy accounts and delete them while sipping a celsius at 5:45am

otherwise known as "flicking your @beanman109"

emgh · July 25

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

I love that you mention contrast because that’s one thing I specifically submitted a ticket about

bdl · July 25

Put a few tiny pp things through "report a bug" link

anakara · July 26

I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

rpqu · July 26

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They're probably busy deduping bugs LOL

forest · July 26

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They still received them. That just means they didn't have anything to say about them, not that they ignored it.

anakara · July 26

@rpqu said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They're probably busy deduping bugs LOL

Maybe so. If the error report has been recorded, that would be good

rpqu · July 26

@forest said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They still received them. That just means they didn't have anything to say about them, not that they ignored it.

Around 50% of bugs I submitted already fixed.

forest · July 26

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They still received them. That just means they didn't have anything to say about them, not that they ignored it.

Around 50% of bugs I submitted already fixed.

I haven't re-checked the bugs except for serious ones after the v2 update came out, since I have no idea if a remaining bug indicates that they missed it or that they just haven't gotten to it yet.

rpqu · July 26

@forest said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They still received them. That just means they didn't have anything to say about them, not that they ignored it.

Around 50% of bugs I submitted already fixed.

I haven't re-checked the bugs except for serious ones after the v2 update came out, since I have no idea if a remaining bug indicates that they missed it or that they just haven't gotten to it yet.

They're likely to do triage. Critical/severe bugs I submitted are fixed on v2, but minors aren't fixed yet.

Void · July 26

Custom ISO size limit of 5Gb is too restrictive, I feel. Most modern Windows OS and some Linux images too are over 5Gb.

benha · July 27

@rpqu said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They're probably busy deduping bugs LOL

While we are deduping quite a few bugs, we're hoping to have almost every bug resolved by the next update, expected in early August (any medium-large bugs should've been already resolved). Obviously, this doesn't include non-bug-bugs (intentional feature design some users may interpret as a bug), or any medium-large feature requests.

I can't promise we'll be able to response to every single ticket or every single bug, but we'll do our best to follow up with statuses when the timing is more feasible.

PuDLeZ · July 28

@Void said:
Custom ISO size limit of 5Gb is too restrictive, I feel. Most modern Windows OS and some Linux images too are over 5Gb.

Pretty sure all windows is similar to the win11 iso I downloaded earlier today
-rw-r--r--. 1 pudlez pudlez 7.9G Jul 27 15:09 Downloads/Win11_25H2_English_x64_v2.iso

For linux, I'm pretty sure 99 point something percent will fit on a standard dvd/4.7G. I mean, I know the dvd for rhel9/10 is 10G+ but do you really need every package on the ISO when you're more than likely going to setup networking during the install or after first boot?

forest · July 28

@benha said: I can't promise we'll be able to response to every single ticket or every single bug, but we'll do our best to follow up with statuses when the timing is more feasible.

Just let us know when you want another round of testing.

Void · July 28

@PuDLeZ said:

@Void said:
Custom ISO size limit of 5Gb is too restrictive, I feel. Most modern Windows OS and some Linux images too are over 5Gb.

Pretty sure all windows is similar to the win11 iso I downloaded earlier today
-rw-r--r--. 1 pudlez pudlez 7.9G Jul 27 15:09 Downloads/Win11_25H2_English_x64_v2.iso

For linux, I'm pretty sure 99 point something percent will fit on a standard dvd/4.7G. I mean, I know the dvd for rhel9/10 is 10G+ but do you really need every package on the ISO when you're more than likely going to setup networking during the install or after first boot?

Windows 11, Server 25, Ubuntu Desktop 24/26 - official sources are > 5GB

rpqu · July 28

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They're probably busy deduping bugs LOL

While we are deduping quite a few bugs, we're hoping to have almost every bug resolved by the next update, expected in early August (any medium-large bugs should've been already resolved). Obviously, this doesn't include non-bug-bugs (intentional feature design some users may interpret as a bug), or any medium-large feature requests.

I can't promise we'll be able to response to every single ticket or every single bug, but we'll do our best to follow up with statuses when the timing is more feasible.

Ok. I hope you could list the non-bug-bugs here. If possible, a review on the bugs plus funny commentary.

forest · July 28

@rpqu said: Ok. I hope you could list the non-bug-bugs here. If possible, a review on the bugs plus funny commentary.

A list (or even AI summary) of all the reported bugs would be good just so that we don't report duplicates and to give each other ideas.

crunchbits · July 29

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@anakara said:
I have sent many error reports via ticket a long time ago, but I have not received any responses

They're probably busy deduping bugs LOL

While we are deduping quite a few bugs, we're hoping to have almost every bug resolved by the next update, expected in early August (any medium-large bugs should've been already resolved). Obviously, this doesn't include non-bug-bugs (intentional feature design some users may interpret as a bug), or any medium-large feature requests.

I can't promise we'll be able to response to every single ticket or every single bug, but we'll do our best to follow up with statuses when the timing is more feasible.

Ok. I hope you could list the non-bug-bugs here. If possible, a review on the bugs plus funny commentary.

@forest said:

@rpqu said: Ok. I hope you could list the non-bug-bugs here. If possible, a review on the bugs plus funny commentary.

A list (or even AI summary) of all the reported bugs would be good just so that we don't report duplicates and to give each other ideas.

I think it would be a good idea. If anything, showing how thorough everyone was--can even make some funny comparisons.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

Comments