America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

benha · July 20

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

rpqu · July 20

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Okay, I will generate more bugs

crunchbits · July 20

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Okay, I will generate more bugs

rpqu · July 20

@crunchbits said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Okay, I will generate more bugs

Can't you post the whole story?

forest · July 20

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@benha said:

@rpqu said:

@forest said:

@Fubuki said: funny enough, i tested it on my other servers and somehow i see leaks...

Yep, quite a few providers here don't know how to set up proper isolation between VMs.

With one particular provider, I even got to see constant DNS answers being returned to someone else.

I can't hold the urge to ask @crunchbits @benha @skorupion to give me the code. It will be easier to debug than probing manually

You're funny if you think @skorupion get's access

Yeah. I thought he got access to the git. Have you assessed the entirety of my report?

Yes I did. Your testing, and report has been much appreciated. Cannot thank you enough.

90% of your report (everything outside of cosmetic/UI) was resolved in an update we pushed the afternoon of the 17th. I've been intentional holding off on UI/Cosmetic updates because I'll be taking one foul swoop over appearance (fonts, contrast, copy, etc) in the near future.

Anything you want me to prioritize testing?

Will wet get access to (brief) GPU cloud servers to test provisioning and resizing them as well?

pwned · July 24

I've not opened any tickets for a few days, and I don't see any update notes here or in the beta support/ticket/announcement page. Should we just hang tight for now?

crunchbits · July 24

@pwned said:
I've not opened any tickets for a few days, and I don't see any update notes here or in the beta support/ticket/announcement page. Should we just hang tight for now?

Yessir. Myself or @benha will update, but short gist: fantastic feedback, very very helpful.

allthemtings · July 24

@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

crunchbits · July 24

@allthemtings said:
@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

find one of @beanman109's proxy accounts and delete them while sipping a celsius at 5:45am

allthemtings · July 24

@crunchbits said:

@allthemtings said:
@crunchbits whats your favourite trick to do on it?

find one of @beanman109's proxy accounts and delete them while sipping a celsius at 5:45am

yoursunny · 12:16AM

YABS on 2C3G20G:

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2026-07-03                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Jul 24 23:46:51 UTC 2026

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8260 CPU @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2399.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 2.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 19.3 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 26.04 LTS
Kernel     : 7.0.0-15-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Redoubt Networks
ASN        : AS400304 Redoubt Networks
Host       : Redoubt Networks
Location   : Spokane, Washington (WA)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 84.22 MB/s   (20.5k) | 626.08 MB/s   (9.5k)
Write      | 84.44 MB/s   (20.6k) | 629.38 MB/s   (9.6k)
Total      | 168.66 MB/s  (41.1k) | 1.25 GB/s    (19.1k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.18 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.14 GB/s     (1.0k)
Write      | 1.24 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.22 GB/s     (1.1k)
Total      | 2.43 GB/s     (4.6k) | 2.37 GB/s     (2.2k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 344 Mbits/sec   | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 115 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 207 Mbits/sec   | 1.99 Gbits/sec  | 124 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 245 Mbits/sec   | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 204 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 361 Mbits/sec   | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 228 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 630 Mbits/sec   | 2.36 Gbits/sec  | 44.9 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 503 Mbits/sec   | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 46.3 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 2.14 Gbits/sec  | 139 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 270 Mbits/sec   | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 109 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 260 Mbits/sec   | 1.89 Gbits/sec  | 125 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 252 Mbits/sec   | 1.63 Gbits/sec  | 204 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 306 Mbits/sec   | 1.33 Gbits/sec  | 230 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 804 Mbits/sec   | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 31.9 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 438 Mbits/sec   | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 46.2 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 303 Mbits/sec   | 2.07 Gbits/sec  | 145 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     |
Multi Core      |
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18817550

YABS completed in 15 min 0 sec

https://serververify.com/benchmarks/5952ab2d-dc77-490b-aa8a-6dc33fd869c8

fio on NVMe boot drive:

root@host-01:~# fio --name=mixed-workload --rw=randrw --rwmixread=75 --bs=4k --size=512m --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=16 --numjobs=4 --group_reporting --runtime=60
mixed-workload: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16
...
fio-3.41
Starting 4 processes
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
Jobs: 3 (f=3): [m(1),_(1),m(2)][100.0%][r=102MiB/s,w=34.1MiB/s][r=26.1k,w=8728 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
mixed-workload: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=4084: Sat Jul 25 00:13:55 2026
  read: IOPS=26.2k, BW=102MiB/s (107MB/s)(1534MiB/14970msec)
    slat (nsec): min=1960, max=6818.3k, avg=10541.11, stdev=71903.30
    clat (usec): min=15, max=24717, avg=1722.82, stdev=681.13
     lat (usec): min=244, max=24722, avg=1733.36, stdev=681.29
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  603],  5.00th=[  898], 10.00th=[ 1057], 20.00th=[ 1254],
     | 30.00th=[ 1401], 40.00th=[ 1532], 50.00th=[ 1647], 60.00th=[ 1762],
     | 70.00th=[ 1909], 80.00th=[ 2073], 90.00th=[ 2376], 95.00th=[ 2704],
     | 99.00th=[ 4424], 99.50th=[ 5407], 99.90th=[ 7177], 99.95th=[ 7635],
     | 99.99th=[ 8586]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=100176, max=111040, per=100.00%, avg=105324.62, stdev=630.90, samples=116
   iops        : min=25044, max=27760, avg=26330.66, stdev=157.71, samples=116
  write: IOPS=8790, BW=34.3MiB/s (36.0MB/s)(514MiB/14970msec); 0 zone resets
    slat (usec): min=2, max=5130, avg=12.48, stdev=81.11
    clat (usec): min=48, max=50047, avg=2055.21, stdev=754.72
     lat (usec): min=529, max=50052, avg=2067.68, stdev=754.35
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  938],  5.00th=[ 1221], 10.00th=[ 1369], 20.00th=[ 1565],
     | 30.00th=[ 1696], 40.00th=[ 1827], 50.00th=[ 1942], 60.00th=[ 2073],
     | 70.00th=[ 2212], 80.00th=[ 2409], 90.00th=[ 2737], 95.00th=[ 3163],
     | 99.00th=[ 5080], 99.50th=[ 5997], 99.90th=[ 7570], 99.95th=[ 8029],
     | 99.99th=[10814]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=33032, max=37536, per=100.00%, avg=35313.86, stdev=278.52, samples=116
   iops        : min= 8258, max= 9384, avg=8827.86, stdev=69.65, samples=116
  lat (usec)   : 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.04%, 250=0.02%, 500=0.28%
  lat (usec)   : 750=1.50%, 1000=4.44%
  lat (msec)   : 2=64.35%, 4=27.81%, 10=1.55%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 100=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=2.96%, sys=11.48%, ctx=102244, majf=0, minf=50
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=100.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=392692,131596,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=16

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=102MiB/s (107MB/s), 102MiB/s-102MiB/s (107MB/s-107MB/s), io=1534MiB (1608MB), run=14970-14970msec
  WRITE: bw=34.3MiB/s (36.0MB/s), 34.3MiB/s-34.3MiB/s (36.0MB/s-36.0MB/s), io=514MiB (539MB), run=14970-14970msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=390781/130969, sectors=3126248/1048888, merge=0/0, ticks=592147/240045, in_queue=832193, util=73.17%

fio on HDD block volume:

root@host-01:/mnt# fio --name=mixed-workload --rw=randrw --rwmixread=75 --bs=4k --size=512m --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=16 --numjobs=4 --group_reporting --runtime=60
mixed-workload: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16
...
fio-3.41
Starting 4 processes
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
mixed-workload: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [m(4)][100.0%][r=3008KiB/s,w=1104KiB/s][r=752,w=276 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
mixed-workload: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=4042: Sat Jul 25 00:09:27 2026
  read: IOPS=912, BW=3650KiB/s (3738kB/s)(214MiB/60058msec)
    slat (usec): min=2, max=3612, avg=13.96, stdev=26.15
    clat (usec): min=875, max=418773, avg=33632.14, stdev=22783.18
     lat (usec): min=887, max=418788, avg=33646.10, stdev=22782.52
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[    6],  5.00th=[   10], 10.00th=[   13], 20.00th=[   18],
     | 30.00th=[   22], 40.00th=[   26], 50.00th=[   30], 60.00th=[   35],
     | 70.00th=[   40], 80.00th=[   46], 90.00th=[   56], 95.00th=[   68],
     | 99.00th=[  122], 99.50th=[  146], 99.90th=[  241], 99.95th=[  321],
     | 99.99th=[  372]
   bw (  KiB/s): min= 1520, max= 5776, per=100.00%, avg=3652.08, stdev=176.02, samples=480
   iops        : min=  380, max= 1444, avg=913.02, stdev=44.01, samples=480
  write: IOPS=308, BW=1234KiB/s (1264kB/s)(72.4MiB/60058msec); 0 zone resets
    slat (usec): min=2, max=3687, avg=15.54, stdev=49.77
    clat (msec): min=2, max=527, avg=107.82, stdev=50.09
     lat (msec): min=2, max=527, avg=107.83, stdev=50.09
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[   17],  5.00th=[   35], 10.00th=[   47], 20.00th=[   66],
     | 30.00th=[   81], 40.00th=[   94], 50.00th=[  106], 60.00th=[  117],
     | 70.00th=[  130], 80.00th=[  146], 90.00th=[  167], 95.00th=[  186],
     | 99.00th=[  253], 99.50th=[  296], 99.90th=[  443], 99.95th=[  443],
     | 99.99th=[  472]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=  480, max= 2056, per=99.88%, avg=1233.07, stdev=67.70, samples=480
   iops        : min=  120, max=  514, avg=308.27, stdev=16.92, samples=480
  lat (usec)   : 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.04%, 4=0.33%, 10=3.63%, 20=16.23%, 50=46.13%
  lat (msec)   : 100=18.54%, 250=14.76%, 500=0.33%, 750=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=0.18%, sys=0.64%, ctx=49203, majf=0, minf=49
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=99.9%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=54802,18535,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=16

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=3650KiB/s (3738kB/s), 3650KiB/s-3650KiB/s (3738kB/s-3738kB/s), io=214MiB (224MB), run=60058-60058msec
  WRITE: bw=1234KiB/s (1264kB/s), 1234KiB/s-1234KiB/s (1264kB/s-1264kB/s), io=72.4MiB (75.9MB), run=60058-60058msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sdb: ios=54741/18497, sectors=437928/147969, merge=0/0, ticks=1838613/1993040, in_queue=3831654, util=97.34%

Yes, this HDD is slightly faster than Daniel's NVMe.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

Comments