Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

RackNerd forced DC migration, refused prorated refund.

124678

Comments

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @mainmod said:

    @TimboJones said:
    OP is expecting SLA service without having a SLA.

    Solution:
    Ban OP from LET
    Add to FraudRecord

    Its ok for racknerd to just kill services because they don't have any SLA? Racknerd doesn't have a SLA?????

    Why do you care?

    Are you a RN client?

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @tommyren said: Your wife gave birth to a baby, but it’s someone else’s. You should still accept it because you still get a baby, right? no chance to say no. take it and be happy!

    Yes, of course.

    This situation is exactly the same.

    @dustinc said: Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket

    image

    @dustinc said: the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02

    image

    @dustinc said: At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out.

    image

    @tommyren starting this thread:

    Thanked by 2zejjnt TimboJones
  • mainmodmainmod Member

    @raindog308 said:

    @tommyren said: Your wife gave birth to a baby, but it’s someone else’s. You should still accept it because you still get a baby, right? no chance to say no. take it and be happy!

    Yes, of course.

    This situation is exactly the same.

    @dustinc said: Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket

    image

    @dustinc said: the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02

    image

    @dustinc said: At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out.

    image

    @tommyren starting this thread:

    Dustin proves its a scam and yet some on here seem to be trying to cover up for some reason

  • forestforest Member

    @mainmod said: Dustin proves its a scam and yet some on here seem to be trying to cover up for some reason

    Whether or not you believe it's a scam, the fact is that datacenter migrations are par for the course. They are not uncommon and even high-end providers will sometimes do that. It's the norm in the hosting industry.

  • @phigros said:

    @lowendclient said:
    You buy a Los Angeles VPS, you get a Los Angeles VPS.
    They never promised you "China optimised route" before you buy or in any contract.
    You get what you want. It's fair enought.

    They promised



    It's "Los Angeles Optimized Route", not "China Optimized Route".
    I could totally say DC03 is also an "optimized route" — because it’s also in Los Angeles, which is closer to Asia/China.
    Is "China optimized" written in the contract? No.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @code95z7 said:
    During their promotion, RackNerd set different prices for the two data centers, with DC2 being the more expensive option. This clearly shows they know the two locations aren't just "both in LAX" — there are real differences between them.

    @zed said:

    @ralf said:
    I've had servers (from other providers) that have switched countries multiple times while I've had them. Switching data centre isn't a big deal. And at the end of the day, you're still getting the location and service you paid for.

    And this is a lot of complaining when most of the customers are $10 - $12 per year.

    if the connectivity in the 2 datacenters are different and the services are thus advertised and priced differently and the customers therefore purchase accordingly, what are you even saying?

    people absolutely should complain when they don't get what they paid for regardless of your opinion of the price point.

    anyway i assume @dustinc will handle the issue appropriately, seems like they do a fair amount of business with the nodeseekers. hopefully it's not too many requiring compensation, for everybody's sake.

    The renewal price is exactly the same for DC02 and DC03. During promotions, you couldn’t buy plans under $15 for DC02, but that doesn’t mean there’s a price difference between the two. I remember only the France data center has an extra fee of a few dollars.

  • @deafcon said:

    @PolyAnthi said:

    @deafcon said:

    @ralf said:
    I've had servers (from other providers) that have switched countries multiple times while I've had them. Switching data centre isn't a big deal. And at the end of the day, you're still getting the location and service you paid for.

    And this is a lot of complaining when most of the customers are $10 - $12 per year.

    I think the mjjs have a point here. It seems that Racknerd sold DC2 as a differentiated service. They didn't buy service in LA, they bought service in DC2. Clearly it was a decision because DC2 had China optimized routing. Racknerd can't deliver that differentiated service any more, so they need to make it right with these customers somehow. I'm not here to say what making it right looks like. Clearly these folks are a large part of their business, so they need to consider what this going to do reputationally. However, it's pretty clear that people here making buying decisions solely based on price, and will defend providers who have fucked over others as long as their service is working.

    Technically, depending on who provides said optimised routes, they can also be moved over to DC3. That'd resolve pretty much all the bitching here if I'm not wrong?

    If I were Racknerd, I'd 100% be doing whatever I could to get the upstream from DC2 into DC3, but who knows if that is possible.

    DC02 uses bgp.net as upstream, it only has optimized routing in MTR. It's ridiculous that Chinese users fool themselves into thinking they've got a direct line to China. Racknerd doesn't charge more for DC02 though — they know what's really going on, they're actually pretty honest.

    Thanked by 1MaxTakeba
  • @mainmod said:

    @ralf said:

    @mainmod said:

    @ralf said:
    I've had servers (from other providers) that have switched countries multiple times while I've had them. Switching data centre isn't a big deal. And at the end of the day, you're still getting the location and service you paid for.

    And this is a lot of complaining when most of the customers are $10 - $12 per year.

    You're ok with providers moving services to other countries then just ignoring when you complain unless you complain loud enough

    Well there's not really much you can do if the provider is exiting a facility. You either take what you're given or leave next billing period.

    At a minimum you offer a prorated refund.. you prepay for a service and aren't able to use now.. it's not take what's given because they changed the terms.

    If I order a brand new Porsche and they have some shipping issue and deliver me a Honda I'm not going to take what's given. I get a refund

    He rented a Porsche from the shop, it was suddenly taken back by the owner. Then the shop gave him another Porsche with exactly the same price, not a Honda. Please check the actual prices first instead of just following what others say. DC02 was never more expensive than DC03.

  • Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    @dustinc said:
    Hi All -- it is still very much all hands on deck on our side, so do excuse my brevity, but I did want to clarify one point here.

    I looked into the ticket that OP messaged me about, and the story being presented here is not fully aligned with what I’m seeing. Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket, and this was offered to OP via ticket before this thread was created. By the way, after reviewing the service history, the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02 and the product OP ordered was never available for DC-02 selection to begin with. At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out. So there is a bit more account-specific history here than what is being presented publicly. With that said, we still offered a prorated account credit option, and to be clear, this is not a matter of someone needing to “complain loud enough” on LET in order for us to work with them.

    As mentioned earlier, we have already been working with customers on a case-by-case basis, including moving services to other in-stock datacenter locations where available, and reviewing prorated account credit requests where appropriate. This remains our stance. These situations do need to be reviewed case by case, as not every service/account is structured the same way. As most here know, we’ve run different promotions over the years, flash sales, renewals, upgrades, customers push transferring services across different accounts, etc - so it is not always as simple as treating every situation identically from the outside.

    We understand there may be some confusion, and we’re here to clarify and work through it with customers directly. Our team has been highly responsive through tickets despite the workload, and customers are welcome to continue working with us there. As always, I can also be reached directly at dustin[@]racknerd[.]com if someone feels their situation needs my attention. We do our best to go above and beyond for our customers, but every account is different and at times needs to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In this particular case, we do believe the prorated account credit option offered was reasonable.

    We understand that not everyone will view this situation the same way, and that’s fair. Facility moves are never fun, especially for users who selected a specific deployment location years ago for their own reasons. At the same time, our priority has been service continuity -- keeping customers online, maintaining Los Angeles-based service delivery, and completing this transition in a way that supports customers long-term. We are continuing to work with customers, review reasonable requests, and handle each situation as fairly as we can.

    By the way, the DC-03 network is not something we consider “done” or final. We have already made improvements with Lumen/Crown Castle, and the network will only continue improving from here. We are actively reviewing feedback, MTRs, routing behavior, and future carrier expansion opportunities.

    Also worth mentioning, this migration project is not yet fully completed. We still have additional physical migration batches scheduled after the Memorial Day holiday next week, so our team remains fully focused on getting through the remaining work as smoothly as possible.

    As always, we appreciate the customers who have been patient and constructive with us throughout this process. We’ll continue doing our best to support everyone through it.

    Interesting!

    Just to clarify one point:

    The package I originally purchased back in 2021 did include DC-02 as an available deployment location at the time. I initially tried the San Jose location first, and later opened a support ticket asking if the VPS could be moved to DC-02.

    So this was not a request for some special exception or for a datacenter outside the original package offering. I simply did not want to cancel the existing service and place a completely new order again.

    I just wanted to clarify the history here, since the current description makes it sound like I requested something the plan never supported, which is not the case.

    Also, I did not need any account credit, because I do not plan to continue using DC-03 or other replacement services. The main reason I purchased and kept renewing this VPS was specifically for DC-02. I have already mentioned this both here and in the support ticket.

    @dustinc

    Thanked by 1zed
  • @lowendclient said:

    @mainmod said:

    @ralf said:

    @mainmod said:

    @ralf said:
    I've had servers (from other providers) that have switched countries multiple times while I've had them. Switching data centre isn't a big deal. And at the end of the day, you're still getting the location and service you paid for.

    And this is a lot of complaining when most of the customers are $10 - $12 per year.

    You're ok with providers moving services to other countries then just ignoring when you complain unless you complain loud enough

    Well there's not really much you can do if the provider is exiting a facility. You either take what you're given or leave next billing period.

    At a minimum you offer a prorated refund.. you prepay for a service and aren't able to use now.. it's not take what's given because they changed the terms.

    If I order a brand new Porsche and they have some shipping issue and deliver me a Honda I'm not going to take what's given. I get a refund

    He rented a Porsche from the shop, it was suddenly taken back by the owner. Then the shop gave him another Porsche with exactly the same price, not a Honda. Please check the actual prices first instead of just following what others say. DC02 was never more expensive than DC03.

    It’s not even that bad, it’s exact same hardware! that’s a different car :)

    Really it’s more like they gave the Porsche back with new software update that stopped you removing the seat belt noise. You had it off before, and now you can’t? I WANT A NEW PORSCHE

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    @zed said:
    haha what a great twist

    what twist?

    Just to clarify one point:

    The package I originally purchased back in 2021 did include DC-02 as an available deployment location at the time. I initially tried the San Jose location first, and later opened a support ticket asking if the VPS could be moved to DC-02.

    So this was not a request for some special exception or for a datacenter outside the original package offering. I simply did not want to cancel the existing service and place a completely new order again.

    I just wanted to clarify the history here, since the current description makes it sound like I requested something the plan never supported, which is not the case.

    Also, I did not need any account credit, because I do not plan to continue using DC-03 or other replacement services. The main reason I purchased and kept renewing this VPS was specifically for DC-02. I have already mentioned this both here and in the support ticket.

    Thanked by 1zed
  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium (they thought) nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

  • forestforest Member

    @tommyren said: Also, I did not need any account credit, because I do not plan to continue using DC-03 or other replacement services. The main reason I purchased and kept renewing this VPS was specifically for DC-02. I have already mentioned this both here and in the support ticket.

    Then I agree that @dustinc should refund you if you explain to him exactly why you needed the VPS to remain in DC-02., but I also think that creating a thread here was the wrong way to go about it.

    Thanked by 2zed RIYAD
  • deafcondeafcon Member

    @tommyren said:

    @dustinc said:
    Hi All -- it is still very much all hands on deck on our side, so do excuse my brevity, but I did want to clarify one point here.

    I looked into the ticket that OP messaged me about, and the story being presented here is not fully aligned with what I’m seeing. Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket, and this was offered to OP via ticket before this thread was created. By the way, after reviewing the service history, the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02 and the product OP ordered was never available for DC-02 selection to begin with. At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out. So there is a bit more account-specific history here than what is being presented publicly. With that said, we still offered a prorated account credit option, and to be clear, this is not a matter of someone needing to “complain loud enough” on LET in order for us to work with them.

    As mentioned earlier, we have already been working with customers on a case-by-case basis, including moving services to other in-stock datacenter locations where available, and reviewing prorated account credit requests where appropriate. This remains our stance. These situations do need to be reviewed case by case, as not every service/account is structured the same way. As most here know, we’ve run different promotions over the years, flash sales, renewals, upgrades, customers push transferring services across different accounts, etc - so it is not always as simple as treating every situation identically from the outside.

    We understand there may be some confusion, and we’re here to clarify and work through it with customers directly. Our team has been highly responsive through tickets despite the workload, and customers are welcome to continue working with us there. As always, I can also be reached directly at dustin[@]racknerd[.]com if someone feels their situation needs my attention. We do our best to go above and beyond for our customers, but every account is different and at times needs to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In this particular case, we do believe the prorated account credit option offered was reasonable.

    We understand that not everyone will view this situation the same way, and that’s fair. Facility moves are never fun, especially for users who selected a specific deployment location years ago for their own reasons. At the same time, our priority has been service continuity -- keeping customers online, maintaining Los Angeles-based service delivery, and completing this transition in a way that supports customers long-term. We are continuing to work with customers, review reasonable requests, and handle each situation as fairly as we can.

    By the way, the DC-03 network is not something we consider “done” or final. We have already made improvements with Lumen/Crown Castle, and the network will only continue improving from here. We are actively reviewing feedback, MTRs, routing behavior, and future carrier expansion opportunities.

    Also worth mentioning, this migration project is not yet fully completed. We still have additional physical migration batches scheduled after the Memorial Day holiday next week, so our team remains fully focused on getting through the remaining work as smoothly as possible.

    As always, we appreciate the customers who have been patient and constructive with us throughout this process. We’ll continue doing our best to support everyone through it.

    Interesting!

    Just to clarify one point:

    The package I originally purchased back in 2021 did include DC-02 as an available deployment location at the time. I initially tried the San Jose location first, and later opened a support ticket asking if the VPS could be moved to DC-02.

    So this was not a request for some special exception or for a datacenter outside the original package offering. I simply did not want to cancel the existing service and place a completely new order again.

    I just wanted to clarify the history here, since the current description makes it sound like I requested something the plan never supported, which is not the case.

    Also, I did not need any account credit, because I do not plan to continue using DC-03 or other replacement services. The main reason I purchased and kept renewing this VPS was specifically for DC-02. I have already mentioned this both here and in the support ticket.

    @dustinc

    You need to take the L here bud. You bought San Jose and they moved you to DC02 as a courtesy. It sounds to me like the plan you bought probably would have said "LA" not "DC02". Find something that works for you now and see if RN can get DC03 working like you need it to later so you can use the credits. You bought San Jose then requested a move to LA. They don't owe you DC02, they owe you LA. Anyone who specifically bought something specific advertised as DC02 might have something to complain about, but you don't.

  • @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

  • @deafcon said:

    @tommyren said:

    @dustinc said:
    Hi All -- it is still very much all hands on deck on our side, so do excuse my brevity, but I did want to clarify one point here.

    I looked into the ticket that OP messaged me about, and the story being presented here is not fully aligned with what I’m seeing. Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket, and this was offered to OP via ticket before this thread was created. By the way, after reviewing the service history, the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02 and the product OP ordered was never available for DC-02 selection to begin with. At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out. So there is a bit more account-specific history here than what is being presented publicly. With that said, we still offered a prorated account credit option, and to be clear, this is not a matter of someone needing to “complain loud enough” on LET in order for us to work with them.

    As mentioned earlier, we have already been working with customers on a case-by-case basis, including moving services to other in-stock datacenter locations where available, and reviewing prorated account credit requests where appropriate. This remains our stance. These situations do need to be reviewed case by case, as not every service/account is structured the same way. As most here know, we’ve run different promotions over the years, flash sales, renewals, upgrades, customers push transferring services across different accounts, etc - so it is not always as simple as treating every situation identically from the outside.

    We understand there may be some confusion, and we’re here to clarify and work through it with customers directly. Our team has been highly responsive through tickets despite the workload, and customers are welcome to continue working with us there. As always, I can also be reached directly at dustin[@]racknerd[.]com if someone feels their situation needs my attention. We do our best to go above and beyond for our customers, but every account is different and at times needs to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In this particular case, we do believe the prorated account credit option offered was reasonable.

    We understand that not everyone will view this situation the same way, and that’s fair. Facility moves are never fun, especially for users who selected a specific deployment location years ago for their own reasons. At the same time, our priority has been service continuity -- keeping customers online, maintaining Los Angeles-based service delivery, and completing this transition in a way that supports customers long-term. We are continuing to work with customers, review reasonable requests, and handle each situation as fairly as we can.

    By the way, the DC-03 network is not something we consider “done” or final. We have already made improvements with Lumen/Crown Castle, and the network will only continue improving from here. We are actively reviewing feedback, MTRs, routing behavior, and future carrier expansion opportunities.

    Also worth mentioning, this migration project is not yet fully completed. We still have additional physical migration batches scheduled after the Memorial Day holiday next week, so our team remains fully focused on getting through the remaining work as smoothly as possible.

    As always, we appreciate the customers who have been patient and constructive with us throughout this process. We’ll continue doing our best to support everyone through it.

    Interesting!

    Just to clarify one point:

    The package I originally purchased back in 2021 did include DC-02 as an available deployment location at the time. I initially tried the San Jose location first, and later opened a support ticket asking if the VPS could be moved to DC-02.

    So this was not a request for some special exception or for a datacenter outside the original package offering. I simply did not want to cancel the existing service and place a completely new order again.

    I just wanted to clarify the history here, since the current description makes it sound like I requested something the plan never supported, which is not the case.

    Also, I did not need any account credit, because I do not plan to continue using DC-03 or other replacement services. The main reason I purchased and kept renewing this VPS was specifically for DC-02. I have already mentioned this both here and in the support ticket.

    @dustinc

    You need to take the L here bud. You bought San Jose and they moved you to DC02 as a courtesy. It sounds to me like the plan you bought probably would have said "LA" not "DC02". Find something that works for you now and see if RN can get DC03 working like you need it to later so you can use the credits. You bought San Jose then requested a move to LA. They don't owe you DC02, they owe you LA. Anyone who specifically bought something specific advertised as DC02 might have something to complain about, but you don't.

    yah if u tranferred plan after u bought wrong one, not even comparable to those that purchased it correctly.

    kinda voided by the fact they alrdy moved you, when they didnt have to

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows VPS in these data centers (Multacom LA & ColoCrossing LA/SJC) have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

  • @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Thanked by 1zed
  • @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

  • zedzed Member

    @lowendclient said: DC02 uses bgp.net as upstream, it only has optimized routing in MTR. It's ridiculous that Chinese users fool themselves into thinking they've got a direct line to China. Racknerd doesn't charge more for DC02 though — they know what's really going on, they're actually pretty honest.

    ah interesting, thanks.

  • @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    I’m not saying this because I like Racknerd — I’m not even their customer. I just can’t stand unreasonable requests. I’d side with any merchant here in the same situation."

  • @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    I think many customers who originally chose DC-02 simply do not want to spend time arguing about it. Most of them will probably just stop renewing once their current term expires.

    In my case, the situation is different because my service still has nearly two full years remaining. Even though I barely use this VPS nowadays, it still feels pretty bad to lose the location that was the only reason I originally kept renewing the service over the years.

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME. It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about.

    In OP's case, he has no right to ask for a refund.
    Merchant provided the agreed service.
    Stop making unreasonable demands.

  • @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

  • sorr yfor hurtful words its how i express my happiness

  • zedzed Member

    jesus fuck trim your quotes were you born in a butthole

    Thanked by 1TimboJones
This discussion has been closed.