Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

RackNerd forced DC migration, refused prorated refund.

123578

Comments

  • @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    This is my last reply about AI.
    I’m not using AI to reply your posts.
    I only use it to polish my words. (I say English to AI, but not native speaker level)
    It’s ridiculous how you’re grasping at straws to argue.

  • @zed said:
    jesus fuck trim your quotes were you born in a butthole

    not quite sure at the angle i came out from, didn’t get a good view

  • LEBUserJoeLEBUserJoe Member
    edited May 25

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    This is my last reply about AI.
    I’m not using AI to reply your posts.
    I only use it to polish my words. (I say English to AI, but not native speaker level)
    It’s ridiculous how you’re grasping at straws to argue.

    “I’m not using AI to reply to your posts” I’m just using AI to write English, to your posts………………….
    w
    wfwfwf…….

    AI USERS ARE THE NEW REDDITORS

    If you read friend i didnt want to argue you kept saying, they don’t need to, I agreed like 5x you just kept arguing the fact I said they should refund cash was just statement

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    Of course I disagree with you.
    Business is based on contracts.
    Racknerd offering credits is a favor, not an obligation. Not to mention a cash refund.
    If you think they should give a refund, show me which part of the contract they broke. Didn't they provide a Los Angeles VPS under the same price and configuration?
    Don’t just go by your own opinion.

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    This is my last reply about AI.
    I’m not using AI to reply your posts.
    I only use it to polish my words. (I say English to AI, but not native speaker level)
    It’s ridiculous how you’re grasping at straws to argue.

    “I’m not using AI to reply to your posts” I’m just using AI to write English, to your posts………………….
    w
    wfwfwf…….

    AI USERS ARE THE NEW REDDITORS

    If you read friend i didnt want to argue you kept saying, they don’t need to, I agreed like 5x you just kept arguing the fact I said they should refund cash was just statement

    Racknerd has no obligation and shouldn't offer any extra options besides SLA compensation. (Extend service period only)

    I type this by myself, no AI.

  • @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    Of course I disagree with you.
    Business is based on contracts.
    Racknerd offering credits is a favor, not an obligation. Not to mention a cash refund.
    If you think they should give a refund, show me which part of the contract they broke. Didn't they provide a Los Angeles VPS under the same price and configuration?
    Don’t just go by your own opinion.

    how we still going bro

    I alrdy said, business good faith, reputation, basic decency for sake of 20% you disagree thats fine i said it’s fine

    but u seem mentally ill and wont allow me to have opinion on it either dw bro im on many drugs rn and even i can stop replying first GL in life

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited May 25

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    Of course I disagree with you.
    Business is based on contracts.
    Racknerd offering credits is a favor, not an obligation. Not to mention a cash refund.
    If you think they should give a refund, show me which part of the contract they broke. Didn't they provide a Los Angeles VPS under the same price and configuration?
    Don’t just go by your own opinion.

    how we still going bro

    I alrdy said, business good faith, reputation, basic decency for sake of 20% you disagree thats fine i said it’s fine

    but u seem mentally ill and wont allow me to have opinion on it either dw bro im on many drugs rn and even i can stop replying first GL in life

    No AI here.
    I'm talking BUSINESS, you're talking about FAVORS again and again.
    What I say, NO, RackNerd should hold their bottom line, shouldn't and musn't refund in this case.
    Otherwise there will be more and more unreasonable requests in low-end VPS market, every provider will be affected in similiar cases.
    This is to maintain basic market order.
    I didn't targeting OP in this topic, just case by case.

    Thanked by 1RIYAD
  • RIYADRIYAD Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 25

    @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited May 25

    @RIYAD said:
    @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.

    I agree, but they don't offer new vps in SJC location anymore.

    Thanked by 1RIYAD
  • tommyrentommyren Member
    edited May 25
    1. > @rpqu said:
      > > @RIYAD said:
      > > @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.
      > I agree, but it doesn't seem they have SJC anymore

    feel a little better to keep 2 DC03 services in my account.
    No SJC?
    They should put me into Azkaban then.

  • RIYADRIYAD Member, Patron Provider

    Azkaban :D

  • dustincdustinc Member, Patron Provider, Top Host
    edited May 25

    @tommyren said:

    @dustinc said:
    Hi All -- it is still very much all hands on deck on our side, so do excuse my brevity, but I did want to clarify one point here.

    I looked into the ticket that OP messaged me about, and the story being presented here is not fully aligned with what I’m seeing. Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket, and this was offered to OP via ticket before this thread was created. By the way, after reviewing the service history, the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02 and the product OP ordered was never available for DC-02 selection to begin with. At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out. So there is a bit more account-specific history here than what is being presented publicly. With that said, we still offered a prorated account credit option, and to be clear, this is not a matter of someone needing to “complain loud enough” on LET in order for us to work with them.

    As mentioned earlier, we have already been working with customers on a case-by-case basis, including moving services to other in-stock datacenter locations where available, and reviewing prorated account credit requests where appropriate. This remains our stance. These situations do need to be reviewed case by case, as not every service/account is structured the same way. As most here know, we’ve run different promotions over the years, flash sales, renewals, upgrades, customers push transferring services across different accounts, etc - so it is not always as simple as treating every situation identically from the outside.

    We understand there may be some confusion, and we’re here to clarify and work through it with customers directly. Our team has been highly responsive through tickets despite the workload, and customers are welcome to continue working with us there. As always, I can also be reached directly at dustin[@]racknerd[.]com if someone feels their situation needs my attention. We do our best to go above and beyond for our customers, but every account is different and at times needs to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In this particular case, we do believe the prorated account credit option offered was reasonable.

    We understand that not everyone will view this situation the same way, and that’s fair. Facility moves are never fun, especially for users who selected a specific deployment location years ago for their own reasons. At the same time, our priority has been service continuity -- keeping customers online, maintaining Los Angeles-based service delivery, and completing this transition in a way that supports customers long-term. We are continuing to work with customers, review reasonable requests, and handle each situation as fairly as we can.

    By the way, the DC-03 network is not something we consider “done” or final. We have already made improvements with Lumen/Crown Castle, and the network will only continue improving from here. We are actively reviewing feedback, MTRs, routing behavior, and future carrier expansion opportunities.

    Also worth mentioning, this migration project is not yet fully completed. We still have additional physical migration batches scheduled after the Memorial Day holiday next week, so our team remains fully focused on getting through the remaining work as smoothly as possible.

    As always, we appreciate the customers who have been patient and constructive with us throughout this process. We’ll continue doing our best to support everyone through it.

    Interesting!

    Just to clarify one point:

    The package I originally purchased back in 2021 did include DC-02 as an available deployment location at the time. I initially tried the San Jose location first, and later opened a support ticket asking if the VPS could be moved to DC-02.

    So this was not a request for some special exception or for a datacenter outside the original package offering. I simply did not want to cancel the existing service and place a completely new order again.

    I just wanted to clarify the history here, since the current description makes it sound like I requested something the plan never supported, which is not the case.

    Also, I did not need any account credit, because I do not plan to continue using DC-03 or other replacement services. The main reason I purchased and kept renewing this VPS was specifically for DC-02. I have already mentioned this both here and in the support ticket.

    @dustinc

    Hi @tommyren -- I appreciate the clarification, though I do want to clarify a few points as well.

    From what I’m seeing, the service was originally deployed in San Jose, which aligns with the location options available under that promotion at the time. Later on, as a courtesy, our team accommodated a request to move that service into Los Angeles DC-02 at no additional cost. That is the point I was attempting to make. Screenshot of the plan you ordered below:

    IMG-1784

    What I also feel is important to clarify is that the title of this thread creates the impression that RackNerd was unwilling to work with you, offered no resolution, or simply told you “too bad” after the migration decision was made. That is not what occurred.

    Prior to this thread being created, our team had already offered a prorated account credit option within your support ticket. Whether that option is useful to you is entirely your decision, but I do think it’s important for the community to have the complete picture, as the title of this thread suggests otherwise.

    Also, I think there may be some misunderstanding regarding how infrastructure and network operations work throughout the hosting industry.

    Providers routinely evolve their networks over time. Carriers are added, carriers are removed, routing policies change, facilities change, and business relationships change. This is not unique to RackNerd. In fact, it is fairly common across the industry. Customers generally purchase a service delivered by the provider, not a guarantee that every aspect of the underlying network blend, carrier mix, facility arrangement, or upstream relationship will remain unchanged indefinitely.

    If a customer has a requirement tied to a specific carrier, specific routing arrangement, or specific contractual network commitment, those are typically handled through custom solutions and specially structured agreements. A VPS service generally does not come with those guarantees.

    In this particular case, customers are remaining in Los Angeles, on the same hardware, with the same allocated resources. The new facility is approximately 0.6 miles away from the current one. For many customers, the primary changes are the IP assignment and the network environment associated with the new facility.

    It’s also worth noting that not every service involved in this project required an IP change. RackNerd utilizes a combination of RackNerd-owned resources and provider-assigned resources across various deployments, which is fairly normal at our scale. As part of this migration effort, we have been moving services in a manner that best supports long-term stability and growth.

    We totally understand that migrations are inconvenient, and nobody enjoys downtime or change. That’s why we’ve been reviewing accounts individually, offering options where possible, and approaching situations on a case-by-case basis. Some customers have accepted migrations, some have accepted credits, some have received upgrades over the years, and some are even using services that originally came from giveaways or special promotions. Every account has its own history, which is why we’re reviewing them individually rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach.

    One thing I will openly acknowledge is that, given the circumstances involved, I would have preferred to provide more advance notice than we ultimately were able to. That is fair feedback, and something we can certainly learn from. At the same time, our responsibility is to make decisions that ensure the long-term stability of the platform and the services our customers trust us with. While this migration may not be the outcome you wanted, it is the decision we believe is necessary for the future of the service.

    As previously mentioned, the prorated account credit option remains available should you wish to proceed with it, and I’m always here to help too.

  • davidedavide Member

    @RIYAD said:
    Azkaban :D

    Always hated Harry Potter, tried two books in middle school, they were translated more dully and apathetically than Mein Kampf. Impossible to do anything with them but collect dust.

    Thanked by 1RIYAD
  • dustincdustinc Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @RIYAD said:
    @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.

    Hi @RIYAD -- this is something we’re open to as well. If OP prefers to go back to San Jose, which is where that specific service was originally provisioned, we can review that and make it happen.

    San Jose is still very much a location we operate in, and are actively expanding in, though it is currently sold out. With that being said, for a situation like this (case by case), we can work on placing the service back there on an existing node that has enough available capacity if desired. Not a problem from our side.

    Thanked by 1RIYAD
  • RIYADRIYAD Member, Patron Provider

    @davide said:

    @RIYAD said:
    Azkaban :D

    Always hated Harry Potter, tried two books in middle school, they were translated more dully and apathetically than Mein Kampf. Impossible to do anything with them but collect dust.

    I enjoyed Harry Potter movies when I was younger..

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    @dustinc said:

    @RIYAD said:
    @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.

    Hi @RIYAD -- this is something we’re open to as well. If OP prefers to go back to San Jose, which is where that specific service was originally provisioned, we can review that and make it happen.

    San Jose is still very much a location we operate in, and are actively expanding in, though it is currently sold out. With that being said, for a situation like this (case by case), we can work on placing the service back there on an existing node that has enough available capacity if desired. Not a problem from our side.

    whatever.

    If you can't refund to the original payment method, send it back to San Jose.

    I have no better choice. I do not need account credit and repeated service.

    Time to let it go back and let it die in peace. And we stop wasting time back and forth.

    @dustinc

  • dustincdustinc Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @tommyren said:

    @dustinc said:

    @RIYAD said:
    @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.

    Hi @RIYAD -- this is something we’re open to as well. If OP prefers to go back to San Jose, which is where that specific service was originally provisioned, we can review that and make it happen.

    San Jose is still very much a location we operate in, and are actively expanding in, though it is currently sold out. With that being said, for a situation like this (case by case), we can work on placing the service back there on an existing node that has enough available capacity if desired. Not a problem from our side.

    whatever.

    If you can't refund to the original payment method, send it back to San Jose.

    I have no better choice. I do not need account credit and repeated service.

    Time to let it go back and let it die in peace. And we stop wasting time back and forth.

    @dustinc

    Hi @tommyren -- Understood, since you messaged me with the ticket ID which I have from earlier, I’ll have a member of my team follow up with you in that ticket and help take care of the migration of this service to San Jose for you.

  • cnencccnencc Member

    Having been moved to DC3, we will no longer consider renewing the subscription. The network experience is extremely poor.

  • tuctuc Member

    DC2 and DC3 are really different :D

  • @rpqu said:

    @RIYAD said:
    @dustinc please move his vps back to San Jose.

    I agree, but they don't offer new vps in SJC location anymore.

    That makes it perfect.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @tommyren said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    Account credit is just a number on the account. If the original service/location I want is no longer available, then the credit itself does not really solve the issue for me.

    I do not need account balance just to leave it sitting there unused, especially since I do not plan to continue purchasing additional services from RackNerd after this.

    Your situation is void, as you was transferred to DC02, it was never even your initial pu> @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:

    @lowendclient said:

    @LEBUserJoe said:
    Honestly at minimum, there should of been notification, and no refund’s to payment method and offering credit is an insult.

    But blaming Racknerd for this, makes no sense and i’m not even a fan, infact my experience turned me away from them for life. Yet, even if I bought a service particularly because of a certain aspect in this circumstance i’m not sure how it can be the hosts fault beyond bad management.

    They are moving hardware, they are actively working on it I had multiple services go down in the OvH DC fire, I was moved from FR, to an entirely different country due to capacity & choice. What’s the difference really here other than they was pushed out by pricing?

    All this “proof” look they advertised specifically as optimised route!!! they are evil, or they had an optimised route and wanted to advertise it with no intention of it going south? just like you would have no intention of a building set a flame.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but nowhere in an actual contract did anyone have even a mention of services that HAVE to remain in a singular location indefinitely? also what the fuck are people doing with this “optimised route” i’m curious of the outrage! use a proxy :)

    MJJ users are upset because DC02 plans were in short supply, and scalpers resold them at much higher prices on Chinese forums. They bought these second-hand VPS at a premium, but later their services were moved to non-premium nodes — so they feel they’ve lost money. But this isn’t the provider’s fault, it was their own choice to buy them at high prices.

    Los Angeles has the lowest ping delay to China, the location itself is an "optimize" to China. So they say it's "Los Angeles Optimized" is totally fine.

    I've bought a DC02 VPS from RackNerd and the route is totally a shit to my country. So I haven't use them anymore.

    Optimised from the US maybe well answers my question but like everyone has said, same prices it was never charged for regardless if they could pick.

    Choosing is a privilege not a right, especially if it’s same city there’s no obligation they do that right? seems case closed to me but not giving real refunds, what’s with this BS I get tryna save a penny when it’s minor, but it’s a pretty big fuckup regardless of who it falls on some simple real refunds, to save this headache seems gg

    OP’s clarification above "migrating from JSC to DC02" exactly shows the two data centers have the same price and are equal in status.

    Racknerd clearly stated during promotions that no refunds would be given in principle — users should have known this when they bought.

    This is just a technical adjustment, no different from changing an IP address. The provider is delivering the services as stated in the contract. What reason do customers have to ask for a refund?

    I mean, to me refund isn’t just a “right” it’s basic etiquette, I run a business if I caused such downtime / dramatic change, without real good prior notice to my clientbase, out of being good in business it’s something i’d offer. Knowing not 100% would take it, i’d try push credit ofcourse as they are. but what’s there margin 30% or so? why not for those that push do payment method refunds. it’s to me just basic offering. Afterall they aren’t saving much by forced credit only more displeasure.

    Their promotions are essentially pre-sales. They only buy a new server once the current one is fully sold out. If refunds were allowed freely, many servers would sit unused, and the provider would lose money. Almost all low-cost VPS deals work this way — if you don’t accept this model, you shouldn’t buy VPS at this price point in the first place.

    Besides, this migration only involved a short downtime and IP change — it wasn’t a major change at all. They also informed customers in advance, so it’s just like regular maintenance. Customers can ask for extra service time as per the SLA, but asking for a refund isn’t reasonable.

    I knew everyone of ur posts have been AI, but it’s getting little silly now bro type u got hands man why everyone so lazy now

    But to keep arguing with AI u keep prompting to be more on RN side, even tho I ain’t against them, why not.

    problem your mixing up is “have” and “should” you keep stating they don’t have to, I agree. Problem to me is they alrdy offered credit refunds, my point simply is, just give them the money properly. its maybe extra 20-30% more, it’s maybe < 20% of those affected

    Cant be big deal, they have to no? should they as a good company to loyal customers who was genuinely reliant on it, sure why not don’t seem harm in keeping your reputation for 20% difference.

    Yes I use AI voice input and grammar fix instead of typing, why not. It doesn't affect what I mean.
    (This sentence I input by myself)

    Since a contract was signed between customer and the merchant at the time of purchase — where the customer agreed to a no-refund policy, and the merchant has provided services that fully meet the agreed specifications — on what grounds should we make an exception to allow the customer to terminate the contract?

    This is the business world, things don’t just go your way simply because you want them to.

    The same grounds u have mised 5 times, as ur having AI reply to me over and over.

    They alrdy offered credit NO THEY DONT GOTTA NO CONTRACTS DOESNT SAY SO

    BUT IF U GONNA VOID IT ANYWAY AND OFFER CREDIT, JUST GIVE CASH FUCK ME MATE

    https://www.racknerd.com/terms-of-service
    Refunds - Refunds are issued on a case-by-case basis since by default no refunds are provided once payment is received.

    So what? STOP BRINGING UP AI ALL THE TIME It has nothing to do with this topic. I know exactly what I'm talking about."

    Yep guy that uses AI to talk like a normal person is telling me he knows all about it. You just listen to AI u muppet.

    It’s not a “default” situation if credit is being offered is it? they already failing there “no refunds” i’d respect it more if there was NO REFUNDS MY POINT IS U APE IF U GONNA DO CREDIT TAKE THE EXTRA 20% LOSS, MAKE URSELF LOOK GOOD AND REFUND PPL THAT PUSH FOR IT I NEVER SAID DO IT BY DEFAULT.

    happy if u disagree with me, but just say that stop with this AI jargon, or ignoring the point entirely to tell me they don’t have to, I know, I understand still say it’s stupid tho can’t I.

    Of course I disagree with you.
    Business is based on contracts.
    Racknerd offering credits is a favor, not an obligation. Not to mention a cash refund.
    If you think they should give a refund, show me which part of the contract they broke. Didn't they provide a Los Angeles VPS under the same price and configuration?
    Don’t just go by your own opinion.

    how we still going bro

    I alrdy said, business good faith, reputation, basic decency for sake of 20% you disagree thats fine i said it’s fine

    but u seem mentally ill and wont allow me to have opinion on it either dw bro im on many drugs rn and even i can stop replying first GL in life

    Please use AI if you can't write English or make an argument properly. You're like the poster boy for annoying teenagers to my generation.

    Thanked by 2lowendclient VTCuong
  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited May 25

    Edit: Hopefully misread.

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    Since people on other platforms are still discussing this post, I feel it’s necessary to clarify a few things again.

    RackNerd VPS services have long had the common practice of allowing a one-time datacenter migration request. This was not some special exception made only for me. In fact, many user asked for migration, and many people and even promotional websites for RackNerd have openly mentioned this before.

    My service was already renewed through 2028, so my request was actually very simple: since DC02 can no longer be provided, I hoped RackNerd could refund the remaining value of this VPS to origion payment method.

    Also, I already have a DC03 service on my account. I do not need another DC03 VPS. Many people originally purchased DC02 specifically because it was DC02. When their service expires, most people simply choose not to renew and do not bother arguing with the provider.

    At no point did I make any unreasonable or exaggerated demands. I simply hoped that, as my first VPS, I could continue keeping it. If that is no longer possible, then refunding the remaining value does not seem unreasonable to me.

    Since they insist on not refunding it, then there is really nothing more I can do as an ordinary customer. only ticket and this post.

    What confuses me, however, are some of the comments people are making. For example, some claim that “because of my post, the San Jose migration was stopped for other customers,” while others talk as if I demanded something absurd like “$10,000” in compensation...
    ???

    In reality, my request was very ordinary and straightforward. :)

    Now they have proposed moving my VPS to San Jose instead, so I accepted that and move on.

    Please make sure you understand the situation clearly before making comments.

    And of course, if other people have their own complaints afterward about DC02 migration, that has nothing to do with me.

    Thanked by 1zed
  • dustincdustinc Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @tommyren said:
    Since people on other platforms are still discussing this post, I feel it’s necessary to clarify a few things again.

    RackNerd VPS services have long had the common practice of allowing a one-time datacenter migration request. This was not some special exception made only for me. In fact, many user asked for migration, and many people and even promotional websites for RackNerd have openly mentioned this before.

    My service was already renewed through 2028, so my request was actually very simple: since DC02 can no longer be provided, I hoped RackNerd could refund the remaining value of this VPS to origion payment method.

    Also, I already have a DC03 service on my account. I do not need another DC03 VPS. Many people originally purchased DC02 specifically because it was DC02. When their service expires, most people simply choose not to renew and do not bother arguing with the provider.

    At no point did I make any unreasonable or exaggerated demands. I simply hoped that, as my first VPS, I could continue keeping it. If that is no longer possible, then refunding the remaining value does not seem unreasonable to me.

    Since they insist on not refunding it, then there is really nothing more I can do as an ordinary customer. only ticket and this post.

    What confuses me, however, are some of the comments people are making. For example, some claim that “because of my post, the San Jose migration was stopped for other customers,” while others talk as if I demanded something absurd like “$10,000” in compensation...
    ???

    In reality, my request was very ordinary and straightforward. :)

    Now they have proposed moving my VPS to San Jose instead, so I accepted that and move on.

    Please make sure you understand the situation clearly before making comments.

    And of course, if other people have their own complaints afterward about DC02 migration, that has nothing to do with me.

    Hi @tommyren -- I understand you’re clarifying your side of things, so I’ll clarify as well.

    The service in question was originally provisioned in San Jose. That is the location selected at the time of order, and that is where the VPS was originally deployed. That part is pretty straightforward.

    Where I think the situation became unfair, was in how this thread was originally titled/presented, as it suggested that we were unwilling to work with you, or that we refused any reasonable path forward. In reality, our team had already offered a prorated credit option before this thread was created. So to suggest otherwise in your original post is not really fair to the situation.

    With that being said, I do understand that you may have created this thread out of frustration, and perhaps some things were said in the heat of the moment. Though after taking a quick look at your account ticket history, I can see that our team has consistently gone above and beyond in accommodating your requests over time (even outside of this particular situation).

    Also, just to be clear RackNerd does not have an obligation to move services between datacenter locations at no additional cost, or as a courtesy. In practice, we have done this many times over the years where stock/capacity permits, and/or where it makes sense on a case by case basis -- because we do try to go above and beyond for our customers.

    But for this to become a constant expectation on every service is not realistic. These requests require manual work, admin time, planning, and coordination, so while we do often go the extra mile for customers, it has to remain something we review based on what is technically possible and where capacity permits.

    I’m glad we were able to resolve your issue and redeploy you in San Jose. As always, my e-mail is open as well.

    Thanked by 3zed PuDLeZ rpqu
  • mwtmwt Member

    I thought this was a frivolous complaint until I saw that the contract went out like 3 years.

    Even still "worst experience" is a big exaggeration for a small thing.

  • @mwt said:
    I thought this was a frivolous complaint until I saw that the contract went out like 3 years.

    Even still "worst experience" is a big exaggeration for a small thing.

    It's an annual plan, so OP went and prepaid in advance above required.

    That makes it even more frivolous.

  • tommyrentommyren Member

    @mwt said:
    I thought this was a frivolous complaint until I saw that the contract went out like 3 years.

    Even still "worst experience" is a big exaggeration for a small thing.

    Thanked by 1lovelyserver
  • tommyrentommyren Member
    edited May 27

    @dustinc said:

    @tommyren said:
    Since people on other platforms are still discussing this post, I feel it’s necessary to clarify a few things again.

    RackNerd VPS services have long had the common practice of allowing a one-time datacenter migration request. This was not some special exception made only for me. In fact, many user asked for migration, and many people and even promotional websites for RackNerd have openly mentioned this before.

    My service was already renewed through 2028, so my request was actually very simple: since DC02 can no longer be provided, I hoped RackNerd could refund the remaining value of this VPS to origion payment method.

    Also, I already have a DC03 service on my account. I do not need another DC03 VPS. Many people originally purchased DC02 specifically because it was DC02. When their service expires, most people simply choose not to renew and do not bother arguing with the provider.

    At no point did I make any unreasonable or exaggerated demands. I simply hoped that, as my first VPS, I could continue keeping it. If that is no longer possible, then refunding the remaining value does not seem unreasonable to me.

    Since they insist on not refunding it, then there is really nothing more I can do as an ordinary customer. only ticket and this post.

    What confuses me, however, are some of the comments people are making. For example, some claim that “because of my post, the San Jose migration was stopped for other customers,” while others talk as if I demanded something absurd like “$10,000” in compensation...
    ???

    In reality, my request was very ordinary and straightforward. :)

    Now they have proposed moving my VPS to San Jose instead, so I accepted that and move on.

    Please make sure you understand the situation clearly before making comments.

    And of course, if other people have their own complaints afterward about DC02 migration, that has nothing to do with me.

    Hi @tommyren -- I understand you’re clarifying your side of things, so I’ll clarify as well.

    The service in question was originally provisioned in San Jose. That is the location selected at the time of order, and that is where the VPS was originally deployed. That part is pretty straightforward.

    Where I think the situation became unfair, was in how this thread was originally titled/presented, as it suggested that we were unwilling to work with you, or that we refused any reasonable path forward. In reality, our team had already offered a prorated credit option before this thread was created. So to suggest otherwise in your original post is not really fair to the situation.

    With that being said, I do understand that you may have created this thread out of frustration, and perhaps some things were said in the heat of the moment. Though after taking a quick look at your account ticket history, I can see that our team has consistently gone above and beyond in accommodating your requests over time (even outside of this particular situation).

    Also, just to be clear RackNerd does not have an obligation to move services between datacenter locations at no additional cost, or as a courtesy. In practice, we have done this many times over the years where stock/capacity permits, and/or where it makes sense on a case by case basis -- because we do try to go above and beyond for our customers.

    But for this to become a constant expectation on every service is not realistic. These requests require manual work, admin time, planning, and coordination, so while we do often go the extra mile for customers, it has to remain something we review based on what is technically possible and where capacity permits.

    I’m glad we were able to resolve your issue and redeploy you in San Jose. As always, my e-mail is open as well.

    As I repeatedly said here and in the tickets, I don’t need account credit. Since you no longer provide DC02 services, and I also probably won’t renew the other DC03 service I still have in my account, I honestly have no use for account credit.

    DtzkO63xv5rUjLAOFaTwO4xFRoiz0w5t.webp

    And I wasn’t asking for any special treatment only for me. I didn’t do anything wrong, OK? On this platform, upgrades like extra RAM, bandwidth, or storage are pretty common for customers. There is really no need to repeatedly present it as if it were some huge favor or huge exception. There’s no need to keep repeating the same explanation. Whether it’s San Jose or DC02, the point is the same: I do not need 2 DC03 or account credit at this moment.

    we can just stop back and forth.

    What I’m trying to clarify here again to others is this: some people are claiming that “because of my post, the San Jose migration was stopped for other customers,” while others are talking as if I demanded something absurd like “$10,000” in compensation. and same complaine as mine from others. None of that has anything to do with me.

    or maybe you also think That this is somehow all my fault? That I did something unreasonable, went “too far,” or somehow wronged or even guilty to your company in some way? :)

  • tommyrentommyren Member
    edited May 27

    DC02
    hPM0VEu7rXjBoSpZCu6ycOpg846CUKXg.webp

    Racknerd DC03
    O9UvIVjG9gr0ddwp2bY8JZkCvEJ5FhvM.webp

    How to change the post title? I want to change it to "best experience ever"

  • dumindu89dumindu89 Member
    edited May 27

    @tommyren said:
    DC02
    hPM0VEu7rXjBoSpZCu6ycOpg846CUKXg.webp

    Racknerd DC03
    O9UvIVjG9gr0ddwp2bY8JZkCvEJ5FhvM.webp

    How to change the post title? I want to change it to "best experience ever"

    Yes, you have a reason to reject the DC-03 and it hurts when the forced DC migration happens within no time. But you need to learn a lesson.

    In your previous screenshot, it says the billing cycle is annual. But the next payment date is 05/22/2028 meaning at last time you renewed the service, you renewed it more than for 1 more year while the Terms and Conditions clearly mention that no refunds by default.

    DC migration by the service providers is not a uncommon practice. This is applicable to other cases as well. You should be to ready to either drop the service provider or accept the change. The lesson you need to learn is don't pay more than what you expected to pay and don't go for long term contracts unless you are ready to accept these kind of situations.

This discussion has been closed.