New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
As I said, you make me no choice.
I tried communicate peacefully with you in ticket.
I tried seek for the refund and alternative solutions
I opened a PayPal dispute
Then, I pointed out that your ToS page is offline for long time.
If this is the way you choose to treat your customers or any other community members, then I have nothing further to say.
Actually, you do have a choice. Accept that you fucked up, learn from it, take the loss and move on.
Why does all mjj's always think that accepting that they are wrong is not even a choice?
or sue the actual scammer.
Maybe I should post the whole ticket here, I think I'm not asking anything out of the range
Sure, post the whole ticket. You demand a refund or start a dispute.
It sounds like you are the one that didn't give me any choice and then forced one upon me :-) You had plenty of choices but chose the worst.
i had to laugh and i can't help but wonder if it's just here in LET where you're a fraudster "pulling stunts" by requiring what you paid for. context matters of course, but my sides.
Hi,
i am sorry, but how exactly does this two fit together:
[...]
[...]
You acknowledge that the person paid FOR a service. And you acknowledge that the person ( who paid FOR the service ) got REVOKED from accessing the service.
I do not really understand this mind set nor how this all fits together contractually.
You acknowledge the person got scammed ( means nothing else but the payment the person made was NOT rightful ).
And you acknowledge the person has no access to the service ( that he actually paid for ).
You make your life here a bit more too easy i think.
The correct way would be to:
But you choose to keep the payment from a person you do not acknowledge to be your contract partner ( and this way be the one who owe you money in exchange for service ).
So either you take the money and provide service to the person who paid you for the service or you refund the money.
I fully understand that there are situations where you have a contract with entity A and entity B pays for it. Thats actually very seldom, but it happens.
But in this situations its clear that B WANTS to pay for A.
And this is here simply not the case. You acknowledge yourself that B does NOT want to pay for A. B paid for B -- at least he thought so.
So we fall back to a situation where B paid and does not receive any service from you for that.
And thats where the story actually ends.
You are keeping money from someone you acknowledge to have been scammed.
This has nothing to do with your example where accounts have been hacked or what ever. I never heard that a hacker paid for a service and complaining then he is not able to use it.
Hacker do not pay it. They hack and use things without permission. Thats why they are hackers and not customers. Thats the major difference ;-)
So all in all, i am really sorry, but this way of handling that situation is for my personal taste beyond fishy.
Won't too late, I'm working on it
So I post the ticket content by a reverse order, hoping that won't bother everyone's reading experience.
I have posted almost all of the content except one with sensitive information and another one with PayPal dispute ID.
Feel free to be critical on me. If you think what I am doing was inappropriate in the ticket, please no hesitation to point it out.
A little off-topic, but the original reason I acquired this service from a third party was that I needed a 1–2TB European server to build my garage cluster and observe its performance under high-latency conditions.
My first choice was HostHatch, but their servers were not available at that time. As a result, I purchased this service from a third party at what I considered to be a reasonable price.
This was actually my first experience with HostBRR’s services, as well as one of the few times I had used a European server. Due to geographical reasons, the vast majority of my VPS infrastructure is located in the APAC region.
Holy shit @layer7 take a break. You made million of assumptions.
Hear this out: What if "owner number 1" decided to buy it back from "owner number 2" (after selling it in first place) after "owner number 2" extended it because "owner number 1" decided he needs it back and is willing to pay premium? And to make this all smoother he decided to "recover via support" the account rather than wait for "owner number 2" to wake up from his weekly nap?!
What if it is owner number 2 actually scamming owner number 1 because he never intended to sell it back - just took the money (premium!).
Or hear this out:
What if "owner number 2" is faking all those screenshot e-mails - ticket and paypal in photoshop because he has photographic memory and has seen his "friend" opening hostbrr e-mail while in class?
You have no idea, there are million of situations and ways this could unfold. Service was paid. Service is active. "Proper" account/e-mail did not asked for refund. What else do you want to do? I think he was even told to take it up with payment provider - the "proper" way at this point.
You should definitely go ahead and contact the OP to offer the same server for no extra money. Maybe if you put your money where your mouth is the fishy taste will fade?
Edit - I missed something.
IMHO just delete the account and refund the money spend for renewing the service - the fees. Time lost on this is not worth..
or check this out!
What if "owner 2" is just "owner 1" via VPN and he wants to extort free year of service?!
According to this post Paypal had already refunded the money yesterday. Also, OP fails to mention that this account was actually being passed around like a blunt and the seller wasn't even the first owner (according to the seller). This is a report done in bad faith at this point.
I understood that money refunded were from buying the account not the money for renewing the service, which this post i think is about ?
That's one take on it.
Up until OP opened the dispute I had no way to verify that he was the owner of the PayPal. He writes from a different email.
I also can't verify what the deal was with the previous owner.
Maybe the account was never transferred and some other deal was made for him to pay his account. Then perhaps if I refunded the payment I'd be dealing with another person that would panic over his service was canceled due to non payment?
I've had multiple requests that one person wanted to pay for another so this isn't far fetched.
Why if the account was really transferred could the other person gain access to it again so easily and change email?
Something doesn't add up.
I stand by the hacking example. If the story is true then he lost access to his service due to poor account security. He paid for a service he intended to use but lost access as he let someone gain unauthorized access.
Then I may deal with another person panicking that he lost his server.
I don't know what the deal was. Maybe OP paid for the service in return for feet pics?
I mean what do I know. This is why you don't do shit like this, and why I simply cannot refund the service and cancel it. There's two sides to every story, and in this case also a third.
According to OP he paid 13.50 for the renewal
Same amount was refunded by Paypal according to the same OP
Again, unless he's trying to get Hostbrr to pay for the fraudulent account transfer, this case was settled 23 hours ago.
This is the part that confuses me the most. It seems that you already have everything under control and fully understand the situation, yet you still choose to leave me with very little explanation.
I don't know how you got that from this.
I don't have anything under control as I have no idea what deal was made.
@detavern Could you confirm you were refunded by Paypal according to this post 23 hours ago?
If so, what else do you want anyone to do?
just whine more, I am bored
Yes, I could confirm it. And technically the dispute is closed in my flavor in less than 5 minutes.
I am here because I want to confirm whether it is legitimate for me to initiate a dispute under these circumstances, despite being threatened with reports to MaxMind and FraudRecord.
As I said, the amount is the most irrelevant part.
And this is the initial reason why I start the discuss from TOS.
Not like account transfer is legitimate, so entire "these circumstances" were 100% self-inflicted
The dispute is still open. I'm not sure where you see it should be decided unless you closed it.
You got "scammed" by another NS user (via Alipay which forces you to have real-name verification by the way, surely you could get your refund via that way), then got a refund via Paypal in 5 minutes. Post done! Everyone move along.
how, when you got the account in a way which is not allowed?
Instead of checking tos and whatnots, simple presale ticket would had helped you.
It has been closed, as shown in my PayPal app.
And I have already got the chargeback.