Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Velox media under new management

1166167169171172184

Comments

  • @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. The problem is that no one knows what he might do tomorrow if he gets mad. He's already shut down servers after receiving false abuse reports and showed that he won't verify if a client is legitimate before shutting down the service at their request.

    I'm perfectly happy with the service I am receiving, but I am not happy with the anxiety that comes with uncertainty.

    You on a 3 y plan? It won't last. Get out asap.

    No way to get out. I paid in cryptocurrency.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited February 10

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. The problem is that no one knows what he might do tomorrow if he gets mad. He's already shut down servers after receiving false abuse reports and showed that he won't verify if a client is legitimate before shutting down the service at their request.

    I'm perfectly happy with the service I am receiving, but I am not happy with the anxiety that comes with uncertainty.

    You on a 3 y plan? It won't last. Get out asap.

    No way to get out. I paid in cryptocurrency.

    Owari da. But, at least it's <$20, right?

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. The problem is that no one knows what he might do tomorrow if he gets mad. He's already shut down servers after receiving false abuse reports and showed that he won't verify if a client is legitimate before shutting down the service at their request.

    I'm perfectly happy with the service I am receiving, but I am not happy with the anxiety that comes with uncertainty.

    You on a 3 y plan? It won't last. Get out asap.

    No way to get out. I paid in cryptocurrency.

    Owari da. But, at least it's <$20, right?

    Nope, it was more.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest said:

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. The problem is that no one knows what he might do tomorrow if he gets mad. He's already shut down servers after receiving false abuse reports and showed that he won't verify if a client is legitimate before shutting down the service at their request.

    I'm perfectly happy with the service I am receiving, but I am not happy with the anxiety that comes with uncertainty.

    You on a 3 y plan? It won't last. Get out asap.

    No way to get out. I paid in cryptocurrency.

    Owari da. But, at least it's <$20, right?

    Nope, it was more.

    😱 Damn

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. The problem is that no one knows what he might do tomorrow if he gets mad. He's already shut down servers after receiving false abuse reports and showed that he won't verify if a client is legitimate before shutting down the service at their request.

    I'm perfectly happy with the service I am receiving, but I am not happy with the anxiety that comes with uncertainty.

    You on a 3 y plan? It won't last. Get out asap.

    No way to get out. I paid in cryptocurrency.

    Owari da. But, at least it's <$20, right?

    Nope, it was more.

    😱 Damn

    And to make matters even worse, I didn't buy it on LET and wasn't even a member here at the time, so if it gets terminated as part of the LET purge, it will feel particularly unfair.

  • @forest said:

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. The problem is that no one knows what he might do tomorrow if he gets mad. He's already shut down servers after receiving false abuse reports and showed that he won't verify if a client is legitimate before shutting down the service at their request.

    I'm perfectly happy with the service I am receiving, but I am not happy with the anxiety that comes with uncertainty.

    You on a 3 y plan? It won't last. Get out asap.

    No way to get out. I paid in cryptocurrency.

    Owari da. But, at least it's <$20, right?

    Nope, it was more.

    😱 Damn

    And to make matters even worse, I didn't buy it on LET and wasn't even a member here at the time, so if it gets terminated as part of the LET purge, it will feel particularly unfair.

    That sentiment kind of supports his argument that the users here deserved to have their services terminated, doesn't it?

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @rpqu said:

    @mhpteam said:
    already requested a chargeback to my bank provider, still in their 120 days chargeback policy btw, 119/120 days lol I was lucky enough o:)

    Great. It seems Eric is going after the more expensive, profitable deals. Clearly, he doesn't stop at unprofitable deals. So, if there's any people out there who still has sustainable deals running under Eric... You know what you had to do.

  • @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My VPS is 5 cores, 2G Mem, small disk. He wants me to pay $8/month for it, while it was just over $15/year. Yes, the number of cores is a bit on the high side for that $15/year, but the rest is just what I'd at least expect for a LET host. I have dozens of VPSes and most of them are around that price range with at least 3 cores, at least 2G RAM and bigger disks.

    Connectivity on my VPS is descent, but that's where I select providers on; if it isn't, they're out. So basically what I'm saying: I have dozens of other providers that do a similar job there.

    Where it differs: VeloxMedia is a scam. Money is gone, service will be terminated way before the end of contract period. Am I gonna pay for this service: no way.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @forest said:

    And to make matters even worse, I didn't buy it on LET and wasn't even a member here at the time, so if it gets terminated as part of the LET purge, it will feel particularly unfair.

    There is no thing as a LET purge. There is a kind of priority set that took out offers with LET in it's name first. And ironically those ones may seem to have gotten "the better deals" (cough) with $4/month - for the current extortion run it's already $8. We're only just over one month in and I don't believe he'll stop purging here - so I think even the "1 year offers" will end up to be terminated before that period is over.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @deafcon said:
    That sentiment kind of supports his argument that the users here deserved to have their services terminated, doesn't it?

    None of the services deserved to be terminated and that's not what I meant, but I can see how it read that way.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • ralfralf Member

    @Calypso said:
    My VPS is 5 cores, 2G Mem, small disk. He wants me to pay $8/month for it, while it was just over $15/year. Yes, the number of cores is a bit on the high side for that $15/year, but the rest is just what I'd at least expect for a LET host. I have dozens of VPSes and most of them are around that price range with at least 3 cores, at least 2G RAM and bigger disks.

    Some examples I have from other providers with high cores:

    Silvercreek 6/6/66 - 6C6G + 66GB disk, 6TB traffic = $12/y
    GreenCloud 5555 - 5C5G + 55GB disk, 5TB traffic = $55/2y (quite an old deal now)
    GreenCloud 9999 - 9C9G + 99GB disk, 9TB traffic = $99/3y (in 3 locations)
    RareCloud JP - 4C8G + 100GB disk, 7TB traffic = $30/y (expensive location normally)

    Yes, $15 is cheap, but not unrealistic even for high cores. And I have a load of smaller VPS under $8/y, all with IPv4.

    Thanked by 2forest Saragoldfarb
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @forest

    I hope they keep your VPS alive and I think your chances aren't bad.

    @Calypso said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My VPS is 5 cores, 2G Mem, small disk. He wants me to pay $8/month for it, while it was just over $15/year. Yes, the number of cores is a bit on the high side for that $15/year, but the rest is just what I'd at least expect for a LET host. I have dozens of VPSes and most of them are around that price range with at least 3 cores, at least 2G RAM and bigger disks.

    Yes $8 isn't exactly cheap, but then 5 cores ...
    IMO the problem there was Lewis selling that for $15/yr.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • xvpsxvps Member

    @forest said:

    @jsg said:
    For a change ...

    I know, many (most?) here won't like it but I compiled 30 runs of benchmarking @VeloxMedia's connectivity. Not to spite anyone but mainly to get an impression whether their current $4/mo price tag for a VPS actually is basically robbery or whether their prices are within a reasonable region.

    Here's the fresh results (from 24hrs since yesterday):

    --- Europe ---
    
    NO TRH mirror.archlinux.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 328.2 - min 156.5 (47.7%), max 342.8 (104.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 33.6 - min 31.3 (93.1%), max 72.4 (215.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 34.1 - min 31.3 (91.7%), max 73.5 (215.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2559.0 - min 839.2 (32.8%), max 4622.4 (180.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 1.6 - min 1.4 (86.4%), max 4.3 (265.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 2.1 - min 1.5 (71.7%), max 15.1 (722.2%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1032.5 - min 238.9 (23.1%), max 1250.5 (121.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 8.9 - min 8.8 (98.7%), max 9.1 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.0 - min 8.9 (98.4%), max 9.3 (102.8%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 852.4 - min 825.0 (96.8%), max 878.6 (103.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (98.9%), max 12.7 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.9 - min 12.7 (98.6%), max 13.1 (101.8%)
    
    FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 485.7 - min 137.3 (28.3%), max 747.0 (153.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 9.8 (73.0%), max 59.6 (444.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 22.2 - min 9.8 (44.2%), max 113.9 (514.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 577.1 - min 542.1 (93.9%), max 618.8 (107.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 18.0 - min 17.6 (97.8%), max 28.7 (159.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 24.1 - min 19.8 (82.0%), max 51.7 (214.1%)
    
    IT ROM archlinux.mirror.garr.it [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 275.6 - min 250.6 (90.9%), max 328.4 (119.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.1 - min 32.1 (82.2%), max 43.7 (111.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.9 - min 36.4 (71.5%), max 909.0 (1785.3%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 429.8 - min 422.9 (98.4%), max 437.2 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.6 - min 25.4 (99.4%), max 26.5 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 27.1 - min 25.7 (94.8%), max 29.4 (108.5%)
    
    RO GIU mirrors.pidginhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 243.3 - min 219.2 (90.1%), max 257.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.0 - min 44.8 (99.6%), max 45.2 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 64.4 - min 44.8 (69.6%), max 118.7 (184.3%)
    
    GR ATH ftp.otenet.gr [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 224.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.5 (112.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.1 (112.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.1 (176.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 227.0 - min 130.1 (57.3%), max 245.0 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 50.2 - min 46.0 (91.6%), max 138.5 (275.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.6 - min 46.0 (78.4%), max 164.7 (280.9%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceania ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 118.5 - min 82.3 (69.5%), max 130.6 (110.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 97.3 - min 1.1 (1.1%), max 119.5 (122.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 102.7 - min 89.1 (86.7%), max 169.2 (164.7%)
    
    SA RIY mirror.maeen.sa [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 128.4 - min 122.9 (95.7%), max 133.9 (104.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.8 (99.7%), max 83.3 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.8 - min 83.1 (93.6%), max 126.3 (142.3%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 23]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 93.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.5 (145.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 93.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 162.9 (175.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 195.3 (204.1%)
    
    IN DEL mirror.del2.albony.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 53.3 - min 22.6 (42.5%), max 60.5 (113.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.9 - min 181.4 (97.1%), max 192.8 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 191.3 - min 183.7 (96.0%), max 196.6 (102.8%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.8 - min 63.6 (95.3%), max 68.2 (102.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.0 - min 165.2 (99.5%), max 175.1 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 272.2 - min 165.2 (60.7%), max 543.4 (199.6%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.8 - min 56.5 (94.5%), max 62.7 (104.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.0 - min 182.8 (99.9%), max 183.3 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 182.8 (96.1%), max 290.4 (152.6%)
    
    CN BFSU_BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.8 (164.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 200.9 (127.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 907.5 (479.4%)
    
    CN TUNA_Bejing mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 45.6 - min 40.2 (88.1%), max 48.7 (106.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 232.9 - min 230.3 (98.9%), max 249.9 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 234.3 - min 230.3 (98.3%), max 256.3 (109.4%)
    
    CN ISCAS_Bejing fast-mirror.isrc.ac.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.6 - min 45.4 (91.6%), max 52.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 211.1 - min 210.7 (99.8%), max 214.8 (101.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.1 - min 213.8 (95.0%), max 247.1 (109.8%)
    
    MY Putrajaya mirrors.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.9 - min 60.8 (93.5%), max 67.9 (104.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.9 - min 165.9 (99.4%), max 169.5 (101.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 170.5 - min 165.9 (97.3%), max 178.1 (104.5%)
    
    KH PNP mirror.sabay.com.kh [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 47.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.8 (137.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 157.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 177.2 (112.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 196.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 762.4 (387.3%)
    
    JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.2 - min 40.2 (93.1%), max 45.9 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 250.1 - min 249.1 (99.6%), max 250.5 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 254.9 - min 249.1 (97.7%), max 267.6 (105.0%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 43.0 - min 41.1 (95.6%), max 47.1 (109.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.9 - min 243.4 (91.9%), max 285.6 (107.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 267.5 - min 244.9 (91.6%), max 285.6 (106.8%)
    
    NZ UNK mirror.fsmg.org.nz [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.9 (116.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 271.2 - min 270.7 (99.8%), max 276.9 (102.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 367.9 - min 270.7 (73.6%), max 1476.3 (401.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.0 - min 82.2 (99.1%), max 84.4 (101.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.5 - min 132.2 (99.8%), max 132.9 (100.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.5 - min 132.3 (97.7%), max 190.9 (140.9%)
    
    ZA, WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 73.1 - min 48.5 (66.3%), max 80.0 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 141.0 - min 140.3 (99.5%), max 144.3 (102.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.3 - min 142.2 (79.8%), max 354.1 (198.6%)
    
    MU POL archlinux-mirror.cloud.mu [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 56.1 (143.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 199.7 - min 199.5 (99.9%), max 200.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 208.5 - min 199.6 (95.8%), max 278.1 (133.4%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    
    CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 17]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.5 (339.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 71.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.5 (112.2%)
    
    CA ONT mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 100.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 129.2 (128.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 88.8 (125.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 583.9 (375.0%)
    
    US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 137.2 - min 128.4 (93.5%), max 149.9 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 76.7 - min 72.1 (94.0%), max 101.7 (132.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 78.4 - min 72.6 (92.6%), max 101.7 (129.7%)
    
    US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.8 - min 89.6 (66.9%), max 143.7 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 79.9 - min 75.7 (94.8%), max 102.2 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.9 - min 76.6 (94.7%), max 102.2 (126.4%)
    
    US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 133.3 - min 24.1 (18.1%), max 148.6 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.8 - min 80.7 (99.9%), max 81.1 (100.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.3 - min 80.7 (98.1%), max 89.0 (108.2%)
    
    US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.1 - min 102.2 (91.9%), max 113.2 (101.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.5 - min 98.9 (99.4%), max 109.1 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 100.0 - min 98.9 (98.9%), max 109.3 (109.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 127.1 - min 124.9 (98.2%), max 129.4 (101.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 89.1 - min 89.0 (99.9%), max 89.2 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.7 - min 90.0 (92.1%), max 126.2 (129.2%)
    
    US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 107.8 - min 44.5 (41.2%), max 120.9 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 96.9 - min 92.2 (95.1%), max 122.5 (126.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.6 - min 92.2 (94.4%), max 122.5 (125.5%)
    
    US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.7 - min 77.7 (92.8%), max 86.9 (103.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.4 - min 127.9 (98.1%), max 135.4 (103.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.5 - min 129.4 (97.7%), max 158.2 (119.4%)
    
    US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 86.9 - min 70.5 (81.2%), max 90.4 (104.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.5 - min 125.7 (96.3%), max 156.4 (119.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 134.6 - min 126.1 (93.7%), max 180.5 (134.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 75.5 (92.3%), max 85.9 (105.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.0 - min 128.6 (97.4%), max 157.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 135.3 - min 128.9 (95.2%), max 157.9 (116.7%)
    
    US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.7 - min 80.0 (97.9%), max 83.7 (102.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 135.5 - min 135.4 (99.9%), max 135.6 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.3 - min 135.4 (99.4%), max 147.1 (108.0%)
    
    US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 132.8 - min 132.7 (99.9%), max 133.1 (100.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 133.0 - min 132.7 (99.7%), max 133.4 (100.3%)
    
    BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.7 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 215.7 - min 211.6 (98.1%), max 244.2 (113.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 216.8 - min 212.7 (98.1%), max 251.4 (116.0%)
    
    CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 11]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 55.6 (165.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 205.0 - min 204.8 (99.9%), max 207.3 (101.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 243.4 - min 204.9 (84.2%), max 354.3 (145.6%)
    

    Front-up: You might notice that this tested an extended range of targets.

    Europe - over a Gb/s within the UK isn't remarkable (although ca. 2.5 Gb/s actually is), but a Gb/s to NL is really good and so is ca. 850 Mb/s to DE, FRA. Also a few more targets show results in the 400 Mb/s and 500 Mb/s (and even above) range. Note also that even otenet GR not only works (which I rarely see) but even achieves a decent 200+ Mb/s! Also, most secondary targets worked and achieved decent results.

    Asia / Oceania - Siberia and Saudi Arabia well over 100 Mb/s, nice! Even better, 2 out of 3 IR targets work and one even gets close to 100 Mb/s! Most IN targets work but even the best one is just over 50 Mb/s, meeh. And while SGP and HKG aren't much better at ca. 55 and 65 Mb/s, in between 45 and 50 Mb/s to multiple CN targets isn't bad at all (for normal, i.e. not CN optimized connectivity). The Malaysia and Cambodia results are OK-ish and so is the JP result and the Straya results as well (at the moment down under connectivity seems to be impaired); Kiwiland results are expectedly even slower.

    Africa - Actually quite nice, not record breaking but really nice.

    Americas - well above 100 Mb/s to pretty much the whole East-Coast and also to CHI is quite decent and so are results in the lower 80 Mb/s to the West-Coast. Sadly the quite good result to Miami doesn't translate to good results to South-America. 40+ Mb/s to Brazil is no disaster but certainly not great, and the Chile result is kind of poor as well; sadly the AR and EC targets failed completely.

    TL;DR The connectivity I measured is between good and great within Europa, but the connectivity to both coasts in North America is quite decent as well. The western part of Asia is acceptable to decent but starting with India and east of it connectivity reaches 'acceptable' territory with a few brighter Spots in between.
    Considering that my VPS has 2 vCores (Gold IIRC) 4 GB memory and a decent disk IMO $4/mo is not super-cheap but an adequate price.

    My aim with this post is not to convince VeloxMedia haters to change their mind but rather to show that the "new" VeloxMedia offers a really decent product with good connectivity in particular within Europe and across the Atlantic for a not at all outrageous price.

    I don't think anyone, or at least not many, are complaining about his technical skills. He certainly can manage it well. ...

    He certainly knows how to install reseller modules.

    https://my.veloxmedia.co.uk/modules/servers/ssreseller/ (https://serverstadium.com/)

    My guess is that it’s only a matter of time before he get hacked due to a lack of skills.

    And didn’t he claim to be using his own servers?

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @ralf said:

    @Calypso said:
    My VPS is 5 cores, 2G Mem, small disk. He wants me to pay $8/month for it, while it was just over $15/year. Yes, the number of cores is a bit on the high side for that $15/year, but the rest is just what I'd at least expect for a LET host. I have dozens of VPSes and most of them are around that price range with at least 3 cores, at least 2G RAM and bigger disks.

    Yes, $15 is cheap, but not unrealistic even for high cores.

    Exactly my point; the 2G and small harddisk make it even more plausible that the offer wasn't that "unsustainable". Maybe if you have to take into account all the legal costs...

    @jsg said:

    Yes $8 isn't exactly cheap, but then 5 cores ...
    IMO the problem there was Lewis selling that for $15/yr.

    Then you can basically call any offer unsustainable. As stated, there are more hosters that have matched the offer, so it's not an "all signs red" one. But if you come from another world, e.g. the B2B one, prices for these kind of VPSes easily go $15+/month. If that's your perception everything on LET can be called "unsustainable".

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @jsg said:

    Yes $8 isn't exactly cheap, but then 5 cores ...
    IMO the problem there was Lewis selling that for $15/yr.

    Then you can basically call any offer unsustainable. As stated, there are more hosters that have matched the offer, so it's not an "all signs red" one. But if you come from another world, e.g. the B2B one, prices for these kind of VPSes easily go $15+/month. If that's your perception everything on LET can be called "unsustainable".

    Yeah, it depends on the cost structure. LET hosts doesn't need pay their execs 7 digits annual salary. Even contabo are proud of their CEO having 2 roommates. Since Eric are proud of 6 7 digits annual salary, of course they need to charge $8/m.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @gbzret4d said:

    @rpqu said:

    @mhpteam said:
    already requested a chargeback to my bank provider, still in their 120 days chargeback policy btw, 119/120 days lol I was lucky enough o:)

    Great. It seems Eric is going after the more expensive, profitable deals. Clearly, he doesn't stop at unprofitable deals. So, if there's any people out there who still has sustainable deals running under Eric... You know what you had to do.

    He sent me an invoice today for a 5/m month sever which he terminated on Sunday.

    They're a mess.

    Thanked by 1gbzret4d
  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    This thread is still going?

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @Jord said:
    This thread is still going?

    Indefinitely.

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Page 169

    Thanked by 2equalz barbarza
  • @Jord said:
    This thread is still going?

    Because Eric Banks is still putting on a show :)

  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    Are they still going? or is it done and dusted now?

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @Jord said:
    Are they still going? or is it done and dusted now?

    Ask @jsg

    They now terminated all my servers.

    Thanked by 1gbzret4d
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Tick tock... Still no email from them....

  • oh, hi guys! Pink dino, Jord, oloke!
    Reguards

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @tfgp99 said:
    oh, hi guys! Pink dino, Jord, oloke!
    Reguards

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Sorry, been busy. Life and all..was supposed to fly to Miami this week but we ditched the client. Tough break for me.

  • @Saragoldfarb said:
    Sorry, been busy. Life and all..was supposed to fly to Miami this week but we ditched the client. Tough break for me.

    Busy as well, can't even get to my laptop with so many infrastructure works going + trips too

  • @Saragoldfarb said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    oh, hi guys! Pink dino, Jord, oloke!
    Reguards

    Can someone explain this joke to me?

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb tfgp99
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @deafcon said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    oh, hi guys! Pink dino, Jord, oloke!
    Reguards

    Can someone explain this joke to me?

    42

Sign In or Register to comment.