Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Massive hardware upgrades to NameCrane Shared & Resellers!

123468

Comments

  • @czed said:
    At the end of the day, the problem isnt NameCrane. It's an issue on all shared hosting providers. If you want total freedom to connect to any ip:port freely, get your own server. Otherwise, submit a ticket. NameCrane responds to my support tickets with a resolution in usually under 10 minutes.

    Fuck off, this is unnecessary hassle. @Francisco just said to use alternate ports besides 465 and 587. That's unnecessary hassle and not typical with other providers.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @abangnoob said:
    If using SMTP from Namecrane, I can understand that Namecrane might be concerned that the email service from the server could be used for spam, brute force attacks, or other negative activities. However, if external SMTP services are also blocked, isn’t that strange? If an external SMTP service gets blacklisted, it’s that service that should be affected, not Namecrane’s server, right?

    And one more thing — the one being blocked by Namecrane isn’t port 25, because I use external SMTP services with port 465 (SSL) or 587 (TLS), and yet these are still blocked by Namecrane by default.

    Blocking or disallowing the use of Namecrane’s own server to send emails makes perfect sense, but blocking external SMTP as well is confusing — how will my web app contact customers via email notifications then?

    Sure, I could open a ticket to request an account whitelist, but that’s quite inconvenient, especially if I forget to open a ticket or the response is delayed while the web app needs to be used immediately.

    Blocking outgoing (crane->world) port 25/465/587 has been common in the shared industry for 10 some odd years. cPanel has had it built in for at least that long. Imunify360 has a full section to handle whitelisting users, redirecting the ports, etc.

    We've had issues where a user gets comp'd, or maybe runs a script, that makes outgoing port 25 sweeps/scans/brutes/whatever, and we end up on abuseipdb or similar. That happened enough times that the node ends up on multiple block lists like malwarebytes/etc and then people cry their site is down.

    Tracking down which user isn't easy either, usually involving ugly iptables rules or similar, but that causes its own issues.

    The very vast majority of mail hosts offer alt ports.

    Francisco

  • I'm guessing you might not block a connection to namecrane hosted email perhaps, which can then send on messages subject to normal screening for spam.

    If that's the case you might not even need to use namecrane for inbound emails

  • @Francisco said:

    @abangnoob said:
    If using SMTP from Namecrane, I can understand that Namecrane might be concerned that the email service from the server could be used for spam, brute force attacks, or other negative activities. However, if external SMTP services are also blocked, isn’t that strange? If an external SMTP service gets blacklisted, it’s that service that should be affected, not Namecrane’s server, right?

    And one more thing — the one being blocked by Namecrane isn’t port 25, because I use external SMTP services with port 465 (SSL) or 587 (TLS), and yet these are still blocked by Namecrane by default.

    Blocking or disallowing the use of Namecrane’s own server to send emails makes perfect sense, but blocking external SMTP as well is confusing — how will my web app contact customers via email notifications then?

    Sure, I could open a ticket to request an account whitelist, but that’s quite inconvenient, especially if I forget to open a ticket or the response is delayed while the web app needs to be used immediately.

    Blocking outgoing (crane->world) port 25/465/587 has been common in the shared industry for 10 some odd years. cPanel has had it built in for at least that long. Imunify360 has a full section to handle whitelisting users, redirecting the ports, etc.

    We've had issues where a user gets comp'd, or maybe runs a script, that makes outgoing port 25 sweeps/scans/brutes/whatever, and we end up on abuseipdb or similar. That happened enough times that the node ends up on multiple block lists like malwarebytes/etc and then people cry their site is down.

    Tracking down which user isn't easy either, usually involving ugly iptables rules or similar, but that causes its own issues.

    The very vast majority of mail hosts offer alt ports.

    Francisco

    Nobody is complaining about blocking port 25, so why do you keep mentioning it? The complaint is blocking mail ports for authenticated users sending mail from a service outside of your shared hosting.

    Anyone else experience port 465/587 blocks on shared hosting? This is the first I'm hearing of this, but I've only used about 4 in the last decade.

  • Any lifetime NameCrane deals coming for Black Friday?

    Can the lifetime email plans still be stacked?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @4pple5auc3 said:
    Any lifetime NameCrane deals coming for Black Friday?

    Can the lifetime email plans still be stacked?

    The stacked plans can be ordered on the site.

    Francisco

  • @Francisco Please update us on the hardware upgrade in New York. Thank you.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @lmonaro said: @Francisco Please update us on the hardware upgrade in New York. Thank you.

    Our techs installing gear as we speak :) I think it'll be tomorrow before I have access, we'll see.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1lmonaro
  • Is crypto no longer accepted?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @Bluey said:
    Is crypto no longer accepted?

    Just fine on everything minus email. Email can be arranged but its a custom order.

    Francisco

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @lmonaro said:
    @Francisco Please update us on the hardware upgrade in New York. Thank you.

    Done!!

    Francisco

    Thanked by 2czed lmonaro
  • Is NameCrane becoming a domain registrar still on the horizon or has it been shelved?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @JosephF said: Is NameCrane becoming a domain registrar still on the horizon or has it been shelved?

    >

    Absolutely, i'm just having to rewrite our EPP system. We need a lot of additional logging/auditing in place due to ICANN. I'm mostly done it, just got preoccupied with some of the DC work and other behind-the-scenes work we're doing :)

    We'll likely have ~20,000 domains under our control before EOY 2025.

    Francisco

  • SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Thanked by 1asadz
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @shakensoul said:
    SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Can you let me know if you’re using cloudflare? We’ve recorded some routing issues from CF in SG and it affected some other users too.

    Francisco

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Francisco said:

    @shakensoul said:
    SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Can you let me know if you’re using cloudflare? We’ve recorded some routing issues from CF in SG and it affected some other users too.

    Francisco

    I have seen this in Sweden as well. Many complaints from users. Had to stop using it for some stuff.

    Thanked by 1asadz
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @emgh said:

    @Francisco said:

    @shakensoul said:
    SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Can you let me know if you’re using cloudflare? We’ve recorded some routing issues from CF in SG and it affected some other users too.

    Francisco

    I have seen this in Sweden as well. Many complaints from users. Had to stop using it for some stuff.

    is it stuff behind CF though? Being in Sweden doesn’t matter much if CF is where the fault is.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Francisco said:

    @emgh said:

    @Francisco said:

    @shakensoul said:
    SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Can you let me know if you’re using cloudflare? We’ve recorded some routing issues from CF in SG and it affected some other users too.

    Francisco

    I have seen this in Sweden as well. Many complaints from users. Had to stop using it for some stuff.

    is it stuff behind CF though? Being in Sweden doesn’t matter much if CF is where the fault is.

    Francisco

    Not NameCrane stuff. Just sites with lots of traffic and lots of user complaints from people seeing 30s+ loading times from some ISPs.

    Tried turning the CDN off for awhile and everyone reported the issue as solved.

    Thanked by 1asadz
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran
    edited November 2025

    @emgh said:

    @Francisco said:

    @emgh said:

    @Francisco said:

    @shakensoul said:
    SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Can you let me know if you’re using cloudflare? We’ve recorded some routing issues from CF in SG and it affected some other users too.

    Francisco

    I have seen this in Sweden as well. Many complaints from users. Had to stop using it for some stuff.

    is it stuff behind CF though? Being in Sweden doesn’t matter much if CF is where the fault is.

    Francisco

    Not NameCrane stuff. Just sites with lots of traffic and lots of user complaints from people seeing 30s+ loading times from some ISPs.

    Tried turning the CDN off for awhile and everyone reported the issue as solved.

    Aah ok. We confirmed it on our upstreams smokeping.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 2emgh asadz
  • @Francisco said:

    @shakensoul said:
    SG node is having issues, frequent downtime since couple of days

    Can you let me know if you’re using cloudflare? We’ve recorded some routing issues from CF in SG and it affected some other users too.

    Francisco

    Yes Using Cloudflare

    Thanked by 1asadz
  • Having same issue with SG node (CF enabled) for few days. :|

    Thanked by 1asadz
  • @go626201 said:
    Having same issue with SG node (CF enabled) for few days. :|

    I disabled CF for the past 5 days and seems like it's stable (no more downtime notifications).

    Just enabled CF now to see if it gets wonky again in the next few days. Hopefully not!

  • Any BF deals?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    Yep, we keep up with those. We stick at most ~1 week behind whatever the latest version is.

    Francisco

  • Any update on the domains?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @MatthewM said: Any update on the domains?

    Yes!

    We've had a beta open on Discord :)

    Just waiting on Verisign to fix our OTE, but XYZ and ORG are there.

    Francisco

  • techdragontechdragon Member
    edited January 22

    @Webrob said:
    Congratulations @Francisco

    Always great to see providers like Francisco who truly care about their clients and keep an eye on both hardware and software performance. That AMD EPYC 9654 setup with 96 cores, 192 threads, and 384GB RAM is absolute monster territory.

    I appreciate that our hosting industry is moving towards better hardware; we’re no longer stuck with E3, E5, or underpowered Ryzen setups. After RackNerd's recent upgrade, it’s awesome to see you stepping up even further.

    Honestly, your hardware is well ahead of the competition. Hats off, Francisco.

    I'm not trying to start an argument but this isn't quite accurate. Economies of scale suggest that providers are over selling unless they have similar master nodes, as the performance per dollar doesn't add up otherwise.

    Hosts like @ProHosting24 have had master nodes with specifications such as the following for over a year already:

    Processor: AMD EPYC 7543
    Memory: 1024 GB REG ECC DDR4
    Hard disk: 2 x 3.84 NVMe SSD

    Processor: AMD EPYC 9554
    Memory: 2304 GB REG ECC DDR5 4800MHz
    Hard disk: 2 x 7.68 TB

    They've obviously got competitors such as @berohost and @advinservers who have similar nodes, including Turin.

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • @Francisco said:

    Yep, we keep up with those. We stick at most ~1 week behind whatever the latest version is.

    Francisco

    That's good to hear because this new one seems relatively serious.
    https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/smartermail-auth-bypass-flaw-now-exploited-to-hijack-admin-accounts/
    https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23760

  • @techdragon said: Hosts like @ProHosting24 have had master nodes with specifications such as the following for over a year already: Processor: AMD EPYC 7543 Memory: 1024 GB REG ECC DDR4 Hard disk: 2 x 3.84 NVMe SSD

    the beefier the servers, the more overselling is done. On E3/E5 with 8 to 12 core, 24 to 36 GB RAM one can host 1000 sites if they are small using only around 500MB to 1GB max space and not much traffic.

Sign In or Register to comment.