Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

DediRock.com: non-working VPS, no promised subnets, pressure to close PayPal dispute

1234689

Comments

  • lol @DediRock if you need help saying no to these type of requests you can hire he to slap the shit out of you for even entertaining them! @yabl0ky stop acting like a the girlfriend who wants to breakup but keeps sending mixed signals! @DediRock refund the money!

    Thanked by 2yongsiklee DediRock
  • Just my 2 cents. It sounds like, while dedirock was willing to refund, he would prefer to take the time to work through everything to get it working, even if it takes awhile.

    The client seems to want a refund, but also goes along to try to get it working.

    So there are some mixed signals. If the client wants the refund, it would be best to stop trying to get it working, and simply ask/insist from that point on a refund. "I'm no longer interested in getting it to work. Please cancel the service and refund my money."

    And then allow some reasonable time for the refund. There's no more discussion about making things work, just processing the refund.

    As long as there's some continuing discussion on getting it working, you shouldn't think there's a refund being processed. It's one or the other.

  • @DediRock said:

    @Watson said:
    They didn't deliver on their promise to give me a doubled IPv6 address and bandwidth.

    Hey @watson I am sorry about that man, def not cool. What's the Inv #? I'll 3x it and throw in an extra as a make good?

    That work for you?

    DediRock Makes It Right™

    @DediRock said:

    @Watson said:
    They didn't deliver on their promise to give me a doubled IPv6 address and bandwidth.

    Hey @watson I am sorry about that man, def not cool. What's the Inv #? I'll 3x it and throw in an extra as a make good?

    That work for you?

    DediRock Makes It Right™

    Invoice #14398

    Thanked by 1DediRock
  • @david said: "I'm no longer interested in getting it to work. Please cancel the service and refund my money."

    I would have been satisfied with, “Okay, I hear you, give me your details, and I'll issue a refund within N amount of time.” Instead, I got a bunch of useless text from which I concluded that the seller had no intention of refunding me, despite his constant repetitions of “I'll refund you, I'll refund you.” He didn't refund me, so I contacted the payment system. What's the problem? How am I at fault?

  • Dedirock processed my refund, i talk too fast or you read as fast as lucky luke!
    Thank you

    Thanked by 1DediRock
  • how many days till PayPal decision?

  • @yabl0ky said: I would have been satisfied with, “Okay, I hear you, give me your details, and I'll issue a refund within N amount of time.” Instead, I got a bunch of useless text from which I concluded that the seller had no intention of refunding me, despite his constant repetitions of “I'll refund you, I'll refund you.” He didn't refund me, so I contacted the payment system. What's the problem? How am I at fault?

    I don't see how you're at fault and I'm pretty amused that people here are falling for his helpful idiot act. At this point there's no way I'd give up on the dispute.

  • I have two servers from DediRock and so far everything has worked smoothly. Just keep in mind that you generally get what you pay for

    Thanked by 2yongsiklee DediRock
  • @reimuoao said:
    PayPal disputes are intended as a last resort when a refund is denied. If you think filing a dispute without nicely asking the provider for refund first gives you 'leverage,' you are mistaken—it hurts the provider so they will treat you the same way, and actually puts you at a disadvantage: if the provider submits some compelling evidences, PayPal is unlikely to rule in your favor.

    I disagree. This is exactly what paypal dispute is for. OP didnt get what he ordered, gave ample time for mr hook it up to fix his six, but he was too retarded to do that. Maybe get good so your customers dont chargeback :joy:

  • @yabl0ky said:

    @david said: "I'm no longer interested in getting it to work. Please cancel the service and refund my money."

    I would have been satisfied with, “Okay, I hear you, give me your details, and I'll issue a refund within N amount of time.” Instead, I got a bunch of useless text from which I concluded that the seller had no intention of refunding me, despite his constant repetitions of “I'll refund you, I'll refund you.” He didn't refund me, so I contacted the payment system. What's the problem? How am I at fault?

    OK, that's more clear, I didn't see that screenshot on page 1, but I see it now on page 5. Though I'm not sure where that fits in on the timeline with all the other discussion. If, after that, you're still trying to work through the issues, it might send a mixed message.

    Thanked by 1yabl0ky
  • Disputes are exactly for this sort of scenario. Do not ever close it OP no matter how much nice words or bs is thrown at you since he CAN make a refund in a dispute. It's really easy for the seller. He's dragging this for who knows what. If the service is still not working after trying to fix it, refund the buyer. Simple as that. Why that point is skipped by over by some is beyond me.

    See for yourselves https://www.paypal.com/us/cshelp/article/how-do-i-issue-a-refund-in-a-dispute-help342

  • Matthew18_Matthew18_ Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2025

    Just to add to this part of that article

    but the payment receiving fees aren’t returned.

    Paypal has stopped refunding the transaction fees on any transaction, so people please don't misinterpret this. As I also already stated in the earlier message, if a dispute is opened the seller can refund, or escalate it to PayPal. If the refund is chosen, there's no "reputational damage" or "added fees", it goes just like any other perfectly normal PayPal refund.

    This is because PayPal would like for seller and buyer to friendly settle things before escalating. The escalation only normally happens if the seller is not ok with the dispute, and rejects it, at which point PayPal will evaluate and take a decision.

    Hope that this fully clears everyone contradictions in previous messages.

    Thanked by 2nonoceb tentor
  • can someone bring me up to the speed?
    is dedirock or OP the bad guy?

  • Matthew18_Matthew18_ Member, Patron Provider

    @DeadlyChemist sentiment has been kinda mixed, to be honest this could go both ways, the only thing that keeps me being suspicious here is why Dedirock couldn't just refund through the dispute once "damage was done" (to be clear, this CAN be done on PayPal as we've established, it just wasn't done).

    This is being dragged on forever for no reason. Because of that I do personally believe that the OP is in the right.

    Thanked by 2DeadlyChemist zed
  • @Matthew18_ said:
    @DeadlyChemist sentiment has been kinda mixed, to be honest this could go both ways, the only thing that keeps me being suspicious here is why Dedirock couldn't just refund through the dispute once "damage was done" (to be clear, this CAN be done on PayPal as we've established, it just wasn't done).

    This is being dragged on forever for no reason. Because of that I do personally believe that the OP is in the right.

    This exactly, thanks for posting my thoughts.

  • @Matthew18_ said:
    @DeadlyChemist sentiment has been kinda mixed, to be honest this could go both ways, the only thing that keeps me being suspicious here is why Dedirock couldn't just refund through the dispute once "damage was done" (to be clear, this CAN be done on PayPal as we've established, it just wasn't done).

    This is being dragged on forever for no reason. Because of that I do personally believe that the OP is in the right.

    Wait, so you are not on cheerful and hyped up dedirock team? :o but he is so cheerful and polite!

    Thanked by 1nonoceb
  • @zed said:

    @TimboJones said:
    @DediRock grow a backbone and stop thanking every single negative post. Stop offering refunds AND free service. These are not the clients you want to be wasting your limited resources on.

    This is his gimmick, his backbone is fine.

    @Levi said: Strooong NexusBytes vibes :O

    At least he's not calling everybody fam.

    No, just "def" a thousand times.

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited November 2025

    @yabl0ky said:

    @JohnnySac said: Ordering 30 loss-leader promo $7 VPS wanting special treatment to put each one on a different IPv4 subnet and expecting it to be setup perfectly on first try within your timeframe then immediately chargeback and open a LET thread to bash provider is the definition of MJJ.

    >

    I saw an offer on the forum with specific terms. I asked the seller upfront if they could provide at least 4 distinct IPv4 subnets across the batch. They agreed.
    They didn’t just miss the deadline, take forever to set things up, or run into "technical issues" -they flat-out didn’t deliver.
    They "gave" me access three times, but none of the instances worked at all.
    Where I’m from that’s called fraud.

    Nowhere in the world is that fraud. Incompetence maybe, but fraud requires intent.

    You're being a whiny bitch.

    Let’s see how that plays out with PayPal. As far as I know, this company can’t get away with claiming the service was "cheap, so we don’t have to actually provide it."
    But hey - I sincerely hope you personally get to enjoy DediRock’s "service" more often.

    You just said when can you expect a refund, you didn't ask to be refunded.

    Edit: ok, now I see a screenshot. Valid request, however should also officially do through tickets or cancel system.

  • @yabl0ky said:

    @Caztiel said:
    +1 for Danny ... He is always willing to work out on best possible options for his customers. Probably the response he received for this $7/yr Deal was overwhelming & we have seen in the past that it's not easy for providers to deal with such a surge especially with most of the orders coming from MJJ.. But I have see Danny always being patient & respectful in such cases.

    I want to be clear about the MJJ (I saw the comments about MJJ, and I had to look up what that term even meant in this context.). My request for 30 VPS is simple and low-risk.

    I am setting up a distributed mesh network using Wireguard and 3proxy purely for decentralization testing. My requirement for different IPs/ASNs is a technical need to simulate a diverse, real-world network—not to evade detection or hide anything abusive.

    Bull fucking shit. You're lying or incompetent.

    Testing different subnets that are located on the same network doesn't test shit except the variable labels in your code.

    You actually need to be testing with geographically separated hosts since latency and disruptions is what you need to be testing your so called mesh protocol.

    So which is it?

  • So which is it?

    It 's impossible to you to add remote users or servers on a partial mesh network located at dedirock, maybe this brain incompatibility is related to russia mainstream bullshit

  • For those following this thread: the issue remains straightforward. The provider DediRock, sold non-existent subnets, delivered broken VPS, and then attempted to pressure me into closing a PayPal dispute instead of issuing a proper refund.

    I don't see value in debating with people who are upset about something else. The facts are in my original post with screenshots.

    Thanked by 1OpaqueRegistrant
  • I do not have the time (or enough popcorn) to read through all of the this thread, but is this subnet stuff why my VPS is down? I did add a ticket earlier today, high priority but have not heard anything back. I am not expecting much for $7/yr but a heads up of what is going on (besides the server that was lost) on the status page would do a ton of work. I cannot reach the server, but it is up and running (can VNC to it, but it has no network access).

  • @Rubben said: This is exactly what paypal dispute is for.

    On reflection, you were absolutely right. However, in the OP's initial post, his poorly written English, the missing context, and the screenshot all suggested otherwise. He only managed to piece together the full picture through subsequent back-and-forth communications.

    This has been a lesson for me, for sure. A reminder to never rush to judgment before you have all the facts.

  • @yabl0ky did you finally get your refund?...

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @yabl0ky said:

    @Caztiel said:
    +1 for Danny ... He is always willing to work out on best possible options for his customers. Probably the response he received for this $7/yr Deal was overwhelming & we have seen in the past that it's not easy for providers to deal with such a surge especially with most of the orders coming from MJJ.. But I have see Danny always being patient & respectful in such cases.

    I want to be clear about the MJJ (I saw the comments about MJJ, and I had to look up what that term even meant in this context.). My request for 30 VPS is simple and low-risk.

    I am setting up a distributed mesh network using Wireguard and 3proxy purely for decentralization testing. My requirement for different IPs/ASNs is a technical need to simulate a diverse, real-world network—not to evade detection or hide anything abusive.

    My load profile is stable and minimal, staying around 8% CPU per VPS unit. This activity generates no spam, no DDoS, and zero high-load activity.

    So i am looking for a reliable provider who respects this low-risk, technical use case.

    Is this similar to what they call MJJ here?

    Hey @yabl0ky you definitely have a awesome set up man.

    Just hired a new systems administrator today!! :) so things are getting better, already cleaning up a bunch of stuff etc.

    Hopefully it all gets worked out man.

    Thx

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @zed said:

    @TimboJones said:
    @DediRock grow a backbone and stop thanking every single negative post. Stop offering refunds AND free service. These are not the clients you want to be wasting your limited resources on.

    This is his gimmick, his backbone is fine.

    @Levi said: Strooong NexusBytes vibes :O

    At least he's not calling everybody fam.

    Hey @zed thanks for that.

    Uhh does this mean I cannot use this anymore? The DediRock Family™

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @Caztiel said:

    @yabl0ky said:

    @Caztiel said:
    +1 for Danny ... He is always willing to work out on best possible options for his customers. Probably the response he received for this $7/yr Deal was overwhelming & we have seen in the past that it's not easy for providers to deal with such a surge especially with most of the orders coming from MJJ.. But I have see Danny always being patient & respectful in such cases.

    I want to be clear about the MJJ (I saw the comments about MJJ, and I had to look up what that term even meant in this context.). My request for 30 VPS is simple and low-risk.

    I am setting up a distributed mesh network using Wireguard and 3proxy purely for decentralization testing. My requirement for different IPs/ASNs is a technical need to simulate a diverse, real-world network—not to evade detection or hide anything abusive.

    My load profile is stable and minimal, staying around 8% CPU per VPS unit. This activity generates no spam, no DDoS, and zero high-load activity.

    So i am looking for a reliable provider who respects this low-risk, technical use case.

    Is this similar to what they call MJJ here?

    I never called you MJJ... Just read my response again... It was supposed to be in Generic context

    great clarification @Caztiel thx!

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @stable_genius said:
    It seems to me that there is more to this story than meets the eye.

    Multiple subnets to russian customer... Hmm.

    hey @stable_genius from what I understood he had cool set up, he tried it to explain to me, but went slightly over my head :)

    Thanked by 1stable_genius
  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @yabl0ky said:

    @stable_genius said:
    It seems to me that there is more to this story than meets the eye.

    Multiple subnets to russian customer... Hmm.

    I’m not sure how your geopolitical comment is relevant here. I’m not Russian and have zero connection to Russia. Russian is simply a common language used by millions across Eastern Europe and parts of the EU and other countries.

    And to keep things factual: I already explained why I need multiple subnets and posted real load screenshots. This is a clean, low-risk technical use case. I’m saying this because some people here act like €7/yr means the service should barely function, but my load profile costs the provider basically nothing. This isn’t charity or a favor — it’s a normal, profitable bulk-use case for any provider with spare capacity.

    The issue is still straightforward: the provider sold non-existent subnets, delivered broken VPS, and then tried to pressure me into closing a PayPal dispute instead of issuing a proper refund.

    hey @yabl0ky I think the deal can still be done @ $7/Yr (BF deal dropping soon :) ) Ya probably just a miscommunication here again. Def sorry if you felt pressured, I don't feel I did that, however I respect your viewpoint. Since though it was opened as a dispute, it has to go through the process. If its closed on your end I guess, I would refund right away, and even give you the 22 servers :) LET can be the witness.

    Hoping for the best.

    Thanks

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @stable_genius said:

    @yabl0ky said:

    @stable_genius said:
    It seems to me that there is more to this story than meets the eye.

    Multiple subnets to russian customer... Hmm.

    I’m not sure how your geopolitical comment is relevant here. I’m not Russian and have zero connection to Russia. Russian is simply a common language used by millions across Eastern Europe and parts of the EU and other countries.

    And to keep things factual: I already explained why I need multiple subnets and posted real load screenshots. This is a clean, low-risk technical use case. I’m saying this because some people here act like €7/yr means the service should barely function, but my load profile costs the provider basically nothing. This isn’t charity or a favor — it’s a normal, profitable bulk-use case for any provider with spare capacity.

    The issue is still straightforward: the provider sold non-existent subnets, delivered broken VPS, and then tried to pressure me into closing a PayPal dispute instead of issuing a proper refund.

    Fair enough, but please note that russian operatives also act exactly like you do.

    As to the €7/yr VPS part, the performance I expect from such a server is that of a reliable 128MB VPS. If I get more than that (as I have always got) then great, if not I'll be happy all the same, no drama.

    That's good to know on the VM part. Thx

Sign In or Register to comment.