Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CharityHost_org banned.

1235712

Comments

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @itachikonoha said: big issue with a man's private collection of porn (of course legally allowed ones).

    Unless you snoop no way hosting knows if there is pron and if it is legal

  • somiksomik Member

    @tentor said:

    @itachikonoha said: big issue with a man's private collection of porn (of course legally allowed ones).

    Unless you snoop no way hosting knows if there is pron and if it is legal

    If it's a private collection, does it mean self recorded? Eww! Ain't nobody wanna see that!

    Also the legality of anything only comes about only if you get found out. So if there was a complaint and his server got banned, I would support the host 100%. If there are no complains, dont go snooping around people's data. And if you are a pervert and likes to snoop on people's data, dont disclose your perverted nature by banning the user!

  • zedzed Member

    @Ivanthegreat said:
    LET enables scams AND when a host stands up for themselves they side with the porn addict?!?!

    Have they looked into Dustin from RN?

    This take is so bizarre it is clearly comedy. I will now lol.

  • mwmw Member
    edited April 2025

    i got this VM for free and said i would share a yabs so here it is:

    **root@charityvps-trivia-prize-let:~# curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s -- -9
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Apr 27 09:13:28 AM UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 3 days, 41 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4192.044 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 961.7 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-31-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corp / Oplink.net
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : NeoTechAdmin LLC
    Location   : Spring, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 320.88 MB/s  (80.2k) | 3.48 GB/s    (54.4k)
    Write      | 321.72 MB/s  (80.4k) | 3.50 GB/s    (54.7k)
    Total      | 642.60 MB/s (160.6k) | 6.99 GB/s   (109.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 3.76 GB/s     (7.3k) | 3.70 GB/s     (3.6k)
    Write      | 3.96 GB/s     (7.7k) | 3.95 GB/s     (3.8k)
    Total      | 7.73 GB/s    (15.1k) | 7.65 GB/s     (7.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 243 Mbits/sec   | 375 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 528 Mbits/sec   | 704 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 194 Mbits/sec   | 557 Mbits/sec   | 208 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 370 Mbits/sec   | 584 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 800 Mbits/sec   | 857 Mbits/sec   | 38.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 841 Mbits/sec   | 822 Mbits/sec   | 38.2 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 506 Mbits/sec   | 727 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 644 Mbits/sec   | 787 Mbits/sec   | 103 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 566 Mbits/sec   | 702 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 151 Mbits/sec   | 642 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 334 Mbits/sec   | 646 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 837 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 36.8 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 838 Mbits/sec   | 837 Mbits/sec   | 38.1 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 413 Mbits/sec   | 767 Mbits/sec   | 133 ms         
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 9039                          
    Multi Core      | 8967                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18687043
    
    Geekbench test failed and low memory was detected. Add at least 1GB of SWAP or use GB4 instead (higher compatibility with low memory systems).
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 38 sec**
    
  • @zed said:

    @Ivanthegreat said:
    LET enables scams AND when a host stands up for themselves they side with the porn addict?!?!

    Have they looked into Dustin from RN?

    This take is so bizarre it is clearly comedy. I will now lol.

    Just another shill. Nothing to see here.

    Thanked by 1Ed_Chd
  • @Ivanthegreat said:
    LET enables scams AND when a host stands up for themselves they side with the porn addict?!?!

    Have they looked into Dustin from RN?

    another CH proxy detected

  • zmeuzmeu Member

    No more charity

  • So who is next? :D

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @mw said:

    @Ivanthegreat said:
    LET enables scams AND when a host stands up for themselves they side with the porn addict?!?!

    Have they looked into Dustin from RN?

    all six of your posts on LET are about CH - what is your relationship with them?

    Just to say that I've barred (not banned) @Ivanthegreat for suspicion of being an alt (shill) account. I'll unbar them if they provide a good clarification

  • @itachikonoha said:
    This is why no one should make big issue with a man's private collection of porn (of course legally allowed ones).

    You can take away our home.
    You can take away our land.
    You can take away our everything.....

    .... Except our stash of porn.

    If you stand against, you'll be crushed. CH learnt it in "hard" way.

    This is correct, without doubt. One may never underestimate the importance of intimacy and privacy.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    TrustPilot replied that they still consider "calls everyone trolls" or "considers negative feedback as attacks" as harmful statements, thus our review has been reduced to:

    not an actual charity

    Despite the name, this hosting provider is not an actual charity, but is registered as a for-profit company.

    So far it has passed TrustPilot AI.
    We also changed 2-star to 1-star, due to the provider attacking our reviews.

    We still have a ticket pending regarding their abuse of Flag button and solicitation of 5-star reviews.

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited April 2025

    @yoursunny said:
    TrustPilot replied that they still consider "calls everyone trolls" or "considers negative feedback as attacks" as harmful statements, thus our review has been reduced to:

    not an actual charity

    Despite the name, this hosting provider is not an actual charity, but is registered as a for-profit company.

    So far it has passed TrustPilot AI.
    We also changed 2-star to 1-star, due to the provider attacking our reviews.

    We still have a ticket pending regarding their abuse of Flag button and solicitation of 5-star reviews.

    It should be removed from Trustpilot.

    1. It has misleading name and advertising, not an actual charity, not an actual non-profit.
    2. It has serious problems as a provider.
    3. It buys reviews, meaning reviews are not authentic.

    If Trustpilot does not act, even when proof is provided, then it means Trustpilot is deeply corrupted.

  • LeviLevi Member
    edited April 2025

    Has anyone have charity to test charity hosting free offer? Preferably with few million visitors per day. Illegal vod suffice as it can be treated as non-profit (it is unable to obtain profit in legal way).

    Does hosting owner is punjabi, bangalore or delhi resident?

    Thanked by 1bdspice
  • _MS__MS_ Member
    edited April 2025

    @default said:

    @yoursunny said:
    TrustPilot replied that they still consider "calls everyone trolls" or "considers negative feedback as attacks" as harmful statements, thus our review has been reduced to:

    not an actual charity

    Despite the name, this hosting provider is not an actual charity, but is registered as a for-profit company.

    So far it has passed TrustPilot AI.
    We also changed 2-star to 1-star, due to the provider attacking our reviews.

    We still have a ticket pending regarding their abuse of Flag button and solicitation of 5-star reviews.

    It should be removed from Trustpilot.

    1. It has misleading name and advertising, not an actual charity, not an actual non-profit.
    2. It has serious problems as a provider.
    3. It buys reviews, meaning reviews are not authentic.

    If Trustpilot does not act, even when proof is provided, then it means Trustpilot is deeply corrupted.

    @System, fork a new thread from here titled "Trustpilot is rigged.".

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate
    edited April 2025

    @default said:
    It has serious problems as a provider.

    We are not in a position to review on this point as we are not a direct customer.
    However, TrustPilot hasn't restored the review written by @bdspice , who is indeed a direct customer.

    It buys reviews, meaning reviews are not authentic.

    We have a pending ticket under whistleblower category.

    If Trustpilot does not act, even when proof is provided, then it means Trustpilot is deeply corrupted.

    Aren't they?
    You can always pay to delete, even if it's expressly not offered.

    On the other hand, @CharityHost_org may not care enough to police the reviews anymore, given several LET threads are on the top 10 search results.
    They'll soon deadpool and come back with a different name.

  • @Levi said:
    Has anyone have charity to test charity hosting free offer? Preferably with few million visitors per day. Illegal vod suffice as it can be treated as non-profit (it is unable to obtain profit in legal way).

    Does hosting owner is punjabi, bangalore or delhi resident?

    Andre Brongniar is the registered owner of Charity Host. He is directly responsible for violating the privacy of clients. He personally changed root passwords in order to access their servers.

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Who's Andrew Edwards?
    It's the name replying to WHTop reviews.
    https://www.whtop.com/review/charityhost.org

  • @yoursunny said:

    @default said:
    It has serious problems as a provider.

    We are not in a position to review on this point as we are not a direct customer.
    However, TrustPilot hasn't restored the review written by @bdspice , who is indeed a direct customer.

    Call me a diabolical motherfucker, but the cheapest shit on his site is the FTP 500 for $2.99 :wink:. PM me if you are in need for a "donation" of $2.99.

    Whats next with this guy? Is he going to come back as Papal Host?

  • _MS__MS_ Member

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • @yoursunny said:

    @default said:
    It has serious problems as a provider.

    We are not in a position to review on this point as we are not a direct customer.
    However, TrustPilot hasn't restored the review written by @bdspice , who is indeed a direct customer.

    i have a ticket opened at TP. but they are asking for modify my review else it will be deleted. so i just edited it and it is now showing live. dont know how longer it can be live.

  • I was very surprised to know that they have over 1000 employees. They can't be neutral in order to pay their employees' salaries.

  • @Arirang said:
    I was very surprised to know that they have over 1000 employees. They can't be neutral in order to pay their employees' salaries.

    They had 1000 employees? It was a very big business then.

  • FatGrizzlyFatGrizzly Member, Host Rep

    What happened here, can someone provide me like... a list of events?

    Just a few days back I read multiple threads about CH's porn-snooping activities and now this?

    Biloh must be making more on drama rather than offers now :joy:

  • LeviLevi Member

    @FatGrizzly said:
    What happened here, can someone provide me like... a list of events?

    Just a few days back I read multiple threads about CH's porn-snooping activities and now this?

    Biloh must be making more on drama rather than offers now :joy:

    Feed url to claude sonet and ask for analysis. Post graphs here.

  • DrNutellaDrNutella Member
    edited April 2025

    I propose w> @FatGrizzly said:

    What happened here, can someone provide me like... a list of events?

    Just a few days back I read multiple threads about CH's porn-snooping activities and now this?

    Biloh must be making more on drama rather than offers now :joy:

    History of CharityGate Scandal
    Snoop on @bdspice
    Ban his account and try to make him pay for access and maybe they eventually did give access
    Got at least one valid 1 star review on trustpilot
    Unfairly flag legit reviews on trustpilot
    Bribe customer for 5 star review
    Bribe reviews against rules so banned me thinks

    Tribute to CharityGate Scandal: https://host.charity/

  • The last option on the poll is hardly going to get us a Calin Calinder, is it!!

  • @FatGrizzly said:
    What happened here, can someone provide me like... a list of events?

    Just a few days back I read multiple threads about CH's porn-snooping activities and now this?

    Biloh must be making more on drama rather than offers now :joy:

    Everything is laid out plain and simple here

    https://host.charity/index.html#FAQ

    Thanked by 1FatGrizzly
  • NJa64FNJa64F Barred
    edited April 2025

    @yoursunny said:
    Who's Andrew Edwards?
    It's the name replying to WHTop reviews.
    https://www.whtop.com/review/charityhost.org

    I do not believe that is the real name -edit-. Personally I'm along with the thoughts there is a real person here, he has blown up his investment, and he still needs to make a living. Let him reset, review and rebrand.

    Now going to trust pilot WHtop and complaining that it is possibly a fake name flagging review, that is fair game. IMHO

  • edited April 2025

    @jperkins said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Who's Andrew Edwards?
    It's the name replying to WHTop reviews.
    https://www.whtop.com/review/charityhost.org

    I do not believe that is the real name -edit-. Personally I'm along with the thoughts there is a real person here, he has blown up his investment, and he still needs to make a living. Let him reset, review and rebrand.

    Now going to trust pilot WHtop and complaining that it is possibly a fake name flagging review, that is fair game. IMHO

    "Andrew Edwards" is CH. His email bribing customers for perfect reviews was literally signed "Andrew E"

    https://imgur.com/a/ch-shill-request-Qx8UiXn

    Whether that's his real name or not, it's the same person.

    When I was a customer, there was some guy signing support tickets as Andre, and Andre B is the contact for SpectroHost (the name of CharityHost prior to rebranding).

    https://www.whtop.com/review/spectrohost.com

    Oh yeah I should say: he's already reset and rebranded before, and this is what came of it. I'd be exceptionally wary if he tried to rebrand again.

This discussion has been closed.