Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

24h limited NVMe & Storage deals in EU, APAC and US

1568101120

Comments

  • @junbach said:
    I purchased a 2-year subscription for a storage plan in HKG, and another existing NVMe VPS I had previously ordered in the same region. While setting up private networking between the two instances, I encountered some issues.

    I submitted a support ticket and provided all the necessary configuration details, which were confirmed to be correct by the support team. However, they requested access to the VM for further troubleshooting. I granted access as requested, but it’s been nearly a week since their last response (December 11th), and I’ve received no updates since. (ticket id: 709404)

    I've had a similar issue in the past.

    Rather than wait for them to fix the networking problem, I'd suggest you ask them to recreate the troublesome VPS.

    There seem to be some occasional bugs with the interaction between their frontend control panel and the hypervisor, and this results in issues like you've described. For whatever reason, such problems can't be resolved quickly by their first-line support and require higher level attention. As I recall, they mentioned that a full rewrite of their software is in progress and should help fix this. But for now, you'll likely get a faster resolution if you abandon your current server and ask for a fresh one.

  • I'm glad I chose HostHatch even though I had to wait so long. Everyone knows HostHatch will eventually come through.

    Thanked by 2ralf costcotravel
  • @hosthatch said:

    @Freek said:

    @ralf said:
    Yeah, I did click order on it because I wanted more than the 5TB and was sure it'd change on the next screen. But now I have an invoice that I kind of hope won't be honoured because I don't want to rip them off, but also now I'm wary about getting another for the 5+2 deal instead in case I end up with 2 servers!

    The pricing for this offer was wrong twice; first it was set too low (which I realized after placing my order) and later it was adjusted too high. As I was unsure of how to proceed, I politely opened a ticket to request clarification. I refrained from bumping the ticket during the two weeks it was open, knowing that HH really discourages doing so.

    After two weeks of silence, I finally received a reply today asking if I had paid the invoice. No, I hadn’t, as I was unsure what to do, hence the ticket in the first place. Now I’ve been told the offer is no longer valid.

    I’m left wondering what would have happened if I had paid the invoice, as HH wasn’t very forthcoming about it. With the ticket now closed, I can’t even respond to seek further clarification.

    I understand your frustration. There was a short period of time where the pricing was half the advertised price here, but this was corrected shortly after. As a token of our appreciation for your patience, I'd be happy to offer the advertised price on this thread for you - even though the promotion is already over.

    You can reply to closed tickets, that is not a problem. We are just not going to offer half the price for a plan that is already very highly discounted. This is what you asked for in the ticket, and were politely refused for.

    Thank you for your response. I appreciate the clarification and the kind gesture of offering the advertised price from this thread.

    You are absolutely right; it is possible to reply to closed tickets. However, I wasn’t aware that I needed to manually re-open the ticket to do so. This wasn’t clear to me at the time, but I’ve learned something new today! :)

    For transparency, I’d also like to clarify for the public audience that this is the first time the initial deal has been offered to me. In the ticket, my request was indeed to honor the originally billed price (because, let’s face it, I can’t resist a great deal!), but this was declined, and no alternative offer was presented at that time.

    Thank you again for taking the time to address this matter. I hope this clarification is helpful to everyone following the thread.

    Best regards.

  • @Freek said:

    @ralf said:
    Yeah, I did click order on it because I wanted more than the 5TB and was sure it'd change on the next screen. But now I have an invoice that I kind of hope won't be honoured because I don't want to rip them off, but also now I'm wary about getting another for the 5+2 deal instead in case I end up with 2 servers!

    The pricing for this offer was wrong twice; first it was set too low (which I realized after placing my order) and later it was adjusted too high. As I was unsure of how to proceed, I politely opened a ticket to request clarification. I refrained from bumping the ticket during the two weeks it was open, knowing that HH really discourages doing so.

    After two weeks of silence, I finally received a reply today asking if I had paid the invoice. No, I hadn’t, as I was unsure what to do, hence the ticket in the first place. Now I’ve been told the offer is no longer valid.

    I’m left wondering what would have happened if I had paid the invoice, as HH wasn’t very forthcoming about it. With the ticket now closed, I can’t even respond to seek further clarification.

    24h sale? That's expected. You can't wait weeks on a 24h sale.

  • @Freek said:

    @hosthatch said:

    @Freek said:

    @ralf said:
    Yeah, I did click order on it because I wanted more than the 5TB and was sure it'd change on the next screen. But now I have an invoice that I kind of hope won't be honoured because I don't want to rip them off, but also now I'm wary about getting another for the 5+2 deal instead in case I end up with 2 servers!

    The pricing for this offer was wrong twice; first it was set too low (which I realized after placing my order) and later it was adjusted too high. As I was unsure of how to proceed, I politely opened a ticket to request clarification. I refrained from bumping the ticket during the two weeks it was open, knowing that HH really discourages doing so.

    After two weeks of silence, I finally received a reply today asking if I had paid the invoice. No, I hadn’t, as I was unsure what to do, hence the ticket in the first place. Now I’ve been told the offer is no longer valid.

    I’m left wondering what would have happened if I had paid the invoice, as HH wasn’t very forthcoming about it. With the ticket now closed, I can’t even respond to seek further clarification.

    I understand your frustration. There was a short period of time where the pricing was half the advertised price here, but this was corrected shortly after. As a token of our appreciation for your patience, I'd be happy to offer the advertised price on this thread for you - even though the promotion is already over.

    You can reply to closed tickets, that is not a problem. We are just not going to offer half the price for a plan that is already very highly discounted. This is what you asked for in the ticket, and were politely refused for.

    Thank you for your response. I appreciate the clarification and the kind gesture of offering the advertised price from this thread.

    You are absolutely right; it is possible to reply to closed tickets. However, I wasn’t aware that I needed to manually re-open the ticket to do so. This wasn’t clear to me at the time, but I’ve learned something new today! :)

    For transparency, I’d also like to clarify for the public audience that this is the first time the initial deal has been offered to me. In the ticket, my request was indeed to honor the originally billed price (because, let’s face it, I can’t resist a great deal!), but this was declined, and no alternative offer was presented at that time.

    Thank you again for taking the time to address this matter. I hope this clarification is helpful to everyone following the thread.

    Best regards.

    I'll just say this.

    Imagine if this ticket was related to interruption of service (on a promotional package).

    Hosthatch has nice hardware in cheap price but support on promotional plan will be atrocious (even they state it in the ad) so one needs to take that factor in to account also.

  • still waiting

    Thanked by 2plumberg satorik
  • Half of mine were activated last week, waiting on the other half. I think progress is being made.

  • @ralf said:

    @junbach said:
    but it’s been nearly a week since their last response (December 11th), and I’ve received no updates since.

    Did you read the part in the offer description about slow support on the discounted packages?

    Yes, I notice about delays in support for discounted plans. However, when I created a support ticket, support team responded very quickly at first. I promptly provided the requested output captures, and after reviewing them, he mentioned that the configurations seemed correct. He then requested access to the VMs for further troubleshooting, which I granted right away. Based on the initial quick responses, I expected the investigation to continue at a similar pace. Unfortunately, it's been several days since then, and I have yet to receive any further updates.

    @aj_potc said:

    @junbach said:
    I purchased a 2-year subscription for a storage plan in HKG, and another existing NVMe VPS I had previously ordered in the same region. While setting up private networking between the two instances, I encountered some issues.

    I submitted a support ticket and provided all the necessary configuration details, which were confirmed to be correct by the support team. However, they requested access to the VM for further troubleshooting. I granted access as requested, but it’s been nearly a week since their last response (December 11th), and I’ve received no updates since. (ticket id: 709404)

    I've had a similar issue in the past.

    Rather than wait for them to fix the networking problem, I'd suggest you ask them to recreate the troublesome VPS.

    There seem to be some occasional bugs with the interaction between their frontend control panel and the hypervisor, and this results in issues like you've described. For whatever reason, such problems can't be resolved quickly by their first-line support and require higher level attention. As I recall, they mentioned that a full rewrite of their software is in progress and should help fix this. But for now, you'll likely get a faster resolution if you abandon your current server and ask for a fresh one.

    I'm completely OK with re-creating both VMs since I have just reinstalled them and am currently stuck at the step of setting up private networking. I’ve been waiting for the support team to access the VMs for troubleshooting, so I haven’t been able to proceed with any further deployment. However, since there’s been no reply to my ticket, I’m not sure if re-creating the VMs would prompt a response or further delay the process LOL

  • @junbach said:
    However, since there’s been no reply to my ticket, I’m not sure if re-creating the VMs would prompt a response or further delay the process LOL

    Yes, I certainly understand your predicament, having been stuck in it myself for many weeks.

    From my experience, it appears HostHatch is using different people for frontline support and more advanced troubleshooting. The first tier of support does the initial triage and, in difficult cases, puts tickets on hold for review when they determine the problem is a complex one. So it may be worthwhile to bump the ticket and ask for new VMs (which frontline support can create), as this would take load off the higher level support and close the case faster.

    Thanked by 1junbach
  • Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    Thanked by 1skippy
  • Thanked by 1the_doctor
  • @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    No. Me too

    Thanked by 2skippy tonyapac
  • @dzungbb said:

    @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    No. Me too

    No. Me too too

    Thanked by 1tonyapac
  • @KylinT said:

    @dzungbb said:

    @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    No. Me too

    No. Me too too

    Me too.

    Thanked by 1tonyapac
  • i12hi12h Member
    edited December 2024

    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

  • @i12h said:

    @KylinT said:

    @dzungbb said:

    @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    No. Me too

    No. Me too too

    Me too.

    I've opened a ticket, let's see what will happen.

  • @tonyapac said:

    @i12h said:

    @KylinT said:

    @dzungbb said:

    @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    No. Me too

    No. Me too too

    Me too.

    I've opened a ticket, let's see what will happen.

    don't do so

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    Thanked by 1the_doctor
  • @satorik said:

    @tonyapac said:

    @i12h said:

    @KylinT said:

    @dzungbb said:

    @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    No. Me too

    No. Me too too

    Me too.

    I've opened a ticket, let's see what will happen.

    don't do so

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    It has been more than 14 days already.

  • I heard that for some Japanese VPS plans with a three-year payment term, the resources don't automatically double as promised after startup—you have to submit a support ticket to make it happen.

  • still waiting for the delivery

  • bassettsbassetts Member
    edited December 2024

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    CM 2024 - AMD Compute 8 GB - T1 (CHI/STO)

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 176.41 MB/s  (44.1k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 176.87 MB/s  (44.2k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.5k)
    Total      | 353.29 MB/s  (88.3k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.9k)
    
  • @bassetts said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    CM 2024 - AMD Compute 8 GB - T1 (CHI/STO)

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 176.41 MB/s  (44.1k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 176.87 MB/s  (44.2k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.5k)
    Total      | 353.29 MB/s  (88.3k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.9k)
    

    Your results are within the normal range.

    Judging from the reply to the ticket, @hosthatch ignored the test results I provided. It seems they didn’t even have time to investigate.

  • @tonyapac said:
    Am I the only one who is still waiting for the delivery?

    2 of my NVME VPS were delivered last week. Still waiting on my storage VPS.

  • @adef_1 said:
    I heard that for some Japanese VPS plans with a three-year payment term, the resources don't automatically double as promised after startup—you have to submit a support ticket to make it happen.

    I'm still waiting for Sweden and Japan VPS servers too. I forgot to take screenshots of the deals and the invoice doesn't say anything about it. LOL Does anyone remember what resources the three-year payment would unlock? I think it was monthly traffic and something else...

  • @houmie said:

    @adef_1 said:
    I heard that for some Japanese VPS plans with a three-year payment term, the resources don't automatically double as promised after startup—you have to submit a support ticket to make it happen.

    I'm still waiting for Sweden and Japan VPS servers too. I forgot to take screenshots of the deals and the invoice doesn't say anything about it. LOL Does anyone remember what resources the three-year payment would unlock? I think it was monthly traffic and something else...

    It says in the OP and depends on location and plan. Most are

    2X RAM, storage, and bandwidth for 3 year payments

    Thanked by 1houmie
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited December 2024

    one image == 999 words

    2x cpu vCores (0.5 dedicated, 1.5 shared) 
    AMD EPYC 7542
    8 GB RAM
    100 GB NVMe storage
    10 TB monthly bandwidth
    $55 / 2 years
    

    $2.29/month

    Thanked by 1loay
  • @dev_vps said:
    one image == 999 words

    I beg to differ.

    % wc yabs.txt
    66 399 2981 yabs.txt

    399 words for YABS, and it has more information.

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited December 2024

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

  • @ralf said:

    @dev_vps said:
    one image == 999 words

    I beg to differ.

    % wc yabs.txt
    66 399 2981 yabs.txt

    399 words for YABS, and it has more information.

    There you go .... customized yabs

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2899.998 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 512 KB
     AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
     Total Disk         : 94.2 GB (2.1 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 7.8 GB (82.9 MB Used)
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 5.10.0-29-amd64
     Virtualization     : KVM
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Primary Network    : IPv6
     IPv6 Access        : ✔ Online
     IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
     ISP                : HostHatch
     ASN                : AS63473 HostHatch, LLC
     Host               : HostHatch, LLC
     Location           : Stockholm, Stockholm County-AB, Sweden
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 124.91 MB/s  (31.2k) | 1.44 GB/s    (22.5k)
    Write      | 125.24 MB/s  (31.3k) | 1.45 GB/s    (22.7k)
    Total      | 250.15 MB/s  (62.5k) | 2.89 GB/s    (45.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.72 GB/s     (5.3k) | 2.84 GB/s     (2.7k)
    Write      | 2.86 GB/s     (5.5k) | 3.03 GB/s     (2.9k)
    Total      | 5.58 GB/s    (10.9k) | 5.87 GB/s     (5.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.34 Gbits/sec  | 1.36 Gbits/sec  | 27.1 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.21 Gbits/sec  | 6.78 Gbits/sec  | 20.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.74 Gbits/sec  | 509 Mbits/sec   | 97.1 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 738 Mbits/sec   | 875 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 952 Mbits/sec   | 111 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 426 Mbits/sec   | 92.7 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 622 Mbits/sec   | 577 Mbits/sec   | 219 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.46 Gbits/sec  | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 27.1 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.64 Gbits/sec  | 6.95 Gbits/sec  | 19.9 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.61 Gbits/sec  | 570 Mbits/sec   | 97.1 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 741 Mbits/sec   | 735 Mbits/sec   | 191 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 132 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.76 Gbits/sec  | 1.17 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 630 Mbits/sec   | 614 Mbits/sec   | 215 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     |  976
    Multi Core      | 1835
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22920275
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1271
    Multi Core      | 2294
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8074175
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     ISP: HostHatch
    
     Dallas, US       127.28 ms   0.0%    1846.26 Mbps   634.39 Mbps    i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Chicago, IL      117.35 ms   0.0%    3235.68 Mbps   682.16 Mbps    Enzu.com - Chicago, IL
     Miami, US        140.79 ms   N/A     1828.47 Mbps   552.06 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, NY     99.17 ms    0.0%    3048.58 Mbps   801.57 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
     Miami, FL        130.91 ms   0.0%    2295.49 Mbps   618.80 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL
     Spokane, WA      165.42 ms   0.0%    2999.93 Mbps   471.49 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
     Seattle, WA      164.66 ms   0.0%    1539.51 Mbps   478.29 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  162.55 ms   0.0%    2310.36 Mbps   504.41 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     San Jose, CA     157.13 ms   0.0%    1794.69 Mbps   509.63 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA
    
     London, UK       28.78 ms    0.0%    6050.78 Mbps   2895.54 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London
     Amsterdam, NL    26.15 ms    0.0%    6094.80 Mbps   2400.74 Mbps   31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
     Paris, FR        34.61 ms    N/A     6434.63 Mbps   2189.16 Mbps   Axione - Paris
     Frankfurt, DE    21.36 ms    0.0%    1911.23 Mbps   3929.37 Mbps   Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
     Warsaw, PL       40.90 ms    0.0%    5011.26 Mbps   2142.08 Mbps   Play - Warszawa
     Kyiv, UA         54.07 ms    0.0%    2779.99 Mbps   1560.05 Mbps   O3 - Kyiv
     Bucharest, RO    55.12 ms    0.0%    1533.12 Mbps   1514.39 Mbps   Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest - Bucharest
    
     Bangalore, IN    194.01 ms   0.0%    2634.51 Mbps   406.13 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      203.70 ms   N/A     2234.86 Mbps   374.58 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       145.75 ms   0.0%    2467.88 Mbps   570.73 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai
     Mumbai, MH       227.91 ms   0.0%    2757.82 Mbps   346.03 Mbps    Jio - Rajkot
     Delhi, IN        176.39 ms   0.0%    2508.16 Mbps   446.65 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Jeddah, SA       99.62 ms    0.0%    3835.24 Mbps   821.69 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
     Dubai, AE        147.94 ms   0.0%    3578.01 Mbps   566.32 Mbps    du - Dubai
    
     Hong Kong        246.24 ms   0.0%    2548.09 Mbps   327.62 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong
     Sydney           345.88 ms   0.0%    1664.72 Mbps   211.42 Mbps    Telstra - Sydney
     Perth            217.34 ms   0.0%    2102.07 Mbps   367.67 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Perth
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 3053.61 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 1102.45 Mbps
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanked by 2ralf loay
  • @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    My 2024 VPS

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 124.91 MB/s  (31.2k) | 1.44 GB/s    (22.5k)
    Write      | 125.24 MB/s  (31.3k) | 1.45 GB/s    (22.7k)
    Total      | 250.15 MB/s  (62.5k) | 2.89 GB/s    (45.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.72 GB/s     (5.3k) | 2.84 GB/s     (2.7k)
    Write      | 2.86 GB/s     (5.5k) | 3.03 GB/s     (2.9k)
    Total      | 5.58 GB/s    (10.9k) | 5.87 GB/s     (5.7k)
    

    NVMe can have variant disk io and more so based on what neighbors are doing

This discussion has been closed.