Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hetzner Black Friday Price Increase Surprise

24

Comments

  • @cloudblast said:
    Time to launch our US location :p

    Please do

    Thanked by 1cloudblast
  • @TYT said:
    I'm still imagining that they might offer a promotion for free installation of dedicated servers

    No promotion, and the price has increased

    20TB traffic reduced to 1TB
    I think I will leave hetzner

    oh welp, time to pack up

  • From 20TB to 1TB???

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • @ahd said: Starting on 1 December 2024, 01:00 am CET, we will begin charging new prices for newly-created Cloud servers and introduce new amounts for included traffic for Cloud Servers and Load balancers at the US locations

    So they weren't able to compete with the American duopoly (triopoly)?

    Would it be correct to suggest that they're used to the "more fish in the pond, but it's smaller" situation, while in the US it is "noticeably less fish, but it's much bigger"?

    @quicksilver03 said:
    Hetzner just invented the Reverse Black Friday.

    Is it the White Monday or the White Thursday then?

  • @JerryHou said:
    From 20TB to 1TB???

    The 1TB is what gets me. Maybe reduce to 5TB or something but this is a wtf moment. Thank God for my idlers to move into and oracle cloud free tier as a suppliment. I know I have until February but what a rug pull on their part. It is what it is though.

  • xrzxrz Barred
    edited November 2024

    Fock Germans and specially forck HetzShiot ahahahahaha, fockers eat ma azz

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/180504/hetzner-traffic-use-notice-unlimited-unlimited/p1

  • @xrz said:
    Fock Germans and specially forck HetzShiot ahahahahaha, fockers eat ma azz

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/180504/hetzner-traffic-use-notice-unlimited-unlimited/p1

    I'm curious what their goals are for their business. It seems they are going through a change into something a bit different. Maybe moving towards whaling instead of having many small customers maybe they want some larger ones?

  • I shutdown like 15 Hetzner cloud servers today. Got about 30 more which I will be replacing before this change goes into effect.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    It's been a long time since I've actually looked at bandwidth offerings on cloud servers. But looking at Linode and DO just now, this change looks to be industry appropriate at least.

    Thanked by 1hanru
  • They got shaky legs and changed now before trump gets in position or try to absorb high costs for singapore.
    Don't forget, on december 3 something great is around the corner.

    Thanked by 1itoshikimonset
  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited November 2024

    20TB at 3.85EUR per month is simply unsustainable. Their EU locations probably rely mostly on private interconnects and can offset costs this way, but if they actually have to pay for this traffic via transit or real IX, no way. I suspect something similar will happen to their EU locations as well at some point, but not to this drastic level, though.

    And some numbers - at 100Gbit commit, say you can get pricing per mbps down to 0.04EUR, at ideal traffic patterns, you are looking at 3.15EUR for the 20TB bandwidth alone. That's excluding hardware, power, support and etc.

    Alex

  • ArkasArkas Member, Retired Moderator

    @quicksilver03 said: Hetzner just invented the Reverse Black Friday.

    And I will introduce to them the reverse subscription.

  • @allthemtings said:
    If they decided to limit the bandwidth on the dedicated servers they may aswell close shop

    They do already. There is large thread here about it.

  • @Cybr said:
    I shutdown like 15 Hetzner cloud servers today. Got about 30 more which I will be replacing before this change goes into effect.

  • Great time to buy from OVH. Especially if you need a lot of bandwidth.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Nov 28 19:44:40 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 270 days, 15 hours, 55 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2295.686 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 78.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-13-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH US LLC
    Location   : Reston, Virginia (VA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 80.08 MB/s   (20.0k) | 1.35 GB/s    (21.1k)
    Write      | 80.29 MB/s   (20.0k) | 1.36 GB/s    (21.2k)
    Total      | 160.37 MB/s  (40.0k) | 2.71 GB/s    (42.4k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.35 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.40 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Write      | 2.47 GB/s     (4.8k) | 2.56 GB/s     (2.5k)
    Total      | 4.82 GB/s     (9.4k) | 4.96 GB/s     (4.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 922 Mbits/sec   | 939 Mbits/sec   | 76.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 920 Mbits/sec   | 840 Mbits/sec   | 89.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 857 Mbits/sec   | 739 Mbits/sec   | 181 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 441 Mbits/sec   | 280 Mbits/sec   | 240 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 934 Mbits/sec   | 947 Mbits/sec   | 62.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 976 Mbits/sec   | 978 Mbits/sec   | 8.01 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 881 Mbits/sec   | 904 Mbits/sec   | 116 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 907 Mbits/sec   | 923 Mbits/sec   | 76.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 909 Mbits/sec   | 839 Mbits/sec   | 89.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 808 Mbits/sec   | 825 Mbits/sec   | 181 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 573 Mbits/sec   | 687 Mbits/sec   | 240 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 921 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec   | 62.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 963 Mbits/sec   | 964 Mbits/sec   | 7.97 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 876 Mbits/sec   | 890 Mbits/sec   | 116 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1358                          
    Multi Core      | 4162                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9125275
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 21 sec
    
    Database updated: 2024-11-28 19:40:00
    
       ens3 since 2024-03-03
    
              rx:  534.43 TiB      tx:  513.79 TiB      total:  1.02 PiB
    
       monthly
                         rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
           2024-10     43.85 TiB |   36.50 TiB |   80.35 TiB |  263.86 Mbit/s
           2024-11     31.26 TiB |   27.44 TiB |   58.70 TiB |  214.82 Mbit/s
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
         estimated     33.71 TiB |   29.59 TiB |   63.30 TiB |
    
       daily
                         rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
         yesterday    926.41 GiB |  890.39 GiB |    1.77 TiB |  180.63 Mbit/s
             today    813.42 GiB |  812.55 GiB |    1.59 TiB |  197.27 Mbit/s
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
         estimated    992.65 GiB |  991.59 GiB |    1.94 TiB |
    
  • @concept said:
    Great time to buy from OVH. Especially if you need a lot of bandwidth.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Nov 28 19:44:40 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 270 days, 15 hours, 55 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2295.686 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 78.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-13-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH US LLC
    Location   : Reston, Virginia (VA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 80.08 MB/s   (20.0k) | 1.35 GB/s    (21.1k)
    Write      | 80.29 MB/s   (20.0k) | 1.36 GB/s    (21.2k)
    Total      | 160.37 MB/s  (40.0k) | 2.71 GB/s    (42.4k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.35 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.40 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Write      | 2.47 GB/s     (4.8k) | 2.56 GB/s     (2.5k)
    Total      | 4.82 GB/s     (9.4k) | 4.96 GB/s     (4.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 922 Mbits/sec   | 939 Mbits/sec   | 76.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 920 Mbits/sec   | 840 Mbits/sec   | 89.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 857 Mbits/sec   | 739 Mbits/sec   | 181 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 441 Mbits/sec   | 280 Mbits/sec   | 240 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 934 Mbits/sec   | 947 Mbits/sec   | 62.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 976 Mbits/sec   | 978 Mbits/sec   | 8.01 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 881 Mbits/sec   | 904 Mbits/sec   | 116 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 907 Mbits/sec   | 923 Mbits/sec   | 76.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 909 Mbits/sec   | 839 Mbits/sec   | 89.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 808 Mbits/sec   | 825 Mbits/sec   | 181 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 573 Mbits/sec   | 687 Mbits/sec   | 240 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 921 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec   | 62.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 963 Mbits/sec   | 964 Mbits/sec   | 7.97 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 876 Mbits/sec   | 890 Mbits/sec   | 116 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1358                          
    Multi Core      | 4162                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9125275
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 21 sec
    
    Database updated: 2024-11-28 19:40:00
    
       ens3 since 2024-03-03
    
              rx:  534.43 TiB      tx:  513.79 TiB      total:  1.02 PiB
    
       monthly
                         rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
           2024-10     43.85 TiB |   36.50 TiB |   80.35 TiB |  263.86 Mbit/s
           2024-11     31.26 TiB |   27.44 TiB |   58.70 TiB |  214.82 Mbit/s
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
         estimated     33.71 TiB |   29.59 TiB |   63.30 TiB |
    
       daily
                         rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
         yesterday    926.41 GiB |  890.39 GiB |    1.77 TiB |  180.63 Mbit/s
             today    813.42 GiB |  812.55 GiB |    1.59 TiB |  197.27 Mbit/s
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
         estimated    992.65 GiB |  991.59 GiB |    1.94 TiB |
    

    What product is this?

  • @unsafetypin said:
    What product is this?

    VLE-4 in Vint Hill.

  • I'm thinking buyvm, clouvider, crunchbits, incognet, ovh might be the most competitive providers ATM. Does anyone else know of who else has at least some of their own equipment and a very solid network?

  • @jar said:
    It's been a long time since I've actually looked at bandwidth offerings on cloud servers. But looking at Linode and DO just now, this change looks to be industry appropriate at least.

    Plus Hetzners excess bandwidth pricing is still €1/TB which is roughly 10x cheaper than their direct competitors at DO/Linode.

    That too might change and for some OVH or decidedly more budget hosts will fit their needs better, but this change isn't the end of the line for Hetzner, just a mild disappointment for certain users.

    Thanked by 1jar
  • @maverick said:

    @Cybr said:
    I shutdown like 15 Hetzner cloud servers today. Got about 30 more which I will be replacing before this change goes into effect.

    Most of my Hetzner cloud servers use under 1TB of bandwidth per month, and they're not the smallest servers either.

    I stopped using Hetzner for dedicated servers when they increased their IP prices, and now I'll stop using their cloud when they increase those prices.

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • @Cybr said:

    @maverick said:

    @Cybr said:
    I shutdown like 15 Hetzner cloud servers today. Got about 30 more which I will be replacing before this change goes into effect.

    Most of my Hetzner cloud servers use under 1TB of bandwidth per month, and they're not the smallest servers either.

    I stopped using Hetzner for dedicated servers when they increased their IP prices, and now I'll stop using their cloud when they increase those prices.

    Can't complain about that. Sometimes it IS a matter of principle.

    I rly thought you were using all those cloud servers to push some serious traffic, obviously not.

    Yeah, this is a pretty drastic move, 20x less bandwidth together with price increase... in a way... they need to be punished.

    Thanked by 1Cybr
  • That is a massive 19TB drop! What was their reasoning for this massive short-notice change? I am not a user, just wondering what horrible thing happened that they took such drastic measures! This is almost like a rug pull move. Maybe I am wrong, but wouldn’t that be like a huge bill for some customers already maintaining themselves to less than a 20TB? It’s not a small bump on a bill, this should be communicated!

  • @indiankesh said: Maybe I am wrong, but wouldn’t that be like a huge bill for some customers already maintaining themselves to less than a 20TB? It’s not a small bump on a bill, this should be communicated!

    If they were hitting exactly 20TB and consuming the whole quota then with the new limits their bill would increase by around 19 euros. Which is a lot when the VM is a few bucks, but is not insanely expensive when compared to similar clouds like DO/Linode/Vultr (if you compare to OVH on the other hand, the calculations become more difficult but its maybe cheaper overall)

    Reading between the lines of the reason they gave, it sounds like they regret setting the Europe and US bandwidth quota to be the same value and were losing money from giving that much away for free in the US where their network setup is probably very different.

  • indiankeshindiankesh Member
    edited November 2024

    @Erisa said:

    @indiankesh said: Maybe I am wrong, but wouldn’t that be like a huge bill for some customers already maintaining themselves to less than a 20TB? It’s not a small bump on a bill, this should be communicated!

    If they were hitting exactly 20TB and consuming the whole quota then with the new limits their bill would increase by around 19 euros. Which is a lot when the VM is a few bucks, but is not insanely expensive when compared to similar clouds like DO/Linode/Vultr (if you compare to OVH on the other hand, the calculations become more difficult but its maybe cheaper overall)

    Reading between the lines of the reason they gave, it sounds like they regret setting the Europe and US bandwidth quota to be the same value and were losing money from giving that much away for free in the US where their network setup is probably very different.

    It's not nothing though , it could be 10-20% cost increase easily on a monthly basis per server.

    Thanked by 1Erisa
  • So what are some suitable replacements?

    Can anyone come close to the uptime and hardware for the price? I know nobody can probably offer 20 tb, but what about 5 tb?

  • @Hetzner_OL Hey Katie, wondering if this was this the real Black Friday deal Hetzner was going to announce?

  • @indiankesh said: That is a massive 19TB drop! What was their reasoning for this massive short-notice change? ... just wondering what horrible thing happened that they took such drastic measures!

    The reasoning is that 20 TB excess traffic was more expensive than another cloud server with 20 TB traffic.
    And this happened: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news/crackdown-illegal-streaming-network-22-million-users-worldwide

  • @bobert said:
    So what are some suitable replacements?

    Can anyone come close to the uptime and hardware for the price? I know nobody can probably offer 20 tb, but what about 5 tb?

    I will be migrating to @Clouvider
    Comparable specs, double bandwidth for BF when commenting, so 10TB, and super reliable.
    Hetzner has lost all credibility with me, and I will be closing my account with them.

    Thanked by 1Clouvider
  • @bobert said:
    So what are some suitable replacements?

    Can anyone come close to the uptime and hardware for the price? I know nobody can probably offer 20 tb, but what about 5 tb?

    Maybe consider Netcup's new US east location. They offer dedicated resources at super competitive price. I'm migrating to them after this.

    Thanked by 1lanefu
  • bobertbobert Member
    edited November 2024

    I really don't get this price increase from Hetzner. People went to them for the lowest prices. The uptime is good, but the cpu ram disk pricing is not the best anymore even if you disregard bandwidth.

    20 tb bandwidth was too good, but lowering it down to 1-2tb just makes it the same as every non-hyperscaler provider. There's no more advantage to using Hetzner anymore.

    I'll be migrating a server to clouvider. Will see how they do now, I left them back in 2021 due to their network support being overloaded.

    Netcup is not a suitable replacement, they only offer 2tb and then throttle you no matter how big of a plan you have.

Sign In or Register to comment.