Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr - NAT 2TB Finland / Hetzner - 10TB Traffic - 2GB - 2vCores

13

Comments

  • @mcs said:
    it should be like this, the translation of the service is done initially, and only then the moderator makes the payment to this user.

    I think the ideal situation would be that the hosting company recognizes the legitimacy of the struck agreement and transfers the server regardless of whether the seller wants to.

    Some companies here might even do that! Not Hetzner though...

  • @egoror said:

    This looks like rsync session and kind of shows OP was already transferring data out for at least ±5 hours and if he was honest about 0.3/1.6TB transferred, he still needed around 22+ hours of non-stop transfer. And @dev_vps made it all public around the same time.

    So it's basically a "two donkeys having a fight on a narrow road" situation, one rude and one impatient. Zero pity for any of two, but I'd say unban the OP, let them sort it out like adults, then ban him back lol. OP's message history might be an evidence that he was initially acting in good faith.

    Its good OP was banned. They can sort it out through email or through paypal. We as a community have seen everything we need to see. The mods don't ban someone if its not clear.

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited November 2024

    @mwt said: I think the ideal situation would be that the hosting company recognizes the legitimacy of the struck agreement and transfers the server regardless of whether the seller wants to.

    Some companies here might even do that!

    On what basis? Don't be silly.
    As a hosting company, you have responsibilities toward your client - the person who ordered and paid for the service, not some unrelated third-party individual who may claim the service from your client.
    A hosting company is there to offer a service, not to play a detective and involve itself in a private dispute between two parties that has nothing to do with company itself.
    (I'm not defending the OP here, just stating the obvious.)

  • mcsmcs Member
    edited November 2024

    @egoror said:

    This looks like rsync session and kind of shows OP was already transferring data out for at least ±5 hours and if he was honest about 0.3/1.6TB transferred, he still needed around 22+ hours of non-stop transfer. And @dev_vps made it all public around the same time.

    So it's basically a "two donkeys having a fight on a narrow road" situation, one rude and one impatient. Zero pity for any of two, but I'd say unban the OP, let them sort it out like adults, then ban him back lol. OP's message history might be an evidence that he was initially acting in good faith.

    Before transferring the service, he should have initially released the server. And then offered it to someone, and not count on someone waiting 2 days for him to do it. Also, if you have been on the forum for a long time, you would understand that a notification is made, you contact the supplier and when paying via PayPal there were rarely cases when you had to wait more than 12-24 hours for the service to be transferred. Therefore, @dev_vps waited a completely reasonable time and asked him about it. Without looking, I assessed the user who was banned a little harshly. Since he has been on the forum for a long time and offered some things for sale - this, I agree, is not right from my point of view to assess him as a hardened scammer. But he did the wrong thing in this situation more than @dev_vps. I think that he, like me, transferred dozens of servers through the site and there was never such a long wait. In my practice, I have the same. And if initially it was necessary to transfer data, then it would have been possible to provide not a screenshot, but a video session or explain in more detail. You also have to understand that when you buy from someone through a forum, and not from a provider, you initially trust them less than any service provider, and even for a small amount, you still worry and twitch much more. And this rule will work for everyone. And you also better avoid comparing forum members to animals, as I did in my statement just now. And I also noticed that you initially find fault with the person a lot, and the same was in another thread.

  • @mcs said: Before transferring the service, he should have released the server initially.

    OP has warned data is not transferred yet in the original message.

    @xyl0n said: Just have to push the data to new server and than you ready to go!

    Sorry, didn't read the rest of your message as the very first sentence is already ireelevant.

  • @Mumbly said:

    @mcs said: Here it is generally clear that most likely this is a professional scammer who wanted to go in to make a good offer and collect a lot of transfers from many users using personal correspondence.

    There's no need to exaggerate. What you're saying is very unlikely. If you check his posting history, you'll notice that he offered, sold, traded, or whatever- a lot of stuff on LET over the past ten years.
    If anything, he's rude and immature. Maybe he really did need more time to back up everything for some reason, but that doesn't justify his behavior. In any case, things got nasty, and that's entirely on him.

    Yes, I looked at it I have already changed my point of view and said that I assessed it a bit harshly. Thank you for pointing this out to me, in future I will be more careful with such assessments and watch a lot in advance, so that I don’t say thoughtless things later.

    Thanked by 1Mumbly
  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited November 2024

    No need to make too much of it or overcomplicate things. Forum members have made hundreds of transactions with each other. Escrow? Really? Stop being silly. Most of these private transactions are worth a few bucks and nothing more than that. No one wants to spend additional effort, time, or even costs to transfer out something worth 10 bucks.
    The majority of service transfers go through smoothly, with only rare complications like this one. The offender is banned, and in the worst case, the buyer will need to open a PayPal case and that's it. Honestly, some people are making too big a deal out of it.

  • @egoror said:

    @mcs said: Before transferring the service, he should have released the server initially.

    OP has warned data is not transferred yet in the original message.

    @xyl0n said: Just have to push the data to new server and than you ready to go!

    Sorry, didn't read the rest of your message as the very first sentence is already ireelevant.

    You are starting to irritate me a little with your one-sentence assessments, I am not going to prove anything. And here the situation is ambiguous, for him to suggest and wait for as long as I need - it was necessary to specify specific deadlines, and not just wait until I finish, I don’t know how much time I need and extend them. The person who is waiting on the other side - gets the impression that the delays are special and they are not going to give him anything. You have one phrase and you are trying to show that this says it all.

  • in my opinion, if someone posts my personal details, that user should be banned

    He had no business of posting my email address and using foul language irrespective of disagreement and who is right vs who is wrong.

    Thanked by 4emgh jsg tentor Falzo
  • @Mumbly said: the buyer will need to open a PayPal case and that's it

    Not an easy thing to do if it's not goods. I still think they need to come into senses, talk, and issue will be solved. I don't see OP scamming, both were acting in good faith and had a fight over nothing.

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited November 2024

    @egoror said:

    @Mumbly said: the buyer will need to open a PayPal case and that's it

    Not an easy thing to do if it's not goods.

    Then I would be on them, as that's against PayPal rules anyway. But this sale actually went through as goods, not F&F, as seen in the screenshot.

    By the way, PayPal has covered digital goods with PayPal protection for some decade now.

    https://www.paypal.com/uk/webapps/mpp/merchant-intangibles-update

  • @Mumbly said:
    No need to make too much of it or overcomplicate things. Forum members have made hundreds of transactions with each other. Escrow? Really? Stop being silly. Most of these private transactions are worth a few bucks and nothing more than that. No one wants to spend additional effort, time, or even costs to transfer out something worth 10 bucks.
    The majority of service transfers go through smoothly, with only rare complications like this one. The offender is banned, and in the worst case, the buyer will need to open a PayPal case and that's it. Honestly, some people are making too big a deal out of it.

    Escrow could have given the opportunity not only to transfer server rental services. But also the opportunity to open the sale of services by forum users of their own - there are webmasters, and devops, and system administrators - and there are many different services that different people use. And there are those that can be sold or transferred. Such a mechanism can be used. In the case as I described - you do not need to spend a lot of time on such implementation and support - especially if only for the transfer of server rental services from user to user, their number is not that large in fact. And you also need to understand that sometimes dedicated servers are transferred and with several months of prepayment, or half a year - and in this case such a payment will not be $ 10-11, but a more decent amount. Well, I understood one thing - that I will definitely implement this on my forum.

  • @Mumbly said:

    @egoror said:

    @Mumbly said: the buyer will need to open a PayPal case and that's it

    Not an easy thing to do if it's not goods.

    Then I would be on them, as that's against PayPal rules anyway. But this sale actually went through as goods, not F&F, as seen in the screenshot.

    PayPal did not let me use F&F for that receiver

    Thanked by 1Mumbly
  • @dev_vps said: PayPal did not let me use F&F for that receiver

    I saw that, which is why I said you will win the case with minimal effort :)

  • @mcs said: You are starting to irritate me a little with your one-sentence assessments

    Make a forum for yourself if other people are irritating you.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    The server is being transferred to @dev_vps as the client did reach out to initiate this transfer.

  • @dev_vps said:
    in my opinion, if someone posts my personal details, that user should be banned

    He had no business of posting my email address and using foul language irrespective of disagreement and who is right vs who is wrong.

    I completely agree with you. Such phrases cannot be ignored. At the same time, he said such very rude expressions not only in relation to you, but also to the whole family. Even if you are very right, this is in no way acceptable. Well, the publication of personal data is also unacceptable and in any case, although we do not have a completely anonymous forum here and if you want, you can find the user's data, but doing what this user does intentionally is naturally not normal.

  • ArkasArkas Member, Retired Moderator

    @itsTomHarper said: May be we should implement some rules in LET for any kind of transfer, any admin or mod will act as a middleman to prevent any sort of foul play.

    Sure buddy... You make a lot of sense...

  • @Arkas said: Sure buddy... You make a lot of sense...

    Haha :) I can imagine that grumpy voice going with that. :)

  • @Mumbly said: By the way, PayPal has covered digital goods with PayPal protection for some decade now.

    There are many small details
    https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/buyer-protection
    I know people were more successful by claiming transaction was not authorized.

  • @egoror said: There are many small details

    What part exactly?

    Of course, you can't get a refund for music or software as example that you've paid for and received, as you obviously can't return something like that "non-used".
    But if you don't receive digital goods at all, it's the same threat as if you didn't receive physical goods.

  • mcsmcs Member
    edited November 2024

    @egoror said:

    @mcs said: You are starting to irritate me a little with your one-sentence assessments

    Make a forum for yourself if other people are irritating you.

    I am creating my forum which I already mentioned before here. I also said that not to write just 1 sentence and showing that you are right.

    I also dont like you said that I don't readu what you wrote to me further on.
    Don't think that your point of view which you write and express in 1 sentence is the only correct assessment and other point of views don't exist. Your manner of communication is special and I can an answer in a rude way. But I will not do this.

  • ArkasArkas Member, Retired Moderator

    @mcs said: I create and have already said this. Secondly, I said that there is no need to irritate by writing one sentence and showing that you are right, to say more than once - I do not read further. There is no need to think that your point of view and the note - in one sentence to which you refer, the only correct possible assessment and there can be no others. In a word, there are special touches in your manner of communication, that you just want to answer more seriously and harshly. But I will not do this.

    Amazing. Even ChatGPT can not decode what you are saying. I have no idea what you are saying either. :neutral:

  • @mcs said: I said that there is no need to irritate by writing one sentence and showing that you are right, to say more than once - I do not read further

    Yep, got no desire and/or time for your usual LLM-like graphomania when the very first sentence shows you haven't read initial OP post but already have an opinion.

  • egororegoror Member
    edited November 2024

    @Mumbly said: Of course, you can't get a refund for music or software as example that you've paid for and received, as you obviously can't return something like that "non-used".
    But if you don't receive digital goods at all, it's the same threat as if you didn't receive physical goods.

    Ok, I hope you are right. Reddit users have quite a bunch of trouble with paypal and vps refunds.

    Thanked by 1Mumbly
  • @egoror said: Ok, hope you are right. Reddit users have quite a bunch of trouble with paypal and vps refunds.

    Well, every case is different, and people usually don't complain publicly about PayPal when they win a dispute.
    But generally, yes, even from past discussions on LET, it's relatively easy to win a PayPal dispute, even for a VPS, as long as it's justified.

  • @mcs said:

    @dev_vps said:
    in my opinion, if someone posts my personal details, that user should be banned

    He had no business of posting my email address and using foul language irrespective of disagreement and who is right vs who is wrong.

    I completely agree with you. Such phrases cannot be ignored. At the same time, he said such very rude expressions not only in relation to you, but also to the whole family.
    Even if you are very right, this is in no way acceptable. Well, the publication of personal data is also unacceptable.

    Thank you.

  • Thanks @labze
    The server has been transferred to my account

    @Arkas
    May I request to kindly take into consideration that he posted my email address and what he wrote about my family before unbanning him.

  • @egoror said:

    @mcs said: I said that there is no need to irritate by writing one sentence and showing that you are right, to say more than once - I do not read further

    Yep, got no desire and/or time for your usual LLM-like graphomania when the very first sentence shows you haven't read initial OP post but already have an opinion.

    I read the first post and what was written. But we look at things differently, I have not considered some points completely.

  • @dev_vps said:
    He had no business of posting my email address and using foul language irrespective of disagreement and who is right vs who is wrong.

    The doxxing was very f****d up. Can't be doing that over an argument, no matter how angry you are. The foul language is neither here nor there as far as I'm concerned, but posting the email address was way over the top.

Sign In or Register to comment.