Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

New: Joshua Moon Didn’t Realize the LLC He Was Operating Kiwi Farms Through Was Dissolved

124678

Comments

  • neckbreakerneckbreaker Member
    edited July 2023

    @tubehosting said: First of all, I would like to say that under no circumstances are we going to allow hosting of such websites in our network. I can confirm that the mentioned IP 84.54.51.78, which belongs to a downstream customer, is not in use right now. We have also informed the downstream customer about this report.


    @tubehosting said: Also, we haven't received any abuse messages about this and only found out about it after someone sent us the link to this Lowendtalk thread. In the future, please send such things to us as Abuse mail: [email protected]

    So you went out of your way to disturb free flow of legal content despite not receiving any abuse/legal reports.
    Despite you not even being the person legally liable for that, neither the owner of IP resources.

    You had no issues hosting actual criminals for months(if not years), but you draw the line on a legal and free speech focused forum. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/03/german-police-raid-ddos-friendly-host-flyhosting/

    Thank you for clarifying your stance on free speech, and have a good day.

    Pathetic.

    Thanked by 2sillycat siemens
  • ahnlakahnlak Member

    @kait said:

    @SirFoxy said: xTom never did anything wrong? The post never said that, at all. What are you even talking about?

    @ahnlak said: To be fair, saying "leave xTom along, he did nothing wrong" kind of implies that you think hosting KF is wrong.

    No, you guys are implying shit, leave xTom alone is all I said, he did nothing wrong, me saying that doesn't mean KF is wrong.

    You keep saying "he did nothing wrong", in the context of "he didn't host KF". The only conclusion is that you think hosting KF is wrong.

    If you don't think it's wrong, stop saying "he did nothing wrong". Try "he didn't host them", or "he has nothing to do with this story".

    I really have no dog in this fight, but it would be nice if you could at least what you yourself write.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    First person to put their dick back in their pants gets 50% off a lap dance at Jaguars in Longview, TX.

  • ahnlakahnlak Member

    @jar said:
    First person to put their dick back in their pants gets 50% off a lap dance at Jaguars in Longview, TX.

    Will you throw in flights?

  • fatchanfatchan Member, Host Rep

    @tubehosting said:
    First of all, I would like to say that under no circumstances are we going to allow hosting of such websites in our network.

    Hello,

    Can you clarify why such websites are considered as abusive or what reason(s) you choose to refuse them service?

    Thank you.

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited July 2023

    @fatchan said: Can you clarify why such websites are considered as abusive

    Hello,

    Can you clarify why you're at this forum as you obviously don't read it.

    The question you asked (just like every other kiwifarm moron who came here before you) was explicitely answered by several people numerous times.

    Thanked by 1fatchan
  • @fatchan said:

    @tubehosting said:
    First of all, I would like to say that under no circumstances are we going to allow hosting of such websites in our network.

    Hello,

    Can you clarify why such websites are considered as abusive or what reason(s) you choose to refuse them service?

    Thank you.

    Nobody is willing to risk pariah status hosting KF

  • sneed.today is indeed sneeding very hard today

  • @jar said:
    First person to put their dick back in their pants gets 50% off a lap dance at Jaguars in Longview, TX.

    Can you convert the lap money into a coupon for MXRoute?

  • ahnlakahnlak Member

    @doghouch said:

    @jar said:
    First person to put their dick back in their pants gets 50% off a lap dance at Jaguars in Longview, TX.

    Can you convert the lap money into a coupon for MXRoute?

    I read that every MXRoute reseller account comes with a free lap dance.

  • Anybody hosting with a reseller of (a reseller of) Skylink does not deserve to be taken serious away.

    Skylink started with their own uplinks, now they have an uplink to Gcore and Aurologic, plus Speed-IX and ERA-IX.

    And, congratulations Skylink for taking over recently the 200 Gigabit ultra highspeed uplink to ERA-IX. It is clear what you are doing in Eygelshoven, offering satellite streaming services, you must have made a nice deal with dutch authorities, offering Globe Datacenter as a sacrificial lamb.

    Or are you now only serving for the backend servers and putting frontends in other networks to not become a target?

    As for the Tube-hosting, interesting terms and conditons translated from german. "tube-hostings general rules of conduct".

    The services provided by Tube-Hosting may only be used within the legal framework. Furthermore, improper use that contradicts the provisions defined in the General Terms and Conditions is prohibited. It is forbidden to store illegal content on the storage space provided or to disseminate illegal content via the communication interfaces of the services. In particular, (D)DoS attacks, sending spam, phishing or the like should be mentioned here. In the event of violations, we reserve the right to disconnect the service from the network without prior notice and to terminate the contract without notice.
    Other abusive cases would include:

    Failure to comply with registration requirements
    Unauthorized Account Management
    Fraud or attempted fraud, for example by using mechanisms, software or other scripts in connection with the use of the Internet Portal that disrupt the functioning of the Customer Portal
    Intentional causing of a fault/malfunction
    Other violations of the legal provisions, the terms and conditions of Tube-Hosting as well as their general rules of conduct resulting obligations and / or rights
    
    Thanked by 1kait
  • image

    Thanked by 1kait
  • kaitkait Member

    @sillycat said:
    image

    funnily enough still skylink DC, just different provider.

  • @kait said:

    @sillycat said:
    image

    funnily enough still skylink DC, just different provider.

    Wondering how long this one will last... Josh has used them in the past for hosting a frontend, albeit via his own ASN.

  • iKeyZiKeyZ Veteran

    the comments speak volumes

  • kaitkait Member

    @sillycat said: Wondering how long this one will last... Josh has used them in the past for hosting a frontend, albeit via his own ASN.

    The current upstream has never removed KF, and it is way more layers untill you actually get to any T1, so who knows.

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member
    edited July 2023

    @ahnlak said:

    @jar said:
    First person to put their dick back in their pants gets 50% off a lap dance at Jaguars in Longview, TX.

    Will you throw in flights?

    Strippers in Longview have to be like C seed strippers in comparison to Houston.

    @iKeyZ said:

    the comments speak volumes

    You’re right:

    “Fucking faggot cunts”

    “What a bunch of pussy ass hard R’s”

    “Damn trannies”

    “Trans people have similar brain as pedos, according to scientists”

    List goes on. Not alt-right, though.

  • neckbreakerneckbreaker Member
    edited July 2023

    @SirFoxy said: You’re right:

    “Fucking faggot cunts”

    “What a bunch of pussy ass hard R’s”

    “Damn trannies”

    “Trans people have similar brain as pedos, according to scientists”

    List goes on. Not alt-right, though.

    People have a right to say whatever they want, whether you like it or not.

    And how does a public chat anyone can join represent KiwiFarms being "alt-right". Because people say things you don't like? You are out of luck.

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • @neckbreaker said:

    @SirFoxy said: You’re right:

    “Fucking faggot cunts”

    “What a bunch of pussy ass hard R’s”

    “Damn trannies”

    “Trans people have similar brain as pedos, according to scientists”

    List goes on. Not alt-right, though.

    People have a right to say whatever they want, whether you like it or not.

    Sure, but a stranger could read those Telegram comments and instantly understand why KiwiFarms would be de-platformed. The userbase is radicalized.

    Thanked by 1iKeyZ
  • @SirFoxy said:

    @neckbreaker said:

    @SirFoxy said: You’re right:

    “Fucking faggot cunts”

    “What a bunch of pussy ass hard R’s”

    “Damn trannies”

    “Trans people have similar brain as pedos, according to scientists”

    List goes on. Not alt-right, though.

    People have a right to say whatever they want, whether you like it or not.

    Sure, but a stranger could read those Telegram comments and instantly understand why KiwiFarms would be de-platformed. The userbase is radicalized.

    A self-proclaimed leftist angry at a site where speech he doesn't agree politically is allowed wants to feel the burn, wants to feel the power, wants to be a fox.

    I see you made a website for your "journalism" portfolio, good luck with that. Lets hope nobody googles your name and sees your articles getting destroyed from logical and factual standpoint.
    You are a biased malicious actor. You fit in Mainstream media, and that's where you should go, LEB readers are your not usual consoomers, they have higher IQ and if they research on their own, will call your bullshit out.

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member
    edited July 2023

    @neckbreaker said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @neckbreaker said:

    @SirFoxy said: You’re right:

    “Fucking faggot cunts”

    “What a bunch of pussy ass hard R’s”

    “Damn trannies”

    “Trans people have similar brain as pedos, according to scientists”

    List goes on. Not alt-right, though.

    People have a right to say whatever they want, whether you like it or not.

    Sure, but a stranger could read those Telegram comments and instantly understand why KiwiFarms would be de-platformed. The userbase is radicalized.

    A self-proclaimed leftist angry at a site where speech he doesn't agree politically is allowed wants to feel the burn, wants to feel the power, wants to be a fox.

    I see you made a website for your "journalism" portfolio, good luck with that. Lets hope nobody googles your name and sees your articles getting destroyed from logical and factual standpoint.
    You are a biased malicious actor. You fit in Mainstream media, and that's where you should go, LEB readers are your not usual consoomers, they have higher IQ and if they research on their own, will call your bullshit out.

    I'm not a journalist, I'm a copywriter. Stop calling me that, never once called myself a journalist. Those are vastly different.

    That's like saying working in advertising is the same as sales - they serve two different purposes. "Consoomers."

    Why are you so angry about the fact the article said KiwiFarms is getting deplatformed and I posted an update on the thread after they got deplatformed again?

    The entirety of the article is still very accurate, instead of arguing against the fact KiwiFarms is being deplatformed... you KF users keep creating tangent arguments that hardly even correlate to the article itself.

    Also, I'm not left nor right, I literally used to classify myself as a Libertarian (posted that here, which you ignore because it would work against your argument) - that would perfectly fit the radicalized "free speech" guys. Go touch grass.

    Thanked by 1Stetsed
  • neckbreakerneckbreaker Member
    edited July 2023

    @SirFoxy said: The entirety of the article is still very accurate

    You live in a bubble. Most of this thread is people pointing out how big of a liar you are, and you trying to be defensive about it.

    @SirFoxy said: Also, I'm not left nor right,

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3676714/#Comment_3676714

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member
    edited July 2023

    @neckbreaker said:

    @SirFoxy said: The entirety of the article is still very accurate

    You live in a bubble. Most of this thread is people pointing out how big of a liar you are, and you trying to be defensive about it.

    @SirFoxy said: Also, I'm not left nor right,

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3676714/#Comment_3676714

    Do you mean a couple of KiwiFarms users including yourself?

    Other users also previously agreed with it, they don't care enough to want to argue with people like you on the internet. It's a polarizing argument.

    Anyways, this is probably my last reply to you, it's circling.

    In what world does the statement "I used to be a diehard Libertarian, now I'm more on the left side than right" mean I'm a leftist? The statement you linked to was literally the statement I was referencing above that. I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean.

    It would imply I used to be young and wishful, just like many KiwiFarms users until experiencing enough mental growth to learn concepts like true free speech or free markets are only ideal and unrealistic.

    Humans require regulation because of the nature of humanity.

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @SirFoxy said:
    Humans require regulation because of the nature of humanity.

    Oof. I guess the real question: Who gets to do the regulating?

    Thanked by 3neckbreaker SirFoxy jar
  • @crunchbits said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Humans require regulation because of the nature of humanity.

    Oof. I guess the real question: Who gets to do the regulating?

    The man himself.

    Thanked by 2SirFoxy jar
  • @crunchbits said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Humans require regulation because of the nature of humanity.

    Oof. I guess the real question: Who gets to do the regulating?

    In this case, I'd start with Joshua Moon so his upstream doesn't have to do it for him.

  • neckbreakerneckbreaker Member
    edited July 2023

    @SirFoxy said: I'd start with Joshua Moon

    He does it, with his lawyers.
    Don't you think the law is enough of a regulation?
    Do we need extremist far-left "social justice" like we see currently from anti-KF "activists"?

  • kaitkait Member
    edited July 2023

    @SirFoxy said: In this case, I'd start with Joshua Moon so his upstream doesn't have to do it for him.

    What does he need to regulate except the laws (because he already does that)?

This discussion has been closed.