Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hetzner - Traffic Use Notice - unlimited != unlimited

1121315171822

Comments

  • @lukehebb said:

    @TimboJones said:
    Solution: switch to "unmetered" and just throttle the speed above "fair use" monthly limits, which can vary depending on network congestion as it should.

    It is impossible for it to be unmetered and for it to also be monitored to restrict speed above a certain limit. Unmetered would mean they have no idea how much is being used

    Unmetered for the purpose of not charging per data. Like text messages for the last 1.5 decades. They probably realistically have daily limits only spammers and teens know about.

    At the end of the day, this is true for most people, "I don't want charges above monthly fee for my normal use and the odd event/month". From the days of ISDN, if you want the whole pipe all day long, you need your own circuit to yourself.

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Veteran
    edited July 2022

    Is this even allowed under German / EU law? Advertising it as "unlimited" when it's not really unlimited?

    Phone companies got huge fines for that in Australia, as they advertised plans as "unlimited" when in reality the data slowed down once a certain quota was hit (like most of the "unlimited" plans in the USA do). They're not allowed to call it "unlimited" any more.

  • @Daniel15 said:
    Is this even allowed under German / EU law? Advertising it as "unlimited" when it's not really unlimited?

    Phone companies got huge fines for that in Australia, as they advertised plans as "unlimited" when in reality the data slowed down once a certain quota was hit (like most of the "unlimited" plans in the USA do). They're not allowed to call it "unlimited" any more.

    Not same thing. They acted inside existing contract. This is a non-renewal. Hetzner isn't doing anything to traffic while the contract is in force.

  • serv_eeserv_ee Member
    edited July 2022

    @Daniel15 said:
    Is this even allowed under German / EU law? Advertising it as "unlimited" when it's not really unlimited?

    Phone companies got huge fines for that in Australia, as they advertised plans as "unlimited" when in reality the data slowed down once a certain quota was hit (like most of the "unlimited" plans in the USA do). They're not allowed to call it "unlimited" any more.

    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    "What we consider fair use" - not a single hint about it in the terms.

    "Find ways to reduce traffic" - reduce from what? Unlimited? Bullshit.

    All these 15 pages of blabbering about contract terms. This isn't about the contract nor the term of it. It's about hetzner advertising their traffic on their website in multiple locations.

    Thanked by 1TimboJones
  • ralfralf Member

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

  • serv_eeserv_ee Member
    edited July 2022

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    Are you people illiterate or something? It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    I sure as fuck hope when some of you get ripped off you'll take it as cool as you try to make this seem like.

    Every thread that comes up there's always some who try to justify some moronic behavior like this.

    Go ask Contabo why did they change their website from "unlimited" to 32TB. Just to avoid messes like this.

  • adlyadly Veteran

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

  • ralfralf Member

    @serv_ee said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    Are you people illiterate or something?

    Yes. I fully understand the word "unlimited". Has any user of Hetzner unlimited plans had their bandwidth limited? No.

    It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    This isn't the usual definition of the word "limited".

  • drivexdrivex Member

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    Are you people illiterate or something?

    Yes. I fully understand the word "unlimited". Has any user of Hetzner unlimited plans had their bandwidth limited? No.

    It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    This isn't the usual definition of the word "limited".

    Please just stop posting, you don‘t understand a single thing nor what false advertising is, which hopefully will be discussed at German courts if it happens more often.

  • kasodkkasodk Barred

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > 
    > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > we consider fair use.
    > 
    > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > then find ways of reducing it.
    > 
    > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > our Terms and conditions:
    > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > 
    > Thank you for your understanding.
    > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

  • @serv_ee said: Are you people illiterate or something? It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    No, are you? You're saying they're required to establish NEW contracts with customers they don't want.

  • adlyadly Veteran

    @drivex said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    Are you people illiterate or something?

    Yes. I fully understand the word "unlimited". Has any user of Hetzner unlimited plans had their bandwidth limited? No.

    It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    This isn't the usual definition of the word "limited".

    Please just stop posting, you don‘t understand a single thing nor what false advertising is, which hopefully will be discussed at German courts if it happens more often.

    Please point out what part of the German law Hetzner are breaking by not renewing a contract with a customer. Keeping in mind the customer has obtained exactly what was advertised for the agreed contracted period (30 days).

  • adlyadly Veteran
    edited July 2022

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > 
    > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > we consider fair use.
    > > 
    > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > 
    > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > 
    > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    Thanked by 1iKeyZ
  • drivexdrivex Member

    @adly said:

    @drivex said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    Are you people illiterate or something?

    Yes. I fully understand the word "unlimited". Has any user of Hetzner unlimited plans had their bandwidth limited? No.

    It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    This isn't the usual definition of the word "limited".

    Please just stop posting, you don‘t understand a single thing nor what false advertising is, which hopefully will be discussed at German courts if it happens more often.

    Please point out what part of the German law Hetzner are breaking by not renewing a contract with a customer. Keeping in mind the customer has obtained exactly what was advertised for the agreed contracted period (30 days).

    It‘s illegal to advertise something and cancel a contract, when someones actual uses it to its fullest. Like it or don’t like it, but German Law is clear about „Irreführende Werbung“. This has nothing to so with „Hausrecht“ or similar things

  • adlyadly Veteran

    @drivex said:

    @adly said:

    @drivex said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    Are you people illiterate or something?

    Yes. I fully understand the word "unlimited". Has any user of Hetzner unlimited plans had their bandwidth limited? No.

    It's clear they are sanctioning a person for using what Hetzner itself promises.

    This isn't the usual definition of the word "limited".

    Please just stop posting, you don‘t understand a single thing nor what false advertising is, which hopefully will be discussed at German courts if it happens more often.

    Please point out what part of the German law Hetzner are breaking by not renewing a contract with a customer. Keeping in mind the customer has obtained exactly what was advertised for the agreed contracted period (30 days).

    It‘s illegal to advertise something and cancel a contract, when someones actual uses it to its fullest. Like it or don’t like it, but German Law is clear about „Irreführende Werbung“. This has nothing to so with „Hausrecht“ or similar things

    I’ve looked through the UWG law related to this - there doesn’t appear to be anything related to cancelling contracts (which Hetzner aren’t doing, they’re refusing to enter into another 30 day contract/renewal).

    The regulations refer to what is being advertised not being delivered, which is not the case as the advertised product is being provided within the contracted period (30 days).

  • kasodkkasodk Barred

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > 
    > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > 
    > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > 
    > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > 
    > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

  • serv_eeserv_ee Member
    edited July 2022

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > 
    > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > 
    > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > 
    > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > 
    > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    It's a waste of time. Don't bother.

    I've been through this with my ISP already and in the consumer protection agency. Guess who lost?

    Some are just shills or right out blinded fanboys it's sad already

  • _cece_cece Member

    Thanks @kasodk … I already posted it twice, but well….

    Thanked by 1kasodk
  • adlyadly Veteran

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > 
    > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > 
    > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > 
    > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > 
    > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    Those terms are typically referred to as a rolling contract. That is the contract is for an indefinite period with a set notice period to terminate the contract.

    Granted, renewal is not the correct term here as Hetzner do not specify an initial period for the contract. However, I don’t believe that impacts upon what others have said about ending the agreement but am happy to be proven wrong.

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • adlyadly Veteran

    @serv_ee said:

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > > 
    > > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > > 
    > > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > > 
    > > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > > 
    > > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    It's a waste of time. Don't bother.

    I've been through this with my ISP already and in the consumer protection agency. Guess who lost?

    Some are just shills or right out blinded fanboys it's sad already

    I actually disagree with this form of advertising, and if there are hidden limits believe they should be specified in the terms. I also believe Hetzner has historically been poor at communication, which doesn’t help.

    However, as things have been stated, I don’t believe this is illegal. I can also see why some prefer the “unlimited” advertising as it is effectively unlimited for them, with a small percentage of people potentially resulting in a hard limit having to be enforced.

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • kasodkkasodk Barred
    edited July 2022

    LET Lawyers: unlimited != unlimited

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • @adly said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    It's a waste of time. Don't bother.

    I've been through this with my ISP already and in the consumer protection agency. Guess who lost?

    Some are just shills or right out blinded fanboys it's sad already

    I actually disagree with this form of advertising, and if there are hidden limits believe they should be specified in the terms. I also believe Hetzner has historically been poor at communication, which doesn’t help.

    However, as things have been stated, I don’t believe this is illegal. I can also see why some prefer the “unlimited” advertising as it is effectively unlimited for them, with a small percentage of people potentially resulting in a hard limit having to be enforced.

    It became illegal the second they sent that email. That's factually sanctioning a person for breaking some on the go made up thing that's not in the terms.

  • If Hetzner did cut off the customer because of bandwidth utilization within the contracted term - that would have been a breach of contract from their end. Pitchforks would have been justified.

    However, as a business - they have the full right to decide against renewing a new contract, and in all fairness - they don't need to provide a reason as to why they decided against that.

    Is it fair from a customers perspective? Perhaps not.
    But I don't think that it is illegal either.

    Thanked by 3adly RapToN Ympker
  • adlyadly Veteran

    @serv_ee said:

    @adly said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    It's a waste of time. Don't bother.

    I've been through this with my ISP already and in the consumer protection agency. Guess who lost?

    Some are just shills or right out blinded fanboys it's sad already

    I actually disagree with this form of advertising, and if there are hidden limits believe they should be specified in the terms. I also believe Hetzner has historically been poor at communication, which doesn’t help.

    However, as things have been stated, I don’t believe this is illegal. I can also see why some prefer the “unlimited” advertising as it is effectively unlimited for them, with a small percentage of people potentially resulting in a hard limit having to be enforced.

    It became illegal the second they sent that email. That's factually sanctioning a person for breaking some on the go made up thing that's not in the terms.

    Again I’m unsure about that, but even if you’re correct surely it only would become illegal once they implement the sanction/cancel the contract? As of that email, they haven’t actually done anything.

    As it goes I don’t use Hetzner, or any of the low cost Central European providers, because I find the communication to be terrible and customer service is often poor. Whether it’s a cultural thing or not as some have said in the past, I’ve no idea, but I don’t find this as much with US or UK providers.

  • kasodkkasodk Barred
    edited July 2022

    @adly said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @adly said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    It's a waste of time. Don't bother.

    I've been through this with my ISP already and in the consumer protection agency. Guess who lost?

    Some are just shills or right out blinded fanboys it's sad already

    I actually disagree with this form of advertising, and if there are hidden limits believe they should be specified in the terms. I also believe Hetzner has historically been poor at communication, which doesn’t help.

    However, as things have been stated, I don’t believe this is illegal. I can also see why some prefer the “unlimited” advertising as it is effectively unlimited for them, with a small percentage of people potentially resulting in a hard limit having to be enforced.

    It became illegal the second they sent that email. That's factually sanctioning a person for breaking some on the go made up thing that's not in the terms.

    Again I’m unsure about that, but even if you’re correct surely it only would become illegal once they implement the sanction/cancel the contract? As of that email, they haven’t actually done anything.

    They have demanded that OP drastically reduces his traffic, and then you say they haven't done anything. :D

    In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will need to be drastically reduced.

  • drivexdrivex Member

    They should just put a fuckin number into a fair use clause and it‘s done ffs

    Thanked by 3kasodk xrz TimboJones
  • ralfralf Member

    @serv_ee said:

    @adly said:

    @serv_ee said:

    @kasodk said:

    @adly said:

    @kasodk said:

    @xrz said:
    My friend got this:

    > > > > > > > We’re writing to you today because of your traffic use, which currently
    > > > > > > > averages above 250 TB/month on some of your servers.
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > Although these servers include unlimited traffic, this is far above what
    > > > > > > > we consider fair use.
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > In order to continue hosting your servers with us, the traffic use will
    > > > > > > > need to be drastically reduced. Please check your servers and confirm
    > > > > > > > what is using so much traffic, making sure it is nothing abusive, and
    > > > > > > > then find ways of reducing it.
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > We will routinely check your traffic use. If we continue to see such a
    > > > > > > > high amount, we may choose to cancel your contract. (Please see 2.7 of
    > > > > > > > our Terms and conditions:
    > > > > > > > https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions)
    > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > Thank you for your understanding.
    > > > > > > > 

    @adly said:

    @ralf said:

    @serv_ee said:
    It's not legal in the EU what so ever. What ever blabbering some do doesn't matter what so ever. It's false advertising and there's no "but" in this.

    People keep repeating this lie.

    They are not limiting anybody's bandwidth. They're choosing not to renew the contract.

    It’s remarkable that people don’t seem to acknowledge this.

    Yes, there are some arguments to be had that non-renewal due to ‘excessive’ usage is unethical and a clear limit may be preferable.

    But they have in no way breached the contract by restricting or limiting traffic within the contracted period, thus the service purchased had been provided. They are simply advising they may exercise their rights to not renew the service going forward.

    @Adly, perhaps you should read OP's post and try again.

    They are demanding that he reduce his traffic OR they will cancel the contract.

    They aren’t demanding anything, they are providing advanced notice that they will refuse to continue the rolling contract renewal with adequate notice should they no longer want the customer. In this case, they have provided a reason why they won’t want them as a customer, but they didn’t have to.

    THERE IS NO ROLLING RENEWAL.

    THE CONTRACT PERIOD IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME.

    Read the fucking terms:
    2.5. Contracts are concluded for an unlimited time period unless otherwise agreed.
    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month

    Source: https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions

    It's a waste of time. Don't bother.

    I've been through this with my ISP already and in the consumer protection agency. Guess who lost?

    Some are just shills or right out blinded fanboys it's sad already

    I actually disagree with this form of advertising, and if there are hidden limits believe they should be specified in the terms. I also believe Hetzner has historically been poor at communication, which doesn’t help.

    However, as things have been stated, I don’t believe this is illegal. I can also see why some prefer the “unlimited” advertising as it is effectively unlimited for them, with a small percentage of people potentially resulting in a hard limit having to be enforced.

    It became illegal the second they sent that email. That's factually sanctioning a person for breaking some on the go made up thing that's not in the terms.

    Have you even read the terms? They can cancel the contract for any reason they choose:

    2.6. The contract may be terminated by either party with 30 days' notice to the end of the month, without specifying any reasons. Differing periods of notice may apply to the Customers depending on the description of relevant services. Notice of termination may be given in text form by letter, fax, email or via the Customer’s account on our secure customer interface.

    2.7. Furthermore, we reserve the right to terminate the contractual relationship without notice for good cause. Such good cause is deemed to exist, among other reasons, if the Customer fails to meet its payment obligations or violates other important customer obligations. A further important reason which may result in us locking or terminating the Customer’s services or account without notice is if the Customer uses content that impairs the regular operating behavior or the security of our infrastructure or our product, or violates paragraphs 8.1. - 8.3. of these Terms and Conditions.

    Thanked by 1adly
  • reb0rnreb0rn Member

    I was also contacted for bandwidth usage and its way less then 250Tb per server, at least for me they wanted to know server use case, but I was null routed for ~4h also for no real reason other then pushing upload 2x this month then in past (use case change and I do not monitor as its unlimited)

    Thanked by 1xrz
  • ErisaErisa Member

    @reb0rn said:
    I was also contacted for bandwidth usage and its way less then 250Tb per server, at least for me they wanted to know server use case, but I was null routed for ~4h also for no real reason other then pushing upload 2x this month then in past (use case change and I do not monitor as its unlimited)

    Can you quote the entire email?

    Thanked by 2adly DanSummer
  • reb0rnreb0rn Member
    edited July 2022

    I would not now as its resolved, if it happen again I will keep update then

    Issue is hetzner is defo best vs value and even quality of service, and as many we do not think what happen if they dich us, I had 15 dedis and dozen VPS, VPS I have backup but for dedis I did not have, now I will use my brain more and not trust all my business on one company, more so as I do not have easy way and fast to migrate

    Thanked by 1xrz
Sign In or Register to comment.