Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

★ VirMach ★ RYZEN ★ NVMe ★★ $8.88/YR- 384MB ★★ $21.85/YR- 2.5GB ★ Instant ★ Japan Pre-order ★ & More

1…228229231233234…339

Comments

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @zh000323 said:

    @VirMach said:
    Just picked up some of these, 1.4M IOPS, SKHynix controller. We ran out of Gen4 drives since so many of them were XPG, and I discovered we had 10-20 additional 5950X in storage. Any votes for where they should go?

    Promised to fix sjc002 on May 24th, today is May 27th

    Yes, sorry, it was delayed by me spending 3 minutes purchasing these drives. Sorry for the "promise," I should stop "promising" things by not providing further estimates.

    Thanked by 1Xrmaddness
  • fanfan Veteran

    Looks like someone on TYOC029 is at it again:

  • dirtminerdirtminer Member

    Would any more enlightened Virmach user know if the 1MB/minute background traffic counts towards the bandwidth quota for the minimal BW plans?

  • fanfan Veteran

    25% packet loss at the gateway on TYOC29. @VirMach

    --- 45.66.129.1 ping statistics ---
    100 packets transmitted, 75 received, 25% packet loss, time 99532ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.890/79.174/587.887/137.586 ms

  • risturizristuriz Member

    @VirMach said:
    Just picked up some of these, 1.4M IOPS, SKHynix controller. We ran out of Gen4 drives since so many of them were XPG, and I discovered we had 10-20 additional 5950X in storage. Any votes for where they should go?

    Miami!

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • KuYeHQKuYeHQ Member

    China HongKong，to the new data center

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @dirtminer said:
    Would any more enlightened Virmach user know if the 1MB/minute background traffic counts towards the bandwidth quota for the minimal BW plans?

    Hello, highly enlightened VirMach user and enthusiast here. Yes, it'd count.

    If you're using your service for something that's private, such as a VPN, a quick way to ensure only you get to use that bandwidth is logging into VNC and blocking all network access and then whitelisting your own IP address only.

    Also 1MB per minute is 42GB per month and in most cases of bandwidth suspensions, there's a delay before suspension to where usually people use about 50GB extra, over their bandwidth limit, and we usually would not charge for that if we're not contacted, as in we don't keep track of it. Also for new plans we advertise as 2TB for example, instead of 2000GB it's now 2048GB so you already in that example would get 48GB extra. Seeing as we upped the smallest plan to already have more bandwidth than most people would use, of 1024GB, that should not be a worrying amount of background traffic for you.

    But with that said if you ever get suspended for using 1024GB/1000GB usage and not 1042GB/1000GB then just mention the background traffic in suspension appeal ticket and I'll up the bandwidth for that month to 1042GB.

    Thanked by 2Xrmaddness dirtminer
  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @fan said:
    25% packet loss at the gateway on TYOC29. @VirMach

    --- 45.66.129.1 ping statistics ---
    100 packets transmitted, 75 received, 25% packet loss, time 99532ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.890/79.174/587.887/137.586 ms

    I'm aware, unfortunately I'm still tending to LAKVM26 and SJCZ002 outages at this exact time but I'll have a look immediately after or between.

    Thanked by 1fan
  • PeachPeach

    @VirMach said:

    @fan said:
    25% packet loss at the gateway on TYOC29. @VirMach

    --- 45.66.129.1 ping statistics ---
    100 packets transmitted, 75 received, 25% packet loss, time 99532ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.890/79.174/587.887/137.586 ms

    I'm aware, unfortunately I'm still tending to LAKVM26 and SJCZ002 outages at this exact time but I'll have a look immediately after or between.

    Hi ,I want change location of vps ,from LA to JP. What should I do? I have no data to save.Pannel has no choice.

  • dirtminerdirtminer Member

    @VirMach said:
    Seeing as we upped the smallest plan to already have more bandwidth than most people would use, of 1024GB,

    I migrated a 100GB/month plan to ATLZ009.
    Prior to migrating, ARP traffic seemed to be less than 1k/second
    After migration, ARP traffic is around the 1MB/minute mark, which seemed it would be half the bandwidth.

    There are arp requests from 7 different gateways

        407 ARP, Request who-has tell 45.83.151.1, length 46
    569 ARP, Request who-has tell 23.147.226.1, length 46
    858 ARP, Request who-has tell 23.147.227.1, length 46
   1190 ARP, Request who-has tell 23.147.225.1, length 46
   2278 ARP, Request who-has tell 149.57.205.1, length 46
   2627 ARP, Request who-has tell 149.57.203.1, length 46
   2717 ARP, Request who-has tell 149.57.204.1, length 46
  • skorousskorous Member

    @dirtminer said:

    I migrated a 100GB/month plan to ATLZ009.

    How much does that plan cost? Honestly curious.

  • dirtminerdirtminer Member

    @skorous said:

    @dirtminer said:

    I migrated a 100GB/month plan to ATLZ009.

    How much does that plan cost? Honestly curious.

    USD$4/year, from years back when mere mortals could get virmach specials without a shopping script.

    Thanked by 3skorous FrankZ AlwaysSkint
  • JabJabJabJab Member

    Same ARP spam in Amsterdam. 10 minutes pcap = 159884 packets, while ARP is 155101 (97.0%). There are even entries like that that makes me wonders wtf

  • MirageMirage Member

    @VirMach I'd like to ask, I chose to upgrade to Japanese AMD earlier, but the VPS only has one more IP address now, will you upgrade to Japanese AMD for me in the future?> @VirMach said:

    @Mirage said:
    @VirMach I'd like to ask, I chose to upgrade to Japanese AMD earlier, but the VPS only has one more IP address now, will you upgrade to Japanese AMD for me in the future?

    How earlier, which button, etc?

    maybe... one month ago? button is Ryzen Upgrade

  • fluffernutterfluffernutter Member

    @VirMach said:
    Just picked up some of these, 1.4M IOPS, SKHynix controller. We ran out of Gen4 drives since so many of them were XPG, and I discovered we had 10-20 additional 5950X in storage. Any votes for where they should go?

    Would love one of these in Amsterdam, or possibly Chicago if/when that happens? Would be killer.

  • masterkmasterk Member

    @VirMach my TYOC026 VPS is still offline,i created a new ticket #580695 as you said,and still no response.it got offline on may 17th, i am interesting in when it will be solved.

  • cachexycachexy Member

    @VirMach said:

    @zh000323 said:

    @VirMach said:
    Just picked up some of these, 1.4M IOPS, SKHynix controller. We ran out of Gen4 drives since so many of them were XPG, and I discovered we had 10-20 additional 5950X in storage. Any votes for where they should go?

    Promised to fix sjc002 on May 24th, today is May 27th

    Yes, sorry, it was delayed by me spending 3 minutes purchasing these drives. Sorry for the "promise," I should stop "promising" things by not providing further estimates.

    So, when will it be fixed?

  • XratzhXratzh Member

    Service in TYOC025 offline :/

  • foitinfoitin Member

    @fan said:
    Looks like someone on TYOC029 is at it again:


    cuz you just got yourself some noisyce new MJJ neighbors.
    Congratulations :)

  • RocksterRockster Member
    edited May 2022

    @JabJab said:
    Same ARP spam in Amsterdam. 10 minutes pcap = 159884 packets, while ARP is 155101 (97.0%). There are even entries like that that makes me wonders wtf

    Can you do some ping tests to see if everything look normal from your side, please? I am getting some strange spikes.

    AMSD025

    Pinging 149.57.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=628ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=532ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=613ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=311ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=54
    Reply from 149.57.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 149.57.xxx.xxx:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 628ms, Average = 157ms

    (normally would be around 35ms)

    1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms
    2 15 ms 3 ms 4 ms
    3 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms
    4 2 ms 2 ms 1 ms
    5 33 ms 8 ms 4 ms zgb-b1-link.ip.twelve99.net [62.115.154.140]
    6 32 ms 33 ms 32 ms win-bb4-link.ip.twelve99.net [62.115.122.176]
    7 25 ms 24 ms 25 ms ffm-bb2-link.ip.twelve99.net [62.115.138.22]
    8 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms adm-bb4-link.ip.twelve99.net [62.115.122.200]
    9 30 ms 31 ms 31 ms adm-b6-link.ip.twelve99.net [62.115.117.115]
    10 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms telia.ams01.xtom.nl [62.115.167.167]
    11 77 ms 66 ms 67 ms cs04.q51.ams02.xtom.nl [194.124.228.169]
    12 1275 ms 1217 ms * 149.57.xxx.xxx

    From the nearest (.nl) location:

    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=4.37 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=2.80 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=3.35 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=79.2 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=6 ttl=59 time=132 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=7 ttl=59 time=164 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=8 ttl=59 time=244 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=9 ttl=59 time=317 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=10 ttl=59 time=225 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=11 ttl=59 time=2.85 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=12 ttl=59 time=145 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=13 ttl=59 time=554 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=14 ttl=59 time=646 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=15 ttl=59 time=660 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=16 ttl=59 time=559 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=19 ttl=59 time=299 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=20 ttl=59 time=21.8 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=21 ttl=59 time=2.91 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=22 ttl=59 time=2.86 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=23 ttl=59 time=3.59 ms
    64 bytes from 149.57.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=24 ttl=59 time=29.3 ms

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 2022

    @masterk said:
    @VirMach my TYOC026 VPS is still offline,i created a new ticket #580695 as you said,and still no response.it got offline on may 17th, i am interesting in when it will be solved.

    It's not going to get completed very quickly with that title, you picked custom department or modified the title if you clicked the correct department. Custom tickets should only be made if you can add more details, not less.

    Also if you have two tickets open they'll end up getting merged and most likely closed.

  • zoranzoran Member

    Please help me confirm #576642, I paid $3 to migrate, but nothing changed, thanks @VirMach

  • GOBBLESGOBBLES Member

    Any one have issues with migrate button?
    I tried but I get error..

  • sljunsljun Member

    @sljun said:

    @sljun said:

    @VirMach said:

    @sljun said:

    @VirMach said:

    @sljun said:

    @brueggus said:

    @sljun said: please check router bad??

    Hello, please restart your router and try again. Thank you!

    VirMach‘s router or superordinate was some problem,not mine.This is a very serious and bad problem!！

    Ryzen migrate button is back and we have a lot of space in Los Angeles available. You may potentially use it if it appears for you.

    107.173.255.14,107.173.140.151,i have 200+Value+ LITE vps all was los angeles node,
    packet loss about 10minutes every time, 3-4 time in one day, not my problem， i was tested it form onther many los angeles data center,never before like this, please check it why???? this has brought me a lot of trouble!!!

    If you want to create a very very thorough ticket with lots of evidence of this, I can forward it to ColoCrossing for you but I can't promise any resolution based on how they've previously treated the situation.

    Of course it's also possible that it's abuse but I already cleaned this up so if there's further abuse then I'd need actual details so I know which nodes to look at, as in you can't just claim it's literally all of Los Angeles because I've already checked and it's not. These are spread out across multiple cabinets and network equipment.

    the problem still exist，please help me report to colocrossing or cogentco thx!

    @VirMach please report to colocrossing check this node：colocrossing-ic317205-las-b24.ip.twelve99-cust.net， or tell me need provide any thing? i have 300+ vps on your websit, if this problem can't fix,then i can only choose others.

  • haynhathaynhat Member

    @VirMach said:
    Just picked up some of these, 1.4M IOPS, SKHynix controller. We ran out of Gen4 drives since so many of them were XPG, and I discovered we had 10-20 additional 5950X in storage. Any votes for where they should go?

    Tokyo Tokyo!

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @sljun said:

    @sljun said:

    @sljun said:

    @VirMach said:

    @sljun said:

    @VirMach said:

    @sljun said:

    @brueggus said:

    @sljun said: please check router bad??

    Hello, please restart your router and try again. Thank you!

    VirMach‘s router or superordinate was some problem,not mine.This is a very serious and bad problem!！

    Ryzen migrate button is back and we have a lot of space in Los Angeles available. You may potentially use it if it appears for you.

    107.173.255.14,107.173.140.151,i have 200+Value+ LITE vps all was los angeles node,
    packet loss about 10minutes every time, 3-4 time in one day, not my problem， i was tested it form onther many los angeles data center,never before like this, please check it why???? this has brought me a lot of trouble!!!

    If you want to create a very very thorough ticket with lots of evidence of this, I can forward it to ColoCrossing for you but I can't promise any resolution based on how they've previously treated the situation.

    Of course it's also possible that it's abuse but I already cleaned this up so if there's further abuse then I'd need actual details so I know which nodes to look at, as in you can't just claim it's literally all of Los Angeles because I've already checked and it's not. These are spread out across multiple cabinets and network equipment.

    the problem still exist，please help me report to colocrossing or cogentco thx!

    @VirMach please report to colocrossing check this node：colocrossing-ic317205-las-b24.ip.twelve99-cust.net， or tell me need provide any thing? i have 300+ vps on your websit, if this problem can't fix,then i can only choose others.

    Still awaiting for you to follow my initial instructions, none of which included posting those screenshots here on this thread. I need more information than that, in a ticket.

  • CalypsoCalypso Member

    @Rockster said:
    Can you do some ping tests to see if everything look normal from your side, please? I am getting some strange spikes.

    Nah, those are not spikes...

    From a few hours of pinging to the default gateway on AMSD029:

    0.923805% packet loss, rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.509/48.337/5368.269/178.051 ms

    Still figuring out if the outages I see from my monitoring system are on top of the packet loss to the default GW, or the same ones.

    Since this behaviour apparantly is on many more nodes in different DCs, I'm just keeping an eye on it to see if/when it is solved...

  • ProxecureProxecure Barred

    @VirMach

    Any update regarding 8gb ram offer?

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @Calypso said:

    @Rockster said:
    Can you do some ping tests to see if everything look normal from your side, please? I am getting some strange spikes.

    Nah, those are not spikes...

    From a few hours of pinging to the default gateway on AMSD029:

    0.923805% packet loss, rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.509/48.337/5368.269/178.051 ms

    Still figuring out if the outages I see from my monitoring system are on top of the packet loss to the default GW, or the same ones.

    Since this behaviour apparantly is on many more nodes in different DCs, I'm just keeping an eye on it to see if/when it is solved...

    That last bit of networking issue is most likely related to VLAN size as people have discussed in the past. We already started setting up new nodes a few weeks ago in most locations to be more separated and we're coming up with a plan to separate them. Unfortunately I don't really have any more information that for you at this stage.

    The majority of it though was unrelated so when we were fixing the initial problems it was mainly the NIC configuration and use cases in locations where there's heavy packets.

    Thanked by 3Calypso lemoncube lowendclient
  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @Proxecure said:

    @VirMach

    Any update regarding 8gb ram offer?

    We cancelled plans for the next LET offer but I can generate it for you specifically if you're still interested, just reply back with your email on the DM chain we already have right now.

This discussion has been closed.