New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
So, fwiw: I ordered a service during the first time frame and it was provisioned within 8 hours. Later I opened a ticket to enable IPv6 which was responded to after 8 minutes.
I'm pretty happy with their support and their performance.
Nice. I didn't have the same experience like you sadly.
Already had a servers with them & yet purchased another Storage box 😍.
Thanx @Abdullah
If the client wasn't my wife most likely I would've been less cheerful lol. Actually, the website still runs fast thanks to Redis and FastCGI caches. Not able to create a backup snapshot to use it in staging environment though, it gets stuck.
Sent you a PM with ticket number, thank you.
I'm following this thread so was aware of what is going on. So, I didn't create dozens of useless tickets. In my ticket I did include bench.sh results.
Edit/ update: Hosthatch replied to the ticket (@ 3 hrs, which is good), and confirmed the below results are due to the faulty node which they will replace.
Results from nench.test I ran this morning (Chicago 0.5 GB NVME plan, Debian 9 upgraded to Debian 10 --> took 1.5 hrs btw) have raised ticket
Sept 26th
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 87.9 us / 13.2 ms / 60.6 ms / 23.2 ms
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 300 requests in 5.04 s, 75 MiB, 59 iops, 14.9 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 477.79 MiB/s
2nd run: 495.91 MiB/s
3rd run: 483.51 MiB/s
average: 485.74 MiB/s
To compare and contrast,
Results from Sept 13th test, same setup
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 69.9 us / 121.3 us / 7.69 ms / 89.1 us
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 15.8 k requests in 5.00 s, 3.85 GiB, 3.15 k iops, 788.7 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 738.14 MiB/s
2nd run: 953.67 MiB/s
3rd run: 673.29 MiB/s
average: 788.37 MiB/s
results from dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
Sept 26th
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 4.09257 s, 262 MB/s
Sept 14th:
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 1.49644 s, 718 MB/s
Looking forward to picking up another 1-3TB in November.
These are very well-tuned storage arrays for sequential writes (rsync of large VM backups.)
The same Chicago 0.5 GB NVME plan, Debian 9 upgraded to Debian 10 --> took 2 hrs.
The normal condition is 10 to 20 minutes. And the vps of other provider only take 10 minutes.
True that.
As I mentioned in the "Edit/update" waiting HH to change things on their end.Update: received their mail about the hardware change.
“ Starting on Thursday, 3rd October - we will start migrating all VMs on this node to our other nodes in Chicago. On average, it takes about 4 minutes of downtime and a reboot to migrate a VM with a disk size of 20 GB. It may take more or less time depending on your disk size”
My server hasn't been provisioned yet either (Chicago). They first promised me an ETA of Sep 22 or 23, but that came and went. When I asked them about it, I was offered a refund.
On a brighter note, their IPV6 and RDNS appear to be working in both Chicago and London DC
My Chicago VPS from this offer still hasn't been provisioned...
Hiya Abdullah,
i need
2vcpu
4gb
40 GB NVMe disk
1TB Storage block
10 TB premium bandwidth
1gbps port
any location
possible ? $80 per year
We provisioned everything last week. Can you please PM me your ticket #?
We don't have anything that will match your requirements (we don't mix NVMe and normal storage)
Can you check the ticket #842438 ? I was one of the early birds that made order 4 weeks ago and receive nothing till now!
okay, anything you've without block storage .!? this was mean for file hosting. within 1 instance,
i can open to use 2nd instance for file storage.
Try LetBox @key900
Just sent you a PM. My ticket was marked as closed, but I don't show any active server in my account.
Disk performance is very poor after the transfer from the defected node (2 months waiting with poor io)
400+MB/sec? What were you expecting?! You are fine.
Thanks! but it was 900+ NVMe plan, this one looks like SSD
NVMe is not about fulfilling your sequential I/O dreams on a dd test.
For me the disk I/O is very good, it seems the times when you had 3-4MB/s because of an oversold box are gone.
Hiya @Abdulah ,
can this plan be realistic for me.
2 CPU core (50% dedicated)
4 GB RAM
50 GB NVMe disk (RAID-10)
4 TB bandwidth
1gbp port
Free 40 Gbps DDoS protection.
$60 per year - possible !??
Is the current offer available? I'd like to place an order.
Seriously? Did you read the post? Offer expired almost 20 days ago..
He's on delayed timescale.
Reading is hard.
Hi, The last benchmark at Chicago NVMe (Migrated from defected one)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest Monster v.1.4.5 2019-10-13
Region: USA https://bench.monster/speedtest.html
Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit)
Virt/Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
CPU Cores : 1 @ 2999.998 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache
CPU Flags : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Disabled
Load Average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
Total Space : 16G (6.2G ~42% used)
Total RAM : 417 MB / 990 MB (388 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 547 MB / 1023 MB
Uptime : 14 days 1:59
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASN & ISP : AS40676, Cogent Communications
Organization : Psychz Networks
Location : Los Angeles, United States / US
Region : California
---------------------------------------------------------------------------