New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Sure, email me your server specs of what you had and we can do two months free. @mrgeneral
@MrGeneral
At least, you get a server. I do not even get the chance to test the network. Get stuck in order issues -_-'
That's fine. I would love to launch a new trial with no intentions to further renewal so LET members can vouch for the network performance with telia's link. If that is OK with @jbiloh.
Note that I won't be launching a new business, simply providing a temporary server. It would only happen in the event of several people willing to renew.
David! I'll give out a trial KVM! Or OpenVZ
Lol, I prefer to stay away of this company now. Learn my lesson. But thanks anyway!
That is a good move to do. Glad to see that.
Email me at [email protected] and we'll get that sorted @mrgeneral.
Congrats for the new carrier, that's really awesome!
Yeah, fuck off.
Hi @fredqc what was that test taken from?
Dedicated server in Buffalo.
Ok thanks for the information!
In fact, I have this server for 10 days now and no one can resolve the speed issue.
Thank you for your generousity, I'll be emailing you shortly! :-)
The cause for this is because i3d.net uses Hibernia and we use Hibernia and the path between our facilities must be congested some where. Possibly on i3d.net's side or within the Hibernia network.
From i3d to us:
1 17 ms <1 ms <1 ms 30ge.ar0-cr1.nikhef.ams.i3d.net [109.200.218.85]
2 51 ms <1 ms <1 ms eth7-1.edge1.ams5.nl.atrato.net [80.249.209.229]
3 * * * ?
4 95 ms <1 ms <1 ms eth7-1.core1.lon1.uk.as5580.net [78.152.44.238]
5 * * * ?
6 * * * ?
7 130 ms <1 ms <1 ms eth1-1.edge1.buf1.us.as5580.net [78.152.45.216]
8 136 ms <1 ms <1 ms 78.152.61.31
9 124 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.8.25.198
10 94 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.8.43.10
11 96 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.8.30.154
12 94 ms <1 ms <1 ms lg.buf.colocrossing.com [198.12.127.26]
From us to i3d:
1 10.8.6.89 (10.8.6.89) 0.930 ms 1.503 ms 1.482 ms
2 10.8.30.153 (10.8.30.153) 0.652 ms 0.683 ms 0.664 ms
3 10.8.43.13 (10.8.43.13) 0.158 ms 0.180 ms 0.158 ms
4 10.8.40.221 (10.8.40.221) 0.187 ms 0.208 ms 0.234 ms
5 78.152.61.30 (78.152.61.30) 0.579 ms 0.740 ms 0.713 ms
6 eth6-1.core1.nyc4.us.as5580.net (78.152.45.217) 8.322 ms 8.235 ms 8.201 ms
7 eth1-5.core1.lon2.uk.as5580.net (80.94.64.135) 87.130 ms 87.127 ms 87.154 ms
8 eth1-1.core1.lon1.uk.as5580.net (78.152.44.99) 87.224 ms * *
9 ae0.edge1.lon1.uk.as5580.net (78.152.34.149) 87.410 ms 87.269 ms 87.441 ms
10 20ge.linx-jnpr.th-n.i3d.net (195.66.225.146) 94.020 ms 87.596 ms 93.904 ms
11 20ge.cr1-lr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net (109.200.218.173) 95.077 ms 95.071 ms 95.487 ms
I'll ping Hibernia on this and see what they come back with.
@jbiloh The speed is very inconsistent
Downloading a file from Incero in NY
First time: 139,405,569 92.2M/s in 1.4s
Second time: 139,405,569 7.9M/s in 22s
Does Incero have a looking glass?
Not sure, however: http://mirror.incero.com/
You should be able to run some speedtests there, traceroute's and such.
Edit: Another one http://10gseattle.incero.com/
Edit 2: From wable.com:
Thank you for improving the bandwidth quality in Buffalo, there is a noticeable difference from before.
Unfortunately Chicago still kicks Buffalo's ass for throughput, I can burst full gigabit on upload and download to most locations. Chicago:
And again downloading some ISO, top one is Chicago
You should provide a traceroute so we can see if the same route (provider/bgp) is used.
this is good news for me since i am/on using Telia, so its time to notice coloxing resellers carefully. best wishs to you.
I'm tired
Go CC
Huho, lets see if that will make some difference. I was very sad to see my 2 HVH dedis deployed in Bufallo last week due to Bufallo's network.
Will test network again from laptop
Will test network again from laptop
Let us know what you think now that Telia has been added!
Seeing much improved routing to my OVH servers in RBX!
Thanks ColoCrossing
Dacentec to CC
OVH Beauharnois to CC
Hetzner to CC
Incero NY to CC
Looks pretty good!
We're eager to hear feedback. Let us know how things look guys!
From CC's Buffalo looking glass:
HOST: lg.buf.colocrossing.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 10.8.6.89 0.0% 10 1.1 7.8 0.8 59.2 18.3
2. 10.8.17.209 0.0% 10 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.1
3. 10.8.43.5 0.0% 10 0.3 3.1 0.2 20.6 6.6
4. 10.8.32.57 0.0% 10 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.1
5. buf-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.1
6. nyk-bb1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 10.0 14.5 9.9 49.0 12.3
7. nyk-b6-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 10.5 10.6 10.5 10.8 0.1
8. 64.125.13.17 0.0% 10 9.3 9.5 9.2 9.9 0.2
9. ae2.cr1.lga5.us.zip.zayo.com 0.0% 10 37.2 17.7 9.5 37.8 13.0
10. v111.ae29.cr1.dfw2.us.zip.zayo.com 0.0% 10 123.0 124.3 122.9 135.2 3.8
11. ae11.er1.dfw2.us.zip.zayo.com 0.0% 10 119.3 119.2 119.0 119.7 0.3
12. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
13. bc2-side-from-r1.inceronetwork.com 0.0% 10 79.0 79.2 78.7 80.8 0.6
14. 107-155-66-250-customer-incero.com 10.0% 10 78.3 78.5 78.3 79.2 0.3
I remember Incero to CC being much better in the past, my backup server is in Buffalo
CC Chicago:
HOST: lg.chi.colocrossing.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 10.1.3.1 0.0% 10 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.1
2. 10ge-1.fz146.chi1.colocrossing.com 0.0% 10 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.1
3. ae7-384.chi12.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 10 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.1
4. xe-7-0-1.dal33.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 10 28.4 28.2 28.1 28.4 0.1
5. gtt-gw.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 10 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.2 0.1
6. as54540.ae15.cr2.dfw1.us.as4436.gtt.net 0.0% 10 29.0 29.1 29.0 29.3 0.1
7. bc2-side-from-r1.inceronetwork.com 0.0% 10 29.2 29.3 29.2 29.6 0.1
8. 107-155-66-250-customer-incero.com 0.0% 10 29.4 29.5 29.4 29.8 0.1
Ramnode NYC looking glass:
HOST: lg Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.|-- ae2-145.nyc38.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0
3.|-- xe-9-1-6.dal33.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 4 40.7 41.5 40.6 43.8 1.3
4.|-- gtt-gw.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 4 40.6 40.7 40.6 40.7 0.0
5.|-- as54540.ae15.cr2.dfw1.us.as4436.gtt.net 0.0% 4 40.9 40.9 40.8 41.0 0.0
6.|-- bc2-side-from-r1.inceronetwork.com 0.0% 4 41.4 41.8 41.3 43.2 0.6
7.|-- 107-155-66-250-customer-incero.com 0.0% 4 40.9 40.9 40.9 41.0 0.0
What's the reverse route look like from Incero to us in Buffalo?
traceroute to 198.12.127.26 (198.12.127.26), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.211.63.5 (192.211.63.5) 2.251 ms 1.295 ms 2.221 ms
2 198.47.104.73 (198.47.104.73) 3.766 ms 1.645 ms 1.035 ms
3 69.31.63.184 (69.31.63.184) 1.392 ms 1.485 ms 1.717 ms
4 173.241.130.137 (173.241.130.137) 2.867 ms 2.543 ms 1.689 ms
5 213.248.81.73 (213.248.81.73) 1.506 ms 1.285 ms 1.389 ms
6 80.91.248.208 (80.91.248.208) 61.676 ms 60.290 ms 59.924 ms
7 62.115.141.184 (62.115.141.184) 78.888 ms 62.115.141.182 (62.115.141.182) 78.788 ms 79.553 ms
8 62.115.59.90 (62.115.59.90) 78.557 ms 62.115.59.98 (62.115.59.98) 80.660 ms 62.115.59.90 (62.115.59.90) 80.517 ms
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 198.12.127.26 (198.12.127.26) 79.959 ms 79.437 ms 80.406 ms
Can't get mtr or dns working, grr...