Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › ColoCrossing adds Telia in Buffalo - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ColoCrossing adds Telia in Buffalo

135

Comments

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    My ISP uses cogent, so mine goes MTY - COGENT - GTT - COLOCROSSING

    That's why I have good ping

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    linuxthefish said: Can't get mtr or dns working, grr...

    If you're able to let me know the rdns entries really help.

  • mike0000mike0000 Member

    @jbiloh said:
    What's the reverse route look like from Incero to us in Buffalo?

    HOST: dallas                      Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 107.155.x.x                0.0%    10    2.0   2.7   2.0   6.7   1.4
  2.|-- r1-side-from-bc1.incerone  0.0%    10    0.2   2.0   0.2  17.2   5.4
  3.|-- ae15.cr2.dfw1.us.as4436.g  0.0%    10    0.7   0.7   0.7   0.8   0.0
  4.|-- ae1-70g.cr1.dfw1.us.as443  0.0%    10    0.8   6.7   0.8  38.4  12.1
  5.|-- ae9-207.dal33.ip4.gtt.net  0.0%    10    1.1   1.2   0.8   1.9   0.4
  6.|-- dls-b21-link.telia.net     0.0%    10    0.8   0.8   0.8   0.9   0.1
  7.|-- chi-b21-link.telia.net     0.0%    10   59.4  59.4  59.0  61.5   0.8
  8.|-- buf-b1-link.telia.net      0.0%    10   77.9  78.1  77.8  79.9   0.6
  9.|-- colocrossing-ic-314282-bu  0.0%    10   78.2  78.1  78.0  78.2   0.0
 10.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 11.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 12.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 13.|-- lg.buf.colocrossing.com   10.0%    10   78.4  78.4  78.2  78.6   0.1
    HOST: seattle                     Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 23-227-xxx-xxx-customer-i  0.0%    10    1.0   1.7   1.0   7.0   1.9
  2.|-- 107.155.127.1              0.0%    10    0.4   1.5   0.4   7.0   2.4
  3.|-- 63.141.218.141             0.0%    10    0.5   2.8   0.4  22.9   7.1
  4.|-- ae2-101.sea22.ip4.gtt.net  0.0%    10    0.5   0.5   0.5   0.5   0.0
  5.|-- xe-8-1-0.sjc10.ip4.gtt.ne  0.0%    10   20.8  21.0  20.8  21.8   0.4
  6.|-- as1299.ip4.gtt.net         0.0%    10   21.7  21.1  20.3  24.7   1.4
  7.|-- nyk-bb1-link.telia.net     0.0%    10   75.5  78.7  75.3 105.2   9.3
  8.|-- buf-b1-link.telia.net      0.0%    10   85.3  85.4  85.1  85.7   0.2
  9.|-- colocrossing-ic-314282-bu 10.0%    10   85.4  86.7  85.1  96.3   3.6
 10.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 11.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 12.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 13.|-- lg.buf.colocrossing.com   10.0%    10   85.3  85.4  85.2  85.8   0.2
    Thanked by 1linuxthefish
  • FredQcFredQc Member

    @jbiloh I think the internet speeds in Buffalo are generally better now. But there is still some flaws :

    [root@qp ~]# mtr -rw 192.227.*.*
HOST: qp                              Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. 104.247.212.*                        0.0%    10    0.3   2.0   0.3   8.6   3.0
  2. 78.152.60.30                           0.0%    10    0.6   1.5   0.5   8.8   2.6
  3. ???                                   100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
  4. eth1-8.core1.chi1.us.as5580.net        0.0%    10   39.2  45.5  39.2  50.7   3.8
  5. eth1-2.edge1.tor1.ca.as5580.net       70.0%    10   68.7  67.2  62.7  70.3   4.0
  6. eth1-3.edge1.buf1.us.as5580.net        0.0%    10   45.4  45.9  45.4  48.4   1.0
  7. 78.152.57.87                           0.0%    10   45.6  48.6  45.6  73.2   8.6
  8. 10.8.25.142                            0.0%    10   45.4  48.2  45.4  72.1   8.4
  9. 10.8.43.14                             0.0%    10   46.0  46.1  45.9  46.4   0.2
 10. 10.8.32.94                             0.0%    10   46.2  46.4  46.0  47.7   0.5
 11. *-host.colocrossing.com  0.0%    10   45.8  45.8  45.7  45.9   0.0
 12. *-host.colocrossing.com  0.0%    10   45.7  45.6  45.5  45.7   0.0
[root@qp ~]#

    That's the route from QP Atlanta to CC Buffalo

    Why does it goes thru Toronto ? On top of that, 70% packet loss here...

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Speeds to i3d.net have been fixed. They have a broken session to Hibernia which was causing the slow speeds on their end.

    I'll look into Quick Packet now.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    @FredQc Colo@ in Atlanta is a customer of Hibernia just as we are. So the traffic is preferred over Hibernia. Here is the route from us to Colo@ / QP:

    HOST: lg.buf.colocrossing.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1. 10.8.6.89 0.0% 10 0.9 1.6 0.9 5.5 1.4
    2. 10.8.17.209 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.2
    3. 10.8.43.5 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1
    4. 10.8.25.197 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0
    5. 78.152.57.110 0.0% 10 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.1
    6. eth6-1.core1.nyc4.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 10.2 11.6 8.2 20.0 4.9
    7. eth1-1.core2.nyc1.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 9.0 9.1 8.9 9.7 0.2
    8. eth3-1.core1.ash2.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 33.0 33.2 32.8 35.0 0.7
    9. eth4-3.r1.atl1.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 45.5 45.4 45.4 45.5 0.0
    10. coloat-as46562-gw.r1.atl1.us.atrato.net 0.0% 10 36.4 31.1 28.8 37.6 3.6
    11. xePO1.dist-ab.atl03.coloat.com 0.0% 10 28.9 36.5 27.9 108.0 25.1
    12. 104.247.212.1 0.0% 10 53.7 50.6 45.8 71.0 7.7

    Can you do a download speed test on this please? http://lg.buf.colocrossing.com/100MB.test

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    @jbiloh said:
    FredQc Colo@ in Atlanta is a customer of Hibernia just as we are. So the traffic is preferred over Hibernia. Here is the route from us to Colo@ / QP:

    HOST: lg.buf.colocrossing.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1. 10.8.6.89 0.0% 10 0.9 1.6 0.9 5.5 1.4
    2. 10.8.17.209 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.2
    3. 10.8.43.5 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1
    4. 10.8.25.197 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0
    5. 78.152.57.110 0.0% 10 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.1
    6. eth6-1.core1.nyc4.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 10.2 11.6 8.2 20.0 4.9
    7. eth1-1.core2.nyc1.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 9.0 9.1 8.9 9.7 0.2
    8. eth3-1.core1.ash2.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 33.0 33.2 32.8 35.0 0.7
    9. eth4-3.r1.atl1.us.as5580.net 0.0% 10 45.5 45.4 45.4 45.5 0.0
    10. coloat-as46562-gw.r1.atl1.us.atrato.net 0.0% 10 36.4 31.1 28.8 37.6 3.6
    11. xePO1.dist-ab.atl03.coloat.com 0.0% 10 28.9 36.5 27.9 108.0 25.1
    12. 104.247.212.1 0.0% 10 53.7 50.6 45.8 71.0 7.7

    Can you do a download speed test on this please? http://lg.buf.colocrossing.com/100MB.test

    [root@qp ~]# wget http://lg.buf.colocrossing.com/100MB.test
--2015-09-24 18:29:17--  http://lg.buf.colocrossing.com/100MB.test
Resolving lg.buf.colocrossing.com... 198.12.127.26
Connecting to lg.buf.colocrossing.com|198.12.127.26|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 100MB.test

100%[=============================================================================================================================>] 100,000,000 6.90M/s   in 13s     

2015-09-24 18:29:30 (7.32 MB/s) - 100MB.test saved [100000000/100000000]
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Looks pretty good. But yes I agree the route shouldn't go TOR-CHI.

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep

    jbiloh said: Colo@ in Atlanta is a customer of Hibernia just as we are. So the traffic is preferred over Hibernia. Here is the route from us to Colo@ / QP:

    QuickPacket is a direct customer of Hibernia through the end of the month, then we're dropping them from our mix. We've already turned down the inbound routes from Hibernia because of the issues and are using them for select outbound routes only. We are turning up PCCW to replace them, and likely one other carrier (to be determined).

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    qps said: QuickPacket is a direct customer of Hibernia through the end of the month, then we're dropping them from our mix. We've already turned down the inbound routes from Hibernia because of the issues and are using them for select outbound routes only. We are turning up PCCW to replace them, and likely one other carrier (to be determined).

    What carriers are in your network currently?

  • mike0000mike0000 Member

    @jbiloh said:
    What carriers are in your network currently?

    I think they're primarily Hibernia, Cogent & HE. At least those are the 3 routes I see the most

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep

    jbiloh said: What carriers are in your network currently?

    In Atlanta, we use Cogent, Hibernia, and the TSS mix (which includes Zayo, GTT, Cogent, Hibernia, and AtlantaIX peering). PCCW will hopefully be online next week. PCCW is having delays in sourcing the proper DWDM optics from their vendor, which has resulted in significant delays in turning up our connections.

    Thanked by 1linuxthefish
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Neat, congrats on your network expansion. :)

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    @jbiloh route to incero is back to normal now ty!

  • hawchawc Moderator, LIR

    100ms from CC Buffalo to Virgin Media in the UK via as5580.net which I think is Hibernia Networks. Not bad. The other way leaves a lot to be desired tho... (Mainly fart arseing around Liberty Global in Austria)

  • WilliamWilliam Member

    hawc said: Mainly fart arseing around Liberty Global in Austria

    That's what you get for using UPC...

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @linuxthefish said:
    jbiloh route to incero is back to normal now ty!

    Glad to hear it!

  • hawchawc Moderator, LIR

    @Jbiloh What is going on with the network tonight? Really really slow.

    Already got a ticket open with HVH about it.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Nothing going on I can see.

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    @jbiloh said:
    Nothing going on I can see.

    Looks like it is saturated? I'm willing to work this out with your NOC team.

    Download speed from CacheFly: 83.5MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1.85MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 1.34MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.81MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 924KB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 283KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 2.77MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 20.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 78.4KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 226KB/s
I/O speed :  459 MB/s

    Any idea, @jbiloh?

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    i can also confirm that network sucks at the moment. actually almost unusable to some destinations:

    [root@bs-buff1 tmp]# wget http://wa-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin
--2015-09-25 18:05:59-- http://wa-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin
Resolving wa-us-ping.vultr.com... 108.61.194.105
Connecting to wa-us-ping.vultr.com|108.61.194.105|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “vultr.com.100MB.bin”

100%[=====================================>] 104,857,600 1.10M/s in 32s


[root@bs-buff1 tmp]# wget http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mb.dat
--2015-09-25 18:11:03-- http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mb.dat
Resolving proof.ovh.net... 188.165.12.106, 2001:41d0:2:876a::1
Connecting to proof.ovh.net|188.165.12.106|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 12500000 (12M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100Mb.dat.1”

100%[=====================================>] 12,500,000 771K/s in 14s

2015-09-25 18:11:18 (847 KB/s) - “100Mb.dat.1” saved [12500000/12500000]
  • angrysnarlangrysnarl Member

    I had to cancel my Buffalo server with @drserver due to the horrible network. I currently have a couple of servers with dediserve and my Buffalo server has the worst network. I'd be happy if CC Buffalo were as decent as CC Chicago or Dallas. Please do something about it!

  • hawchawc Moderator, LIR

    HVH have escalated it up to Engineering for me. My server and network was awesome before this.

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    @angrysnarl said: I had to cancel my Buffalo server with @drserver due to the horrible network. I currently have a couple of servers with dediserve and my Buffalo server has the worst network. I'd be happy if CC Buffalo were as decent as CC Chicago or Dallas. Please do something about it!

    Lots of customers are affected, we are loosing pretty badly...

  • 28Tom28Tom Member

    Just as I need to transfer around 500GB down to Miami their network does this :(

  • hawchawc Moderator, LIR

    @Ernie - Can you please try and find out what is going on. 12+ hours now and getting slightly fed up

  • ErnieErnie Patron Provider, Veteran

    @hawc said:
    Ernie - Can you please try and find out what is going on. 12+ hours now and getting slightly fed up

    Sure can you just PM me your ticket id?

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    Jon replied to my ticket @ CC portal.

    It seems Hibernia is having issues, and he's in touch with the Senior Network Staff to fix this for once. The communication between me and CC has been great.

    I can't resist to comment something further:

    • I have a server from CC that had issues with the NIC. CC staff worked on it all night.
      Ryan, Nicholas and Zack. I must say that their support is top noutch. The only bad thing I see on CC, is definitely the network. I've never seen it performing it well, and I am being very honest.

    Let's see how it goes, at least they're putting all their effort to solve this matter.

    Anyway, kudos for @ CC team.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    The specific destinations where the speeds are slow is because Softlayer, Colo@, etc, utilize Hibernia just as we do, and there seems to be some slowness in their network right now. I am discussing this with their senior management currently and feel pretty confident that the issue will get resolved this week.

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep
    edited September 2015

    @jbiloh said: The specific destinations where the speeds are slow is because Softlayer, Colo@, etc, utilize Hibernia just as we do, and there seems to be some slowness in their network right now. I am discussing this with their senior management currently and feel pretty confident that the issue will get resolved this week.

    We are having issues with almost every endpoint that we try. Try for example vultr test.
    I am having terrible speeds. @MrGeneral, can you download vultr test file and paste report here, to be sure that my servers are not only ones that are affected

Sign In or Register to comment.