Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › ColoCrossing adds Telia in Buffalo - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ColoCrossing adds Telia in Buffalo

245

Comments

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Sure, email me your server specs of what you had and we can do two months free. @mrgeneral

    Thanked by 2MikePT iKeyZ
  • gestiondbigestiondbi Member, Patron Provider

    @MrGeneral

    At least, you get a server. I do not even get the chance to test the network. Get stuck in order issues -_-'

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    That's fine. I would love to launch a new trial with no intentions to further renewal so LET members can vouch for the network performance with telia's link. If that is OK with @jbiloh.
    Note that I won't be launching a new business, simply providing a temporary server. It would only happen in the event of several people willing to renew.

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @davidgestiondbi said:
    MrGeneral

    At least, you get a server. I do not even get the chance to test the network. Get stuck in order issues -_-'

    David! I'll give out a trial KVM! Or OpenVZ :p

    Thanked by 1gestiondbi
  • gestiondbigestiondbi Member, Patron Provider

    @MrGeneral said:
    David! I'll give out a trial KVM! Or OpenVZ :p

    Lol, I prefer to stay away of this company now. Learn my lesson. But thanks anyway! :)

    jbiloh said: Sure, email me your server specs of what you had and we can do two months free. @mrgeneral

    That is a good move to do. Glad to see that.

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Email me at [email protected] and we'll get that sorted @mrgeneral.

    Thanked by 2inthecloudblog MikePT
  • FredQcFredQc Member

    Congrats for the new carrier, that's really awesome!

    Download speed from CacheFly: 87.4MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 970KB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 27.0MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.36MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 675KB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 2.85MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.97MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 2.08MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 1.32MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 24.1MB/s

    Yeah, fuck off.

    Thanked by 1angrysnarl
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Hi @fredqc what was that test taken from?

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    @jbiloh said:
    Hi fredqc what was that test taken from?

    Dedicated server in Buffalo.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Ok thanks for the information! :)

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    In fact, I have this server for 10 days now and no one can resolve the speed issue.

    Thanked by 1inthecloudblog
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @jbiloh said:
    Email me at [email protected] and we'll get that sorted mrgeneral.

    Thank you for your generousity, I'll be emailing you shortly! :-)

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    FredQc said: Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 675KB/s

    The cause for this is because i3d.net uses Hibernia and we use Hibernia and the path between our facilities must be congested some where. Possibly on i3d.net's side or within the Hibernia network.

    From i3d to us:
    1 17 ms <1 ms <1 ms 30ge.ar0-cr1.nikhef.ams.i3d.net [109.200.218.85]
    2 51 ms <1 ms <1 ms eth7-1.edge1.ams5.nl.atrato.net [80.249.209.229]
    3 * * * ?
    4 95 ms <1 ms <1 ms eth7-1.core1.lon1.uk.as5580.net [78.152.44.238]
    5 * * * ?
    6 * * * ?
    7 130 ms <1 ms <1 ms eth1-1.edge1.buf1.us.as5580.net [78.152.45.216]
    8 136 ms <1 ms <1 ms 78.152.61.31
    9 124 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.8.25.198
    10 94 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.8.43.10
    11 96 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.8.30.154
    12 94 ms <1 ms <1 ms lg.buf.colocrossing.com [198.12.127.26]

    From us to i3d:
    1 10.8.6.89 (10.8.6.89) 0.930 ms 1.503 ms 1.482 ms
    2 10.8.30.153 (10.8.30.153) 0.652 ms 0.683 ms 0.664 ms
    3 10.8.43.13 (10.8.43.13) 0.158 ms 0.180 ms 0.158 ms
    4 10.8.40.221 (10.8.40.221) 0.187 ms 0.208 ms 0.234 ms
    5 78.152.61.30 (78.152.61.30) 0.579 ms 0.740 ms 0.713 ms
    6 eth6-1.core1.nyc4.us.as5580.net (78.152.45.217) 8.322 ms 8.235 ms 8.201 ms
    7 eth1-5.core1.lon2.uk.as5580.net (80.94.64.135) 87.130 ms 87.127 ms 87.154 ms
    8 eth1-1.core1.lon1.uk.as5580.net (78.152.44.99) 87.224 ms * *
    9 ae0.edge1.lon1.uk.as5580.net (78.152.34.149) 87.410 ms 87.269 ms 87.441 ms
    10 20ge.linx-jnpr.th-n.i3d.net (195.66.225.146) 94.020 ms 87.596 ms 93.904 ms
    11 20ge.cr1-lr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net (109.200.218.173) 95.077 ms 95.071 ms 95.487 ms

    I'll ping Hibernia on this and see what they come back with.

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    @jbiloh The speed is very inconsistent

    Downloading a file from Incero in NY

    First time: 139,405,569 92.2M/s in 1.4s

    Second time: 139,405,569 7.9M/s in 22s

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Does Incero have a looking glass?

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    @jbiloh said:
    Our network in Buffalo consists of Telia, XO Communications, Zayo and Hibernia.

    :(

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    @jbiloh said:
    Does Incero have a looking glass?

    Not sure, however: http://mirror.incero.com/

    You should be able to run some speedtests there, traceroute's and such.

    Edit: Another one http://10gseattle.incero.com/
    Edit 2: From wable.com:

    23.92.71.1 New York City (ping rate limited to 1/second)
107.155.106.1 Seattle (ping rate limited to 1/second)
107.155.103.1 Dallas (ping rate limited to 1/second)
  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member
    edited September 2015

    Thank you for improving the bandwidth quality in Buffalo, there is a noticeable difference from before.

    Unfortunately Chicago still kicks Buffalo's ass for throughput, I can burst full gigabit on upload and download to most locations. Chicago:

    And again downloading some ISO, top one is Chicago :(

  • telephonetelephone Member

    @linuxthefish said:
    Thank you for improving the bandwidth quality in Buffalo, there is a noticeable difference from before.

    You should provide a traceroute so we can see if the same route (provider/bgp) is used.

  • ehabehab Member
    edited September 2015

    this is good news for me since i am/on using Telia, so its time to notice coloxing resellers carefully. best wishs to you.

  • DerekDerek Member
    edited September 2015

    I'm tired

    Go CC

  • SadySady Member

    Huho, lets see if that will make some difference. I was very sad to see my 2 HVH dedis deployed in Bufallo last week due to Bufallo's network.
    Will test network again from laptop :)

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Sady said: Huho, lets see if that will make some difference. I was very sad to see my 2 HVH dedis deployed in Bufallo last week due to Bufallo's network.

    Will test network again from laptop :)

    Let us know what you think now that Telia has been added!

  • hawchawc Moderator, LIR

    Seeing much improved routing to my OVH servers in RBX!

    Thanks ColoCrossing

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    Dacentec to CC

     9  colocrossing-ic-314283-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.98)  26.976 ms colocrossing-ic-314281-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.90)  26.765 ms colocrossing-ic-314283-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.98)  26.864 ms
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  cc.server  26.964 ms  26.868 ms  26.856 ms

    OVH Beauharnois to CC

    11  eth1-3.edge1.buf1.us.as5580.net (78.152.45.218)  59.378 ms 78.152.57.111 (78.152.57.111)  55.239 ms 78.152.60.49 (78.152.60.49)  55.335 ms
12  78.152.57.87 (78.152.57.87)  63.786 ms * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  cc.server  55.261 ms *  55.489 ms

    Hetzner to CC

     8  colocrossing-ic-314283-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.98)  93.904 ms  93.943 ms  96.715 ms
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  cc.server  93.530 ms  96.357 ms  98.283 ms

    Incero NY to CC

     6  colocrossing-ic-314283-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.98)  9.792 ms colocrossing-ic-314281-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.90)  10.578 ms colocrossing-ic-314283-buf-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.59.98)  17.213 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  cc.server   10.381 ms  10.315 ms  10.106 ms
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Looks pretty good!

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    We're eager to hear feedback. Let us know how things look guys!

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    @telephone said:
    You should provide a traceroute so we can see if the same route (provider/bgp) is used.

    From CC's Buffalo looking glass:

    HOST: lg.buf.colocrossing.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1. 10.8.6.89 0.0% 10 1.1 7.8 0.8 59.2 18.3
    2. 10.8.17.209 0.0% 10 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.1
    3. 10.8.43.5 0.0% 10 0.3 3.1 0.2 20.6 6.6
    4. 10.8.32.57 0.0% 10 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.1
    5. buf-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.1
    6. nyk-bb1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 10.0 14.5 9.9 49.0 12.3
    7. nyk-b6-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 10.5 10.6 10.5 10.8 0.1
    8. 64.125.13.17 0.0% 10 9.3 9.5 9.2 9.9 0.2
    9. ae2.cr1.lga5.us.zip.zayo.com 0.0% 10 37.2 17.7 9.5 37.8 13.0
    10. v111.ae29.cr1.dfw2.us.zip.zayo.com 0.0% 10 123.0 124.3 122.9 135.2 3.8
    11. ae11.er1.dfw2.us.zip.zayo.com 0.0% 10 119.3 119.2 119.0 119.7 0.3
    12. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    13. bc2-side-from-r1.inceronetwork.com 0.0% 10 79.0 79.2 78.7 80.8 0.6
    14. 107-155-66-250-customer-incero.com 10.0% 10 78.3 78.5 78.3 79.2 0.3

    I remember Incero to CC being much better in the past, my backup server is in Buffalo :(

    CC Chicago:

    HOST: lg.chi.colocrossing.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1. 10.1.3.1 0.0% 10 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.1
    2. 10ge-1.fz146.chi1.colocrossing.com 0.0% 10 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.1
    3. ae7-384.chi12.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 10 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.1
    4. xe-7-0-1.dal33.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 10 28.4 28.2 28.1 28.4 0.1
    5. gtt-gw.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 10 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.2 0.1
    6. as54540.ae15.cr2.dfw1.us.as4436.gtt.net 0.0% 10 29.0 29.1 29.0 29.3 0.1
    7. bc2-side-from-r1.inceronetwork.com 0.0% 10 29.2 29.3 29.2 29.6 0.1
    8. 107-155-66-250-customer-incero.com 0.0% 10 29.4 29.5 29.4 29.8 0.1

    Ramnode NYC looking glass:

    HOST: lg Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1.|-- ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    2.|-- ae2-145.nyc38.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0
    3.|-- xe-9-1-6.dal33.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 4 40.7 41.5 40.6 43.8 1.3
    4.|-- gtt-gw.ip4.gtt.net 0.0% 4 40.6 40.7 40.6 40.7 0.0
    5.|-- as54540.ae15.cr2.dfw1.us.as4436.gtt.net 0.0% 4 40.9 40.9 40.8 41.0 0.0
    6.|-- bc2-side-from-r1.inceronetwork.com 0.0% 4 41.4 41.8 41.3 43.2 0.6
    7.|-- 107-155-66-250-customer-incero.com 0.0% 4 40.9 40.9 40.9 41.0 0.0

    Thanked by 1telephone
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    What's the reverse route look like from Incero to us in Buffalo?

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member
    edited September 2015

    @jbiloh said:
    What's the reverse route look like from Incero to us in Buffalo?

    traceroute to 198.12.127.26 (198.12.127.26), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 192.211.63.5 (192.211.63.5) 2.251 ms 1.295 ms 2.221 ms
    2 198.47.104.73 (198.47.104.73) 3.766 ms 1.645 ms 1.035 ms
    3 69.31.63.184 (69.31.63.184) 1.392 ms 1.485 ms 1.717 ms
    4 173.241.130.137 (173.241.130.137) 2.867 ms 2.543 ms 1.689 ms
    5 213.248.81.73 (213.248.81.73) 1.506 ms 1.285 ms 1.389 ms
    6 80.91.248.208 (80.91.248.208) 61.676 ms 60.290 ms 59.924 ms
    7 62.115.141.184 (62.115.141.184) 78.888 ms 62.115.141.182 (62.115.141.182) 78.788 ms 79.553 ms
    8 62.115.59.90 (62.115.59.90) 78.557 ms 62.115.59.98 (62.115.59.98) 80.660 ms 62.115.59.90 (62.115.59.90) 80.517 ms
    9 * * *
    10 * * *
    11 * * *
    12 198.12.127.26 (198.12.127.26) 79.959 ms 79.437 ms 80.406 ms

    Can't get mtr or dns working, grr...

Sign In or Register to comment.