Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Crazy New Online.net 2016 Offers Released

1246

Comments

  • info_hashinfo_hash Member
    edited March 2016

    Spacedust said: XC is completely fine

    Yeah on higher end servers that make sense, I was thinking about the personal range. Could you please do a speedtest on different servers/networks? (Ideally download + upload) to have an idea better than online's local network?

  • Do these come with RPN @spacedust?

  • SpacedustSpacedust Member
    edited March 2016

    The KVM shows just a ponytail and nothing happens ;) The XC 2015 had professional KVM console delivered by SuperMicro.

  • AlbaHostAlbaHost Member, Patron Provider
    edited March 2016

    Is the 1Gbps guaranteed? Any test/review?

  • SpacedustSpacedust Member
    edited March 2016

    @vimalware said:
    Do these come with RPN spacedust?

    Yes:

    RPN-E 1000 - 1Gbps personal private network free

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • Why would they do connect them to a SATA2 port, that's just sad

  • vimalwarevimalware Member
    edited March 2016

    @Spacedust said:
    RPN-E 1000 - 1Gbps personal private network free

    I missed that. I was looking at the c2350 page, assuming they were identical infrastructure.

    Edit: for general public: only the 16 euro Avoton comes with RPN (private network interface)

  • @Spacedust said:
    The KVM shows just a ponytail and nothing happens ;) The XC 2015 had professional KVM console delivered by SuperMicro.

    The new XC 2016 doesn't seem to mention KVM as a feature on their page, is it actually confirmed whether it is intended to have one or not? Because the 2015 does have it as you said. Not having a KVM on the new one would be annoying for me if I want to upgrade.

  • It has a TTY where you can see what's happening on the screen. It not even close to the old KVM where you can do almost everything.

  • @Spacedust said:
    It has a TTY where you can see what's happening on the screen. It not even close to the old KVM where you can do almost everything.

    No ISO or anything?

  • Micro black screen - nothing else. This server does not even have BIOS.

  • That is interesting, I suppose it is something at least.

  • But I cannot even see my CentOS booting. Then comes ponytail and nothing more ;)

    Probably I would need to move my old server via rsync in rescue mode and try to boot.

  • SpacedustSpacedust Member
    edited March 2016
    SATA controller: Intel Corporation Atom processor C2000 AHCI SATA3 Controller (rev 02)
    

    why SATA2 then ? It could be some BIOS limitation.

  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member
    edited March 2016

    Bought a Dedibox SC SATA 2016, not a succes until now.

    OS has been installed and I waited another hour, but the server can not be reached by SSH. The KVM works and shows pathetic internet speeds. And it even seems to reboot every x minutes ...

    Location Provider Speed
    CDN Cachefly 106MB/s

    Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 15.8MB/s
    Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 12.0MB/s
    Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 9.32MB/s
    San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 2.79MB/s
    Washington, DC, US Softlayer 5.72MB/s

    Tokyo, Japan Linode 9.61MB/s
    ... dit not wait for the other locations to be tested ...

    Thanked by 1info_hash
  • wlambrechts said: pathetic internet speeds

    That's interesting to know, as in real use scenario you won't download big test file from online server close to your server :)

  • wlambrechts said: OS has been installed and I waited another hour, but the server can not be reached by SSH. The KVM works and shows pathetic internet speeds. And it even seems to reboot every x minutes ...

    Hmmmm
    Can you give me your server number, i am going to have a look now. Your problem is very strange for me (we delivered few thousands of theses servers today, and nobody reported this kind of issue ...)
    Arnaud

    Thanked by 1ManofServer
  • Test files doing 4mbyte/s on a 1gbit residential connection in the Netherlands, I assume your NL lines are still filled up?

  • wlambrechtswlambrechts Member
    edited March 2016

    @abermingham said:

    Arnaud: J'ai créé un ticket (386187) et Julien m'avais demandé d'installer Proxmox 3 au lieu de Proxmox 4: l'installation est en cours. C'est mon premier serveur online avec une telle déception...

    Sorry (switching between French - ticketing and English): I created a ticket and Julien asked me to install Proxmox 3 (which is being installed now). It's my first online.net server which such a disappointment...

  • @teamacc said:
    Test files doing 4mbyte/s on a 1gbit residential connection in the Netherlands, I assume your NL lines are still filled up?

    AMS-2 is at over 90% utilisation right now, probably why.

    Check here https://status.online.net/weathermap/

  • Its been like that for at least a week now, probably longer.

  • wlambrechts said: Arnaud: J'ai créé un ticket (386187) et Julien m'avais demandé d'installer Proxmox 3 au lieu de Proxmox 4: l'installation est en cours. C'est mon premier serveur online avec une telle déception...

    >

    J'escalade. Merci beaucoup de l'info !! On va tacher de ne pas te décevoir !

  • teamacc said: Its been like that for at least a week now, probably longer.

    >

    Upgrade of AMS in multiple 100G is in progress (http://bit.ly/1R1bYEQ)
    Don't worry :)

    Thanked by 1Admiral_Awesome
  • abermingham said: J'escalade. Merci beaucoup de l'info !! On va tacher de ne pas te décevoir !

    >

    Bug identifié. C'est corrigé demain sans faute

  • Arnaud - please work on CentOS 6.x installation image. It's the most important thing now.

  • @abermingham said:
    Bug identifié. C'est corrigé demain sans faute

    Could you explain: is this a bug with Proxmox 4 ?

  • Spacedust said: Arnaud - please work on CentOS 6.x installation image. It's the most important thing now.

    >
    ok

  • Same > @wlambrechts said:

    Could you explain: is this a bug with Proxmox 4> @abermingham said:
    Bug identifié. C'est corrigé demain sans faute

    Same issue with Debain 8 it seems ... no SSH possible ...

  • ValdVald Member

    this is great

  • trvztrvz Member

    Debian 8 comes with password authentication disabled for root, you need to log in the first time with the other account you've specified.

    Thanked by 1ManofServer
Sign In or Register to comment.