Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › BuyVM ddos protection review - FAKE CUSTOMER - Page 6
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

BuyVM ddos protection review - FAKE CUSTOMER

12346

Comments

  • MunMun Member

    @GStanley said:
    Spending the next 4-5 hours reporting the Fake whois info on their domains across different IPs and names / email addresses.

    So far never has failed dropping a domain with fake whois yet.

    You do not fuck with Frantech, they are one of the good ones.

    Good luck sz1.

    I'm ignorant as I have never posted fake whois, but what will that do?

  • sabbo2001sabbo2001 Member

    @GStanley said:
    Spending the next 4-5 hours reporting the Fake whois info on their domains across different IPs and names / email addresses.

    So far never has failed dropping a domain with fake whois yet.

    You do not fuck with Frantech, they are one of the good ones.

    Good luck sz1.

    I have certainly had a good time on LET tonight.

    Thanked by 1GStanley
  • ATHKATHK Member
    edited October 2015

    premiumcheaphosting said: Sent to @Buyvm @Francisco in pm, he is a compulsive liar.

    Even if that's true (which I doubt it is, he's a nice guy and always acts professional) why don't you just go ahead and post the ID here, like Fran said no one can look it up.

    Just do everyone a favour and post it, if it turns out he's incorrect or lying you can have a field day with him, if it's the other way around you can just close LET and never login with that account again to save yourself from embarrassment.

    I really don't see the big issue here..

  • premiumcheaphostingpremiumcheaphosting Member

    GStanley said: You do not fuck with Frantech

    Aww lol

  • 0xdragon0xdragon Member

    http://www.m.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder

  • mike0000mike0000 Member

    @premiumcheaphosting said:
    Aww lol

    You should just stick to DDoS'ing folks, your "marketing" sucks. You've driven a whopping 0 sales from these threads.

    Thanked by 3Francisco William GStanley
  • GStanleyGStanley Member

    @Mun said:

    >

    Well, depends on how vocal you are with ICANN and amount of complaints and time is a factor.

    Also going to the sponsor registrar is a good idea, they're easily scared and will often lock someone out of the domain / commandeer ownership until they can prove the address & name registered when getting a barrage of legimate complaints.

    If you bring out fake headers, game over.

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • RizRiz Member

    Will someone ban him and close this shit already?

    Thanked by 1GStanley
  • GStanleyGStanley Member

    If the registry is unwilling to cooporate, remind them of the many Breach Notices they could receive and be acted on if they do not.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site:https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/++breach&

    They always cave.

  • premiumcheaphostingpremiumcheaphosting Member

    http://who.is/whois/premiumcheaphosting.com

  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2015

    @premiumcheaphosting You should exit the hosting industry and leave it to people who actually know what they are doing! If you actually have any kind of clientele you are really scamming them out of some money!

  • sabbo2001sabbo2001 Member

    @premiumcheaphosting said:
    http://who.is/whois/premiumcheaphosting.com

    Adorable! He bought whois privacy in the last few hours!

    Here's what it said BEFORE he did that.

    Owner was: Joseph Brown

    Phone number was: +11931495199 (A FAKE phone number as 193 is not a valid area code for the US)

    The address was: "BUSINESS DISTRICT" 121 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M14 5AN, United Kingdom

    I have been talking about the whois throughout this thread btw.

    Thanked by 2vimalware GStanley
  • tr1ckytr1cky Member
    edited October 2015

    @GStanley said:
    If the registry is unwilling to cooporate, remind them of the many Breach Notices they could receive and be acted on if they do not.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site:https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/++breach&

    They always cave.

    That's why I use reputable first-class chinese domain registrars, they don't give any fucks.

    Thanked by 4GStanley vimalware paily Frecyboy
  • draziloxdrazilox Member

    Y-m-d (or Y-m-d H:i:s) is the only right way to display time. This is my input to this thread.

  • tr1ckytr1cky Member

    @drazilox said:
    Y-m-d (or Y-m-d H:i:s) is the only right way to display time. This is my input to this thread.

    Nobody beats d.m.Y

    Thanked by 3drazilox Amitz TriDoxiuM
  • draziloxdrazilox Member

    @tr1cky said:

    That's the second best way :P.

  • a-super-random-usera-super-random-user Member
    edited October 2015

    Nah. Better go with unix (*ps- unix = unix time stamp) time.

  • draziloxdrazilox Member

    @sdglhm said:
    Nah. Better go with unix (*ps- unix = unix time stamp) time.

    "So, the meeting will be at 1444834800. See you there!"

  • a-super-random-usera-super-random-user Member

    drazilox said: "So, the meeting will be at 1444834800. See you there!"

    Hell yeah. ;)

  • draziloxdrazilox Member

    @sdglhm said:
    Hell yeah. ;)

    Honestly, if it would be easier to use and understand, I would be all for it. Fuck the timezones.

  • a-super-random-usera-super-random-user Member

    drazilox said: Honestly, if it would be easier to use and understand, I would be all for it. Fuck the timezones.

    In all seriousness, If we were using Unix timestamp from our childhood. That numbers would make perfect sense to our normal look. ;)

  • GStanleyGStanley Member

    @sabbo2001 said:
    Adorable! He bought whois privacy in the last few hours!

    Good looks. Worth it knowing while that domain will not fall from my barrage of complaints, he had to pay to get that activated.

    Worth it just so he had to pay for WHOIS protection.

    Already scoping out his domains on BGP.he.net by IP, he brought piss to a shit fight.

    Totally unprevoked.

    Thanked by 4sabbo2001 Francisco jar Pwner
  • sabbo2001sabbo2001 Member

    @GStanley said:

    Hahahahhhahahaha oh god. Tonight is a good night.

  • GStanleyGStanley Member

    http://bgp.he.net/ip/5.39.26.194#_whois

    organisation:   ORG-SH43-RIPE
org-name:       szHosting HOSTINGandVPS
org-type:       OTHER
address:        ekologi cigadung 1
address:        40191 bandung
address:        ID
abuse-mailbox:  [email protected]
phone:          +62.81931495199
mnt-ref:        OVH-MNT
mnt-by:         OVH-MNT
created:        2014-09-03T03:22:03Z
last-modified:  2014-09-03T03:22:03Z
source:         RIPE # Filtered

    I've just made another coffee, this is going to be a good night.

    http://www.nocreport.com/?sec=ip_whois&ip=5.39.26.194

    organisation:   ORG-SH43-RIPE
org-name:       PCH PremiumCheapHosting
org-type:       OTHER
address:        ekologi cigadung 1
address:        40191 bandung
address:        ID
abuse-mailbox:  [email protected]
phone:          +62.81931495199
mnt-ref:        OVH-MNT
mnt-by:         OVH-MNT
created:        2014-09-03T03:22:03Z
last-modified:  2015-09-22T18:14:04Z
source:         RIPE # Filtered

    You do know that clearing your WHOIS doesn't clear archives of sites that have it right?

    Continuing on his 151.80.x IPs from : https://www.google.com/search?q="ORG-SH43-RIPE"&

    Nighty night sz1, keep your domain's buttholes tight!

    I'll be reporting all of them.

  • GStanleyGStanley Member

    Holy shit, this is amazing.

    Your address was unique enough : https://www.google.com/search?q="ekologi+cigadung+1"+

    Going to restock on coffee, you're fucked.

  • miTgiBmiTgiB Member

    sdglhm said: If we were using Unix timestamp from our childhood.

    When were you born? Well I was born -188497740

  • ATHKATHK Member
    edited October 2015

    I think it's safe to say that Fran and BuyVM have clearly done nothing wrong here (as to be expected from one of the top providers) and handled the situation the best they could with the evidence that was somewhat provided by OP. Which was minimal.

    It's also safe to assume this post is complete and utter bullshit and will never be close to the truth, OP has been outted several times as being SZ1 or whatever his stupid name is, which in the past has been a pain for the majority of providers here on LET/LEB and WHT.

    There's honestly nothing more to see or do here, if you feel like posting more of his whois results (which look/are fake) please ensure you report them to the registrar.

    Prop's to Fran for handling this professional even though it's frustrating with the lack of information...

    /thread closed

    Thanked by 4GStanley Francisco sabbo2001 William
  • shellshell Member

    @sabbo2001 said:
    premiumcheaphosting

    Nice fake whois details

    +1.193.1495199 is the registered phone number for premiumcheaphosting.com according to their whois... 193 isn't a valid area code for the US?

    Domain Name: HOSTINGANDVPS.COM
Registrant Name: SHAFAET BRADY HUSSAIN
Registrant Organization: SZ1HOSTING GROUP
Registrant Street: JL. EKOLOGI
Registrant City: BANDUNG
Registrant State/Province: WEST JAVA
Registrant Postal Code: 40191
Registrant Country: ID
Registrant Phone: +62.81931495199

    same number = same person ?

    *fyi, phone number from indonesian provider XL Axiata +62-819xxx

    Thanked by 1GStanley
  • premiumcheaphostingpremiumcheaphosting Member

    http://prntscr.com/8pbgkp

    GStanley said: Going to restock on coffee, you're fucked.

    See you soon!

  • DerekDerek Member

    I love @Francisco and buyvm <3

This discussion has been closed.