Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Datashack is getting some stock back on cheap dedicated servers

1101113151628

Comments

  • earlearl Member

    @ihatetonyy

    The "Integrated Remote Console" only works with IE but the "Remote Console" works fine under FF and chrome..

  • HalfEatenPieHalfEatenPie Veteran
    edited July 2012

    So I talked with them their tech support guys (exchanged a total of probably 40 e-mails now) and they're going to take a look into my I/O.

    Should be interesting :P

  • You guys have pretty good IO compare to mine:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    ^C1025+0 records in
    1025+0 records out
    67174400 bytes (67 MB) copied
    , 361.119 s, 186 kB/s

    I had to cancel it by pressing Ctrl + C several times as it was taking too long.

    It is running on VMWare Esxi 5

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @zhuanyi said: 186 kB/s

    Did you ask them to switch it from the parallel port? That is quite the performance for a floppy drive.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    @zhuanyi said: You guys have pretty good IO compare to mine:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync

    ^C1025+0 records in
    1025+0 records out
    67174400 bytes (67 MB) copied
    , 361.119 s, 186 kB/s

    I had to cancel it by pressing Ctrl + C several times as it was taking too long.

    It is running on VMWare Esxi 5

    Absolutely impossible to run a OS on such HDD. Something is deffinetely wrong. I suggest getting rid of the vmware and installing some minimal linux distro and trying again.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @HalfEatenPie said: So I talked with them their tech support guys (exchanged a total of probably 40 e-mails now) and they're going to take a look into my I/O.

    http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&swLang=8&mode=2&taskId=135&swItem=MTX-b8cacaa71541492d8ee070fe99

    My reading so far has led me to the strange notion that making sure write cache is enabled and set to 0% is the solution to fixing disk I/O. Apparently the e200i is pure trash. I'll let you know how that goes when 1mbit upload manages to boot a 100mb ISO.

  • latest update:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 33.8769 s, 31.7 MB/s

    They told me it just happened to be a bad sector where I was doing dd test originally...

    They can swap the hard drive for me, but for some reason hardware RAID 1 is not hot-swappable so they'll have to take my server offline first...

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    @zhuanyi said: They told me it just happened to be a bad sector where I was doing dd test originally...

    They can swap the hard drive for me, but for some reason hardware RAID 1 is not hot-swappable so they'll have to take my server offline first...

    Hot swapping does not really depend on the RAID type. More likely if the RAID card/chasis support it.

  • @jarland said: Probably Minecraft

    At the risk of throwing this thread off-topic, if you've started your server, have you gotten it to run smoothly?

    I'm trying to continue a server/world that ran beautifully on a (admittedly quite more powerful) OVH demo server. It's literally killing itself if anyone so much as runs around. It keeps throwing OOM even with 1705MB free according to free -m.

  • @ihatetonyy said: It keeps throwing OOM even with 1705MB free according to free -m.

    What is java's memory limit set to?

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @ihatetonyy After tweaking the system a bit, I could fly and force it to generate new territory rapidly and not a hint of any kind of lag.

  • @dmmcintyre3 said: What is java's memory limit set to?

    1536M. Using this string to start the server:

    java -native -server -Xincgc -Xmx1536M -cp "craftbukkit-1.2.5-R4.1-SNAPSHOT.jar" -jar "craftbukkit-1.2.5-R4.1-SNAPSHOT.jar" nogui
    

    @jarland said: After tweaking the system a bit, I could fly and force it to generate new territory rapidly and not a hint of any kind of lag.

    Sadly this is with an existing world. :/

  • yomeroyomero Member

    @jarland said: Apparently the e200i is pure trash

    how we can check all the smart parameters in the disks? I've tried to use smartmontools a little bit, but I don't get all the parameters as a normal HDD.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran
    edited July 2012

    @yomero smartctl --all -d cciss,1 /dev/cciss/c0d0p1

  • Hm we'll see how it goes once they get the new box up.

  • bdtechbdtech Member

    Anyone have any luck running openvz on the datashack'er?

  • I haven't tried yet but I'm sure it can handle it. The CPUs have virtualization enabled anyways.

  • @bdtech said: Anyone have any luck running openvz on the datashack'er?

    Definitely possible, but disk I/O alone will kill your VPS :)

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    OVZ does not require amd-v or intel vt enabled to run.

    I am sbolutely sure it can handle a couple of low-end VPS, the dual CPU setup is not that bad.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    The CPU is actually a lot better in practice than you'd think by looking at the scary benchmark numbers for it's model. It's no i7 but it's not bad. I've got disk I/O up to 123mb/s, still doubtful that's the expected performance of two 10k SAS drives on RAID0 but I'm determined to make these things scream.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    @jarland said: The CPU is actually a lot better in practice than you'd think by looking at the scary benchmark numbers for it's model. It's no i7 but it's not bad. I've got disk I/O up to 123mb/s, still doubtful that's the expected performance of two 10k SAS drives on RAID0 but I'm determined to make these things scream.

    Just as I said, the CPU is not that bad and you get 4 cores. Probably you can get up to 140MB/s. What chunk size do you use on the RAID? Does it have caching enabled? The performance is not that bad for RAID 0, counting this HDDs are probably used for a couple of years.

  • earlearl Member

    @LiquidHost said: Just as I said, the CPU is not that bad and you get 4 cores

    Yeah, these are the cpu's Damian uses for his 32mb VPS's and still pretty good

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    You can actually build a machine similar to this for around 130-150$, the CPUs cost around 6$ each.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran
    edited July 2012

    @LiquidHost said: What chunk size do you use on the RAID? Does it have caching enabled?

    Not sure on the chunk size, their utilities are kind of vague and it's taken me most of the day to gain the kind of control over them that I'm just starting to get (thanks to upload speed and the utility ISO). Current task is flashing the firmware in the controller. HP is so confusing. If you go to the E200i page you get firmware for the possible drives connected, had to google to find the actual firmware for the controller.

    The performance is not that bad for RAID 0, counting this HDDs are probably used for a couple of years.

    You really think so? I mean I've not exactly ran around testing a lot of drives like this, but it bothers me that I have a 500gb 7200rpm SATA (II...if memory serves, my brain is a little off) outperforming either one of these drives by themselves. With the consistency of other reports I feel like there is something fixable here.

  • yomeroyomero Member

    @jarland Ty, I did that. But doesn't show enough information for me u_u (Like normal drives and so).

    Btw, any idea what happens if I move from HT1.0 to HT3.0??

    And what about the firmware? Is the latest? Is convenient to update? I have this one "1.81 01/15/2010"

  • PatsPats Member

    @jarland how u did the firmware update?

    when i click on iLO2 firmware, i get:
    iLO 2 User Privilege Notice

    Currently ineligible for access to this resource.

  • ihatetonyyihatetonyy Member
    edited July 2012

    @Pats said: when i click on iLO2 firmware, i get:

    iLO 2 User Privilege Notice

    Currently ineligible for access to this resource.

    Reboot from console, hit F9, and change your privileges in the User setup thing. If you feel adventurous, you may be able to change your privs via HPONCFG, but I was too lazy to install it.

  • earlearl Member

    Did you guys notice a difference in changing the firmware?

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    @jarland
    I will answer about the things you posted asap I am home

    And just wanted to point out my experience with them:
    Sent an email to the support asking my questions for sales, they answered in 3 minutes, exhanged 2 more emails and ordered a server 15 minutes after.
    Around 20 hours later I received the email that they are setting it up.
    7 hours later the server was already delivered in my email
    Responded to the email for ilo access - received it in around 1 minute :)

Sign In or Register to comment.