Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


IPXCore - Page 21
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

IPXCore

1181921232439

Comments

  • shunnyshunny Member

    @jcaleb said: some people say its not wise to put serious stuff in 32mb

    yea I agree those people are usually correct...

  • @shunny said: @jcaleb said: some people say its not wise to put serious stuff in 32mb

    yea I agree those people are usually correct...

    Apparently I suck and don't know how to make a VPN with 32mb of ram

  • DamianDamian Member

    I seem to miss some people with my emails, but pick them up here, so:

    At approximately 1:00pm Mountain Standard time (-7 UTC), node sapphire will go down for a reboot for a kernel upgrade. Due to the length of time it takes to reload VM containers after a reboot, we expect approximately 20 minutes of downtime total, if nothing goes wrong. We apologize for the short notice on this, however, we are adamant on getting to the bottom of this node's instability.
  • @jcaleb said: some people say its not wise to put serious stuff in 32mb

    @Dionysus said: And those people are correct.

    @shunny said: yea I agree those people are usually correct...

    And I say, nonsense.

    I would not put "serious stuff" on a VPS that is unreliable.

    But reliability does not equate with memory size. Is a 64MB VPS twice as reliable as a 32MB? A 128MB four times as reliable? I guess we should all get 1GB VPSs because they're incredibly reliable, right?

    I think that "some people" are implying that a 32MB VPS will inevitably be bad because it's bound to be oversold, or because the provider must be "fly-by-night" to make such an offer, or because it "too cheap".

    Anyone who's been following the lowend VPS market for the past couple of years knows that today's "too cheap to be good" offer becomes tomorrow's standard. And that the quality of an offering should be judged by the provider's performance, not some price/MB ram formula.

    Go Damian.

  • TaylorTaylor Member

    @Damian

    Not a very nice way to start an email "all" CRYS

  • InfinityInfinity Member, Host Rep

    @Taylor said: Not a very nice way to start an email "all" CRYS

    What's up with all your recent trolling, @Damian has been having to send out lots of e-mails out recently, so why not just give him a break, he's been through a lot recently. If you are that passionate, why not tell him personally?

  • DamianDamian Member

    @sleddog said: Anyone who's been following the lowend VPS market for the past couple of years knows that today's "too cheap to be good" offer becomes tomorrow's standard.

    Indeed, I've noticed a recent influx of interesting offers; not sure if they're due to our offer or they just happened to all come at the same time :)

  • TaylorTaylor Member

    @Infinity said: If you are that passionate, why not tell him personally?

    I did, I put @Damian :P

  • InglarInglar Member

    @sleddog said: And that the quality of an offering should be judged by the provider's performance, not some price/MB ram formula.

    And stability is very important, I would also like to add.

  • DamianDamian Member

    Kernel upgrade seems to have completed without issue.

  • LAKidLAKid Member

    Yup, everything is up and running on both nodes.

  • Seems fine on my side. :L

  • LAKidLAKid Member

    No take it back.. all down..and up and down

  • @LAKid said: No take it back.. all down

    23:23:04 up 51 min

  • eastoncheastonch Member
    edited July 2012
    root@my32:~# uptime
     22:24:34 up 53 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    

    @LAKid

  • LAKidLAKid Member
    edited July 2012
  • 02:07:14 up 1:33, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.01, 0.00

  • joepie91joepie91 Member, Patron Provider

    @sleddog said: And I say, nonsense.

    I would not put "serious stuff" on a VPS that is unreliable.

    But reliability does not equate with memory size. Is a 64MB VPS twice as reliable as a 32MB? A 128MB four times as reliable? I guess we should all get 1GB VPSs because they're incredibly reliable, right?

    I think that "some people" are implying that a 32MB VPS will inevitably be bad because it's bound to be oversold, or because the provider must be "fly-by-night" to make such an offer, or because it "too cheap".

    Anyone who's been following the lowend VPS market for the past couple of years knows that today's "too cheap to be good" offer becomes tomorrow's standard. And that the quality of an offering should be judged by the provider's performance, not some price/MB ram formula.

    Go Damian.

    This.

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    @LAKid

    17:18:19 up  1:46,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
  • JacobJacob Member

    Heuston we have a problem

    I joke, Good Work Damian!

    Thanked by 1klikli
  • @liam said: fIxEd 4 u.

    Broken for you.

  • TaylorTaylor Member

    @HalfEatenPie said:Fixed for you.

    >

    Fixed it for you

  • Fixed it for you

    I didn't want it to be fixed! :(

    Imma tell on you!

  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    @Damian said: Kernel upgrade seems to have completed without issue.

    is this for vswap feature?

  • @Jcaleb I think it was for "STOP FUCKING CRASHING YOU POS!".

    Thanked by 1jcaleb
  • DamianDamian Member

    @eastonch said: think it was for "STOP FUCKING CRASHING YOU POS!".

    +1. It made it overnight, so there's an improvement...

    Thanked by 1DeletedUser
  • Missed the longest thread but did not miss @Damian's great VPS :)

    Thanks for the great service @Damian, really appreciate it :)

    Thanked by 1Damian
  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    @zhuanyi said: Missed the longest thread

    We can still make it.

  • LAKidLAKid Member

    @Damian So what do you think? Stable enough? unless DC unplug the wrong cord..

This discussion has been closed.