New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
ChicagoVPS is a terrible company.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
You know in the very thread you're referring to on VPSB a lot of people who love to hate Chicago VPS even were quick to admit the licenses are probably registered to NetWave, maybe he's not responding because most people see that (and maybe he doesn't want to get into the whole ownership debacle again, which seems likely to me).
It could be true but I doubt it, especially after the hacks.
Yes I would.
First there is no proof whatsoever, not even a shred of reliable evidence. So there is nothing to prove or disprove.
Second, if @CVPS_Chris comes along now to say he does not have a nulled Solus you and others will just start a slagging match where you say he does and he says he does not that will go on for 5 more pages.
I am not defending CVPS, I would be saying the same regardless of whoever it was and whatever I thought of them.
CVPS seems to be taking the appropriate response to your accusations. Like a crazy person on the street, you ignore what they say and just keep walking.
If you want CVPS to stop ignoring you and act like a more "professional company", they could always hit you with a defamation lawsuit.
Why would a hosting company care what some random person on the Internet claims?
If you insist upon repeatedly pushing the same keys on your keyboard over, and over and over, whatever you're typing must be true until proven otherwise, right?
Not taking any sides on whether the speculation is true or not. BUT......
The burden of proof is on the claimant ( accuser ), not the respondent ( accused ).
Will you back you your accusations with proof? Or you are just having a brain damage?
Quoting from another thread - http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/542388/#Comment_542388
they are also under no legal obligation what-so-ever to disclose anything unless a legal proceeding is commenced by Solus. At which point, they will be required to disclose any relevant information, but not to you, me, or anyone else that are not involved with the matter in question.
so in the end, you will never know. And if Solus wants to take action, its up to them. Until proven, all accusations are just that, accusations, nothing more.
Wow, so much proof
Customer paid for service if provider does not supply paid for service he is then entitled to a refund or part refund. its really common sense. you cannot just take someones money and not provide a service thats totally wrong on every level.
@TarZZ92 The case you've stated above is not the same as the case you originally responded to. You've completely skimmed over the part whee the client makes threats of a monetary nature to the provider.
A company that charges next to nothing for VPS attracting all sorts internet low lifes to overloaded servers creating DDoS honeypots and gives crap support. Shocking.... That is not how self correcting market dynamics are supposed to work.
{/sarcasm off}
I made no such monetary threat to said provider. I requested a refund in a civil manner and was rejected, so I resorted to another method of receiving my money back that was over their head. They cancelled my service and account for threatening to take it up with my CC company. At that point, it's theft. If it weren't, ponzi schemes would be legal.
I don't think that was sarcasm, more like how most things work. If someone doesn't like a company they are bound to find one of there liking.